Perceived Importance of Corporate Sustainability Disclosure: Evidence from China

  • Terri TrireksaniEmail author
  • Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta
  • Junru Zhang
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)


While effective sustainability reporting frameworks have become more important as sustainability disclosures have become integrated with the current economy, their complexity and users’ different expectations often deter the practice of sustainability reporting. This chapter offers an insight into users’ perceived importance of the indicators in the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) reporting framework based on a study in China , which represents an Asian giant economy with differences from the Western developed countries that the reporting frame-works were mostly developed around. The findings show that Chinese users’ perceived the relative importance of the indicators differently, with issues such as the environment being emphasised. This understanding needs to be considered in the future development of sustainability reporting and policies.


Corporate Sustainability sustainabilitySustainability Report Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) Chinese Customs disclosureDisclosure 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Adams C, Frost G (2007) Managing social and environmental performance: do companies have adequate information? Aust Account Rev 17(43):2–11CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams C, McNicholas P (2007) Making a difference: sustainability reporting, accountability and organisational change. Account Audit Account J 20(3):382–402CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bai C, Sarkis J, Dou Y (2015) Corporate sustainability development in China: review and analysis. Ind Manag Data Syst 115(1):5–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Balatbat M (2012) ESG Scores and its influence on firm performance: Australian evidence. The University of New South Wales. Working PaperGoogle Scholar
  5. Betianu L (2010) Indicators of the global reporting initiative regarding sustainable development. Ann Univ Apulensis: Series Oeconomica 12(1):5–24Google Scholar
  6. Billings DM, Halstead JA (2005) Corporate social reporting and reputation risk. J Manag Account Audit Account 21(3):337–361Google Scholar
  7. Brace I (2004) Questionnaire design: how to plan, structure and write survey material for effective market research. Kogan Page, LondonGoogle Scholar
  8. Bradford M, Earp J, Williams P (2012) Sustainability: an analysis of organizational reporting and implications for ERP systems. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the Southern Association for Information Systems Conference Atlanta, GA, 23–24 MarchGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown H, de Jong M, Lessidrenska T (2009) The rise of the global reporting initiative: a case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environ Pollut 18(2):182–200Google Scholar
  10. Carroll AB (1979) A three-dimensional conceptual model of corporate performance. Acad Manag Rev 4(4):497–505Google Scholar
  11. Chauvey J, Giordano-Spring S, Cho CH, Pattern DM (2015) The normativity and legitimacy of CSR disclosures: evidence from France. J Bus Ethics 130:789–803CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chinese Academy of Social Science (CASS) (2016) White paper of corporate social responsibility in China, 2013. Available at:
  13. Chu X (2007) Empirical study on the relation between taking society responsibility and market performance of listed company – take the Shanghai industrial enterprise as the example (Unpublished Master’s dissertation), Xinjiang University of FinanceGoogle Scholar
  14. Clarkson P, Li Y, Richardson G, Vasvari F (2008) Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: an empirical analysis. Account Org Soc 33(4):303–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Dellios E (2012) Sustainability reporting in Australia. Keeping Good Companies 64(9):521Google Scholar
  16. Dhaliwal DS, Radhakrishnan S, Tsang A, Yang YG (2012) Nonfinancial disclosure and analyst forecast accuracy: international evidence on corporate social responsibility disclosure. Account Revi 8(3):723–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dingwerth K, Eichinger M (2010) Tamed transparency: how information disclosure under the global reporting initiative fails to empower. Glob Environ Polit 10(3):74–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Djajadikerta HG, Trireksani T (2012) Corporate social and environmental disclosure by Indonesian listed companies on their corporate web sites. J Appl Account Res 13(1):21–36CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Drori GS, Meyer JW, Hwang H (2006) Globalization and organisation: world society and organisational change. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  20. Etzion D, Ferraro F (2010) The role of analogy in the institutionalisation of sustainability reporting. Org Sci 21(5):1092–1107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frost G, Jones S, Loftus J, Laan S (2005) A survey of sustainability reporting practices of Australian reporting entities. Aust Account Rev 15(1):89–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gao Y (2009) Corporate social performance in China: evidence from large companies. J Bus Ethics 89(1):23–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Global Reporting Initiative (2013) G4 sustainability reporting guidelinesGoogle Scholar
  24. Gunawan J, Djajadikerta HG, Smith M (2009) An examination of corporate social disclosures in the annual reports of Indonesian listed companies. APC Environ Account J 15(1):13–36Google Scholar
  25. Hackston D, Milne MJ (1996) Some determinants of social and environmental disclosures in New Zealand companies. Account Audit Account J 9(1):77–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Humphrey EJ, Lee D, Shen Y (2012) The independent effects of environmental, social and governance initiatives on the performance of UK firms. Aust J Manag 37(2):135–151CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hussey D, Kirsop P, Meissen R (2001) Global reporting initiative guidelines: an evaluation of sustainable development metrics for industry. Environ Qual Manag 11(1):1–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kocmanová A, Hrebicek J, Dočekalová M (2011) Corporate governance and sustainability. Econ Manag 16:543–549Google Scholar
  29. KPMG (2008) International survey of corporate social responsibility reporting. Available at:
  30. KPMG (2015) Currents of change: the KPMG survey of corporate responsibility reporting 2015Google Scholar
  31. Lin I (2010) Users’ and preparers’ perception of sustainability reporting and corporate sustainability (Doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertation and Theses database (UMI 3427306)Google Scholar
  32. Liu X (2007) Qi ye she hui ze ren yu wo guo min ying qi ye ke chi xu fa zhan [Corporate social responsibility and sustainability in private sectors]. Econ Manag 8:22–26Google Scholar
  33. Lu D (2002) Gong si she hui ze ren de jing ji xue yu fa xue fen xi [Corporate social responsibility analysis – approaches from economics and legitimacy]. Falv Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  34. Maignan I, Ferrell OC (2001) Corporate citizenship: cultural antecedents and business benefits. J Acad Mark Sci 27(4):455–469CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Ong T, Trireksani T, Djajadikerta HG (2016) Hard and soft sustainability disclosures: Australia’s resources industry. Account Res J 29(2):198–217Google Scholar
  36. Orlitzky M, Siegel D, Waldman DA (2011) Strategic corporate social responsibility and environmental sustainability. Bus Soc 50(6):6–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Peng HG (2009) Research on corporate social disclosure in China (Unpublished master’s dissertation). Jilin University, ChangchunGoogle Scholar
  38. Quaak L, Aalbers T, Goedee J (2007) Transparency of corporate social responsibilities in Dutch breweries. J Bus Ethics 76(3):293–308CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ratanajongkol S, Davey H, Low M (2006) Corporate social reporting in Thailand: the news is all good and increasing. Qual Res Account Manag 3(1):67–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Shan GY, Taylor D (2014) Theoretical perspectives on corporate social and environmental disclosures: evidence from China. J Asia-Pac Bus 15(3):260–281CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Shen G, Lowe J, Shu WD (2009) Tianjin economic-technological development area in China. J Clean Prod 18(3):191–199Google Scholar
  42. Shi H, Chertow M, Song Y (2010) Developing country experience with eco-industrial parks: a case study of the Tianjin economic-technological development area in China. J Clean Prod 18(3):191–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Tiong P, Anantharaman R (2011) An examination of the sustainability disclosures of ANZ, NAB and Westpac. JASSA Finsia J Appl Fin 3:12–16Google Scholar
  44. Trireksani T, Djajadikerta HG (2016) Corporate governance and environmental disclosure in the Indonesian Mining Industry. Aust Account Bus Fin J 10(1):18–28Google Scholar
  45. Vigneau L, Humphreys M, Moon J (2015) How do firms comply with international sustainability standards? J Bus Ethics 131(2):469–486CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wang Q, Chen Y (2010) Energy saving and emission reduction revolutionizing China’s environmental protection. Renew Sustain Energ Rev 14(1):535–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. World Commission on Environment Development (1987) Our common future. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  48. Yuan Y (2007) Research on information disclosure of corporate social responsibility (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). South-Western University of Finance and Economics, ChengDuGoogle Scholar
  49. Zain M, Janggu T (2006) Corporate social disclosure (CSD) of construction company in Malaysia. Malays Account Rev 5(1):85–114Google Scholar
  50. Zhou Z (2005) Qi ye she hui ze ren shi jian, xing shi yu nei han [The vision, format and the meaning of corporate social responsibility]. Theory Acad 5:15–19Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Terri Trireksani
    • 1
    Email author
  • Hadrian Geri Djajadikerta
    • 2
  • Junru Zhang
    • 2
  1. 1.School of Business and GovernanceMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.School of Business and LawEdith Cowan UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations