Advertisement

Heidegger and the Question of Being

  • Joshua Spier
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter lays the foundation for the analysis of university teachers’ experiential stories by sketching some of Martin Heidegger’s key ideas. During Spier’s interpretive analysis process, philosophical notions from Heidegger’s Being and Time enabled him to discern deeper layers of ontological meaning that were previously unnoticed. This chapter touches on Heidegger’s existential notions that were particularly informative, including care, being-with, conversation and temporality. In turn, for readers unfamiliar with Heidegger’s philosophy, the hope is to unlock the interpretive themes discussed in the analysis chapters.

Keywords

University educators Martin Heidegger Being and Time Being human (Dasein) Ontology Hermeneutic analysis 

References

  1. Anton, C. (2001). Selfhood and authenticity. New York: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  2. Blattner, W. D. (2006). Heidegger’s Being and time: A reader’s guide. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  3. Brook, A. (2009). The potentiality of authenticity in becoming a teacher. Educational Philosophy and Theory, 41(1), 46–59. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-5812.2008.00474.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Critchley, S. (2009, June 8). Being and time, part 1: Why Heidegger matters. The Guardian. Retrieved from: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/belief/2009/jun/05/heidegger-philosophy
  5. Dahlstrom, D. O. (2010). Hermeneutic ontology. In R. Poli & J. Seibt (Eds.), Theory and applications of ontology: Philosophical perspectives (pp. 395–415). Dordrecht/London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dahlstrom, D. O. (2013). Heidegger’s ontological analysis of language. In J. L. Powell (Ed.), Heidegger and language (pp. 13–31). Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dall’Alba, G. (Ed.). (2009). Exploring education through phenomenology: Diverse approaches. Chichester: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  8. Diekelmann, N., & Diekelmann, J. (2009). Schooling learning teaching: Toward narrative pedagogy. Bloomington, IN: iUniverse.Google Scholar
  9. Dreyfus, H. L. (1991). Being-in-the-world: A commentary on Heidegger’s Being and time, Division I. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  10. Friesen, N., Henriksson, C., & Saevi, T. (Eds.). (2012). Hermeneutic phenomenology in education: Method and practice. Rotterdam: Sense.Google Scholar
  11. Gadamer, H.-G. (2013). Truth and method (J. Weinsheimer & D. G. Marshall, Trans.). London: Bloomsbury Academic. (Original work published 1960).Google Scholar
  12. Giles, D. (2009). Phenomenologically researching the lecturer-student teacher relationship: Some challenges encountered. Indo-Pacific Journal of Phenomenology, 9(2), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Greaves, T. (2010). Starting with Heidegger. London/New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  14. Gutting, G. (2016). Bridging the analytic-continental divide. In P. Catapano & S. Critchley (Eds.), The stone reader: Modern philosophy in 133 arguments (pp. 72–78). New York: WW Norton & Company.Google Scholar
  15. Harman, G. (2007). Heidegger explained: From phenomenon to thing. Chicago: Open Court.Google Scholar
  16. Haugeland, J. (1998). Having thought: Essays in the metaphysics of mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Healy, M. (2011). Heidegger’s contribution to hermeneutic phenomenological research. In G. Thomson, F. Dykes, & S. Downe (Eds.), Qualitative research in midwifery and childbirth: Phenomenological approaches (pp. 215–232). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  18. Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time (J. Macquarrie & E. Robinson, Trans.). Oxford, UK: Blackwell. (Original work published 1927).Google Scholar
  19. Heidegger, M. (1988). The basic problems of phenomenology (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). Indianapolis: Indiana University Press (Original lectures delivered 1927).Google Scholar
  20. Heidegger, M. (1998). On the essence and concept of physis in Aristotle’s physics, B, I (T. Sheehan, Trans.). In W. McNeill (Ed.), Pathmarks (pp. 183–230). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. (Original work written 1939).Google Scholar
  21. Heidegger, M. (2001a). Poetry, language, thought (A. Hofstadter, Trans.). New York: Harper Perennial Modern Thought. (Original work published 1971).Google Scholar
  22. Heidegger, M. (2011). Basic writings: From Being and time (1927) to The task of thinking (1964) (D. F. Krell, Ed.). London: Routledge Classics. (Original work published 1964).Google Scholar
  23. Heidegger, M. (2014). An introduction to metaphysics (2nd ed., G. Fried & R. Polt, Trans.). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. (Original lectures delivered 1935).Google Scholar
  24. Heidegger, M. (2015). The beginning of western philosophy: Interpretation of Anaximander and Parmenides. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. (Original lectures delivered 1932).Google Scholar
  25. Laverty, S. M. (2003). Hermeneutic phenomenology and phenomenology: A comparison of historical and methodological considerations. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 2(3), 21–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Lucy, N. (2004). A Derrida dictionary. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Moran, D., & Mooney, T. (Eds.). (2002). The phenomenology reader. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  28. Mulhall, S. (2013). Routledge philosophy guidebook to Heidegger and Being and time. Abingdon, Oxon/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Polt, R. (2013). The secret homeland of speech: Heidegger on language, 1933–34. In J. Powell (Ed.), Heidegger and language (pp. 63–85). Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Ricoeur, P. (2004). The conflict of interpretations: Essays in hermeneutics (D. Ihde, Ed.). London: Continuum.Google Scholar
  31. Sembera, R. (2007). Rephrasing Heidegger: A companion to being and time. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  32. Sheehan, T. (2010). Heidegger: The man and the thinker. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers. (Original work published 1981).Google Scholar
  33. Smythe, E. A., Ironside, P. M., Sims, S. L., Swenson, M. M., & Spence, D. G. (2008). Doing Heideggerian hermeneutic research: A discussion paper. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 45(9), 1389–1397. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2007.09.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Steiner, G. (1978). Heidegger. Hassocks, Sussex: Harvester Press/Fontana Books.Google Scholar
  35. van Manen, M. (1990). Researching lived experience: Human science for an action sensitive pedagogy. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  36. van Manen, M. (2014). Phenomenology of practice: Meaning-giving methods in phenomenological research and writing. Walnut Creek, CA: Left Coast Press.Google Scholar
  37. Wheeler, M. (2014). Martin Heidegger. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy. Retrieved from http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/heidegger/
  38. Willis, P., Smith, R., & Collins, E. (Eds.). (2000). Being, seeking, telling: Expressive approaches to qualitative adult education research. Flaxton, QLD: Post Pressed.Google Scholar
  39. Wrathall, M. A. (2011). Heidegger and unconcealment: Truth, language, and history. Cambridge/New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Joshua Spier
    • 1
  1. 1.College of Education, Psychology and Social WorkFlinders UniversityAdelaideAustralia

Personalised recommendations