Abstract
The complexity and constraints in which the public administrations have to operate have greatly increased over the last twenty years. It is common (and established) that public administration and public companies in Italy have not been able to understand this change, sometimes assuming a defensive and conservative approach. The ability (and willingness) to translate traditional principles that inform public policy in organization and management models based on performance measurements is missing. The objective of this work is to offer a report of what has been done and a few thoughts on what, based on experience, should not be done. This is framed in the specific changes within integrated water management, highlighting that the model, in the opinion of the writer, is a practical tool that defines and achieves the integration and industrial development processes and their accompanying public service. It is a valid response to the needs of every modern company acting within the market, which is fully projected into the challenging dimension of the Industry 4.0. The work supports the wish to promote a better understanding among stakeholders (institutions, shareholders, investors, customers, suppliers, and, more broadly, territories), as well as in the community of professionals.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Bibliography
Bianchi, C., & Montemaggiore, G. B. (2006). Building ‘‘dynamic’’ balanced scorecards to enhance strategy design and planning in public utilities: Key findings from a project in a city water company. Rev Din Sist, 2(2).
Bortoni, G. (2013). Acqua: Autorità : Rilanciare investimenti, puntare su ‘hydrobond’. La Stampa. Retrieved June from http://www.lastampa.it/2013/06/26/scienza/ambiente/acqua-autorita-rilanciare-investimenti-puntare-su-hydrobond-7414Cyxmuv5mcjQPmqUCaI/pagina.html.
Cavaliere, V., & Rosini, D. (2002). Da amministratore a manager, il dirigente pubblico nella gestione del personale. Esperienze a confronto, Firenze University Press.
Drucker, P. F. (1954). The practice of management. New York: Harper & Row.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992, January–February). The balanced scorecard: Measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review.
Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1996). The balanced scorecard: Translating strategy into action. Harvard Business Press.
Lerner, A. W., & Wanat, J. (1992). Public administration: A realistic reinterpretation of contemporary public management. Prentice Hall.
Neely, A. D., Adams, C., & Kennerley, M. (2002). The performance prism: The scorecard for measuring and managing business success. London: Financial Times/Prentice Hall.
Oliver, D., & Drewry, G. (1996). Public service reforms: Issues of accountability and public law. Pinter Pub Ltd.
Wechsler, B., & Backoff, R. W. (1986). Policy making and administration in state agencies: Strategic management approaches. Public Administration Review, 321–327.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ramazzotti, A. (2018). Implementation of a Balanced Scorecard in the Water Industry. The Abbanoa S.p.A. Case. In: Gilardoni, A. (eds) The Italian Water Industry. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71336-6_21
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71336-6_21
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71335-9
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71336-6
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)