Skip to main content

Vulnerability Context: A Study on Livelihood Pathways of the Indigenous People

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Livelihood Pathways of Indigenous People in Vietnam’s Central Highlands

Part of the book series: Advances in Asian Human-Environmental Research ((AAHER))

Abstract

The socioeconomic transformation in Vietnam ’s Central Highlands has achieved good results in developing diverse cash crops that have a high output. However, this situation pushed indigenous inhabitants into the vulnerability context of livelihood constraint, which is caused by a lack of land and insufficient key assets. To examine the specific context of the indigenous people, this chapter forms a theoretical framework, which is constructed by three components of vulnerability (exposure, sensitivity, and resilience). More importantly, the actor concept is integrated in this framework to form the core connection of the three components and shed light on the active agent role of indigenous people. In addition, this chapter deals with the main methods, which combine spatial data and survey data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Conceptual works usually bifurcate into two opposing approaches: “biophysical” and “social”, “outcome” and “context”, “current” and “future” (Adger 2006; Wolf et al. 2013), “pre-existing condition” and “tempered response” (Cutter 1996), “internal side” and “external side” (Bohle 2001; Chambers 2006), etc. However, it is not the purpose of this research to review and gain insight into each conceptual frame. For a summary of approaches to vulnerability, the reader is directed to W. Adger 2006 and Füssel 2007.

  2. 2.

    Klein and Nicholls (1999) regard “natural vulnerability” as one of the determinants of “socioeconomic vulnerability”; Brooks (2003), in contrast, regards “social vulnerability” as one of the determinants of biophysical vulnerability. And in a different point of view, Cutter (1996) sees “biophysical” and “social” vulnerability as parallel processes that exist independently.

  3. 3.

    Landsat imagery is available since 1972 from six satellites in the Landsat series. These satellites have been a major component of NASA’s Earth observation program, with three primary sensors evolving over 30 years: MSS (Multispectral Scanner), TM (Thematic Mapper), and ETM+ (Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus) (http://glcf.umd.edu/data/landsat/).

  4. 4.

    MCD12Q1 is derived from observations spanning a year’s input of Terra and Aqua MODIS data at 500 m spatial resolution. Many components of the classification algorithm are applied: training site is revised, land surface temperature is included, and ancillary datasets are used in post-processing (Friedl et al. 2010). The interpreting process, after that, was conducted by a supervised classification. The primary land cover scheme identifies 17 land cover classes defined by the International Geosphere Biosphere Programme (IGBP), which includes 11 natural vegetation classes, 3 developed and mosaicked land classes, and 3 nonvegetated land classes. For ease of use, a number of other classification schemes are also provided by different communities (Friedl and Sulla-Menashe 2013).

  5. 5.

    Supervised classification is based on the spectral characteristics of identified sample areas or training fields (Daniel Müller 2003).

  6. 6.

    Due to specific crops among different study sites, paddy class will be detected in Kontum City and Lak District, and flower class will be detected in Lac Duong, instead.

  7. 7.

    Vietnam’s Central Highlands is a tough study area, as it is a huge mountainous area where it is historically viewed as a remote, isolated area that is difficult to access. Moreover, in recent decades, Central Highlands has come out to be a sensitive area due to some conflicts and demonstrations relating to land rights and freedom of religion in 2001 and 2004 (Human Rights Watch 2002; UNHCR 2006). Therefore, research about Central Highlands, in whatever topics, is regarded as socially or politically sensitive.

  8. 8.

    At every study site, the author had to firstly present herself at the highest government management offices (the People’s Committee) and obtained the contacts with local cadres (in communes and villages). A village in the Central Highlands nowadays is a state administrative unit though it still appears as a traditional social unit controlled by its header. The mixture in the management of its society generated more barriers and confusions to access. The experiences from the specialists introduced that besides asking for the permission from authorities, the researchers should get contact with villages’ headers on the field as the first step to “penetrate” study sites.

References

  • Adger WN (2006) Vulnerability. Glob Environ Chang 16:268–281. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.02.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ashley C, Roe D (1998) Enhancing community involvement in wildlife tourism: issues and challenges. International Institute for Environment and Development, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann J (2006) Measuring vulnerability to promote disaster-resilient societies: conceptual frameworks and definitions. In: Birkmann J (ed) Measuring vulnerability to natural hazards: towards disaster resilient societies. United Nations University Press, Tokyo/New York/Paris, pp 9–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkmann J, Cardona OD, Carreño ML, Barbat AH, Pelling M, Schneiderbauer S et al (2013) Framing vulnerability, risk and societal responses: the MOVE framework. Nat Hazards 67(2):193–211. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-013-0558-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bohle H-G (2001) Vulnerability and criticality. IHDP Updqate 2/2001. Newsletter of the International Human Dimensions Programme on Global Environmental Change

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu P (1977) Outline of a theory of practice. In: Gellner E, Goody J, Gudeman S, Herzfeld M, Parry J (eds) Cambridge studies in social and cultural anthropology. Cambrige University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks N (2003) Vulnerability, risk and adaptation: a conceptual framework (Tyndall Centre Working Paper No. 38). Tyndall Centre Working Paper

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers R (2006) Vulnerability, coping and policy (editorial introduction). IDS Bull 37(4):33–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coleman JS (1988) Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol 94:95–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazard. Prog Hum Geogr 20(4):529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dang TH, Espaldon MVO (2001) Balancing economic and environmental concerns in the pplands of Vietnam: a continuing challenge. SANREM CRSP Research Scientific Synthesis Conference, Athens

    Google Scholar 

  • Dang TH, Shively G (2005) Coffee vs. cacao: a case study from the Vietnamese central highlands. J Nat Res Life Sci Edu 34:107–111

    Google Scholar 

  • De Chazal J (2010) Examining resilience and vulnerability as concepts conditional upon human values: a review. Canberra, Australia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Decrop A (1999) Triangulation in qualitative tourism research. Tour Manag 20(1):157–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00102-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Department for International Development (1999) Sustainable livelihoods guidance sheets. Department for International Development, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Devereux S (2001) Sen’s entitlement approach: critiques and counter-critiques. Oxf Dev Stud 29(3):245–263. https://doi.org/10.1080/13600810120088859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellis F (1999) Rural livelihood diversity in developing countries : evidence and policy implications. ODI Nat Res Perspect 40:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Espaldon DMVO, Phuoc PHD, Thuy NN, Du L Van, Hung PT, Thong LQ, … Ha DT (2004) Challenges on sustainable agriculture and natural resource management in Vietnam uplands: a case study. SEAMEO SEARCA

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedl M, Sulla-Menashe D (2013) User guide for the MODIS land cover type product (MCD12Q1). https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004

  • Friedl MA, Sulla-Menashe D, Tan B, Schneider A, Ramankutty N, Sibley A, Huang X (2010) MODIS collection 5 global land cover: algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote Sens Environ 114:168–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rse.2009.08.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fünfgeld H (2007) Fishing in muddy waters: socio-environemental relations under the impact of violence in eastern Sri Lanka. Verlag für Entwichlungspolitik, Saarbrücken

    Google Scholar 

  • Füssel H-M (2007) Vulnerability: a generally applicable conceptual framework for climate change research. Glob Environ Chang 17:155–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2006.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • General Statistical Office (2010) Socio-economic statistical data of 63 Provinces and cities. Statistical Publishing House, Hanoi

    Google Scholar 

  • General Statistical Office (2015) Statistical yearbook of Vietnam. Statistical Publishing House

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens A (1984) The constitution of society: outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press, Berkeley/Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamzah A, Khalifah Z (2009) Handbook on community based tourism: “How to develop and sustain CBT”. Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation, Kuala Lumpur

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardy A, Turner S (2000) Editorial: migration, markets and social change in the highlands of Vietnam. Asia Pacific Viewpoint 41(1):1–6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickey GC (1967) The highland people of South Vietnam: Social and economic development. The Rand Corporation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Holling CS (2001) Understanding the complexity of economic, ecological, and social systems. Ecosystems 4:390–405. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-001-0101-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Human Rights Watch (2002) Repression of Montagnards: conflicts over land and religion in Vietnam’s Central Highlands. Washington/London/Brussels, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Hussein K, Nelson J (1999) Sustainable livelihoods and livelihoods diversification (IDS Working Paper 69 No. 69)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huynh TPL (2015) State – society interaction in Vietnam: the everyday dialogue of local irrigation management in the Mekong Delta. Bonn University, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Ifejika Speranza C, Wiesmann U, Rist S (2014) An indicator framework for assessing livelihood resilience in the context of social–ecological dynamics. Glob Environ Chang 28:109–119. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.06.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ITTO, & IUCN (2005) Restoring forest landscapes: an introduction to the art and science of forest landscape restoration. ITTO technical series no 23. https://doi.org/10.1890/1540-9295(2005)003[0243:ROFPCI]2.0.CO;2

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ (1999) Assessment of coastal vulnerability to climate change. Ambio 28(2):182–187. https://doi.org/10.2307/4314873

    Google Scholar 

  • Leach M, Mearns R, Scoones I (1999) Environmental entitlements: dynamics and institutions in community-based natural resource management. World Dev 27(2):225–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leisz SJ, Fox J, Yasuyuki K, Masayuki Y, Rambo A, T. (2009) Land use changes in the uplands of Southeast Asia: proximate and distant causes. Southeast Asian Stud 47(3):237–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack N, Woodsong C, McQueen KM, Guest G, Namey E (2005) Qualitative research methods: a data collector’s field guide, vol 36. Family Health International, Triangle Park. https://doi.org/10.1108/eb020723

  • McElwee P (2001) Coffee, Christianity and conflict: an update on the central highlands of Vietnam. Mekong Update Dialogue 4(3):8

    Google Scholar 

  • McElwee P (2008a) Becoming Socialist or becoming Kinh. In: Duncan CR (ed) Civilizing the margins: Southeast Asian government policies for the development of minorities. NUS Press, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • McElwee P (2008b) “Blood relatives” or uneasy neighbors? Kinh migrant and ethnic minority interactions in the Trường Sơn Mountains. J Vietnam Stud 3(3):81–116. https://doi.org/10.1525/vs.2008.3.3.81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser CON (1998) Reassessing urban poverty reduction strategies: the asset vulnerability framework. World Dev 26(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Müller D (2003) Land-use change in the Central Highlands of Vietnam a spatial econometric model combining satellite imagery and village survey data. Georg-August-Universität Göttingen, Göttingen

    Google Scholar 

  • Müller D, Zeller M (2002) Land use dynamics in the central highlands of Vietnam: a spatial model combining village survey data with satellite imagery interpretation. Agric Econ 27:21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niehof A (2004) The significance of diversification for rural livelihood systems. Food Policy 29:321–338. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodpol.2004.07.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyamwanza AM (2012) Livelihood resilience and adaptive capacity: a critical conceptual review. Jàmbá J Disaster Risk Stud 4(1):1–6. https://doi.org/10.4102/jamba.v4i1.55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker J (2010) Structuration theories. Historical developments and theoretical approaches in sociology, vol 2. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203519394.ch4

  • Parry M, Canziani O, Palutikof J, Van der Linden P, Hanson C (2007) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability (Intergovernmental panel on climate change). Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Pelling M (2010) Adaptation to climate change: from resilience to transformation. Routledge, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Prowse M (2003) Towards a clearer understanding of “vulnerability ” in relation to chronic poverty. Chronic Poverty Research Centre No. 24

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietbergen-McCracken J, Maginnis S, Sarre A (2007) The forest landscape restoration handbook. In: Sayer JA (ed) The Earthscan forestry library. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Sen A (1981) Ingredients of famine analysis: availability and entitlements. Q J Econ 96(3):433–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith T, Lynam T (2010) Towards enhancing adaptive capacity for climate change response in South East Queensland. Australas J Disast Trauma Stud 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Sunderlin WD, Ba HT (2005) Poverty alleviation and forests in Vietnam. Center for International Forest Research (CIFOR), Bogor Barat

    Google Scholar 

  • Tahmasebi A (2012) Pastoralism under pressure: vulnerability of pastoral nomads to multiple socio-political and climate stresses – The Shahsevan of Northwest Iran. Bonn University, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • The World Bank (2009) Country social analysis: ethnicity and development in Vietnam, vol 1 and 2. Social Development Unit, East Asia and Pacific Region, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Thywissen K (2004) Comparative glossary for core terms of disaster reduction. Institute for Environment and Human Security, United Nations University, Bonn

    Google Scholar 

  • Tran TPH (2012) Resilience and livelihood dynamics of shrimp farmers and fishers in the Mekong Delta, Vietnam. Wageningen University, Wageningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L et al (2003) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100(14). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1231335100

  • UNHCR (2006) Vietnam: situation of indigenous minority groups in the Central Highlands

    Google Scholar 

  • United States Agency for International Development. (2008) Vietnam Central Highlands needs assessment. USAID

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dillen S (2004) Different choices: assessing vulnerability in a south Indian village. Verlag für Entwichlungspolitik, Saarbrücken

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts M, Bohle H (1993) The space of vulnerability: the causal structure of hunger and famine. Prog Hum Geogr 17(1):43–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wells-Dang A (2012) Ethnic minority development in Vietnam: what leads to success? Background paper prepared for the 2012 Poverty Assessment, Hanoi, Apri, Hanoi

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiesmann U, Ott C, Speranza CI, Kiteme BP, Müller-Böker U, Messerli P, Zinsstag J (2011) A Human actor model as a conceptual orientation in interdisciplinary research for sustainable development. In: Wiesmann U, Hurni H, with an international group of co-editors (eds) Research for sustainable development: foundations, experiences, and perspectives of the Swiss National Centre of Competence in Research (NCCR) North-South. University of Bern, Bern, pp 231–256

    Google Scholar 

  • Wisner B, Blaikie P, Cannon T, Davis I (2003) At risk second edition: natural Hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters. Routledge, London/New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf S, Hinkel J, Hallier M, Bisaro A, Lincke D, Ionescu C, Klein RJT (2013) Clarifying vulnerability definitions and assessments using formalisation. Int J Clim Change Strategies Manage 5(1):54–70. https://doi.org/10.1108/17568691311299363

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin R (2013) Case study research: design and methods. Sage, Thousand Oaks

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Thái, H.A.C. (2018). Vulnerability Context: A Study on Livelihood Pathways of the Indigenous People. In: Livelihood Pathways of Indigenous People in Vietnam’s Central Highlands. Advances in Asian Human-Environmental Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71171-3_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics