Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Selecting the Best Strategy for Industry 4.0 Applications with a Case Study

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Industrial Engineering in the Industry 4.0 Era

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering ((LNMIE))

Abstract

In this paper, we try to find the best strategy for Industry 4.0 implementation. For this aim, we determine the aggregated strategies for applying this concept and criteria that are used to select the best strategy. With the criteria set out in this context, basic strategies should be applied as a priority, considering for example human resources, work organization and design, information systems, and effective use of resources, and the development of new business models and standardization are specified. Since this selection is a process in which many different measures need to be considered, multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods based on AHP-VIKOR methodologies have been applied to find the best strategy. Fuzzy set theory was beneficial for coping with uncertainties in the selection process.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Barbosa J, Leitão P, Trentesaux D, Colombo AW, Karnouskosk S (2017) Cross benefits from cyber-physical systems and intelligent products for future smart industries. In: IEEE international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN) 7819214, pp 504–509

    Google Scholar 

  • Beloglazov A, Abawajy J, Buyya R (2012) Energy-aware resource allocation heuristics for efficient management of data centers for cloud computing. Future Gener Comput Syst 28(5):755–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buckley JJ (1985) Fuzzy hierarchical analysis. Fuzzy Sets Syst 17(3):233–247

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Chang WY, Wu SJ (2016) Investigated information data of CNC machine tool for established productivity of industry 4.0. In: 2016 5th IIAI international congress on advanced applied informatics (IIAI-AAI). IEEE, pp 1088–1092

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen JK, Chen IS (2010) Using a novel conjunctive MCDM approach based on DEMATEL, fuzzy ANP, and TOPSIS as an innovation support system for Taiwanese higher education. Expert Syst Appl 37(3):1981–1990

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischmann H, Kohl J, Franke J (2017) Improving maintenance processes with distributed monitoring systems. In: IEEE international conference on industrial informatics (INDIN) 7819189, pp 377–382

    Google Scholar 

  • Forstner L, Dümmler M (2014) Integrierte Wertschöpfungsnetzwerke-Chancen und Potenziale durch Industrie 4.0. e and i. Elektrotechnik und Informationstechnik 131(7):199–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goh KI, Cusick ME, Valle D, Childs B, Vidal M, Barabási AL (2007) The human disease network. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(21):8685–8690

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorecky D, Khamis M, Mura K (2017) Introduction and establishment of virtual training in the factory of the future. Int J Comput Integr Manuf 30(1):182–190

    Google Scholar 

  • Grundstein S, Freitag M, Scholz-Reiter B (2017) A new method for autonomous control of complex job shops—integrating order release, sequencing and capacity control to meet due dates. J Manuf Syst 42:11–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul M, Celik E, Aydin N, Gumus AT, Guneri AF (2016) A state of the art literature review of VIKOR and its fuzzy extensions on applications. Appl Soft Comput 46:60–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta P, Mehlawat MK, Grover N (2016) Intuitionistic fuzzy multi-attribute group decision-making with an application to plant location selection based on a new extended VIKOR method. Inf Sci 370:184–203

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh TY, Lu ST, Tzeng GH (2004) Fuzzy MCDM approach for planning and design tenders selection in public office buildings. Int J Project Manag 22(7):573–584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kahraman C, Süder A, Kaya İ (2014) Fuzzy multicriteria evaluation of health research investments. Technol Econ Dev Econ 20(2):210–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya T, Kahraman C (2010) Multicriteria renewable energy planning using an integrated fuzzy VIKOR and AHP methodology: the case of Istanbul. Energy 35(6):2517–2527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya T, Kahraman C (2011) Multicriteria decision making in energy planning using a modified fuzzy TOPSIS methodology. Expert Syst Appl 38(6):6577–6585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaya I, Kahraman C (2014) A comparison of fuzzy multicriteria decision making methods for intelligent building assessment. J Civ Eng Manag 20(1):59–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein S, Pluim JP, Staring M, Viergever MA (2009) Adaptive stochastic gradient descent optimisation for image registration. Int J Comput Vis 81(3):227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolberg D, Knobloch J, Zühlke D (2016) Towards a lean automation interface for workstations. Int J Prod Res. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1223384

    Google Scholar 

  • Oesterreich T-D, Teuteberg F (2016) Understanding the implications of digitisation and automation in the context of Industry 4.0: a triangulation approach and elements of a research agenda for the construction industry. Comput Ind 83:121–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Opricovic S, Tzeng GH (2004) Compromise solution by MCDM methods: a comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. Eur J Oper Res 156(2):445–455

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Rennung F, Luminosu CT, Draghici A (2016) Service provision in the framework of Industry 4.0. Procedia Soc Behav Sci 221:372–377

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rezaie K, Ramiyani SS, Shirkouhi SN, Badizadeh A (2014) Evaluating performance of Iranian cement firms using an integrated fuzzy AHP-VIKOR method. Appl Math Model 38:5033–5046

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty TL (1980) The analytic hierarchy process. McGraw-Hill, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Sepulcre M, Gozalvez J, Coll-Perales B (2016) Multipath QoS-driven routing protocol for industrial wireless networks. J Netw Comput Appl 74:121–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tuzkaya G, Gülsün B, Kahraman C, Özgen D (2010) An integrated fuzzy multi-criteria decision making methodology for material handling equipment selection problem and an application. Expert Syst Appl 37(4):2853–2863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tzeng GH, Huang JJ (2011) Multiple attribute decision making: methods and applications. CRC press

    Google Scholar 

  • Veza I. Mladineo M, Gjeldum N (2015) Managing innovative production network of smart factories. IFAC-Papers OnLine 48(3):555–560

    Google Scholar 

  • Vinodh S, Prasanna M, Prakash NH (2014) Integrated fuzzy AHP–TOPSIS for selecting the best plastic recycling method: a case study. Appl Math Model 38(19):4662–4672

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Y, Chen K, Zeng B, Xu H, Yang Y (2016) Supplier selection in nuclear power industry with extended VIKOR method under linguistic information. Appl Soft Comput 48:444–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zadeh L (1965) Fuzzy sets. Inf Control 8(1965):338–353

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Zare M, Pahl C, Rahnama H, Nilashi M, Mardani A, Ibrahim O, Ahmadi H (2016) Multi-criteria decision making approach in E-learning: a systematic review and classification. Appl Soft Comput 45:108–128

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial Engineering, Yıldız Technical University, 34349, Beşiktaş, İstanbul, Turkey

    Melike Erdogan, Betul Ozkan, Ali Karasan & Ihsan Kaya

Authors
  1. Melike Erdogan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Betul Ozkan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Ali Karasan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Ihsan Kaya
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Melike Erdogan .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Industrial Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, Macka/Istanbul, Turkey

    Fethi Calisir

  2. Management Engineering Department, Istanbul Technical University, Macka/Istanbul, Turkey

    Hatice Camgoz Akdag

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Erdogan, M., Ozkan, B., Karasan, A., Kaya, I. (2018). Selecting the Best Strategy for Industry 4.0 Applications with a Case Study. In: Calisir, F., Camgoz Akdag, H. (eds) Industrial Engineering in the Industry 4.0 Era. Lecture Notes in Management and Industrial Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71225-3_10

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71225-3_10

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71224-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71225-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation