Skip to main content

Managing Knowledge and Learning for Process Improvement: A Software-Mediated Process Assessment Approach for IT Service Management

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Palgrave Handbook of Knowledge Management

Abstract

As business users increasingly rely upon services from their information technology (IT) service providers, the demand for process improvements in IT services will continue to grow. Although service outcome measures, such as customer satisfaction, may represent the desired end result of IT services, validated assessment of processes provides an important additional element to process improvement efforts, as they may determine actions that could be taken to improve IT services. In the fast-changing and dynamic business environment, IT service organisations must continue to improve their learning processes, create knowledge and implement best practices that allow them to be able to deliver innovative and adaptive value-adding services to their clients. In this chapter, we describe how we applied the software-mediated process assessment (SMPA) approach to assist IT service organisations to conduct process assessments in a transparent and cost-effective manner. In addition, we introduce a knowledge management (KM) process cycle that illustrates how KM and learning processes may be used concurrently to achieve process improvement within the SMPA approach for maximum impact in the IT service management (ITSM) sector. We introduce and discuss three innovative strategies using the SMPA approach to conduct process assessments in the ITSM sector. The practical strategies include (1) adopting the international standards for assessments; (2) facilitating assessments using a decision support system (DSS) tool; and (3) incorporating process assessments for managing knowledge and learning processes. A KM process cycle along with the SMPA approach is introduced. Key value propositions of the SMPA approach are highlighted.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 249.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • d’Armagnac, S. (2015). Issues in the management of embedded knowledge in project-based organisations: The project actor’s role. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 13(4), 446–462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aakhus, M. (2007). Conversations for reflection. In C. R. McInerney & R. E. Day (Eds.), Rethinking knowledge management: From knowledge objects to knowledge processes (pp. 1–20). Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alter, S. L. (1980). Decision support systems: Current practice and continuing challenge. Reading: Addison-Wesley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barafort, B., Betry, V., Cortina, S., Picard, M., St-Jean, M., Renault, A., & Valdès, O. (2009). ITSM process assessment supporting ITIL. Zaltbommel: Van Haren Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan, I. R., Demirkan, H., Kannan, P., Kauffman, R. J., & Sougstad, R. (2010). An interdisciplinary perspective on IT services management and service science. Journal of Management Information Systems, 26(4), 13–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basili, V. R., Caldiera, G., Rombach, H. D., & van Solingen, R. (2002). Goal question metric (GQM) approach. J. Marciniak: Encyclopedia of Software Engineering, 1, 578–583.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becerra-Fernandez, I., & Sabherwal, R. (2015). Knowledge management: Systems and processes. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, K. (2010). Facilitating unlearning during implementation of new technology. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 23(3), 251–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhatnagar, J. (2006). Measuring organisational learning capability in Indian managers and establishing firm performance linkage: An empirical analysis. The Learning Organisation, 13(5), 416–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boal, K. B., & Hooijberg, R. (2000). Strategic leadership research: Moving on. The Leadership Quarterly, 11(4), 515–549.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bontis, N., & Serenko, A. (2007). The moderating role of human capital management practices on employee capabilities. Journal of Knowledge Management, 11(3), 31–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chesbrough, H., & Spohrer, J. (2006). A research manifesto for services science. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 35–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crossan, M. M., & Apaydin, M. (2010). A multi-dimensional framework of organisational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. Journal of Management Studies, 47(6), 1154–1191.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deloitte. (2017). Technology industry outlook 2017. created by Deloitte, https://www2.deloitte.com/us/en/pages/technology-media-and-telecommunications/articles/technology-industry-outlook.html.

  • Fayad, M. E., & Laitinen, M. (1997). Process assessment considered wasteful. Communications of the ACM, 40(11), 125–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garud, R. (1997). On the distinction between know-how, know-what, and know-why. In J. P. Walsh & A. S. Huff (Eds.), Advances in strategic management (Vol. 14, pp. 81–101). Greenwich: JAI Press Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harkness, W. L., Kettinger, W. J., & Segars, A. H. (1996). Sustaining process improvement and innovation in the information services function: Lessons learned at the Bose Corporation. MIS Quarterly, 20(3), 349–368.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (1999). Achieving and maintaining strategic competitiveness in the 21st century: The role of strategic leadership. Academy of Management Executive, 13(1), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC. (2004). ISO/IEC 15504-2:2004 – Information technology – Process assessment – Part 2: Performing an assessment. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC. (2011a). ISO/IEC 20000-1:2011 – Information technology – Service management – Part 1: Service management system requirements. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • ISO/IEC. (2011b). ISO/IEC 25010:2011 – Systems and software engineering – Systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE) – System and software quality models. Geneva: International Organisation for Standardisation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Juran, J. M., & Godfrey, A. B. (1999). Juran’s quality handbook (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapeleris, J. (2010). “Applied” knowledge is power. Published on 29 November 2010, (Blog). http://johnkapeleris.com/blog/?p=502. Accessed 29 June 2017.

  • Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The Balanced scorecard – Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, E., Chadee, D., & Raman, R. (2013). Managing Indian IT professionals for global competitiveness: The role of human resource practices in developing knowledge and learning capabilities for innovation. Knowledge Management Research and Practice, 11(4), 334–345.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kongpichayanond, P. (2009). Knowledge management for sustained competitive advantage in mergers and acquisitions. Advances in Developing Human Resources, 11(3), 375–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kraut, R., Olson, J., Banaji, M., Bruckman, A., Cohen, J., & Couper, M. (2004). Psychological research online: Report of board of scientific affairs’ advisory group on the conduct of research on the internet. American Psychologist, 59(2), 105.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Massingham, P., & Holaibi, M. A. (2017). Embedding knowledge management into business processes. Knowledge and Process Management, 24(1), 53–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murray, P., & Chapman, R. (2003). From continuous improvement to organisational learning: Developmental theory. Learning Organization, 10(5), 272–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman, V. (1997). Redefining knowledge management to deliver competitive advantage. Journal of Knowledge Management, 1(2), 123–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nonaka, I., Toyama, R., & Hirata, T. (2008). Managing flow: A process theory of the knowledge-based firm. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1985). A conceptual model of service quality and its implications for future research. Journal of Marketing, 49(4), 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pertusa-Ortega, E. M., Molina-Azorín, J. F., & Claver-Cortés, E. (2010). Competitive strategy, structure and firm performance: A comparison of the resource-based view and the contingency approach. Management Decision, 48(8), 1282–1303.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power, D., Burstein, F., & Sharda, R. (2011). Reflections on the past and future of decision support systems: Perspective of eleven Pioneers. In D. Schuff, D. Paradice, F. Burstein, D. J. Power, & R. Sharda (Eds.), Decision support (pp. 25–48). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Pries-Heje, J, Baskerville, R, & Venable, J. R. (2008). Strategies for design science research evaluation. In 16th European conference on information systems. Galway.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinn, J. B., Anderson, P., & Finkelstein, S. (1996). Managing professional intellect: Making the most of the best. Harvard Business Review, 74(2), 71–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rudd, C., & Sansbury, J. (2013). ITIL® maturity model and self-assessment service: User guide. Norwich: AXELOS Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schimpf, H. (2015). Competitive intelligence and knowledge management: A study of enhancing the employees’ motivation to sharing their knowledge. Hamburg: Anchor Academic Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, A. (2015). Development and evaluation of a software-mediated process assessment approach in IT service management. Doctoral dissertation, University of Southern Queensland.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shrestha, A., Cater-Steel, A., & Toleman, M. (2016). Innovative decision support for IT service management. Journal of Decision Systems, 25(S1), 486–499.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague, R. H., Jr. (1980). A framework for the development of decision support systems. MIS Quarterly, 4(4), 1–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • TSO. (2011). The Official introduction to the ITIL service lifecycle. London: The Stationery Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsoukas, H., & Mylonopoulos, N. (2004). Introduction: Knowledge construction and creation in organisations. British Journal of Management, 15(S1), S1–S8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H. C., He, J., & Mahoney, J. T. (2009). Firm-specific knowledge resources and competitive advantage: The roles of economic – And relationship-based employee governance mechanisms. Strategic Management Journal, 30(12), 1265–1285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt, B. (1995). The resource-based view of the firm: Ten years after. Strategic Management Journal, 16(3), 171–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, D. (2014). Here are the biggest IT challenges in financial services industry. Asian Banking & Finance, viewed 26 June 2017, http://asianbankingandfinance.net/blogs-opinion/commentary/here-are-biggest-it-challenges-in-financial-services-industry.

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by an Australian Research Council (ARC) Linkage grant. We thank Mr Paul Collins, CEO of Assessment Portal for his support in providing the platform for the DSS tool. Note. ITIL® is a Registered Trade Mark of AXELOS Limited.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Shrestha, A., Kong, E., Cater-Steel, A. (2018). Managing Knowledge and Learning for Process Improvement: A Software-Mediated Process Assessment Approach for IT Service Management. In: Syed, J., Murray, P., Hislop, D., Mouzughi, Y. (eds) The Palgrave Handbook of Knowledge Management. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71434-9_25

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics