Advertisement

Agrammaticality

  • Nuno VenturinhaEmail author
Chapter
  • 184 Downloads
Part of the Nordic Wittgenstein Studies book series (NRWS, volume 3)

Abstract

In this paper I begin by scrutinizing classic approaches to the question of agrammaticality, with a particular focus on Frege and the early Wittgenstein, and try to show that a further step is needed in order to adequately address this topic. I then focus on the later Wittgenstein’s treatment of nonsense-poems and claim that the failure of the Philosophical Investigations as a book is actually connected with Wittgenstein’s recognition that philosophy should be written under the form of poetry. The therapeutic consequences of this view are discussed in connection with Deleuze’s comments on Melville and with Read’s comments on Sass, which offer very different views of agrammaticality.

Keywords

Agrammaticality Language Literature Nonsense Philosophy Wittgenstein 

References

  1. Baker, G. P., & Hacker, P. M. S. (2005). Wittgenstein: Understanding and meaning: Volume 1 of an analytical commentary on the Philosophical Investigations, exegesis §§1–184. P. M. S. Hacker(Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Brusotti, M. (2009). Wittgensteins Nietzsche: Mit vergleichenden Betrachtungen zur Nietzsche-Rezeption im Wiener Kreis. Nietzsche-Studien, 38, 335–362.Google Scholar
  3. Carnap, R. (1959). The elimination of metaphysics through logical analysis of language. A. Pap, (Trans.). In A. J. Ayer (Ed.), Logical positivism (pp. 60–81). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  4. Carroll, L. (1994). Through the looking-glass. London: Puffin Books.Google Scholar
  5. Conant, J. (2002). The method of the Tractatus. In E. H. Reck (Ed.), From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on early analytic philosophy (pp. 374–462). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Davidson, D. (1984). What metaphors mean. In D. Davidson (Ed.), Inquiries into truth and interpretation (pp. 245–264). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  7. Deleuze, G. (1998). Essays critical and clinical. D. W. Smith & M. A. Greco (Trans.). London: Verso.Google Scholar
  8. Diamond, C. (1991). Frege and nonsense. In C. Diamond (Ed.), The realistic spirit: Wittgenstein, philosophy, and the mind (pp. 73–79). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  9. Dummett, M. (1981). Frege: Philosophy of language. London: Duckworth.Google Scholar
  10. Frege, G. (1884/1980). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik: Eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau: W. Koebner. English edition: Frege, G. (1980). The foundations of arithmetic: A logico-mathematical enquiry into the concept of number (2nd rev. ed., 5th impr. with corr.). J. L. Austin (Trans.). Oxford: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Frege, G. (1892/1980). Über Sinn und Bedeutung. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophische Kritik, 100, 25–50. English edition: Frege, G. (1980). On sense and meaning. M. Black, (Trans.). In P. Geach & M. Black (Eds.), Translations from the philosophical writings of Gottlob Frege (pp. 56–78). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Frege, G. (1893/1964). Grundgesetze der Arithmetik: Begriffsschriftlich abgeleitet (Vol. I). Jena: Hermann Pohle. English edition: Frege, G. (1964). The basic laws of arithmetic: Exposition of the system. M. Furth (Ed. & Trans.). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  13. Heidegger, M. (1998). What is metaphysics? D. F. Krell, (Trans.). In M. Heidegger, Pathmarks (pp. 82–96). W. McNeill (Ed.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Kant, I. (1998). Critique of pure reason. P. Guyer & A. W. Wood (Ed. & Trans.). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Klement, K. C. (2002). Frege and the logic of sense and reference. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Lugg, A. (2004). Wittgenstein’s Investigations 1–133: A guide and interpretation. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  17. Melville, H. (1996). Bartleby, the scrivener: A story of Wall-Street. In H. Melville (Ed.), The Piazza tales (pp. 15–52). New York: The Modern Library.Google Scholar
  18. Pitcher, G. (1986). Wittgenstein, nonsense, and Lewis Carroll. In S. Shanker (Ed.), Ludwig Wittgenstein: Critical assessments (Vol. 4, pp. 398–415). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Read, R. (2001). On approaching schizophrenia through Wittgenstein. Philosophical Psychology, 14, 449–475.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sass, L. (1994). The paradoxes of delusion: Wittgenstein, Schreber, and the schizophrenic mind. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Schalkwyk, D. (2004). Wittgenstein’s “imperfect garden”: The ladders and labyrinths of philosophy as Dichtung. In J. Gibson & W. Huemer (Eds.), The literary Wittgenstein (pp. 55–74). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  22. Schroeder, S. (2006). Wittgenstein: The way out of the fly-bottle. Cambridge: Polity Press.Google Scholar
  23. Schulte, J. (2013). Wittgenstein on philosophy and poetry. In M. F. Molder, D. Soeiro, & N. Fonseca (Eds.), Morphology: Questions on method and language (pp. 347–360). Bern: Peter Lang.Google Scholar
  24. Smyth, J. V. (1997). A glance at SunSet: Numerical fundaments in Frege, Wittgenstein, Shakespeare, Beckett. In B. H. Smith & A. Plotnitsky (Eds.), Mathematics, science, and postclassical theory (pp. 212–242). Durham: Duke University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Stern, D. (1995). Wittgenstein on mind and language. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Venturinha, N. (2011). Wittgenstein reads Nietzsche: The roots of Tractarian solipsism. In E. Ramharter (Ed.), Unsocial sociabilities: Wittgenstein’s sources (pp. 59–74). Berlin: Parerga.Google Scholar
  27. Weiner, J. (2002). Section 31 revisited: Frege’s elucidations. In E. H. Reck (Ed.), From Frege to Wittgenstein: Perspectives on early analytic philosophy (pp. 149–182). Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Wittgenstein, L. (1922). Tractatus logico-philosophicus. C. K. Ogden (Trans.). London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  29. Wittgenstein, L. (1974). Philosophical grammar. R. Rhees. (Ed.), A. Kenny (Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  30. Wittgenstein, L. (1979a). Wittgenstein and the Vienna Circle: Conversations recorded by Friedrich Waismann. B. McGuinness (Ed.), J. Schulte & B. McGuinness (Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  31. Wittgenstein, L. (1979b). Notebooks 1914–1916. G. H. von Wright & G. E. M Anscombe (Eds.), G. E. M. Anscombe (Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  32. Wittgenstein, L. (1980). Wittgenstein’s lectures: Cambridge, 1930–1932. D. Lee (Ed.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  33. Wittgenstein, L. (1981b). Zettel. G. E. M. Anscombe & G. H. von Wright (Eds.), G. E. M. Anscombe (Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  34. Wittgenstein, L. (1998). Culture and value: A selection from the posthumous remains (2nd ed.). G. H. von Wright with H. Nyman (Ed.), A. Pichler (Rev. Ed.), P. Winch (Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  35. Wittgenstein, L. (2000). Wittgenstein’s Nachlass: The Bergen electronic edition. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Wittgenstein, L. (2005). The Big Typescript: TS 213. C. G. Luckhardt & M. A. E. Aue (Eds. & Trans.). Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  37. Wittgenstein, L. (2009). Philosophical investigations. P. M. S. Hacker & J. Schulte (Eds.), G. E. M Anscombe, P. M. S. Hacker, & J. Schulte (Trans.). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Wittgenstein, L., & Waismann, F. (2003). The voices of Wittgenstein: The Vienna Circle. G. Baker (Ed.), G. Baker, M. Mackert, J. Connolly, & V. Politis (Trans.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidade Nova de LisboaLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations