Progress in medical and dental clinical practice fosters treating even very old geriatric patients with implants. Very few absolute contraindications remain nowadays, and the long-term performance of endosseous implants has largely exceeded initial expectations. In contrast to the environment in which they are placed, implants do not change. In view of the aging population, a paradigm shift in implant dentistry seems inevitable.
Physiological aging is featured by deterioration in vision, tactile sensitivity, and dexterity, rendering denture handling and oral hygiene difficult. In addition, old people often present with frailty and multimorbidity, often requiring assistance with the activities of daily living and a shift in life priorities.
When additional tooth loss occurs, a new restorative treatment is required. Although it is well accepted that age alone is not a contraindication for successful implant therapy, it is increasingly necessary to consider its implications in a geriatric treatment planning.
Monitoring the use and management of fixed and removable implant prostheses in geriatric patients seems mandatory. When functional decline and frailty render denture management difficult, “backing off” to a simplified and less complex restoration with or without the present implants may become necessary.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access
The text of this chapter is largely based on the International Team of Implantology Treatment Guide 9, Implant therapy in the Geriatric Patient (Quintessence, Berlin, 2016).
Newton J, Yemm R, Abel R, Menhinick S. Changes in human jaw muscles with age and dental state. Gerodontology. 1993;10(1):16–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Tokmakidis SP, Kalapotharakos VI, Smilios I, Parlavantzas A. Effects of detraining on muscle strength and mass after high or moderate intensity of resistance training in older adults. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2009;29(4):316–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Schimmel M, Loup A, Duvernay E, Gaydarov N, Müller F. The effect of lower denture abstention on masseter muscle thickness in a 97 year-old patient: a case report. Int J Prosthodont. 2010;23:418–20.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Scott J, Valentine JA, St Hill CA, Balasooriya BA. A quantitative histological analysis of the effects of age and sex on human lingual epithelium. J Biol Buccale. 1983;11(4):303–15.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Müller F, Link I, Fuhr K, Utz KH. Studies on adaptation to complete dentures. Part II: oral stereognosis and tactile sensibility. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22(10):759–67.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Fried LP, Walston J. Frailty and failure to thrive. In: Hazzard WR, Blass JP, Jr EW, editors. Principles of geriatric medicine and gerontology. 4th ed. New York, NY: McGraw Hill; 1998. p. 1387–402.Google Scholar
Katz S, Downs TD, Cash HR, Grotz RC. Progress in development of the index of ADL. The Gerontologist. 1970;10(1):20–30.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Fillenbaum GG. Screening the elderly. A brief instrumental activities of daily living measure. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1985;33(10):698–706.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Mahoney FI, Barthel DW. Functional evaluation: the barthel index. Md State Med J. 1965;14:61–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Guigoz Y, Vellas B, Garry PJ. Mini nutritional assessment: a practical assessment tool for grading the nutritional state of elderly patients. In:The mini nutritional assessment, facts and research in gerontology, vol. Suppl I. Paris: Serdi; 1994.Google Scholar
Sheikh J, Yesavange J. Geriatric depression scale (GDS): recent evidence and development of a shorter version. In: Bring T, editor. Clinical gerontology: a guide to assessment and interventions. New York: Haworth Press; 1986. p. 165–73.Google Scholar
Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. “Mini-mental state”. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Shulman KI. Clock-drawing: is it the ideal cognitive screening test? Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2000;15(6):548–61.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Locker D, Jokovic A. Using subjective oral health status indicators to screen for dental care needs in older adults. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1996;24(6):398–402.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Müller F, Salem K, Barbezat C, Herrmann FR, Schimmel M. Knowledge and attitude of elderly persons towards dental implants. Gerodontology. 2012;29(2):e914–23.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Graves AB, Larson EB, Edland SD, Bowen JD, McCormick WC, McCurry SM, Rice MM, Wenzlow A, Uomoto JM. Prevalence of dementia and its subtypes in the Japanese American population of King County, Washington state. The Kame Project. Am J Epidemiol. 1996;144(8):760–71.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
American Psychiatry Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders 4th edn. Washington, DC: APA; 1994.Google Scholar
White H. Weight change in Alzheimer’s disease. J Nutr Health Aging. 1998;2(2):110–2.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Taji T, Yoshida M, Hiasa K, Abe Y, Tsuga K, Akagawa Y. Influence of mental status on removable prosthesis compliance in institutionalized elderly persons. Int J Prosthodont. 2005;18(2):146–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
Zhang Y, Niu J, Kelly-Hayes M, Chaisson CE, Aliabadi P, Felson DT. Prevalence of symptomatic hand osteoarthritis and its impact on functional status among the elderly: the Framingham Study. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(11):1021–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
Müller F, Rentsch A. Les prothèses de recouvrement supraradiculaires. Titane. 2010;7(4):249–57.Google Scholar
Müller F, Schimmel M. GUEST EDITORIAL: revised success criteria: a vision to meet frailty and dependency in implant patients. JOMI. 2016;31(1):15.PubMedGoogle Scholar