Advertisement

Human Vulnerability Mapping Facing Critical Service Disruptions for Crisis Managers

  • Amélie GrangeatEmail author
  • Julie Sina
  • Vittorio Rosato
  • Aurélia Bony
  • Marianthi Theocharidou
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10242)

Abstract

Societies rely on the exchange of essential goods and services produced by Critical Infrastructures (CI). The failure of one CI following an event could cause “cascading effects” on other CI that amplifies the crisis. Existing tools incorporate modelling and simulation techniques to analyze these effects. The CIPRNet tools go a step further by assessing the consequences on population in a static manner: people are located at their census home; their sensibility to a resource lack varies during the day. This paper improves human impacts assessment by mapping people mobility thanks to the DEMOCRITE project methodology. It focuses on location of people with regards to their activities and the time period (night/day, holidays), and discuss their sensibility to the lack of key infrastructure services. Human vulnerability maps of Paris area during periods of a working day time show the importance to take into account people mobility when assessing crisis impacts.

Keywords

Cascading effects Critical Infrastructure Vulnerability mapping Risk analysis GIS method 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was derived from the FP7 projects CIPRNet and PREDICT, which has received funding from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration under grant agreements no. 312450 and no. 607697, respectively. The contents of this article do not necessarily reflect the official opinion of the European Union. Responsibility for the information and views expressed herein lies entirely with the authors. The authors want to thank the DEMOCRITE (ANR-13-SECU-0007) project that enables the research on this topic.

References

  1. 1.
    Brozović, N., Sunding, D.L., Zilberman, D.: Estimating business and residential water supply interruption losses from catastrophic events. Water Resour. Res. 43, W08423 (2007)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    CIPRNet: CIPRNet project website (2015). http://ciprnet.eu/summary.html. Accessed 11 Jan 2016
  3. 3.
    CIPRNet: CIPRNet Flyer: Critical Infrastructure Research and Resilience Network, 4 pp., 26 February 2015Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cutter, S.L., Boruff, B.J., Shirley, W.L.: Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc. Sci. Q. 84(2), 242–261 (2003).  https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6237.8402002. ©2003 by the Southwestern Social ScienceCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Gibbs, L.I., Holloway, C.F.: Hurricane Sandy After Action Report and Recommendations to Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg, New-York City (2013)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Di Pietro, A., La Porta, L., Lavalle, L., Pollino, M., Rosato V., Tofani, A.: CIPRNet deliverable D7.4 Implementation of the DSS with consequence analysis. Technical report, ENEA (2015)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Amélie, G., Aurélia, B., Emmanuel, L., Mohamed, E., Gilles, D.: The challenge of critical infrastructure dependency modelling and simulation for emergency management and decision making by the civil security authorities. In: Rome, E., Theocharidou, M., Wolthusen, S. (eds.) CRITIS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9578, pp. 255–258. Springer, Cham (2016).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-33331-1_23 Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Heflin, C., Jensen, J., Miller, K.: Understanding the economic impacts of disruptions in water service. Eval. Program Plan. 46, 80–86 (2014). © 2014 Elsevier Ltd. Published by Elsevier Ltd. Editor-in-chief: Morell J.A.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Holand, I.S., Lujala, P., Röd, J.K.: Social vulnerability assessment for Norway: a quantitative approach. Nor. Geogr. Tidsskr. 65(1), 1–17 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    LaCommare, K.H., Eto, J.H.: Cost of power interruptions to electricity consumers in the United States (US). Energy Int. J. 31(12), 1845–1855 (2006). Editor-in-Chief: N. LiorCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Lapebie, E.: Concepts, Systèmes et Outils pour la Sécurité Globale (CSOSG) 2013: Projet DEMOCRITE. Emmanuel LAPEBIE, CEA. Agence Nationale de la Recherche. http://www.agencenationalerecherche.fr/?Projet=ANR13SECU0007. Accessed Nov 2015
  12. 12.
    Luiijf, E.: Avoid enlarging a disaster. Presentation from TNO for Engineers Without Borders, 28 November 2015. 22 slidesGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Nieuwenhuijs, A., Luiijf, E., Klaver, M.: Modeling dependencies in critical infrastructures. In: Papa, M., Shenoi, S. (eds.) ICCIP 2008. IFIPAICT, vol. 290, pp. 205–213. Springer, Boston (2008).  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-0-387-88523-0_15 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Osaragi, T.: Estimation of transient occupants on weekdays and weekends for risk exposure analysis. In: Tapia, Antunes, Bañuls, Moore and Porto de Albuquerque (eds.) Proceedings of the ISCRAM 2016 Conference – Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, May 2016, 17 p. (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rosato, V., Tofani, A., Pollino, M.: CIPRNet deliverable D7.1: design of the DSS with consequence analysis. Technical report, ENEA (2014)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Sina, J., Bony, A.: Livrable n°1: extension des approches vulnérabilité humaine et fonctionnelle. DEMOCRITE report number 150531-DEMOCRITE-ARMINES-Livrable-01-01, 101 p. (2015)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Sphere: Sphere project website (2015). http://www.sphereproject.org/. Accessed Jan 2016

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amélie Grangeat
    • 1
    Email author
  • Julie Sina
    • 2
  • Vittorio Rosato
    • 3
  • Aurélia Bony
    • 2
  • Marianthi Theocharidou
    • 4
  1. 1.CEA/GRAMATGramatFrance
  2. 2.Institut des Sciences des Risques – Centre LGEI, Ecole des mines d’AlèsAlèsFrance
  3. 3.ENEA Casaccia Research CentreRomeItaly
  4. 4.European Commission, Joint Research Centre (JRC)IspraItaly

Personalised recommendations