Case Presentation: Implant-Supported Fixed Mandibular Prostheses

  • Samer Abi Nader
  • Samer Mesmar


This chapter will present a clinical case describing the treatment of a lower edentulous patient with an implant-supported fixed prosthesis. The surgical strategies underlining the placement and the distribution of the dental implants will be highlighted and discussed, as well as the concepts that underscore the design of the final prosthetic outcome.

The various clinical and laboratory steps starting from the planning to the completion of the prostheses will be presented. This includes the use of cone beam computer tomography in the planning process to prepare and plan for implant placement, the various impression technics, as well as the computer-aided design and manufacturing (CAD/CAM) of the titanium bar.


  1. 1.
    Malo P, Nobre M d A, Lopes A, Moss SM, Molina GJ. A longitudinal study of the survival of All-on-4 implants in the mandible with up to 10 years of follow-up. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011;142(3):310–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Assif D, Nissan J, Varsano I, Singer A. Accuracy of implant impression splinted techniques: effect of splinting material. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1999;14(6):885–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Papaspyridakos P, Lal K, White GS, Weber HP, Gallucci GO. Effect of splinted and nonsplinted impression techniques on the accuracy of fit of fixed implant prostheses in edentulous patients: a comparative study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2011;26(6):1267–72.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Papaspyridakos P, Chen CJ, Gallucci GO, Doukoudakis A, Weber HP, Chronopoulos V. Accuracy of implant impressions for partially and completely edentulous patients: a systematic review. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2014;29(4):836–45.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Buzayan M, Baig MR, Yunus N. Evaluation of accuracy of complete-arch multiple-unit abutment-level dental implant impressions using different impression and splinting materials. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 2013;28(6):1512–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Papaspyridakos P, Benic GI, Hogsett VL, White GS, Lal K, Gallucci GO. Accuracy of implant casts generated with splinted and non-splinted impression techniques for edentulous patients: an optical scanning study. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2012;23(6):676–81.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Papaspyridakos P, Hirayama H, Weber H-P, Papaspyridakos P, Chronopoulos V, Chen C-J, Ho C-H, et al. Full-arch implant fixed prostheses: a comparative study on the effect of connection type and impression technique on accuracy of fit. Clin Oral Implants Res. 2015a;27(9):1099–105.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Thalji G, Bryington M, De Kok IJ, Cooper LF. Prosthodontic management of implant therapy. Dent Clin N Am. 2014;58:207–25.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Sawdosky SJ, et al. Evidence-based criteria for differential treatment planning of implant restorations for the maxillary edentulous patient. J Prosthodont. 2015;24(6):433–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Phillips K, Wong KM. Vertical space requirement for the fixed-detachable, implant-supported prosthesis. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2002;23:750–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Al-Fadda SA, Zarb GA, Finer Y. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks. Int J Prosthodont. 2007;20(2):125–31.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Sierraalta M, Vivas JL, Razzoog ME, Wang RF. Precision of fit of titanium and cast implant frameworks using a new matching formula. Int J Dentistry. 2012;2012 Article ID 374315, 9 pages.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Jemt T. Three-dimensional distortion of gold alloy castings and welded titanium frameworks. Measurements of the precision of fit between completed implant prostheses and the master casts in routine edentulous situations. J Oral Rehabil. 1995;22(8):557–64.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Drago C, Howell K. Concepts for designing and fabricating metal implant frameworks for hybrid implant prostheses. J Prosthodont. 2012;21(5):413–24.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Jemt T. Failures and complications in 391 consecutively inserted fixed prostheses supported by Brånemark implant in the edentulous jaw: a study of treatment from the time of prostheses placement to the first annual check up. Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1991;6:270–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Yanase RT, Binon PP, Jemt T, Gulbransen HJ, Parel S. Current issue form. How do you test a cast framework for a full arch fixed implant supported prosthesis? Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants. 1994;9:471–4.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kan JY, Rungcharassaeng K, Bohsali K, Goodacre CJ, Lang BR. Clinical methods for evaluating implant framework fit. J Prosthet Dent. 1999;81(1):7–13.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Abi Nader S, Eimar H, Momani M, Shang K, Daniel NG, Tamimi F. Plaque accumulation beneath maxillary All-on-4™ implant-supported prostheses. Clin Implant Dent Relat Res. 2015;17(5):932–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Restorative Dentistry, Faculty of DentistryMcGill UniversityMontrealCanada
  2. 2.Division of ProsthodonticsMcGill University Health CentreMontrealCanada

Personalised recommendations