The Journey of Self, Nature, Technology and Sustainable Organisational Design: Insights for Transformative Leadership Praxis

  • Scott GardnerEmail author
  • Sally Paulin
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)


In this chapter, we seek to advance the notion that the evolution of ‘Self’, organisational design and leadership thinking and an Eco-centric versus Ego-centric worldview—are a precondition for true sustainability and survival for organisations and interdependent local and global ecosystems in 2017 and beyond.

We develop this position with reference to Historical, Sociological, Literary and Philosophical precedents, leading-edge organisational and leadership theory, topical reports on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) global standards, practices and metrics, and our own reflective practice narratives. This rich body of knowledge and expertise is used to illustrate the potential costs of the contested relationship between humans and nature from classical times into the current digital era. We argue that to truly understand human, organisational and broader ecosystems dynamics in a complex and emerging environment, non-linear interpretive methodologies are required versus traditional positivist empirical investigations.

Based on this approach and extensive conversations with other experienced academic researchers, teachers, and consultants actively involved in organisational change and design, stakeholder and community engagement, we conclude that even the most progressive Corporate Social Responsibility and corporate social integration organising and leadership models such as Conscious Capitalism and Shared Value are trapped in the Ego-centric self-serving worldview. By contrast we explore the potential of the Eco-centric worldview and allied organisational design and reward practices based on—shared values, self-transcending purpose, personal insight, and creative use of digital technologies for collaboration, problem-solving, and knowledge sharing in high trust social networks.

Having explored how some of these principles can be applied within leading-edge, radical leadership and organisational design frameworks such as—Theory U and Teal organisations, we revisit the notion of the digital double-edged sword. This represents massive, previously unimaginable power and agency which human beings can exercise through interconnected digital networks for better or for worse. We argue that ‘for better’ translates as a unique opportunity to change the way that we lead and design organisations and balance risk and opportunity for humankind, natural systems, and the planet.


Transformative Leadership Praxis Conscious Capitalism Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) Leadership Thinking Organizational Design Framework 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Attwood M, Pedler M, Pritchard S, Wilkinson D (2003) Leading change. A guide to whole systems working. Policy Press, BristolGoogle Scholar
  2. Australian Centre for Corporate Social Responsibility (2014) The state of CSR in Australia and New Zealand Annual Review 2014Google Scholar
  3. Balmer JMT, Greyser SA (2003) Revealing the corporation: perspectives on identity, image, reputation, corporate branding and corporate level marketing. Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  4. Barrett A (2010) Capitalising on experience for an evolving era: a reflective practitioner study. Edith Cowan University, PerthGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruner JS (2009) Actual minds possible worlds. Harvard University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Byrne A (2006) What causes an organisation to be what it is and to become and what it could be: a philosophical expedition (PhD), Edith Cowan University, PerthGoogle Scholar
  7. Daft RL, Lane PG (2011) The leadership experience. South Western Cengage Learning, MasonGoogle Scholar
  8. De Botton A (2002) The art of travel. Penguin, LondonGoogle Scholar
  9. Doppelt B (2003) Leading change toward sustainability. A change management guide for business, government and civil society. Greenleaf, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  10. Doppelt B (2012) From me to we. The five transformational commitments required to rescue the planet, your organisation and your life. Greenleaf, SheffieldGoogle Scholar
  11. Dowling G (2001) Creating corporate reputations: identity image and performance. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Dunphy D, Griffiths A, Benn S (2003) Organisational change for corporate sustainability, 2nd edn (Revised edition 2007). Routledge, LondonGoogle Scholar
  13. Elkington J (1999) Cannibals with forks. The triple bottom line of 21st-century business. Capstone, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  14. Fombrun C, Van Riel CBM (2004) Fame, fortune and how companies build reputation. Pearson Education, Upper Saddle RiverGoogle Scholar
  15. Frankl, V. E. (2011) Man’s search for meaning. The classic tribute to hope from the holocaust. Rider, SydneyGoogle Scholar
  16. Gleeson-White J (2014) Six capitals; the revolution capitalism has to have – or can accountants save the planet. Allen and Unwin, Crows NestGoogle Scholar
  17. Gregson W (2017) Harnessing sources of innovation, useful knowledge and leadership within a complex public sector agency network: a reflective practice perspective (PhDI), University of New England, ArmidaleGoogle Scholar
  18. Harari YN (2016) Homo deus – a brief history of tomorrow. Vintage Penguin, Random House, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Hawken P (2007) How the largest movement in the world came into being and why no one saw it coming. Viking Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Ito J, Howe J (2016) Whiplash: how to survive our faster future. Grand Central, BostonGoogle Scholar
  21. Klein N (2001) No logo. Flamingo, LondonGoogle Scholar
  22. Klein N (2014) This changes everything. Capitalism vs the climate. Penguin Books, LondonGoogle Scholar
  23. Laloux F (2014) Reinventing organisations. A guide to creating organisations inspired by the next stage of human consciousness. Nelson Parker, BrusselsGoogle Scholar
  24. Laszlo C (2003) The sustainable company: how to create lasting value to social and environmental performance. Island Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  25. Mackay J, Sisoda R (2013) Conscious capitalism: liberating the heroic spirit of business. Harvard Business Review Press, BrightonGoogle Scholar
  26. McKibben B (2013) Oil and honey: the education of an unlikely activist. Black Inc Publishers, CarltonGoogle Scholar
  27. MIT EdX (2016) Learning from the emerging future.
  28. Morrigan P, Paull M (2002) Taking your values shopping: conversations about values and fulfilment, dialogue and engagement with customer stakeholders in the body shop Western Australia. ECU – industry collaboration project. Retrieved from Perth, WAGoogle Scholar
  29. Norton BG (2005) Sustainability: a philosophy of adaptive ecosystem management. University of Chicago Press, ChicagoGoogle Scholar
  30. Porter M, Kramer M (2011) Creating shared value – how to reinvent capitalism and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. Harvard Business Review, BostonGoogle Scholar
  31. Post JE, Preston LE, Sachs S (2002) Redefining the corporation: stakeholder management and organisational wealth. Stanford Press, Palo AltoGoogle Scholar
  32. Scharmer O (2009) Theory U, leading from the future as it emerges. The social technology of presencing. Berrett-Koehler Publishers, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  33. Scharmer O, Kaufer K (2013) Leading from the emerging future. From ego-system to eco-system economies. Berrett-Koehler, San FranciscoGoogle Scholar
  34. Schon D (1987) Educating the reflective practitioner. Jossey-Bass, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Suzuki D (1997) The secret balance: rediscovering our place in nature. Allen and Unwin, Crows NestGoogle Scholar
  36. Wheeler D, Sillanpaa M (1997) The stakeholder corporation: a blueprint for maximising stakeholder value. Pitman, LondonGoogle Scholar
  37. Wong ES (2004) Action research: the living thesis. Action research professional practice on reflective practitioner research. Edith Cowan University, PerthGoogle Scholar
  38. World Economic Forum (2017) The global risks report 2017. Retrieved from Geneva:

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and GovernanceMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Responsible Citizenship and SustainabilityMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations