Educating the Artrepreneur

  • Nadine M. Kalin
Chapter
Part of the Creativity, Education and the Arts book series (CEA)

Abstract

This chapter begins by asking: What if business remade creativity education on its terms? What would become of art and its education in the wake of creativity-for-business only? This chapter explores these questions in light of the intensifying entrepreneurialization of art and its education. I examine the Partnership for the 21st Century Skills’ push for entrepreneurial literacy through art and creativity education along with the rise of artrepreneurs within contemporary art. I end with a plea for the relative autonomy of art education so that it may not only be a mode of vocationalization, but also a site of struggle and critical creativity.

Keywords

Entrepreneurialism Contemporary art Education 21st Century Skills 

References

  1. Adams, J., & Owens, A. (2016). Theories of creativity and democratic education: Practices and politics of learning through the arts. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Adorno, T. W. (1991). The culture industry: Selected essays on mass culture. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  3. Adorno, T. W. (2004). Aesthetic theory (R. Hullot-Kentor, Trans.). New York: Continuum. (Original work published in 1970)Google Scholar
  4. Baldacchino, J. (2013). What creative industries? Instrumentalism, autonomy and the education of artists. International Journal of Education through Art, 9(3), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Berardi, F. B. (2013). EMPTINESS. In T. Bazzichelli & G. Cox (Eds.), Disrupting business: Art and activism in times of financial crisis (pp. 23–29). Brooklyn: Autonomedia.Google Scholar
  6. Blanchflower, D. G., & Oswald, A. J. (1998). What makes an entrepreneur? Journal of Labor Economics, 16(1), 26–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bolaños, P. A. (2007). The critical role of art: Adorno between utopia and dystopia. KRITIK, 1(1), 25–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brown, W. (2011). The end of democracy. Representations, 116(1), 19–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, W. (2015). Undoing the demos: Neoliberalism’s stealth revolution. Brooklyn: Zone Books.Google Scholar
  10. Caliskan, K., & Callon, M. (2009). Economization, part 1: Shifting attention from the economy towards processes of economization. Economy and Society, 38(3), 369–398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Center for Cultural Innovation for National Endowment for the Arts. (2016). Creativity connects: Trends and conditions affecting U.S. artists. Washington, DC: National Endowment for the Arts. Retrieved from https://www.arts.gov/sites/default/files/Creativity-Connects-Final-Report.pdf. Accessed 19 Aug 2017.
  12. Deresiewicz, W. (2015). The neoliberal arts: How college sold its soul to the market. Harper’s Magazine, 331(1984), 25–31.Google Scholar
  13. Foucault, M. (1991). Governmentality (R. Braidotti, Trans.). In G. Burchell, C. Gordon, & P. Miller (Eds.), The Foucault effect: Studies in governmentality (pp. 87–104). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  14. Gielen, P. (2010). The murmuring of the artistic multitude; Global art, memory and post-Fordism. Amsterdam: Valiz.Google Scholar
  15. Gielen, P. (2013). Creativity and other fundamentalisms. Amsterdam: Mondrian Fund.Google Scholar
  16. Gilead, T. (2012). On the theoretical implications of approaching arts education as an investment. In C. Ruitenberg (Ed.), Philosophy of education yearbook 2012 (pp. 87–95). Urbana: Philosophy of Education Society.Google Scholar
  17. Harris, A. (2014). The creative turn: Toward a new aesthetic imaginary. Boston: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harvie, J. (2013). Fair play: Art, performance and neoliberalism. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keay, D. (1987, October 31). Aids, education and the year 2000! Women’s Own, p. 8.Google Scholar
  20. Laermans, R. (2012). Teaching theory and the art of not-knowing: Notes on pedagogical commonalism. Krisis: Journal for Contemporary Philosophy, 1, 63–73.Google Scholar
  21. Léger, M.J. (2013). For the de-incapacitation of community art practice. ONCURATING.org, 1(16), 51–57.Google Scholar
  22. Leslie, E. (2011). Add value to contents: The valorization of culture today. In G. Raunig, G. Ray, & U. Wuggenig (Eds.), Critique of creativity: Precarity, subjectivity and resistance in the ‘creative industries’ (pp. 183–190). London: MayFlyBooks.Google Scholar
  23. Lorey, I. (2006). Governmentality and self-precarization: On the normalization of cultural producers (L. Rosenblatt & D. Fink, Trans.). Transveral. Retrieved from http://eipcp.net/transversal/1106/lorey/en/print. Accessed 27 July 2017.
  24. McRobbie, A. (2013). “Everyone is creative”: Artists as new economy pioneers? ONCURATING.org, 1(16), 58–61. (Original work published in 2001)Google Scholar
  25. Mylonas, Y. (2012). Amateur creation and entrepreneurialism: A critical study of artistic production in post-Fordist structures. tripleC, 10(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  26. OECD. (2012). Lessons from PISA for Japan. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved from http://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/docserver/download/9811061e.pdf?expires=1501215333&id=id&accname=guest&checksum=4C16A225086F9E59A07E27D79E909E7A. Accessed 27 July 2017.
  27. Ozgun, A. (2011). Creative industries: Neo-liberalism as mass deception. In M. J. Léger (Ed.), Culture and contestation in the new century (pp. 106–124). Chicago: Intellect.Google Scholar
  28. Pang, W., & Plucker, J. A. (2013). Recent transformations in China’s economic, social, and education policies for promoting innovation and creativity. The Journal of Creative Behavior, 46(4), 247–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. P21Partnership for 21st Century Skills. (2015). P21 framework definitions. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/docs/P21_Framework_Definitions_New_Logo_2015.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2017.
  30. Partnership for 21st Century Learning. (2015). Framework for 21st century learning. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_framework_0515.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2017.
  31. Partnership for 21st Century Skills (n.d.). 21st century skills map. The arts. Washington, DC: Partnership for 21st Century Learning. Retrieved from http://www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_arts_map_final.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2017.
  32. Peers, C. (2011). Making art invisible: Visual education and the cultural stagnation of neo-liberal rationality. Discourse: Studies in the Cultural Politics of Education, 32(3), 415–429.Google Scholar
  33. Peters, M. (2001). Education, enterprise culture and the entrepreneurial self: A Foucauldian perspective. Journal of Educational Enquiry, 2(2), 58–71.Google Scholar
  34. Pongratz, L. A. (2006). Voluntary self-control: Education reform as a governmental strategy. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 471–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ray, G. (2011). Culture industry and the administration of terror. In G. Raunig, G. Ray, & U. Wuggenig (Eds.), Critique of creativity: Precarity, subjectivity and resistance in the ‘creative industries’ (pp. 167–181). London: MayFlyBooks.Google Scholar
  36. Relyea, L. (2013). Your everyday art world. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  37. Reuters. (2017, January 8). Why a country with some of the world’s best schools is now scrapping grades. Reuters. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2017/01/09/singapore-schools-education-grades/. Accessed 27 July 2017.
  38. Rose-Redwood, R. B. (2006). Governmentality, geography, and the geo-coded world. Progress in Human Geography, 30(4), 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Round 43: Small Business/Big Change: Economic Perspectives from Artists and Artrepreneurs. (n.d.). In On view | Project Row Houses. Retrieved from https://projectrowhouses.org/press-releases/round-43. Accessed 27 July 2016.
  40. Rubin, C. M. (2014, December 8). The global search for education: Creative China—Part 2. Retrieved from http://www.huffingtonpost.com/c-m-rubin/the-global-search-for-edu_b_6285838.html. Accessed 27 July 2017.
  41. Schumpeter, J. A. (2003). Capitalism, socialism & democracy. New York: Routledge. (Original work published in 1943)Google Scholar
  42. Simons, M. (2002). Governmentality, education and quality management: Toward a critique of the permanent quality tribunal. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 5(4), 617–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2006). The learning society and governmentality: An introduction. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 38(4), 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Simons, M., & Masschelein, J. (2008). The governmentalization of learning and the assemblage of a learning apparatus. Educational Theory, 58(4), 391–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Teng, A. (2016, April 17). Going beyond grades: Evolving the Singapore education system. The Straits Times. Retrieved from http://www.straitstimes.com/singapore/education/going-beyond-grades-evolving-the-singapore-education-system. Accessed 27 July 2017.
  46. Virno, P. (2012). The dismeasure of art. An interview with Paolo Virno/Interviewer S. Lavaert & P. Gielen. In P. Gielen & P. De Bruyne (Eds.), Being an artist in post-fordist times (2nd ed., pp. 19–46). Rotterdam: NAi Publishers.Google Scholar
  47. von Osten, M. (2011). Unpredictable outcomes / unpredictable outcasts: On recent debates over creativity and the creative industries. In G. Raunig, G. Ray, & U. Wuggenig (Eds.), Critique of creativity: Precarity, subjectivity and resistance in the ‘creative industries’ (pp. 133–146). London: MayFlyBooks.Google Scholar
  48. World Economic Forum. (2015). New vision of education. Cologny: World Economic Forum. Retrieved from http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEFUSA_NewVisionforEducation_Report2015.pdf. Accessed 27 July 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Nadine M. Kalin
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Art Education and Art HistoryUniversity of North TexasDentonUSA

Personalised recommendations