Advertisement

Shifting Climate Sensitivities, Shifting Paradigms: Tree-Ring Science in a Dynamic World

  • Christine Biermann
  • Henri D. Grissino-Mayer
Chapter

Abstract

In the field of tree-ring science, findings of unstable growth responses by trees to climate have spurred self-reflection and generated debate, with significant implications for climate change politics, science, and discourse. To interrogate this issue, we bring together quantitative data on climate-growth relationships in Great Smoky Mountains National Park, Tennessee, and qualitative survey data on the practices and perspectives of tree-ring scientists. Our tree-ring data compel us to consider often-overlooked socioecological factors that may influence trees’ sensitivities to climate, including atmospheric pollution and historical changes in land use and ecosystem structure and function. Survey data contextualize our analyses within broader changes in the field, demonstrating that climate-growth relationships are increasingly understood as fluid, non-linear, and contingent rather than stable and fixed.

References

  1. Adams, H., S. Stephenson, T. Blasing, and D. Duvick. 1985. Growth-trend declines of spruce and fir in mid-appalachian subalpine forests. Environmental and Experimental Botany 25 (4): 315–325.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Allen, E.R., and H.L. Gholz. 1996. Air quality and atmospheric deposition in southern U.S. forests. In Impact of air pollutants on Southern Pine Forests, ed. S. Fox and R. Mickler, 83–170. New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anchukaitis, K.J., P. Breitenmoser, K.R. Briffa, A. Buchwal, U. Büntgen, E.R. Cook, R.D. D’Arrigo, et al. 2012. Tree rings and volcanic cooling. Nature Geoscience 5 (12): 836–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Anderegg, W., and G.R. Goldsmith. 2014. Public interest in climate change over the past decade and the effects of the ‘climategate’ media event. Environmental Research Letters 9 (5): 054005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Baes, C., and S. McLaughlin. 1984. Trace elements in tree rings: Evidence of recent and historical air pollution. Science 224: 494–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barber, V., G. Juday, and B. Finney. 2000. Reduced growth of Alaskan white spruce in the twentieth century from temperature-induced drought stress. Nature 405: 668–673.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biondi, F., and K. Waikul. 2004. DendroClim2002: A C++ program for statistical calibration of climate signals in tree-ring chronologies. Computers and Geoscience 30 (3): 303–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bridge, M. 2012. Locating the origins of wood resources: A review of dendroprovenancing. Journal of Archaeological Science 39 (8): 2828–2834.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brienen, R.J.W., G. Helle, T.L. Pons, J.L. Guyot, and M. Gloor. 2012. Oxygen isotopes in tree rings are a good proxy for Amazon precipitation and El Nino-Southern Oscillation variability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109 (42): 16957–16962.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Briffa, K., F. Schweingruber, P. Jones, T. Osborn, S. Shiyatov, and E. Vaganov. 1998. Reduced sensitivity of recent tree-growth to temperature at high northern latitudes. Nature 391: 678–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Carrer, M., and C. Urbinati. 2006. Long-term change in the sensitivity of tree-ring growth to climate forcing in Larix decidua. New Phytologist 170 (4): 861–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cook, E. 1985. A time series analysis approach to tree-ring standardization. Ph.D. Tucson, University of Arizona School of Renewable Natural Resources.Google Scholar
  13. Cook, E.R., and A.H. Johnson. 1989. Climate change and forest decline: A review of the red spruce case. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 48 (1): 127–140.Google Scholar
  14. Copenheaver, C., L. Grinter, J. Lorber, M. Neathour, and M. Spinney. 2002. A dendroecological and dendroclimatic analysis of Pinus virginiana and Pinus rigida at two slope positions in the Virginia Piedmont. Castanea 67: 302–315.Google Scholar
  15. Coyle, D.R., K.D. Klepzig, F.H. Koch, L.A. Morris, J.T. Nowak, S.W. Oak, W.J. Otrosina, W.D. Smith, and K. Gandhi. 2015. A review of southern pine decline in North America. Forest Ecology and Management 349: 134–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. D’Arrigo, R., R. Kaufmann, N. Davi, G. Jacoby, C. Laskowski, R. Myeni, and P. Cherubini. 2004. Thresholds for warming-induced growth decline at elevational tree line in the Yukon Territory, Canada. Global Biogeochemical Cycles, 18 (3).Google Scholar
  17. D’Arrigo, R., R. Wilson, B. Liepert, and P. Cherubini. 2008. On the ‘divergence problem’ in northern forests: A review of the tree-ring evidence and possible causes. Global Planetary Change 60 (3): 289–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dale, V.H., M.L. Tharp, K.O. Lannom, and D.G. Hodges. 2010. Modeling transient response of forests to climate change. Science of the Total Environment 408 (8): 1888–1901.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dougherty, P.M., D. Whitehead, and J.M. Vose. 1994. Environmental constraints on the structure and productivity of pine forest ecosystems: A comparative analysis. Ecological Bulletins 43: 64–75.Google Scholar
  20. Driscoll, W., G. Wiles, R. D’Arrigo, and M. Wilmking. 2005. Divergent tree growth response to recent climate warming, Lake Clark National Park and Preserve, Alaska. Geophysical Research Letters, 32 (20).Google Scholar
  21. Emhart, V.I., T.A. Martin, T.L. White, and D.A. Huber. 2006. Genetic variation in basal area increment phenology and its correlation with growth rate in loblolly and slash pine families and clones. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 36 (4): 961–971.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Esper, J., and D. Frank. 2009. Divergence pitfalls in tree-ring research. Climatic Change 94 (3): 261–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Flagler, R.B., and A.H. Chappelka. 1996. Growth response of southern pines to acidic precipitation and ozone. In Impact of Air Pollutants on Southern Pine Forests, ed. S. Fox and R. Mickler, 388–424. New York: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Frank, D., U. Büntgen, R. Böhm, M. Maugeri, and J. Esper. 2007. Warmer early instrumental measurements versus colder reconstructed temperatures: Shooting at a moving target. Quaternary Science Reviews 26 (25): 3298–3310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Friend, A., and W. Hafley. 1989. Climatic limitations to growth in loblolly and shortleaf pine: A dendroclimatological approach. Forest Ecology and Management 26 (2): 113–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Fritts, H. 1976. Tree rings and climate. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  27. Grissino-Mayer, H.D. 2001. Evaluating crossdating accuracy: A manual and tutorial for the computer program COFECHA. Tree-Ring Research 57: 205–221.Google Scholar
  28. ———. 2016. Fire as a once-dominant disturbance process in the yellow pine and mixed pine-hardwood forests of the Appalachian Mountains. In Natural disturbances and historic range of variation: Type, frequency, severity, and post-disturbance structure in Central Hardwood Forests, ed. C. Greenberg and B. Collins, 123–146. Berlin: Springer Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Grissino-Mayer, H.D., and D.R. Butler. 1993. Effects of climate on growth of shortleaf pine in northern Georgia: A dendroclimatic study. Southeastern Geographer 33 (1): 65–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Harrod, J., and R. White. 1999. Age structure and radial growth in xeric pine-oak forests in western Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Journal of the Torrey Botanical Society 126: 139–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harrod, J., P. White, and M. Harmon. 1998. Changes in xeric forests in western Great Smoky Mountains National Park, 1936–1995. Castanea 63: 346–360.Google Scholar
  32. Harrod, J., M. Harmon, and P. White. 2000. Post-fire succession and twentieth century reduction in fire frequency on xeric southern Appalachian sites. Journal of Vegetation Science 11 (4): 465–472.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Holliman, R. 2011. Advocacy in the tail: Exploring the implications of ‘climategate’ for science journalism and public debate in the digital age. Journalism 12 (7): 832–846.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Holmes, R. 1983. Computer-assisted quality control in tree-ring dating and measurement. Tree-Ring Bulletin 43: 69–78.Google Scholar
  35. Hulme, M. 2011. Reducing the future to climate: A story of climate determinism and reductionism. Osiris 26 (1): 245–266.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jacoby, G.C., and R.D. D’Arrigo. 1995. Tree ring width and density evidence of climatic and potential forest change in Alaska. Global Biogeochemical Cycles 9 (2): 227–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Jasanoff, S. 2003. Technologies of humility: Citizen participation in governing science. Minerva 41 (3): 223–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. ———. 2007. Technologies of humility. Nature 450: 33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ke, L., X. Ding, R.L. Tanner, J.J. Schauer, and M. Zheng. 2007. Source contributions to carbonaceous aerosols in the Tennessee Valley Region. Atmospheric Environment 41: 8898–8923.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Larson, E., K. Kipfmueller, C. Hale, L. Frelich, and P. Reich. 2010. Tree rings detect earthworm invasions and their effects in northern hardwood forests. Biological Invasions 12 (5): 1053–1066.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. LeBlanc, D., D. Raynal, and E. White. 1987. Acidic deposition and tree growth I: The use of stem analysis to study historical growth patterns. Journal of Environmental Quality 16 (4): 325–333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Mann, M.E., R.S. Bradley, and M.K. Hughes. 1998. Global-scale temperature patterns and climate forcing over the past six centuries. Nature 392: 779–787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. ———. 1999. Northern hemisphere temperatures during the past millennium: Inferences, uncertainties, and limitations. Geophysical Research Letters 26 (6): 759–762.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Mann, M.E., J.D. Fuentes, and S. Rutherford. 2012. Underestimation of volcanic cooling in tree-ring-based reconstructions of hemispheric temperatures. Nature Geoscience 5 (3): 202–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Marcinkowski, K., D. Peterson, and G. Ettl. 2015. Nonstationary temporal response of mountain hemlock growth to climatic variability in the North Cascade Range, Washington, USA. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 45 (6): 676–688.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Maxwell, J., G. Harley, and S. Robeson. 2016. On the declining relationship between tree growth and climate in the Midwest United States: The fading drought signal. Climatic Change 138: 127–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McIntyre, S., and R. McKitrick. 2005. Hockey sticks, principal components, and spurious significance. Geophysical Research Letters, 32 (3).Google Scholar
  48. McLaughlin, S., and K. Percy. 1999. Forest health in North America: Some perspectives on actual and potential roles of climate and air pollution. Water, Air and Soil Pollution 116: 151–197.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. National Park Service. 2002. Air Quality in the National Parks. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of the Interior.Google Scholar
  50. Oberhuber, W., W. Kofler, K. Pfeifer, A. Seeber, A. Gruber, and G. Wiesner. 2008. Long-term changes in tree-ring-climate relationships at Mt. Patscherkofel (Tyrol, Austria) since the mid-1980s. Trees-Structure and Function 22 (1): 31–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Orvis, K., and H.D. Grissino-Mayer. 2002. Standardizing the reporting of abrasive papers used to surface tree-ring samples. Tree-Ring Research 58: 47–50.Google Scholar
  52. Perry, T. 1971. Dormancy of trees in winter. Science 171: 29–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Porter, T.J., and M. Pisaric. 2011. Temperature-growth divergence in white spruce forests of Old Crow Flats, Yukon Territory, and adjacent regions of northwestern North America. Global Change Biology 17 (11): 3418–3430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Pyle, C. 1988. The type and extent of anthropogenic vegetation disturbance in the Great Smoky Mountains before National Park Service acquisition. Castanea 53: 183–196.Google Scholar
  55. Saladyga, T., and R. Maxwell. 2015. Temporal variability in climate response of eastern hemlock in the Central Appalachian Region. Southeastern Geographer 55 (2): 143–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shaver, C.L., K.A. Tonnessen, and T.G. Maniero. 1994. Clearing the air at Great Smoky Mountains National Park. Ecological Applications 4 (4): 690–701.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Smiljanić, M., J.W. Seo, A. Läänelaid, M. van der Maaten-Theunissen, B. Stajić, and M. Wilmking. 2014. Peatland pines as a proxy for water table fluctuations: Disentangling tree growth, hydrology and possible human influence. Science of the Total Environment 500: 52–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Smouse, P., and L. Saylor. 1973. Studies of the Pinus rigida-serotina complex I. A study of geographic variation. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 60: 174–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. South, D., and E. Buckner. 2003. The decline of southern yellow pine timberland. Journal of Forestry 101 (1): 30–35.Google Scholar
  60. Speer, J.H. 2010. Fundamentals of Tree-Ring Research. Tucson: The University of Arizona Press.Google Scholar
  61. Stambaugh, M., and R. Guyette. 2004. Long-term growth and climate response of shortleaf pine at the Missouri Ozark Forest Ecosystem Project. In Proceedings of the 14th Central Hardwood Forest Conference, ed. D.A. Yaussy, D.M. Mix, R.P. Long, and P.C. Goebel, 448–458. Newtown Square, PA: USDA Forest Service.Google Scholar
  62. Szeicz, J., and G. MacDonald. 1994. Age-dependent tree-ring growth responses of subarctic white spruce to climate. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 24 (1): 120–132.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Tomlinson, G.H. 2003. Acidic deposition, nutrient leaching and forest growth. Biogeochemistry 65 (1): 51–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Van Deusen, P.C. 1990. Evaluating time-dependent tree ring and climate relationships. Journal of Environmental Quality 19 (3): 481–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Wahl, E., and C. Ammann. 2007. Robustness of the Mann, Bradley, Hughes reconstruction of Northern Hemisphere surface temperatures: Examination of criticisms based on the nature and processing of proxy climate evidence. Climatic Change 85 (1): 33–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. White, P., P. Soulé, and S. van de Gevel. 2014. Impacts of human disturbance on the temporal stability of climate–growth relationships in a red spruce forest, southern Appalachian Mountains, USA. Dendrochronologia 32 (1): 71–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Wiles, G., C. Mennett, S. Jarvis, R. D’Arrigo, N. Wiesenberg, and D. Lawson. 2012. Tree-ring investigations into changing climatic responses of yellow-cedar, Glacier Bay, Alaska. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 42 (4): 814–819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilmking, M., and I. Myers-Smith. 2008. Changing climate sensitivity of black spruce in a peatland-forest landscape in Interior Alaska. Dendrochronologia 25 (3): 167–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Wilson, R., and W. Elling. 2004. Temporal instability in tree-growth/climate response in Lower Bavarian Forest region: Implications for dendroclimatic reconstructions. Trees-Structure and Function 18 (1): 19–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yamaguchi, D.K. 1991. A simple method for cross-dating increment cores from living trees. Canadian Journal of Forest Research 21 (3): 414–416.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Zahner, R. 1962. Terminal growth and wood formation by juvenile loblolly pine under two soil moisture regimes. Forest Science 8 (4): 345–352.Google Scholar
  72. Zang, C., and F. Biondi. 2015. Treeclim: An R package for the numerical calibration of proxy-climate relationships. Ecography 38 (4): 431–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Christine Biermann
    • 1
  • Henri D. Grissino-Mayer
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of GeographyUniversity of WashingtonSeattleUSA
  2. 2.Department of GeographyUniversity of TennesseeKnoxvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations