Skip to main content

Military Control over Intellectual Property

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Australian Army Uniform and the Government Clothing Factory
  • 162 Accesses

Abstract

Army uniforms have several specific functions, including: to identify the wearer as belonging to a certain nation; to protect during battles; and to signify rank and status. Accordingly, the uniform is of national significance and by law its design cannot be copied without authorisation. The design of the uniform is protected as a part of the nation’s intellectual property (IP). Each new version of the design must be described in detail, entered into an IP system, numbered and sealed. Thereafter it is referred to as a ‘sealed pattern’. However, it cannot be found in the usual national IP registers. By meticulous and often time-consuming searches through archival documents, evidence of a separate IP system has come to light, a system held by the Army’s administration in collaboration with the Australian Government Clothing Factory. Together, they influenced not only the specifications of the uniform’s design, but also the use of specified fabrics, buttons and the like, and the production methods to be used in the manufacturing process. This gave the Army and Clothing Factory the power to dictate processes to any subcontractors involved in the production and the system became a gateway to the introduction of innovation in segments of the Australian clothing industry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    For a detailed analysis of the uniform’s sociological aspects, see Nathan Joseph and Nicholas Alex, ‘The Uniform: A Sociological Perspective’, American Journal of Sociology, 77, no. 4 (1972), pp. 719–730.

  2. 2.

    Barton C. Hacker and Margaret Vining, ‘Cutting a New Pattern: Uniforms and Women’s Mobilization for War 1854–1919’, Textile History and the Military, 41, no. 1, Supplement, May 2010, pp. 109–110.

  3. 3.

    Nathan Joseph and Nicholas Alex, ‘The Uniform: A Sociological Perspective’, American Journal of Sociology, 77, no. 4 (1972), p. 725; Sean Kikkert, ‘Military Uniforms: The Psychological Dimension’, Australian Army Journal, 11, no. 2, p. 245.

  4. 4.

    What follows also applies to police uniforms and some other law enforcement uniforms. See Nathan Joseph and Nicholas Alex, ‘The Uniform: A Sociological Perspective’, American Journal of Sociology, 77, no. 4 (1972), pp. 719–730.

  5. 5.

    The services provided by IP Australia are explained on its website: www.ipaustralia.gov.au

  6. 6.

    Katherine Elliott, ‘Clothing Soldiers; Development of a System of Production and Supply of Military Clothing in England from 1645 to 1708’, Arms & Armour, 10, no. 1, Spring 2013, pp. 30–50.

  7. 7.

    NAA: A4940, C3567, Report from Sir John Allison and Mr. L. Brewster on Commonwealth Government Clothing Factory Requested in Letter from Minister for Supply dated 13th January, 1964, p. 1.

  8. 8.

    NAA: A816, 14/301/486, Commonwealth Government Clothing Factory, C.K. Davies (Chair), Interim Report, p. 1.

  9. 9.

    AWM27, 382/7, Correspondence Concerning the Manufacture of Military Clothing for the AIF, 1916.

  10. 10.

    NAA: MP84/1/0, 1990/2/35, Letter from Lieut.Colonel Legge, Quartermaster General, to Commandant, C.M. Forces of All States except Victoria, 2 February, 1911. The abbreviation D.A.Q.M.G. stands for Deputy Assistant Quartermaster-General.

  11. 11.

    This is evident from NAA: MP508/1, 61/707/39, Department of Army [Cloth & Cord, vide ‘Clothing & Materials’]—Uniforms for volunteer defence Corps [131 pages] [Box 99].

  12. 12.

    NAA: MP222/1, 13 K, Camouflage—Individual Concealment—Uniforms and Equipment, Letter from the Engineer-in-Chief.

  13. 13.

    NAA: MP76/1, 18,315, Inventor/Submitter -] J Burton—Improvement in Jungle Green Trousers.

  14. 14.

    See ABS, Year Book Australia, No. 23, 1930, p. 410.

  15. 15.

    NAA: B1535, 733/1/31, Memorandum from Chief Inspector, Munitions Supply Board to the Secretary, Contract Board, 28 April 1927.

  16. 16.

    NAA: B1535, 733/1/31, Memorandum from Secretary, Co-Ordination Committee, to Secretary, Military Board, 26 September 1928.

  17. 17.

    NAA: MP508/1, 61/716/91, Specifications for Military Clothing, 1937–1941.

  18. 18.

    NAA: MP508/1, 61/716/91, Correspondence between Ordnance Services and Chief Inspector, Munitions Supply Board, various dates during 1938.

  19. 19.

    NAA: MP508/1, 61/716/91, Memorandum from Director of Ordnance Services to Chief Inspector, Munitions Supply, 28 August 1939.

  20. 20.

    Ted Henzell, Australian Agriculture: Its History and Challenges, Collingwood, VIC, 2007, p. 213, based on J.J. Basinsky, Cotton Growing in Australia: An Agronomic Survey, Canberra, CSIRO, 1963, pp. 27 and 103, and quoting W.H. Johnson, Cotton and Its Production, London, 1926, p. 329.

  21. 21.

    NAA: B1535, 733/1/251, Letter from D.M. Davies, Managing Director of Davies Coop & Co. Ltd., to Secretary, Contracts Board, 19 August 1938.

  22. 22.

    NAA: B1535, 733/1/251, Memorandum from Secretary, Contract Board to Secretary, Military Board, 1 December, 1938.

  23. 23.

    University of Melbourne Archives (UMA): The Ballarat Woollen and Worsted Company Ltd., Correspondence—Commonwealth of Australia Department of Defence, Army, Air, Supply & Development, From 14 February, 1941 to 30 October 1941, Letters from the Manager, The Ballarat Woollen and Worsted Company Ltd., to A.V. Smith, Contracts Branch, Department of Supply and Development, both dated 16 May 1941.

  24. 24.

    NAA: B4601/5, 78,243 Part 1, Department of Supply and Shipping, Contract Board, Fixation of Prices of Uniform Clothing—General Policy File, Business Paper No. 1355, p. 2.

  25. 25.

    To determine the appropriate wage rates, Leslie Brewster, Acting Deputy Director of Contracts, carried out negotiations with the Clothing & Allied Trades Union, whose General Secretary-Treasurer at this time (1943) was A.R. Wallis. NAA: B4601/5, 78,243, Part 1, Department of Supply and Shipping, Contract Board, Fixation of Prices of Uniform Clothing—General Policy File, Correspondence between L. Brewster and A.R. Wallis.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

van Mosseveld, A. (2018). Military Control over Intellectual Property. In: The Australian Army Uniform and the Government Clothing Factory. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71425-7_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71425-7_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71424-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71425-7

  • eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics