For the “Human” Development of Cities in an Era of Climate Change

  • Rosalba D’OnofrioEmail author
  • Elio Trusiani
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Geography book series (BRIEFSGEOGRAPHY)


The connection between health, well-being, and the quality of living spaces is not accidental. The organization of the city and, in general, of social and environmental contexts, is capable of conditioning and modifying emerging needs, lifestyles, and individual expectations. Faced with scientific evidence for these relationships, it is necessary for urban planning to realize that there is no time left to hope that economic growth and demographic change, by themselves, will be able to generate conditions conducive to people’s quality of life. This invitation is energetically shared by the WHO’s Healthy Cities Movement. Through an interdisciplinary group that met between 2009 and 2011, the UCL–Lancet Commission developed a series of recommendations for policy makers to improve the urban environment and to open a discussion on the role that urban planning can play.


Healthy cities movement Urban human scale Well-being Quality of living spaces Climate change 


  1. Barata, M., Ligeti, E., De Simone, G., Dickinson, T., Jack, D., Penney, J., et al. (2011). Climate change and human health in cities. In C. Rosenzweig, W. D. Solecki, S. A. Hammer, & S. Mehrotra (Eds.), Climate change and cities: First assessment report of the urban climate change research network (pp. 179–213). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Duhl, L. J., & Sanchez, A. K. (1999). Healthy cities and the city planning process: A background document on links between health and urban planning. Copenhagen, WHO Regional Office for Europe. Accessed May 31, 2017.
  3. Helliwell, J. F., & Putnam, R. D. (2004). The social context of well-being. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1435–1446. Scholar
  4. Kenzer, M. (1999). Healthy cities: A guide to the literature. Environment and Urbanization, 11(1), 201–220. Accessed May 31, 2017.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Parry, M. L., Canziani, O. F., Palutikof, J. P., van der Linden, P. J., & Hanson, C. E. (2007). Contribution of working group II to the fourth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, UK and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Rydin, Y., Bleahu, A., Davies, M., Dávila, J. D., Friel, S., De Grandis, G., et al. (2012). Shaping cities for health: Complexity and the planning of urban environments in the 21st century. The Lancet, 379(9831), 2079–2108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Sampson, R. J. (2003). The neighorhood context of well-being. Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 46(3 Suppl), S53–S64 (Johns Hopkins University Press).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Seresinhe, C. I., Preis, T., & Susannah Moat, H. (2015). Quantifying the impact of scenic environments on health. Scientific Reports, 5, 16899. Scholar
  9. UN. (2016). Sustainable development goals. 17 Goals to transform our world. Accessed May 31, 2017.
  10. White, M. P., Alcock, I., Wheeler, B. W., & Depledge, M. H. (2013). Would you be happier living in a greener urban area? A fixed-effects analysis of panel data. Psychological Science, 24(6), 920–928. Scholar
  11. WHO. (2016). Global report on urban health: Equitable, healthier cities for sustainable development. Accessed May 31, 2017.
  12. WHO, UN HABITAT. (2010). Hidden cities: Unmasking and overcoming health inequities in urban settings. Accessed May 31, 2017.

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Architecture and DesignUniversity of CamerinoAscoli PicenoItaly
  2. 2.School of Architecture and DesignUniversity of CamerinoAscoli PicenoItaly

Personalised recommendations