Advertisement

Senior Management Perceptions of CSR Impact: Long-term Investment for Social Good or Necessary Cost?

  • Stephen KlompEmail author
  • Anne Clear
Chapter
Part of the CSR, Sustainability, Ethics & Governance book series (CSEG)

Abstract

This chapter gives voice to the views of company Senior Management and senior executives and reveals some of the contradictions evident in their thinking. It also reveals key themes and emergent debates as perceived by the academic staff undertaking the research, where individual values and personal experience can influence the interpretation of data. It concludes by framing the debates relevant to a stakeholder view of CSR , reflecting a management perspective of the topic.

References

  1. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2015) Australian national accounts: non-profit institutions satellite account, 2012–13, 5256.0. http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/Lookup/5256.0Appendix52012-13
  2. Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2016) Counts of Australian businesses, including entries and exits, June 2011 to June 2015, 8165.0. http://www.abs.gov.au/AUSSTATS/abs@.nsf/Lookup/8165.0Main+Features1Jun%202011%20to%20Jun%202015?OpenDocument
  3. Australian Securities & Investments Commission (ASIC) (2016) Small business. http://asic.gov.au/for-business/your-business/small-business/small-business-overview/
  4. Awasthi S (2012) Perceptive differences in social responsibility among executives and management students. J Entrep Manag 1(2):32–40Google Scholar
  5. Banerjee SB (2001) Managerial perceptions of corporate environmentalism: interpretations from industry and strategic implications for organizations. J Manag Stud 38(4):489–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banerjee SB (2008) Corporate social responsibility: the good, the bad and the ugly. Crit Sociol 34(1):51–79CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Baumann-Pauly D, Wickert C, Spence LJ, Scherer AG (2013) Organizing corporate social responsibility in small and large firms: size matters. J Bus Ethics 115(4):693–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berrone P, Surroca J, Tribó JA (2007) Corporate ethical identity as a determinant of firm performance: a test of the mediating role of stakeholder satisfaction. J Bus Ethics 76(1):35–53CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bishop WH (2013) The role of ethics in 21st century organizations. J Bus Ethics 118(3):635–637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Blowfield M (2005) Corporate social responsibility – the failing discipline and why it matters for international relations. Int Rel 19(2):173–191Google Scholar
  11. Bryman A, Bell E (2007) Business research methods, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  12. Burke L, Logsdon JM (1996) How corporate social responsibility pays off. Long Range Plan 29(4):495–502CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Clarkson ME (1995) A stakeholder framework for analyzing and evaluating corporate social performance. Acad J Manag Rev 20(1):92–117Google Scholar
  14. Dahlsrud A (2008) How corporate social responsibility is defined: an analysis of 37 definitions. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 15(1):1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. de Bussy NM, Suprawan L (2012) Most valuable stakeholders: the impact of employee orientation on corporate financial performance. Public Relat Rev 38(2):280–287CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Freeman RE (1984) Strategic management: a stakeholder approach. Pitman, BostonGoogle Scholar
  17. Galbreath J (2010) How does corporate social responsibility benefit firms? Evidence from Australia. Eur Bus Rev 22(4):411–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Graafland J, Mazereeuw-Van der Duijn Schouten C (2012) Motives for corporate social responsibility. De Economist 160(4):377–396CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Harrison JS, Wicks AC (2013) Stakeholder theory, value, and firm performance. Bus Ethics Q 23(1):97–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hemingway CA, Maclagan PW (2004) Managers’ personal values as drivers of corporate social responsibility. J Bus Ethics 50(1):33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hussein MM (2010) Corporate social responsibility: finding the middle ground. Soc Resp J 6(3):420–432Google Scholar
  22. International Organisation for standards (ISO) (2010) International organization for standardization’s guidance standard on social responsibility, ISO 26000. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards/iso26000.htm
  23. Katamba D, Tushabomwe Kazooba C, Babiiha Mpisi S, Marvin Nkiko C, Nabatanzi-Muyimba AK, Hensley Kekaramu J (2012) Corporate social responsibility management in Uganda. Int J Soc Econ 39(6):375–390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kiron D, Kruschwitz N, Haanaes K, Reeves M, Goh E (2013) The innovation bottom line. MIT. Sloan Manag Rev 54(3):1–21Google Scholar
  25. Kooskora M (2008) Corporate governance from the stakeholder perspective in the context of estonian business organizations. Balt J Manag 3(2):193–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Korhonen J (2003) Should we measure corporate social responsibility? Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 10(1):25–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lawler EE, Worley CG (2012) Why boards need to change? MIT. Sloan Manag Rev 54(1):10–12Google Scholar
  28. Lindgreen A, Swaen V, Johnston WJ (2009) Corporate social responsibility: an empirical investigation of U.S. organizations. J Bus Ethics 85:303–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lindorff M, Peck J (2010) Exploring Australian financial leaders’ views of corporate social responsibility. J Manag Org 16(1):48–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Maon F, Kotler P, Lindgreen A, Vanhamme J (2012) A stakeholder approach to corporate social responsibility: pressures, conflicts, and reconciliation. Gower Publishing, BurlingtonGoogle Scholar
  31. McWilliams A, Siegel D (2000) Corporate social responsibility and financial performance: correlation or misspecification? Strateg Manag J 21(5):603–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. McWilliams A, Siegel DS, Wright PM (2006) Corporate social responsibility: strategic implications. J Manag Stud 43:1–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Money K, Schepers H (2007) Are CSR and corporate governance converging? a view from boardroom directors and company secretaries in FTSE100 companies in the UK. J Gen Manag 33(2):1–11Google Scholar
  34. Moura-Leite RC, Padgett RC, Galan JI (2014) Stakeholder management and nonparticipation in controversial business. Bus Soc 53(1):45–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Noe CA (2014) Strategic CSR and value creation within small and medium U.S. enterprises. ProQuest Dissertations PublishingGoogle Scholar
  36. Orlitzky M, Louche C, Gond JP, Chapple W (2015) Unpacking the drivers of corporate social performance: a multilevel, multistakeholder, and multimethod analysis. J Bus Ethics:1–20Google Scholar
  37. Papasolomou-Doukakis I, Krambia-Kapardis M, Katsioloudes M (2005) Corporate social responsibility: the way forward? maybe not! A preliminary study in Cyprus. Eur Bus Rev 17(3):263–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Reider-Gordon M (2013) Understanding foreign states’ mandatory corporate social responsibility reporting. Litigation 39(1):61–63Google Scholar
  39. Schnackenberg AK, Tomlinson EC (2016) Organizational transparency: a new perspective on managing trust in organization-stakeholder relationships. J Manag 42(7):1784–1810Google Scholar
  40. Schneider A, Meins E (2012) Two dimensions of corporate sustainability assessment: towards a comprehensive framework. Bus Strateg Environ 21(4):211–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Schölmerich M (2013) On the impact of corporate social responsibility on poverty in Cambodia in the light of Sen’s capability approach. Asian J Bus Ethic 2(1):1–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Sprinkle GB, Maines LA (2010) The benefits and costs of corporate social responsibility. Bus Horiz 53(5):445–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Thirarungrueang K (2013) Rethinking CSR in Australia: time for binding regulation? Int J Law Manag 55(3):173–200CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Weber M (2008) The business case for corporate social responsibility: a company-level measurement approach for CSR. Eur Manag J 26(4):247–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Whitehouse L (2006) Corporate social responsibility: views from the frontline. J Bus Ethics 63(3):279–296CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Wiese A, Toporowski W (2013) CSR failures in food supply chains – an agency perspective. Br Food J 115(1):92–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Business and GovernanceMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Centre for Responsible Citizenship and Sustainability, School of Business and GovernanceMurdoch UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations