Advertisement

Knowing and Forgiving

  • Regina M. Schwartz
Chapter
Part of the Crossroads of Knowledge in Early Modern Literature book series (CKEML, volume 1)

Abstract

The knowledge that retribution seeks is certain knowledge, gleaned from evidence, testimony, witness and confession. Such retribution is based on inchoate ideas about the justice of hurting the hurter, evening the score, although as long ago as Plato, the insight has been available that punishment only redoubles harm. Forgiveness, in contrast, seeks a knowledge that is inevitably partial, known only by the sufferer; and yet, forgiveness generates new knowledge, that the wrongdoer can be re-oriented toward the good. This process of restoration, toward the good, but also toward the repair of a broken relationship, is a long, mutual process of acknowledgement: of wrongdoing, of pain, of suffering; and it includes rebuke, the calling to attention of one’s moral transgression. According to the Bible, we bear a responsibility to rebuke offenders. Rebuke, from the Bible on through its commentators, holds a key place in the process of forgiveness, and we can see it at work in Hamlet: a play that stages rebuke, rather than retribution, as an effective response to transgression.

Bibliography

  1. Arendt, Hannah, The Human Condition (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1958).Google Scholar
  2. Cummings, Brian, Mortal Thoughts: Religion, Secularity, and Identity in Shakespeare and Early Modern Culture (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2013).Google Scholar
  3. Derrida, Jacques, ‘On Forgiveness’, in On Cosmopolitanism and Forgiveness, trans. M. Dooley and M. Hughes (New York: Routledge, 2002).Google Scholar
  4. ———, ‘To Forgive: The Unforgivable and the Imprescriptible’, trans. E. Rottenberg, in Questioning God, ed. J.D. Caputo, M. Dooley, and M.J. Scanlon (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001), 21–51.Google Scholar
  5. Jackson, Timothy P., The Priority of Love: Christian Charity and Social Justice (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2003).Google Scholar
  6. Jankélévitch, Vladimir, Forgiveness, trans. A. Kelley (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2005).Google Scholar
  7. Kant, Immanuel, Groundwork of the Metaphysics of Morals, trans. M. Gregor (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997).Google Scholar
  8. ———, The Metaphysical Elements of Justice, Part I of The Metaphysics of Morals, trans. J. Ladd (Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1965).Google Scholar
  9. Kerrigan, John, Revenge Tragedy: Aeschylus to Armageddon (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  10. Milbank, John, ‘Forgiveness and Incarnation’, in Questioning God, ed. J.D. Caputo, M. Dooley, and M.J. Scanlon (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 2001), 92–128.Google Scholar
  11. Milton, John, Paradise Lost, Book 9 of The Complete Poetry and Essential Prose of John Milton, ed. W. Kerrigan, J. Rumrich, and S.M. Fallon (New York: Modern Library, 2007).Google Scholar
  12. Morris, Herbert, ‘Persons and Punishment’ (1968), in On Guilt and Innocence: Essays in Legal Philosophy and Moral Psychology (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1976), 31–88.Google Scholar
  13. Murphy, Jeffrie, ‘Legal Moralism and Retribution Revisited’, The Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 80:2 (2006): 45–62.Google Scholar
  14. Newman, Louis E., Past Imperatives: Studies in the History and Theory of Jewish Ethics (Albany, NY: State University of New York Press, 1998).Google Scholar
  15. Nietzsche, On the Genealogy of Morals, ed. D. Smith (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009).Google Scholar
  16. Nozick, Robert, Philosophical Explanations (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981).Google Scholar
  17. Plato, Republic: Books 1–5, ed. and trans. C. Emlyn-Jones and W. Preddy (Cambridge, MA: Loeb Classical Library, 2013).Google Scholar
  18. Posner, Richard, The Economics of Justice (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1983).Google Scholar
  19. Shakespeare, Hamlet, ed. A. Thompson and N. Tylor (London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2006).Google Scholar
  20. ———, Romeo and Juliet, ed. R. Weis (London: Bloomsbury Arden Shakespeare, 2012).Google Scholar
  21. Schwartz, Regina, Loving Justice, Living Shakespeare (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2016).Google Scholar
  22. Siegel, Paul, ‘Christianity and the Religion of Love in Romeo and Juliet’, Shakespeare Quarterly, 12:4 (1961): 371–92.Google Scholar
  23. Steiker, Carol S., ‘Murphy on Mercy: A Prudential Reconsideration’, Criminal Justice Ethics 27:2 (2008): 45–54.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Regina M. Schwartz
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of EnglishNorthwestern UniversityEvanstonUSA

Personalised recommendations