Abstract
Due to recent technological developments in mobile applications, the use of mobile banking is becoming increasingly widespread. On the other hand, when the investment costs are taken into consideration, the desired level of utilization has not yet been achieved. This study extends Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) with the factors perceived risk, mobility access, compatibility, perceived self-efficacy and subjective norms in order to understand mobile banking use. A survey is conducted in Turkey and 225 questionnaires are collected. A stepwise multiple regression analyses are performed to reveal the determinants of behavioral intention to use, perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. The results of the study indicate that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use and perceived risk have significant effects on behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Furthermore, mobility access and perceived ease of use are the most significant determinants of perceived usefulness. In addition, compatibility is the most significant factor for perceived ease of use.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aboelmaged, M., & Gebba, T.R. (2013). Mobile banking adoption: an examination of technology acceptance model and theory of planned behavior. International Journal of Business Research and Development (IJBRD), 2(1)
Ajzen I, Fishbein M (1980) Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ
Akturan U, Tezcan N (2012) Mobile banking adoption of the youth market: perceptions and intentions. Marketing Intelligence & Planning 30(4):444–459
Al-Jabri IM, Sohail MS (2012) Mobile banking adoption: Application of diffusion of innovation theory. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 13(4):379–391
Amin H, Baba R, Muhammad MZ (2007) An analysis of mobile banking acceptance by Malaysian customers. Sunway Academic Journal 4:1–12
Bulamacı, K. (2016). Mobil abone sayısı 73.2 milyon, akıllı telefon sayısı 41.5 million. http://btdunyasi.net/mobil-abone-sayisi-73-2-milyon-akilli-telefon-sayisi-41-5-milyon/
Chitungo SK, Munongo S (2013) Extending the technology acceptance model to mobile banking adoption in rural Zimbabwe. Journal of Business Administration and Education 3(1):51
Davis FD (1989) Perceived Usefulness. Perceived Ease of Use and User Acceptance of Information Technology, MIS Quarterly 13(3):319–340
Fishbein M, Ajzen I (1975) Belief, attitude, intention and behavior: an introduction to theory and research. Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA
Gu J, Lee S, Suh Y (2009) Determinants of behavioral intention to mobile banking. Expert Syst Appl 36:11605–11616
Gumussoy CA (2016) Usability guideline for banking software design. Comput Hum Behav 62:277–285
Hanafizadeh P, Behboudi M, Koshksaray AA, Tabar MJS (2014) Mobile-banking adoption by Iranian bank clients. Telematics Inform 31(1):62–78
Hung SY, Ku CY, Chang CM (2003) Critical factors of WAP services adoption: An empirical study. Electron Commer Res Appl 2:42–60
Koenig-Lewis N, Palmer A, Moll A (2010) Predicting young consumers’ take up of mobile banking services. International journal of bank marketing 28(5):410–432
Lin HF (2011) An empirical investigation of mobile banking adoption: The effect of innovation attributes and knowledge-based trust. Int J Inf Manage 31(3):252–260
Luarn P, Lin HH (2005) Toward an understanding of the behavioral intention to use mobile banking. Comput Hum Behav 21(6):873–891
Mendez, F. (2016). Mobile banking in turkey: The future of digital banking. https://www.bbva.com/en/news/economy/computerstudies-sciences-and-development/digital-processing/mobile-banking-turkey-future-digital-banking/
Pavlou PA (2003) Consumer Acceptance of Electronic Commerce: Integrating Trust and Risk with the Technology Acceptance Model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 7(3):101–134
Sekaran U (1992) Research Methods for Business – A skill building approach, 2nd edn. John Wiley & Sons Inc., United States of America
Shaikh AA, Karjaluoto H (2015) Mobile banking adoption: A literature review. Telematics Inform 32(1):129–142
Teo AC, Tan GWH, Cheah CM, Ooi KB, Yew KT (2012) Can the demographic and subjective norms influence the adoption of mobile banking? Int J Mobile Commun 10(6):578–597
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425–478
Yu S (2009) Factors influencing the use of Mobile Banking: The case of SMS-based Mobile Banking. School of Computing and Mathematical Sciences, Auckland University, New Zealand, Master of Computer and Information Sciences
Yu CS (2012) Factors affecting individuals to adopt mobile banking: Empirical evidence from the UTAUT model. Journal of Electronic Commerce Research 13(2):104
Zhou T, Lu Y, Wang B (2010) Integrating TTF and UTUAT to explain mobile banking user adoption. Computers in Human Behavior 26:760–767
url 1. (2016). The Banks Association of Turkey. https://www.tbb.org.tr/tr/bankacilik/banka-ve-sektor-bilgileri/4
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this paper
Cite this paper
Altin Gumussoy, C., Kaya, A., Ozlu, E. (2018). Determinants of Mobile Banking Use: An Extended TAM with Perceived Risk, Mobility Access, Compatibility, Perceived Self-efficacy and Subjective Norms. In: Calisir, F., Camgoz Akdag, H. (eds) Industrial Engineering in the Industry 4.0 Era. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71225-3_20
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71225-3_20
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71224-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71225-3
eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)