Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Overcoming Sustainability Displacement: The Challenge of Making Sustainability Accessible in the Here and Now

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Disciplining the Undisciplined?

Part of the book series: CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance ((CSEG))

Abstract

Sustainability displacement is the idea that the achievement of sustainability is shifted to some other place and future time rather than being delivered in the here and now. The growing use of environmental offsets is a key example of this phenomenon that is explored in this chapter. Sustainability displacement through use of environmental offsets is problematic because limitations, unknowns and complications mean there is no guarantee of achieving the desired goal. Based on a literature review and illustrative case studies, we present both theoretical and practical examples highlighting the problems with operationalizing sustainability in the context of individual development activities. We introduce a sustainability framework that includes the dimensions of ‘here and now’ and ‘there and then’ to make explicit the trade-offs in time and space. We conclude with reflections on the issues with sustainability displacement and the advantage of conceptualising sustainability in a simple but integrated and holistic fashion that provides a useful foundation for university teaching and research in sustainability.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Stoeglehner G (2013) Designing an effective sustainability assessment process. In: Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A, Howitt R (eds) Sustainability assessment pluralism, practice and progress. Routledge, London, pp 231–244

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown P, Lant C (1999) The effect of wetland mitigation banking in the achievement of no-net-loss. Environ Manag 23(3):333–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brownlie S, King N, Treweek J (2013) Biodiversity trade-offs and offsets in impact assessment and decision making: can we stop the loss? Impact Assess Proj A 31(1):24–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman K (2016) Complexity and creative capacity: rethinking knowledge transfer, adaptive management and wicked environmental problems (Routledge explorations in environmental studies). Routledge, Oxon

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuperus R (2004) Ecological compensation of the highway impacts: negotiated trade-off or no-net-loss? Strapatz, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  • DLWC – Department of Land and Water Conservation New South Wales (2001) Offsets, salinity and native vegetation: Discussion Paper. DLWC, Sydney. http://www.environment.nsw.gov.au/resources/salinity/offsets.pdf. Accessed 29 Nov 2016

  • Dybas CL (2011) Ripple marks. The story behind the story. Oceanography 24(4):8–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elkington J (1997) Cannibals with forks: the triple bottom line of 21st century business. Capstone, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • George C (1999) Testing for sustainable development through environmental assessment. Environ Impact Assess Rev 19:175–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson R (2006) Sustainability assessment: basic components of a practical approach. Impact Assess Proj A 24(3):170–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson R (2011) Application of a contribution to sustainability test by the Joint Review Panel for the Canadian Mackenzie Gas Project. Impact Assessment Proj A 29(3):231–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson R (2013) Avoiding sustainability trade-offs in environmental assessment. Impact Assess Proj A 31(1):2–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson R, Hassan S, Holtz S, Tansey J, Whitelaw G (2005) Sustainability assessment criteria, processes and applications. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasson J (1999) Environmental impact assessment—impact on decisions. In: Petts J (ed) Handbook of environmental impact assessment, Environmental impact assessment: process, methods and potential, vol 1. Blackwell Science, Oxford, pp 121–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A (1999) Introduction to environmental impact assessment: principles and procedures, process, practice and prospects. UCL Press, Philadelphia

    Google Scholar 

  • Glasson J, Therivel R, Chadwick A (2012) Introduction to environmental impact assessment, 4th edn. Routledge, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Government of Western Australia (n.d.) Pilbara Conservation Strategy, Government of Western Australia, Perth. Available: https://www.dpaw.wa.gov.au/management/pilbara-conservation-strategy

  • Grace W, Pope J (2015) A systems approach to sustainability assessment. In: Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J, Bond A (eds) Handbook of sustainability assessment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 285–320

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hacking T, Guthrie P (2006) Sustainable development objectives: why are they needed and where do they come from? J Environ Assess Policy Manag 8(3):341–371

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes N, Morrison-Saunders A (2007) The effectiveness of environmental offsets in EIA – practitioner perspectives from western Australia. Impact Assess Proj A 25(3):209–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kemess North Copper-Gold Mine Project Joint Review Panel (2007) Kemess north copper-gold mine project joint review panel report September 17, 2007. http://www.carriersekani.ca/images/docs/lup/Kemess North JPR Report Complete 2007.pdf. Accessed 21 Nov 2016

  • Lamorgese L, Geneletti D (2015) Equity in sustainability assessment: a conceptual framework. In: Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J, Bond A (eds) Handbook of sustainability assessment, research handbooks on impact assessment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 57–76

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Lele SM (1991) Sustainable development: a critical review. World Dev 19(6):607–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maron M, Hobbs RJ, Moilanen A et al (2012) Faustian bargains? Restoration realities in the context of biodiversity offset policies. Biol Conserv 155:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Middle G (n.d.) Issues in the use of offsets. http://www.garrymiddle.net/issues-in-there-use-of-offsets/. Accessed 29 Nov 2016

  • Middle G, Middle I (2010) A review of the use of environmental offset as a policy mechanism in the environmental impact assessment process (EIA) in western Australia. Impact Assess Proj A 28(4):313–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development (MMSD) (2002) Breaking new ground: mining, minerals and sustainable development: the report of the MMSD project. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J (2013) Conceptualising and managing trade-offs in sustainability assessment. EIA Rev 38:54–63

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsome D, Hughes M (2016) Understanding the impacts of ecotourism on biodiversity: a multi-scale, cumulative issue influenced by perceptions and politics. In: Geneletti D, Lamorgese L (eds) Handbook on biodiversity and ecosystem services in impact assessment, Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 276–282

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Riordan T (2000) The sustainability debate. In: O’Riordan T (ed) Environmental science for environmental management, 2nd edn. Routledge, London, pp 29–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Ortolando L, Shepherd A (1995) Environmental impact assessment. In: Bronstein DA (ed) Environmental and social impact assessment. Wiley, Chichester, pp 3–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Pope J, Bond A, Morrison-Saunders A (2015) A conceptual framework for sustainability assessment. In: Morrison-Saunders A, Pope J, Bond A (eds) Handbook of sustainability assessment, research handbooks on impact assessment. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 20–42

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pope J, Bond A, Hugé J, Morrison-Saunders A (2017) Reconceptualising sustainability assessment. EIA Rev 62:205–215

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajvanshi A, Brownlie S, Slootweg R, Arora R (2011) Maximizing benefits for biodiversity: the potential of enhancement strategies in impact assessment. Impact Assess Proj A 29(3):181–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rundcrantz K, Skärbäck E (2003) Environmental compensation in planning: a review of five different countries with major emphasis on the German system. Eur Environ 13(4):204–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith MD (2007) A review of recent NEPA alternatives analysis case law. EIA Rev 27(2):126–144

    Google Scholar 

  • Steinemann A (2001) Improving alternatives for environmental impact assessment. EIA Rev 21(1):3–21

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner R, Redmond A, Zelder J (2001) Count it by acre or function—mitigation adds up to net loss of wetlands. In: Kate K, Bishop J, Bayon R (eds) Biodiversity offsets: views, experience and the business case. Insight Investment, Cambridge, pp 5–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Verheem R, Draaijers G (2006) Experiences on sustainability assessment in The Netherlands, The Netherlands Commission for Environmental Assessment. https://www.researchgate.net/profile/Rob_Verheem/publication/267399927_Experiences_on_Sustainability_Assessment_in_the_Netherlands/links/545c8c3b0cf2f1dbcbcb4d85.pdf. Accessed 15 Nov 2016

  • Voisey’s Bay Mine and Mill Environmental Assessment Panel Report (2005) http://www.ceaa-acee.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=En&n=0a571a1a-1&xml=0a571a1a-84cd-496b-969e-7cf9cbea16ae&offset=2&toc=show. Accessed 21 Nov 2016

  • Walker S, Brower A, Theo Stephens R, Lee W (2009) Why bartering biodiversity fails. Conserv Lett 2:149–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weiss JA (1982) Coping with complexity: an experimental study of public policy decision-making. J Policy Anal Manag 2(1):66–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams CC, Millington AC (2004) The diverse and contested meanings of sustainable development. Geogr J 170:99–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Commission on Environment and Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Science, Edith Cowan University, Perth, WA, Australia

    Angus Morrison Saunders

  2. Environmental and Conservation Sciences, Murdoch University, Perth, WA, Australia

    Angus Morrison Saunders & Michael Hughes

  3. Research Unit for Environmental Science and Management, North West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

    Angus Morrison Saunders

Authors
  1. Angus Morrison Saunders
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Michael Hughes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angus Morrison Saunders .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Responsible Citizenship and Sustainability, School of Business and Governance, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia

    Martin Brueckner

  2. Centre for Responsible Citizenship and Sustainability, School of Business and Governance, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia

    Rochelle Spencer

  3. Centre for Responsible Citizenship and Sustainability, School of Business and Governance, Murdoch University, Murdoch, Western Australia, Australia

    Megan Paull

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Saunders, A.M., Hughes, M. (2018). Overcoming Sustainability Displacement: The Challenge of Making Sustainability Accessible in the Here and Now. In: Brueckner, M., Spencer, R., Paull, M. (eds) Disciplining the Undisciplined?. CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71449-3_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation