Skip to main content
  • 452 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter highlights the differing approaches to advocacy and how young people and their families are supported through particular interventions, especially Family Group Conference (FGC). The various types of advocacy approach are explored and framed within the current political context. Alternative advocacy roles are identified and highlight a shift in advocacy practice from one that was seen as less formal to a preferred formalised process. How these approaches impact the FGC and the level of support for the participants is examined and discussed in terms of the client’s best interest or wishes and feelings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Action 4 Advocacy. (2002). The Advocacy Charter. Available from http://www.aqvx59.dsl.pipex.com/Quality%20Standards%20Doc.pdf. [16.05.12].

  • Action 4 Advocacy. (2006). Quality Standards for Advocacy Schemes. Available from http://www.aqvx59.dsl.pipex.com/Quality%20Standards%20Doc.pdf. [06.06.12].

  • Action 4 Advocacy. (2011). Are There Different Types of Advocacy? Available from http://www.actionforadvocacy.org.uk/articleServlet?action=display&article=716&articletype=20. [20.10.11].

  • Adams, R. (1990). Self-Help, Social Work and Empowerment. London: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Banks, S. (2006). Ethics and Values in Social Work (3rd ed.). Basingstoke: Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barford, R., & Wattam, C. (1991). Children’s Participation in Decision Making. Practice, 5(2), 93–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnes, V. (2012). Social Work and Advocacy with Young People: Rights and Care in Practice. British Journal of Social Work, 42(7), 1275–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnsdale, L., & Walker, M. (2007). Examining the Use and Impact of Family Group Conference. Social Work Research Centre, University of Stirling. Available from http://www.scotland.gov.uk/Resource/Doc/172475/0048191.pdf. [23.11.12].

  • Becker, F. (2011). Safeguarding Looked After Children Through Advocacy. London: NSPCC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beresford, P., & Croft, S. (1993). Citizen Involvement. A Practical Guide for Change. London: Macmillan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, J., & Braye, S. (2006). Paid, Professionalised and Proceduralised: Can Legal and Policy Frameworks for Child Advocacy Give Voice to Children and Young People? Journal Social Welfare and Family Law, 28(3–4), 233–249.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boylan, J., & Dalrymple, J. (2009). Understanding Advocacy for Children and Young People. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brady, L. (2011). Where Is My Advocate? A Scoping Report on Advocacy Services for Children. The Children’s Commissioner. Available from http://www.childrenscommissioner.gov.uk/content/publications/content_513. [16.04.12].

  • Burke, B., & Harrison, P. (2002). Anti-Oppressive Practice. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli, & M. Payne (Eds.), Social Work: Themes, Issues and Critical Debate. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleaver, H. (2006). The Influence of Parenting and Other Family Relationships. In J. Aldgate, W. Rose, & C. Jeffery (Eds.), The Developing World of the Child. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coyle, M. (2013, September 4). Demand for Eadvocacy Is Rising as Funding and Access Fall. The Guardian. Available from http://www.theguardian.com/social-care-network/2013/sep/04/demand-for-advocacy-rising. [31.08.14].

  • Fox, D. (2005). An Examination of the Implementation of Restorative Justice in Canada, and Family Group Conferencing Approaches in the UK (Monograph Series). London: BASW/Venture Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. (2007). Non-instructed Advocacy in Focus. London: Action for Advocacy.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hodgson, D. (1995). Advocating Self-advocacy – Partnership to Promote the Rights of Young People with Learning Disabilities. In J. Dalrymple & J. Hough (Eds.), Having a Voice: An Exploration of Children’s Rights and Advocacy. Birmingham: Venture Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horan, H., & Dalrymple, J. (2003). Promoting the Participation Rights of Children and Young People in Family Group Conferences. Practice, 15(2), 5–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horverak, S. (2009). Family Group Conferences and Network Conferences, Oslo, University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins, P. (1995). Advocacy and the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child. In J. Dalrymple & J. Hough (Eds.), Having a Voice: An Exploration of Children’s Rights and Advocacy. Birmingham: Venture Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph Rowntree Foundation. (2006). Promoting Person-Centred Care at the Front Line. Available from http://www.jrf.org.uk/knowledge/findings/socialcare/0296.asp. [15.03.08].

  • Laws, S., & Kirby, P. (2007). Under the Table or at the Table: Supporting Children and Families in Family Group Conferences-a Summary of the Daybreak Research. Brighton: Children and Young People’s Trust, Brighton and Hove.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leadbetter, M. (2002). Empowerment and Advocacy. In R. Adams, L. Dominelli, & M. Payne (Eds.), Social Work: Themes, Issues and Critical Debates. Basingstoke: Palgrave.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCold, P. (2007). Restorative Justice: The Evidence. Available from http://www.realjustice.org/library/rjevidence.html. [23.05.07].

  • Mullaly, B. (2007). The New Structural Social Work. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (1999). Supporting Families. Palmerston North: Dunmore Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Munford, R., & Sanders, J. (2005). Working with Families: Strengths Based Approaches. In M. Nash, R. Munford, & K. O’Donoghue (Eds.), Social Work Theories in Action. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • NCAC. (2012). National Children’s Advocacy Consortium Report “Listen to Me”. Available from http://www.voiceyp.org/professional-zone/news/national-childrens-advocacy-consortium-release-report-listen-me-identifying. [12.06.13].

  • Ofsted. (2010). Children’s Rights Director: Children’s Care Monitor 2010. Manchester: Ofsted.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parton, N. (2006). Safeguarding Childhood: Early Intervention and Surveillance in a Late Modern Society. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, M. (2014). Modern Social Work Theory (4th ed.). Hampshire: Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Pithouse, A., & Crowley, A. (2007). Adults Rule? Children, Advocacy, and Complaints to Social Services. Children and Society, 21(3), 201–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pranis, K. (2000). Conferencing and the Community. In G. Burford & J. Hudson (Eds.), Family Group Conferencing. New York: Walter de Gruyeter, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Representative for Children and Youth. (2017). Available from https://www.rcybc.ca/. [15.06.2017].

  • Sanderson, H., Acraman, C., & Short, A. (2004). Using Person Centred Planning and Approaches with Children and Their Families. Available from http://www.nursing-standard.co.uk/archives/ldp_pdfs/ldpvol7-10/ldpv07n10p1621.pdf. [15.03.2008].

  • Smith, L. (2001). Decolonizing Methodologies: Research and Indigenous Peoples. London: Zed books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voisin, D., DiClemente, R. J., Salazar, L. F., Crosby, R. A., & Yarbar, W. L. (2006). Ecological Factors Associated with STD Risk Behaviours Among Detained Female Adolescents. Social Work, 51(1), 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Fox, D. (2018). Advocacy. In: Family Group Conferencing with Children and Young People. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71492-9_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71492-9_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71491-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71492-9

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics