Locke’s Cicero: Between Moral Knowledge and Faith

  • Tim Stuart-Buttle
Chapter
Part of the Crossroads of Knowledge in Early Modern Literature book series (CKEML, volume 1)

Abstract

From the fourteenth century onwards, the question of Cicero’s philosophical commitments—was he a Stoic or an academic sceptic?—was considered to carry very real implications for a just understanding of religion, morality, justice and human nature. One reason why the correct interpretation of Cicero’s philosophy was accorded such importance by Christian apologists was because, living shortly before Christ’s coming and summarising the insights gleaned by the heathen (Greek and Roman) philosophical schools, Cicero might show how far reason could ‘get’ in the absence of revelation. For John Locke, as for Erasmus, Cicero’s unique insight was that human reason could not establish man’s true end and purpose—in classical philosophical parlance, the summum bonum—with dogmatic certainty: this showed where Christ’s revelation had enlarged exponentially upon human knowledge. The importance place of Cicero in Locke’s thinking alerts us to his preoccupation with the vexed relationship between reason and revelation as the two sources of our knowledge. Locke, as this chapter indicates, turned to the heathen world in order to evaluate the nature and significance of the Christian revelation for mankind’s grasp of moral truths.

Bibliography

  1. Augustine, The City of God Against the Pagans, ed. R.W. Dyson (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  2. Batsaki, Y., S. Mukherji, and J.-M. Schramm, eds., Fictions of Knowledge: Fact, Evidence, Doubt (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2011).Google Scholar
  3. Bouwsma, William J., ‘The Two Faces of Humanism: Stoicism and Augustinianism in Renaissance Thought’, in Itinerarium Italicum: The Profile of the Italian Renaissance in the Mirror of Its European Transformations, ed. T.A. Brady, P.O. Kristeller, and H.A. Oberman (Leiden: Brill, 1975), 3–60.Google Scholar
  4. Cicero, Academica, trans. H. Rackham (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933a).Google Scholar
  5. ———, De Legibus, trans. C.W. Keyes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1928a).Google Scholar
  6. ———, De Natura Deorum, trans. H. Rackham (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1933b).Google Scholar
  7. ———, De Officiis, trans. W. Miller (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1913).Google Scholar
  8. ———, De Republica, trans. C.W. Keyes (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1928b).Google Scholar
  9. ———, Tusculan Disputations, trans. J.E. King (Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1945).Google Scholar
  10. Colman, John, ‘Locke’s Empiricist Theory of the Law of Nature’, in The Philosophy of John Locke: New Perspectives, ed. P.R. Anstey (London: Routledge, 2003), 106–26.Google Scholar
  11. Daston, Lorraine, Classical Probability in the Enlightenment (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1988).Google Scholar
  12. Grotius, Hugo, The Rights of War and Peace; […] from the Edition by Jean Barbeyrac, ed. R. Tuck, 3 vols. (Indianapolis: Liberty Fund, 2005).Google Scholar
  13. Hacking, Ian, The Emergence of Probability: A Philosophical Study of Early Ideas About Probability, Induction and Statistical Inference, 2nd edn (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2006).Google Scholar
  14. Kraye, Jill, ‘Moral Philosophy’, in The Cambridge History of Renaissance Philosophy, ed. E. Kessler, J. Kraye, C.B. Schmitt, and Q. Skinner (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988), 301–86.Google Scholar
  15. Levitin, Dmitri, Ancient Wisdom in the Age of the New Science: Histories of Philosophy in England, c. 1640–1700 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
  16. Locke, John, The Correspondence of John Locke, ed. E.S. de Beer, 8 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1976–89).Google Scholar
  17. ———, The Educational Writings of John Locke, ed. J.L. Axtell (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1968).Google Scholar
  18. ———, An Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. P.H. Nidditch (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1975).Google Scholar
  19. ———, Essays on the Law of Nature, ed. W. von Leyden (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1954).Google Scholar
  20. ———, The Library of John Locke, ed. J. Harrison and P. Laslett, 2nd edn (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1971).Google Scholar
  21. ———, Political Essays, ed. M. Goldie (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997a).Google Scholar
  22. ———, Some Thoughts Concerning Education, ed. J.W. Yolton and J.S. Yolton (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1989).Google Scholar
  23. ———, The Works of John Locke, 9 vols. (London: T. Longman, 1794; repr. London: Routledge/Thoemmes, 1997b).Google Scholar
  24. ———, Writings on Religion, ed. V. Nuovo (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002).Google Scholar
  25. Long, Anthony A., Hellenistic Philosophy: Stoics, Epicureans, Sceptics (London: Duckworth, 1974).Google Scholar
  26. Marenbon, John, Pagans and Philosophers: The Problem of Paganism from Augustine to Leibniz (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
  27. Marshall, John, John Locke: Resistance, Religion and Responsibility (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).Google Scholar
  28. Mitsis, Phillip, ‘Locke’s Offices’, in Hellenistic and Early Modern Philosophy, ed. J. Miller and B. Inwood (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2003), 45–61.Google Scholar
  29. Oakley, Francis, Natural Law, Laws of Nature, Natural Rights: Continuity and Discontinuity in the History of Ideas (New York: Continuum, 2005).Google Scholar
  30. Obbink, Dirk, ‘“What All Men Believe—Must Be True”: Common Conceptions and Consensio Omnium in Aristotle and Hellenistic Philosophy’, Oxford Studies in Ancient Philosophy, 10 (1992): 193–231.Google Scholar
  31. Pufendorf, Samuel, De Jure Naturae et Gentium Libri Octo, ed. C.H. and W.A. Oldfather, 2 vols. (Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1934).Google Scholar
  32. ———, On the Duty of Man and Citizen According to Natural Law, ed. J. Tully (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991).Google Scholar
  33. Rivers, Isabel, Reason, Grace and Sentiment: A Study of the Language of Religion and Ethics in England, 1660–1780, 2 vols. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1991–2000).Google Scholar
  34. Rabil, Albert, Jr., ‘Cicero and Erasmus’s Moral Philosophy’, Erasmus of Rotterdam Society Yearbook, 8 (1988): 70–90.Google Scholar
  35. Schmidt, Charles B., Cicero Scepticus: A Study of the Influence of the Academica in the Renaissance (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1972).Google Scholar
  36. Serjeantson, Richard, ‘“Human Understanding” and the Genre of Locke’s Essay’, Intellectual History Review, 18:2 (2008): 157–71.Google Scholar
  37. Shapiro, Barbara, Probability and Certainty in Seventeenth-Century England: A Study of the Relationships Between Natural Science, Religion, History, Law, and Literature (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  38. Stewart, M.A., ‘Stillingfleet and the Way of Ideas’, in English Philosophy in the Age of Locke, ed. Idem (Oxford, 2000), 245–80.Google Scholar
  39. Straumann, Benjamin, Roman Law in the State of Nature: The Classical Foundations of Hugo Grotius’ Natural Law (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2015).Google Scholar
  40. Tuck, Richard, ‘The “Modern” Theory of Natural Law’, in The Languages of Political Theory in Early-Modern Europe, ed. A. Pagden (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987), 99–122.Google Scholar
  41. ———, Natural Rights Theories: Their Origin and Development (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1979).Google Scholar
  42. Walmsley, Jonathan C., ‘John Locke’s Natural Philosophy’ (King’s College London, Ph.D. Thesis, 1998).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Tim Stuart-Buttle
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PoliticsUniversity of YorkYorkUK

Personalised recommendations