Advertisement

Online and Onsite: Intersections in Embodied and Digital Engagement

  • Millicent Weber
Chapter
Part of the New Directions in Book History book series (NDBH)

Abstract

This chapter builds on the theoretical and analytic work done in previous chapters to offer a model for the ways in which live and digital modes of engagement with literary culture intersect and enhance one another. It explores connections between the uptake of digital culture and literary festivals’ increasing popularity, and argues that both live and mediatised forms of contemporary engagement with literary culture sit within a tradition of reading as socially and materially constructed cultural practice. Building on the empirical audience data collected for this study, this chapter theorises and analyses the ways in which contemporary readers and writers interact in both live and digital environments, and how they negotiate engagement and develop communities across media boundaries.

Bibliography

  1. AbeBooks. (2006, May 16). AbeBooks.Com Acquires Major Stake in LibraryThing.Com – A Social Networking Site for Bibliophiles. AbeBooks. Retrieved September 12, 2016, from http://www.abebooks.com/docs/CompanyInformation/PressRoom/library-thing.shtml.
  2. Agger, B. (2004). The Virtual Self: A Contemporary Sociology. Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  3. Auslander, P. (2008). Liveness: Performance in a Mediatized Culture. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  4. Australia Council for the Arts. (2014). Arts in Daily Life: Australian Participation in the Arts. Australia Council for the Arts. Retrieved February 12, 2016, from http://www.australiacouncil.gov.au/workspace/uploads/files/research/arts-in-daily-life-australian-5432524d0f2f0.pdf.
  5. Bauerlin, M. (2009). The Dumbest Generation: How the Digital Age Stupefies Young Americans and Jeopardizes our Future. New York: Jeremy P. Tarcher/Penguin.Google Scholar
  6. Baum, C. (2012). Leading by Trailing. Australian Author 44(4), 16–18.Google Scholar
  7. Birkerts, S. (1994). The Gutenberg Elegies: The Fate of Reading in an Electronic Age. Boston and London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
  8. Bolter, J. D., & Grusin, R. (2002). Remediation: Understanding New Media. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bringhurst, R. (2008). Book Culture: Why There Are Pages and Why They Must Turn. World Literature Today 82(5), 20–26.Google Scholar
  10. Chartier, R. (1992). Laborers and Voyagers: From the Text to the Reader. Diacritics 22(2), 49–61.Google Scholar
  11. Cover, R. (2014). Becoming and Belonging: Performativity, Subjectivity, and the Cultural Purposes of Social Networking. In A. Poletti & J. Rak (Eds.), Identity Technologies: Constructing the Self Online. Madison: University of Wisconsin Press. 55–69.Google Scholar
  12. Darnton, R. (1986). First Steps toward a History of Reading. Australian Journal of French Studies 23(1), 5–30.Google Scholar
  13. Dempster, L. (2012). Literary Participation at the Digital Frontier. Island 128, 116–129.Google Scholar
  14. Dillard, S. (2002). The Art of Performing Poetry: Festivals, Slams and Americans’ Favorite Poem Project Events. Text and Performance Quarterly 22(3), 217–227.Google Scholar
  15. dovegreyreader. (2014). About. Dovegreyreader Scribbles. Retrieved May 2, 2015, from http://dovegreyreader.typepad.com/about.html.
  16. Driscoll, B. (2014). The New Literary Middlebrow: Tastemakers and Reading in the Twenty-First Century. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Driscoll, B. (2015). Sentiment Analysis and the Literary Festival Audience. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 29(6), 861–873.Google Scholar
  18. Duggan, M., Ellison, N. B., Lampe, C., Lenhart, A., & Madden, M. (2015). Social Media Update 2014. Pew Research Center. Retrieved May 9, 2015, from http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2015/01/PI_SocialMediaUpdate20144.pdf.
  19. Emerson, L. (2014). Reading Writing Interfaces: From the Digital to the Bookbound. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar
  20. Enis, M. (2013, April 2). Goodreads Acquisition Presents Opportunity for LibraryThing. The Digital Shift. Retrieved September 12, 2016, from http://www.thedigitalshift.com/.
  21. Fish, S. E. (1976). Interpreting the Variorum. Critical Enquiry 2(3), 465–485.Google Scholar
  22. Fuller, D., & Rehberg Sedo, D. (2013). Reading Beyond the Book: The Social Practices of Contemporary Literary Culture. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Gomez, J. (2005). Thinking Outside the Blog: Navigating the Literary Blogosphere. Publishing Research Quarterly 21(3), 3–11.Google Scholar
  24. Green, L. R. (2008). Is it Meaningless to Talk About “the Internet”? Australian Journal of Communication 35(3), 1–14.Google Scholar
  25. Gruzd, A., & Rehberg Sedo, D. (2012). #1b1t: Investigating Reading Practices at the Turn of the Twenty-First Century. Mémoires du livre/Studies in Book Culture 3(2). Retrieved May 8, 2015, from http://www.erudit.org/revue/memoires/.Google Scholar
  26. Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. W. (2002 [1944]). The Culture Industry: Enlightenment as Mass Deception. In G. S. Noerr (Ed.), Dialectic of Enlightenment: Philosophical Fragments. (E. Jephcott, Trans.). Stanford: Stanford University Press. 94–136.Google Scholar
  27. Jacoby, S. (2008). The Age of American Unreason. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  28. Johanson, K., & Freeman, R. (2012). The Reader as Audience: The Appeal of the Writers’ Festival to the Contemporary Audience. Continuum: Journal of Media & Cultural Studies 26(2), 303–314.Google Scholar
  29. Lang, A. (2012). From Codex to Hypertext: Reading at the Turn of the Twenty-first Century. Amherst and Boston: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
  30. Langellier, K. (1983). A Phenomenological Approach to Audience. Literature in Performance 3(2), 34–39.Google Scholar
  31. Lanham, R. A. (1989). The Electronic Word: Literary Study and the Digital Revolution. New Literary History 20(2), 265–290.Google Scholar
  32. Literary Festivals. (2014). Literary Festivals. Retrieved April 14, 2014, from http://www.literaryfestivals.com.au/.
  33. Long, E. (2003). Book Clubs: Women and the Uses of Reading in Everyday Life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lurie, C. (2004). Festival, Inc. Australian Author 36(2), 8–12.Google Scholar
  35. Marinaro, T. S. (2004). Searching for Profits with Amazon—Inside the Book and in the Margins. Publishing Research Quarterly 20(4), 3–8.Google Scholar
  36. McLuhan, M. (2005 [1964]). Understanding Media: The Extensions of Man. London and New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  37. Meehan, M. (2005). The Word Made Flesh: Festival, Carnality and Literary Consumption. TEXT: Journal of the Australian Association of Writing, Oct. 2005. Retrieved September 3, 2013, from http://pandora.nla.gov.au/tep/10069.
  38. Murray, S., & Weber, M. (2017). “Live and Local”?: The Significance of Digital Media for Writers’ Festivals. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 23(1), 61–78.Google Scholar
  39. Nossek, H., & Adoni, H. (2006). The Future of Reading as a Cultural Behaviour in a Multi-Channel Media Environment. The Future of the Book in the Digital Age. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. 89–113.Google Scholar
  40. O’Brien, C. T. (2015, March 12). Digital Writers’ Festival 2015: A Wrap. The Wheeler Centre. Retrieved January 17, 2016, from http://www.wheelercentre.com/notes/digital-writers-festival-2015-a-wrap.
  41. Ommundsen, W. (2009). Literary Festivals and Cultural Consumption. Australian Literary Studies 24(1), 19–34.Google Scholar
  42. Pinder, J. (2012). Online Literary Communities: A Case Study of LibraryThing. In A. Lang (Ed.), From Codex to Hypertext: Reading at the Turn of the Twenty-first Century. Amherst and Boston: University of Massachusetts Press. 68–87.Google Scholar
  43. Price, G. (2013, March 28). Amazon.com Will Acquire Goodreads. INFOdocket. Retrieved September 12, 2016, from http://www.infodocket.com/.
  44. Rak, J. (2005). The Digital Queer: Weblogs and Internet Identity. Biography: An Interdisciplinary Quarterly 28(1), 166–182.Google Scholar
  45. Ray Murray, P., & Squires, C. (2013). The Digital Publishing Communications Circuit. Book 2.0 3(1), 3–23.Google Scholar
  46. Reason, M. (2004). Theatre Audiences and Perceptions of “Liveness” in Performance. Particip@tions 1(2), Retrieved October 28, 2013, from http://www.participations.org/.
  47. Rehberg Sedo, D. (2003). Readers in Reading Groups: An Online Survey of Face-to-Face and Virtual Book Clubs. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 9(1), 66–90.Google Scholar
  48. Reinking, D. (2009). Valuing Reading, Writing, and Books in a Post-Typographic World. In D. P. Nord, J. S. Rubin & M. Schudson (Eds.), The History of the Book in America, Volume 5: The Enduring Book, Print Culture in Post-War America. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. 485–501.Google Scholar
  49. Ruddock, A. (2006). Understanding Audiences: Theory and Method. London: Sage Publications.Google Scholar
  50. Skains, R. L. (2010). The Shifting Author–Reader Dynamic: Online Novel Communities as a Bridge from Print to Digital Literature. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 16(1), 95–111.Google Scholar
  51. Stein, M. B., Walker, J. R., & Forde, D. R. (1996). Public-Speaking Fears in a Community Sample. Archives of General Psychiatry 53(2), 169–174.Google Scholar
  52. Steiner, A. (2008). Private Criticism in the Public Space: Personal Writing on Literature in Readers’ Reviews on Amazon. Particip@tions 5(2). Retrieved May 11, 2015, from http://www.participations.org/.
  53. Steiner, A. (2010). Personal Readings and Public Texts: Book Blogs and Online Writing about Literature. Culture Unbound 2, 471–494.Google Scholar
  54. Sutherland, K. (2015). We Are All Materialists Now: Books after Books. Talk presented at the Books as/and New Media symposium, Edinburgh University, UK, 10 Jul. 2015. Retrieved September 1, 2016, from http://www.ed.ac.uk/schools-departments/literatures-languages-cultures/chb/books-and-new-media/professor-kathryn-sutherland.
  55. Thompson, E. (2005). Sensorimotor Subjectivity and the Enactive Approach to Experience. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences 4(4), 407–427.Google Scholar
  56. Whalen, J. (2014, September 17). Try Perusing This as Slowly as You Can. Wall Street Journal, p. 25.Google Scholar
  57. Woodhouse, M. (2006). A Whiff of Tobacco Smoke on the Page: Primary Sources in the Cold New World—Evidence, Imagination and Experience. In B. Cope & A. Phillips (Eds.), The Future of the Book in the Digital Age. Oxford: Chandos Publishing. 211–217.Google Scholar
  58. Zickuhr, K., & Rainie, L. (2014, January 16). E-Reading Rises as Device Ownership Jumps. Pew Research Center. Retrieved February 12, 2016, from http://www.pewinternet.org/.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Millicent Weber
    • 1
  1. 1.Australian National UniversityCanberraAustralia

Personalised recommendations