Liminal Contexts and Critical Insights: The Cases of McLuhan and Debray
Abstract
Martins raised very early the issue of the impact of the new communications and media technologies on critical thought. To analyse these themes further, it is fruitful to compare two figures—Marshall McLuhan and Régis Debray—whose work reveals particular responsiveness to this transformed environment. McLuhan is famously an explorer of the new media of the 1960s, whilst Debray, after his imprisonment for revolutionary activity in Latin America, also turned himself into a media analyst. In many respects what is most interesting is not only how different these two figures were in their background, culture and politics but also how sensitive they both were to the changing media environment and the need to derive new styles of research to deal with this situation.
References
- Althusser, L. 1993. The Future Lasts Forever: A Memoir. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
- Boland, T. 2012. Critique as a Modern Social Phenomenon. New York: Edwin Mellon Press.Google Scholar
- Davey, E. 2015. Idealism Beyond Borders:The French Revolutionary Left and the Rise of Humanitarianism, 1954–1988. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Debray, R. 1965. Le Castrisme: la Longue Marche de l’Amérique Latine. Les Temps Modernes 224. 1172–1237Google Scholar
- ———. 1967. The Revolution in the Revolution? Armed Struggle and Political Struggle in Latin America. New York: Monthly Review Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 1976. Journal d’un Petit Bourgeois entre Deux Feux et Quatre Murs. Paris: Éds du Seuil.Google Scholar
- ———. 1977. Marxism and the National Question. New Left Review I (105): 25–41.Google Scholar
- ———. 1981. Teachers, Writers, Celebrities, The Intellectuals of Modern France. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- ———. 1983. Critique of Political Reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- ———. 1996. Media Manifestos: On the Technological Transmission of Cultural Forms. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- ———. 2007. Socialism: A Life-Cycle. New Left Review 46: 5–28.Google Scholar
- Eagleton, T. 1978. Criticism and Ideology: A Study in Marxist Literary Theory. London: Verso.Google Scholar
- ———. 2005. The English Novel, An Introduction. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Elias, N. 1978. What Is Sociology? London: Hutchinson.Google Scholar
- Genosko, G. 1999. McLuhan and Baudrillard: The Masters of Implosion. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Grant, G. 1965. Lament for a Nation: The Defeat of Canadian Nationalism. Toronto: McCelland and Stewart.Google Scholar
- ———. 1969. Technology and Empire: Perspective on North America. Toronto: House of Anansi.Google Scholar
- Hadot, P. 2002. What Is Ancient Philosophy? Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
- Kroker, A. 1984. Technology and the Canadian Mind: Innis, McLuhan, Grant. Montreal: New World Perspectives.Google Scholar
- Latour, B. 2004. Why has Critique Run Out of Steam? From Matters of Fact to Matters of Concern. Critical Inquiry 30 (2): 225–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Leavis, F.R., and D. Thompson. 1933. Culture and Environment, the Training of Critical Awareness. London: Chatto & Windus.Google Scholar
- Lipset, S.M. 1990. The Continental Divide: The Values and Institutions of the United States and Canada. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Marchand, P. 1998. Marshall McLuhan, The Medium and the Messenger. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
- Martins, H.G. 1993. Hegel, Texas. In Knowledge and Passion: Essays in Honour of John Rex, ed. Hermínio Martins, 226–249. London: I. B. Tauris.Google Scholar
- ———. 2005. The Metaphysics of Information: The Power and the Glory of Machinehood. Res-Publica: Revista Lusóofonia de Ciencia Politica e Relações Internacionais 1: 165–192.Google Scholar
- McLuhan, M. 1951. The Mechanical Bride: Folklore of Industrial Man. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
- ———. 1962. The Gutenberg Galaxy: The Making of Typographic Man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
- ———. 1964. Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- ———. 2005. The Classical Trivium, The Place of Thomas Nash in the Learning of His Time. Berkeley: Gingko Press.Google Scholar
- McMylor, P. 2005. Reflexive Historical Sociology: Consciousness, Experience and the Author. History of the Human Sciences 18 (4): 141–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ———. 2015. Critique as a Social Phenomenon Review Essay. International Political Anthropology 8 (1): 63–66.Google Scholar
- Miller, J. 1970. McLuhan. London: Fontana Press.Google Scholar
- Reader, K. 1995. Régis Debray: A Critical Introduction. London: Pluto Press.Google Scholar
- Reid, D. 1992. Régis Debray’s Quest: From France to Bolivia and Back. History of European Ideas 14 (6): 839–862.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ———. 1996. Republican in a Democratic Age. In Intellectuals and Public Life: Between Radicalism and Reform, ed. L. Fink, S.T. Leonard, and D.M. Reid, 121–141. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
- Rossbach, S. 2005. ‘Gnosis’ in Eric Voegelin’s Philosophy. Political Science Reviewer 34: 77–121.Google Scholar
- Szakolczai, A. 1998a. Max Weber and Michel Foucault: Parallel Life-Works. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- ———. 1998b. Reflexive Historical Sociology. European Journal of Social Theory 1 (2): 209–227.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ———. 2000. Reflexive Historical Sociology. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- ———. 2003. The Genesis of Modernity. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Theall, D.F. 2001. The Virtual Marshall McLuhan. Montreal: McGill-Queen’s Press.Google Scholar
- Turner, V. 1985. Experience and Performance: Towards a New Processual Anthropology. In On the Edge of the Bush. Tucson: University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
- Van Gennep, A. 1960. The Rites of Passage. Introduction by S. T. Kimball. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Voegelin, E. 1952. The New Science of Politics: An Introduction. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar