Complications of Biliopancreatic Diversion and Duodenal Switch

Chapter

Abstract

Given the increasing discussion about BPD-DS and its younger sibling the SADI as one of the options for weight regain after a sleeve gastrectomy, it’s very important to be aware of the potential short-term and long-term complications associated with these operations. Early complications include mortality, infectious complications (wound infections and anastomotic/staple line leaks), venous thromboembolism, bleeding, and early bowel obstruction. Long-term complications include internal hernias, GI malabsorptive symptoms, and nutritional deficiencies. We will briefly discuss these complications and their treatment options.

Keywords

Duodenal switch SADI Early complications Late complications Anastomotic leak Internal hernia Nutritional deficiencies Micronutrient deficiencies 

References

  1. 1.
    DeMeester TR, Fuchs K, Ball C, et al. Experimental and clinical results with proximal end-to-end duodenojejunostomy for pathologic duodenogastric reflux. Ann Surg. 1987;206(4):414–26.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Scopinaro N, Gianetta E, Civalleri D, et al. Bilio-pancreatic bypass for obesity: II.Initial experience in man. Br J Surg. 1979;66(9):618–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Angrisani L, Santonicola A, Iovino P, et al. Bariatric surgery worldwide 2013. Obes Surg. 2015;25(10):1822–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Kim WW, Gagner M, Kini S, et al. Laparoscopic vs. open biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: a comparative study. J Gastrointest Surg. 2003;7:552–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buchwald H, Estok R, Fahrbach K, et al. Trends in mortality in bariatric surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2007;142:621–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Weiner RA, Blanco-Engert R, Weiner S, et al. Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: three different duodeno-ileal anastomotic techniques and initial experience. Obes Surg. 2004;14:334–40.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parikh MS, Shen R, Weiner M, et al. Laparoscopic bariatric surgery in super-obese patients (BMI _50) is safe and effective: a review of 332 patients. Obes Surg. 2005;15:858–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rabkin RA, Rabkin JM, Metcalf B, et al. Laparoscopic technique for performing duodenal switch with gastric reduction. Obes Surg. 2003;13:263–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Prachand VN, DaVee RT, Alverdy JC. Duodenal switch provides superior weight loss in the super-obese (BMI _50 kg/m2) compared with gastric bypass. Ann Surg. 2006;244:611–9.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Biertho L, Lebel S, Marceau S, et al. Perioperative complications in a consecutive series of 1000 duodenal switches. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:63–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Magee CJ, Barry J, Brocklejurst J, et al. Outcome of laparoscopic duodenal switch for morbid obesity. Br J Surg. 2011;98:79–84.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Baltasar A, Serra C, Perez N, et al. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy: a multi-purpose bariatric operation. Obes Surg. 2005;15:1124–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Biertho L, Simon-Hould F, Marceau S, et al. Current outcomes of laparoscopic duodenal switch. Ann Surg Innov Res. 2016;10:1.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hedberg J, Sundstrom J, Sundbom M. Duodenal switch versus roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity: systematic review and meta-analysis of weight results, diabetes resolution and early complications in single-centre comparisons. Obes Rev. 2014;15:555–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Abou-Nukta F, Alkhoury F, Arroyo K, et al. Clinical pulmonary embolus after gastric bypass surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2:24–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Carmody BJ, Sugerman HJ, Kellum JM, et al. Pulmonary embolism complicating bariatric surgery: detailed analysis of a single institution’s 24-year experience. J Am Coll Surg. 2006;203:831–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gonzalez QH, Tishler DS, Plata-Munoz JJ, et al. Incidence of clinically evident deep venous thrombosis after laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Endosc. 2004;18:1082–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Gonzalez R, Haines K, Nelson LG, Gallagher SF, Murr MM. Predictive factors of thromboembolic events in patients undergoing roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2006;2:30–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Prystowsky JB, Morasch MD, Eskandari MK, Hungness ES, Nagle AP. Prospective analysis of the incidence of deep venous thrombosis in bariatric surgery patients. Surgery. 2005;138:759–63.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Sapala JA, Wood MH, Schuhknecht MP, Sapala MA. Fatal pulmonary embolism after bariatric operations for morbid obesity: a 24-year retrospective analysis. Obes Surg. 2003;13:819–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Rezvani M, Sucandy I, Das R, et al. Venous thromboembolism after laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: analysis of 362 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2014;10:469–73.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Chan MM, Hamza N, Ammori BJ. Duration of surgery independently influences risk of venous thromboembolism after laparoscopic bariatric surgery. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9:88–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ren CJ. Laparoscopic malabsorption procedures: complications. In: Schauer PR, Schirmer BD, Brethauer SA, editors. Minimally invasive bariatric surgery. New York: Springer Science; 2007.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Rabkin RA. Distal gastric bypass/duodenal switch procedure, Roux en Y gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion in a community practice. Obes Surg. 1998;8:53–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Balatasar A, Bou R, Bengochea M, et al. Duodenal switch: an eggective therapy for morbid obesity- intermediate results. Obes Surg. 2001;11:54–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dolan K, Hazifotis M, Newbury L, et al. A clinical and nutritional comparison of biliopancreatic diversion with and without duodenal switch. Ann Surg. 2004;240(1):51–6.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Marceau P, Hould FS, Simard S, et al. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. World J Surg. 1998;22:947–54.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hess DS, Hess DW. Biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch. Obes Surg. 1998;8:267–82.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Chapter 22.5 - laparoscopic malabsorption procedures: complications. In: Schauer PR, Shirmer BD, Brethauer SA, editors. Minimally invasive bariatric surgery. New York: Springer Science; (2007). (9, 23, 25–32).Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ren CJ, Patterson E, Gagner M. Early results of laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch for morbid obesity: a case series of 40 consecutive patients. Obes Surg. 2000;10:514–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Baltasar A, Bou R, Miro J, et al. Laparoscopic biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch: technique and initial experience. Obes Surg. 2002;12:245–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Buchwald H, Kellogg TA, Leslie DB, et al. Duodenal switch operative mortality and morbidity are not impacted by body mass index. Ann Surg. 2008;248(4):541–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Rissstad H, Sovik TT, Engstrom M, et al. Five-year outcomes after laparoscopic gastric bypass and laparoscopic duodenal switch in patients with body mass index of 50 to 60: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg. 2015;150(4):352–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Kim Y, Crookes PF. Complications of bariatric surgery. In: Huang C-K, editor. Essentials and controversies in bariatric surgery: InTech; 2014.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Lockhart ME, Tessler FN, Canon CL, Smith JK, Larrison MC, Fineberg NS, Roy BP, Clements RH. Internal hernia after gastric bypass: sensitivity and specificity of seven CT signs with surgical correlation and controls. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;188:745–50.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Allied Health Sciences Section Ad Hoc Nutrition Committee, Aills L, Blankenship J, et al. ASMBS allied health nutritional guidelines for the surgical weight loss patient. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2008;4:S73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Picard M, Frédéric Simon H, Stefane L, et al. Complications of combined gastric restrictive and malabsorptive procedures: Part 2. Curr Surg 2003;60(3):274–279; discussion 279–8.Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Strain GW, Torghabeh MH, Gangner M, et al. The impact of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch (BPD/DS) over 9 years. Obes Surg. 2017;27:787–94.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Slater GH, Ren CJ, Seigel N, et al. Serum fat-soluble vitamin deficiency and abnormal calcium metabolism after malabsorptive bariatric surgery. J Gastrointest Surg. 2004;8:48–55.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Gracia JA, Martínez M, Elia M, Aguilella V, Royo P, Jiménez A, Bielsa MA, Arribas D. Obesity surgery results depending on technique performed: long-term outcome. Obes Surg. 2009;19(4):432–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Ballesteros-Pomar MD, González de Francisco T, Urioste-Fondo A, González-Herraez L, Calleja-Fernández A, Vidal-Casariego A, Simó-Fernández V, Cano-Rodríguez I. Biliopancreatic diversion for severe obesity: long-term effectiveness and nutritional complications. Obes Surg. 2016;26(1):38–44.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Topart T, Becouarn G. Revision and reversal after biliopancreatic diversion for excessive side effects or ineffective weight loss: a review of the current literature on indications and procedures. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2015;11(4):965–72.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Tucker ON, Szomstein S, Rosenthal RJ. Nutritional consequences of weight-loss surgery. Med Clin N Am. 2007;91:499–514.Google Scholar
  44. 44.
    Homan J, Betzel B, Aarts EO, et al. Vitamin and mineral deficiencies after biliopancreatic diversion and biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch-the rule rather than the exception. Obes Surg. 2015;25(9):1626–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Parrott J, et al. American society for metabolic and bariatric surgery integrated health nutritional guidelines for the surgical weight loss patient 2016 update: micronutrients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13(5):727–41.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Homan J, Ruinemans-Koerts J, Aarts EO, Janssen IM, Berends FJ, de Boer H. Management of vitamin K deficiency after biliopancreatic diversion with or without duodenal switch. Surg obes Relat Dis: official journal of the American Society for Bariatric Surgery. 2016;12(2):338–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Sallé A, Demarsy D, Poirier AL, et al. Zinc deficiency: a frequent and underestimated complication after bariatric surgery. Obes Surg. 2010;20:1660.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Schauer PR, Ikramuddin S, Gourash W, Ramanthan R, Luketich J. Outcomes after laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass for morbid obesity. Ann Surg. 2000;232:515–29.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Crowley LV, Seay J, Mullin G. Late effects of gastric bypass for obesity. Am J Gastroenterol. 1984;79:850–60.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Iannelli A, Addeo P, Novellas S, Gugenheim J. Wernicke's encephalopathy after laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: a misdiagnosed complication. Obes Surg. 2010;20(11):1594.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Gollobin C, Marcus WY. Bariatric beriberi. Obes Surg. 2002;12:309–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Singh S, Kumar A. Wernicke encephalopathy after obesity surgery: a systematic review. Neurology. 2007;68:807–11.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Skroubis G, Sakellarapoulos G, Pouggouras K. Comparison of nutritional deficiencies after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and biliopancreatic diversion with Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. Obes Surg. 2002;12:551–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Sánchez-Pernaute A, Rubio MA, Pérez-Aguirre E, et al. Single-anastomosis duodenoileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy: metabolic improvement and weight loss in first 100 patients. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2013;9(5):731–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Cottam A, Cottam D, Medlin W, et al. A matched cohort analysis of single anastomosis loop duodenal switch versus Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with 18-month follow-up. Surg Endosc. 2016;30(9):3958–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    Surve A, Zaveri H, Cottam D, et al. A retrospective comparison of biliopancreatic diversion with duodenal switch with single anastomosis duodenal switch (SIPS-stomach intestinal pylorus sparing surgery) at a single institution with two year follow-up. Surg Obes Relat Dis. 2017;13:415–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Topart P, Becouarn G. The single anastomosis duodenal switch modifications: a review of the current literature on outcomes. Surgery for Obesity and Related. 2017;13(8):1306–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Houston Methodist Hospital, Department of SurgeryWeill Cornell College of MedicineHoustonUSA

Personalised recommendations