Advertisement

Can the Presumed Impacts Be Proven? Analysis from a Quantitative Point of View

  • Volker Then
  • Christian Schober
  • Olivia Rauscher
  • Konstantin Kehl
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Studies in Impact Finance book series (SIF)

Abstract

This chapter discusses the methodological aspects of dealing with the data that serve to verify the impact models. First, we outline the basic possibilities and limits of non-experimental designs, each of which has consequences on the time horizon, the costs and the skills needed to measure impacts.

References

  1. AWN. (2011). SROI-Info (Kurzfassung). Präsentation der 1. Studie des SROI für Werkstätten für Menschen mit Behinderungen (Arbeitsgemeinschaft der Werkstätten am Niederrhein).Google Scholar
  2. Banerjee, A. V., & Duflo, E. (2011). Poor economics. A radical rethinking of the way to fight global poverty. New York: PublicAffairs.Google Scholar
  3. BMZ. (2008). Wirkungsevaluierungen. Zum Stand der internationalen Diskussion und dessen Relevanz für die Evaluierung der deutschen Entwicklungszusammenarbeit (BMZ Evaluation Division, Evaluation Working Papers). Bonn and Berlin: Bundesministerium für wirtschaftliche Zusammenarbeit und Entwicklung.Google Scholar
  4. Cohen, G. A. (1993). Equality of what? On welfare, goods, and capabilities. In M. C. Nussbaum & A. Sen (Eds.), The quality of life (pp. 9–29). Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Kahneman, D., & Krueger, A. B. (2006). Developments in the measurement of subjective well-being. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(1), 3–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kehl, K. (2016). Sozialinvestive Pflegepolitik in Deutschland. Familiäre und zivilgesellschaftliche Potenziale im Abseits wohlfahrtsstaatlichen Handelns. Wiesbaden: Springer VS.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kehl, K., & Then, V. (2013). Community and civil society returns of multi-generation cohousing in Germany. Journal of Civil Society, 9(1), 41–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Krlev, G., Münscher, R., & Mülbert, K. (2013). Social return on investment (SROI). State-of-the-art and perspectives. A meta-analysis of practice in social return on investment (SROI) studies published 2002–2012. Heidelberg: Centre for Social Investment, Heidelberg University.Google Scholar
  9. Layard, R. (2005). Happiness. Lessons from a new science. New York: Penguin Press.Google Scholar
  10. Leifeld, P. (2016). Policy debates as dynamic networks: German pension politics and privatization discourse. Frankfurt am Main: Campus.Google Scholar
  11. Miyamoto, J., & Eraker, S. (1985). Parameter estimates for a QALY utility model. Medical Decision Making, 5(2), 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Möller, A., & Schaltegger, S. (2005). The sustainability balanced scorecard as a framework for eco-efficiency analysis. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 9(4), 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Netzwerk Soziales neu gestalten. (2009). Soziale Wirkung und ‘Social Return’. Eine sozioökonomische Mehrwertanalyse gemeinschaftlicher Wohnprojekte, Zukunft Quartier, Lebensräume zum Älterwerden (Vol. 3). Gütersloh: Bertelsmann Stiftung.Google Scholar
  14. Pinquart, M., & Sörensen, S. (2003). Associations of stressors and uplifts of caregiving with caregiver burden and depressive mood. A meta-analysis. The Journals of Gerontology, 58B(2), 112–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Robeyns, I. (2007). The capability approach. A theoretical survey. Journal of Human Development, 6(1), 93–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Rothstein, B., & Stolle, D. (2003). Social capital, impartiality and the welfare state. An institutional approach. In M. Hooghe & D. Stolle (Eds.), Generating social capital. Civil society and institutions in comparative perspective (pp. 191–210). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  17. Salamon, L. M. (1995). Partners in public service. Government-nonprofit relations in the modern welfare state. Baltimore and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Schober, C., More-Hollerweger, E., & Rauscher, O. (2012). SROI-Analyse für die Feuerwehren in Oberösterreich. Project Report. Vienna: Competence Center for Nonprofit Organisations and Social Entrepreneurship, Vienna University of Economics and Business.Google Scholar
  19. Sen, A. K. (2001). Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Specialisterne. (n.d.). Specialisterne foundation. http://specialisternefoundation.com. Accessed September 07, 2017.
  21. Then, V., Münscher, R., Callegari, B., Stahlschmidt, S., Wedemeyer, L., Bungard, P., et al. (2012). Assessing the impact of the mechatronics programme at the University of Agder. A social return on investment report to the competence development fund of Southern Norway. Project Report. Heidelberg: Centre for Social Investment, Heidelberg University.Google Scholar
  22. Then, V., Münscher, R., Stahlschmidt, S., & Knust, R. (2014). Studie zu den Effekten betrieblicher Kinderbetreuung. Ein CSI Bericht unter Verwendung des Social Return on Investment. Report. Heidelberg: Centre for Social Investment, Heidelberg University.Google Scholar
  23. Thümler, E., & Scheuerle, T. (2013). International approaches to measuring well-being. An empirical and theoretical overview. Report. Heidelberg: Centre for Social Investment, Heidelberg University.Google Scholar
  24. Torgerson, D. J., & Torgerson, C. J. (2008). Designing randomized trials in health, education and the social sciences. An introduction. Basingstoke, England and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  25. Van Oorschot, W., Arts, W., & Halman, L. (2005). Welfare state effects on social capital and informal solidarity in the European Union. Evidence from the 1999/2000 European values study. Policy and Politics, 33(1), 35–56.Google Scholar
  26. Veenhoven, R. (2009). Well-being in nations and well-being of nations. Social Indicators Research, 91(1), 5–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. WVS. (n.d.). World values survey. http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org. Accessed September 07, 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Volker Then
    • 1
  • Christian Schober
    • 2
  • Olivia Rauscher
    • 2
  • Konstantin Kehl
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Social InvestmentHeidelberg UniversityBerlinGermany
  2. 2.Competence Centre for Nonprofit Organisations and Social EntrepreneurshipWU Vienna University of Economics and BusinessViennaAustria
  3. 3.Institute of Management and Social PolicyZHAW Zurich University of Applied SciencesZurichSwitzerland

Personalised recommendations