Skip to main content

Introduction: Change and Continuity in Institutional Transformation in Korea

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 348 Accesses

Part of the book series: The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific ((PEAP))

Abstract

The political economy in South Korea (hereafter Korea) has dramatically transformed since the Asian financial crisis in 1997. Interestingly, since the crisis, the political economy of Korea has displayed two diametrically opposed features (Park 2015). One the one hand, the institutional foundations that spearheaded high economic growth until the 1980s eroded in the face of the forces of globalization ushered in by the crisis (Pirie 2006, 2012; Moon and Chung 2014). It seems that under the exponentially increasing complexity of the world economy, the Korean government is no longer able to provide a strategic guidance for the national economy, rapidly converging into the Anglo-American model of political economy. The track record of liberalization measures such as financial liberalization, corporate governance reform, and labor reform suggests that the empirical basis of these arguments is robust.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    By contrast, Thurbon argues that the political leadership’s ambition dictated the Korean government’s for ill-designed and reckless liberalization in the pre-crisis period, which ultimately became structural causes of the crisis (Thurbon 2001).

  2. 2.

    Henry Yeung (2016) stresses “strategic coupling” among state, firm, and global production networks.

  3. 3.

    At the same time, because the dynamics has unfolded unevenly across industrial sectors, one can find significant variations between industrial sectors (Lim 2010).

References

  • Amsden, Alice. 1989. Asia’s Next Giant. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byon, Sang Kyu, Han Joo Kim, and Tae You Kim. 2002. Export-oriented Industrialization Strategy and Industrial Growth Factors in the 1990s: The Case of Mobile Phone Industry. Journal of Information and Communications 9 (2): 115–141. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Camdessus, Michael. 1999. “Crisis, Restructuring, and Recovery in Korea.” Speech in Seoul. http://www.imf.org/external/np/speeches/1999/120299.htm . December.

  • Choi, Byung-Doo. 2012. Developmental Neoliberalism and the Hybridity of the Urban Policy of South Korea. In Locating Neoliberalism in East Asia: Neoliberalizing Spaces in Developmental States, ed. Bae-Gyoon Park, Richard Child Hill, and Asato Saito. Chichester: Blackwell Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, Peter. 1995. Embedded Autonomy: States and Industrial Transformation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ha, Yong Chool. 2012. Continuity and Change in the Institutional Foundations of Korean Crony Capitalism: A Preliminary Assessment. Journal of Korean Politics 21 (3): 207–248.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hong, Sung Gul. 2006. The Political Economy of the IT Industry Development. In Theory of New Growth State in the Information Age, ed. Sung Gul Hong and Seok Man Yoon. Seoul: Nanam. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, Helen. 1999. Crony Capitalism and the East Asian Currency and Financial Crises. Policy 15: 3–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ji, Joo-hyoung. 2009. The shift in the State form and mode of power exercise in South Korea: From the authoritarian developmental state to Neoliberal state power. Korean Political Science Review 43 (4): 175–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kalinowski, Thomas. 2015. Crisis Management and the Diversity of Capitalism: Fiscal Stimulus Packages and the East Asian (neo-)Developmental State. Economy and Society 44 (2): 244–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kang, David C. 2002. Bad Loans to Good Friends: Money Politics and the Developmental State in South Korea. International Organization 56 (1): 177–207.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Byung-kook, and Lim Hyuk-baek. 2000. The Myth and Reality of Crony Capitalism in East Asia. Ideology Quarterly 45: 7–74. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Young-In. 2013. From the Developmental State to the Post Developmental State: The Case of Lee Myung-bak Government’s ‘Low Carbon Green Growth’ Policy. The Korean Journal of Area Studies 31 (1): 29–53. (in Korean).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Ihn Young. 2008. Revisting the Developmental State Theory in Korea: Changes in Developmental State and Its Characteristics since the 1997 Asian Financial Crisis. Journal of Northeast Asian Studies 47: 183–204. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Jeong Hae. 2005. Regulatory Reforms on Big Business and Changes in State’s Role in Korea. Korean Journal of Public Administration 43 (4): 327–355. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Krugman, Paul. 1997. What ever happened to the Asian Miracle? Fortune. Aug. 18.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1998. “The Capitalist; I Told You So.” The New York Times Magazine. May 3.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Chung H., Keun Lee, and Kangkook Lee. 2002. Chaebol, Financial Liberalization, and Economic Crisis: Transformation of Quasi-Internal Organization in Korea. Asian Economic Journal 16: 17–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Seungjoo. 2004. Transforming the developmental state in Korea under Globalization. In Handbook of development policy studies, ed. Gedeon M. Mudacumura and M. Shamsul Haque, 509–522. New York: Marcel Dekker.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Seungjoo. 2018. The Asian financial crisis and the formation of the new political economy model in Korea. In Political economic history of Korean model of developmental state, ed. Hoon Jaung and Seungjoo Lee, 238–296. Seoul: Ingansarang. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Seungjoo, and Hyun Park. 2010. Self-Reinforcing Mechanism and Continuity in Policy Network: The Case of the IT Industry. Journal of Korean Politics 19 (3): 77–104. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lew, Seok-Choon, and Hey Suk Wang. 2007. A Re-interpretation of Korean Economic Development through Social Capital: The Interplay of Strong State and Strong Society. Society and Theory 12: 109–162. (in Korean).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lim, Haeran. 2008. Changes of industrial policy and governance in Korea. Journal of Korean Politics 17 (2): 1–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lim, Haeran. 2010. The transformation of the developmental state and economic reform in Korea. Journal of Contemporary Asia 40 (2): 188–210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Andrew J., T.J. Pempel, and John Ravenhill, eds. 2008. Crisis as Catalyst: Asia's Dynamic Political Economy. Ithaca/London: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahoney, James. 2000. Path Dependence in Historical Sociology. Theory and Society 29 (4): 507–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moon, Don, and Jin Young Chung. 2014. From ‘Developmental State Model’ to ‘Neoliberal Model’ – A Critical Assessment on the Debates of the ‘Korean Developmental Model’. Journal of Asia Pacific Studies 21 (2): 129–164. (in Korean).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, Sang Young. 2015. Analysis on the Cohabitation of Developmentalism and Neoliberalism in Korea: Changes in the Korean Developmental State since the 1990s and Varieties of Developmental-Neoliberal Mixes. Journal of Asia Pacific Studies 22 (4): 5–40. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierson, Paul. 1999. Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics. American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirie, Iain. 2005. The new Korean State. New Political Economy 10(1): 25–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhyu, Sang-Young, and Seungjoo Lee. 2006. Economic Reform and Changes in Informal Networks between Government and Business in South Korea. Journal of 21st Century Political Science 16 (1): 43–66. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Shin, Jang-Sup, and Ha-Joon Chang. 2003. Restructuring Korea Inc. London: RoutledgeCourzon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stubbs, Richard. 2009. What ever happened to the East Asian Developmental State? The Unfolding Debate. The Pacific Review 22 (1): 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thurbon, Elizabeth. 2001. “Two paths to financial liberalization: South Korea and Taiwan.” The Pacific Review 14 (2): 241–267.

    Google Scholar 

  • Um, Kyusook, Hyun-Chin Lim, and Suk-Man Hwang. 2014. South Korea’s developmental state at a crossroads: Disintegration or re-emergence 45(2): 211–253.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, Steven K. 2006. Japan Remodeled: How Government and Industry Are Reforming Japanese Capitalism. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, Steven. 1996. Freer Markets, More Rules: Regulatory Reform in Advanced Industrial Countries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, Robert. 1990. Governing the market: Economic theory and role of government in East Asian industrialization. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wade, Robert, and Frank Veneroso. 1998. The Asian Crisis: The High Debt Model versus the Wall Street-Treasury-IMF Complex. New Left Review 228: 3–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, Linda. 2000. Developmental States in Transition: Adapting, Dismantling, Innovating, not ‘Normalizing’. The Pacific Review 13 (1): 21–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo-Cumings, Meredith. 1999. The Developmental State. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Jae Jin. 2005. Developmentalism after Development: Growth, Crisis, and Future of the Korean Developmental State. Korean Public Administration Review 39 (1): 1–18. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeung, Henry Wei-chung. 2016. Strategic Coupling: East Asian Industrial Transformation in the New Global Economy. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoon, Sang Woo. 2009. Internalizing Neoliberal Globalization in Korea: A Case for ‘Developmental Neoliberalization’. Economy and Society 83: 40–68. (in Korean).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2019 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Lee, S., Rhyu, Sy. (2019). Introduction: Change and Continuity in Institutional Transformation in Korea. In: The Political Economy of Change and Continuity in Korea. The Political Economy of the Asia Pacific. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71453-0_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics