Skip to main content

Editors’ Introduction

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Empathy, Sociality, and Personhood

Part of the book series: Contributions To Phenomenology ((CTPH,volume 94))

  • 480 Accesses

Abstract

Recent years have seen growing interest in the work of Edith Stein (1891–1942), particularly in her theory of empathy. This is due not only to the fact that Stein’s work intersects significantly with contemporary research on empathy, but also because Stein’s phenomenological writings shed new light on problems concerning the nature of self, affectivity, and sociality. In this Introduction, we aim at summarizing some important issues surrounding empathy before introducing Stein’s work and the relevance of her philosophical contribution as developed in the original essays collected in this volume.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Most of the essays collected in this volume were originally presented at the conference Edith Stein and Phenomenology held at University College Dublin in May 2015. We are very grateful to all the participants in the conference and to all the authors of this volume for their engagement and interest in carrying out a philosophical exploration of Stein’s phenomenology. We also wish to acknowledge and express our gratitude to the funding bodies that have supported the preparation of this volume: UCD Newman Fellowship, funded by the Catrechetics Trust, and the Irish Research Council Postdoctoral Fellowship.

  2. 2.

    Cfr. Hume 1978: 318, Smith 2004: 15. See also Wispé 1991: 1–16 and Agosta 2014: 9–30. For the affinity and difference between Smith’s and Husserl’s use of imagination see Drummond 2012.

  3. 3.

    “No doubt a tiger or lion feels sympathy for the sufferings of its own young, but not for any other animal” (Darwin 1981: 82). With strictly social animals (e.g. animals that associate together) – Darwin points out – the feeling will be more or less connected to all the associated members. See also Darwin 2009: 228. For an analysis of Darwin’s account of sympathy see Wispé 1991: 31–42.

  4. 4.

    “The more a part of the body signifies what it should signify, the more beautiful it is; inner sympathy alone, feeling and the transposition of our entire human self into the figure we touch, is the true teacher and instrument of beauty” (Herder 2002a: 78).

  5. 5.

    See, for instance, This Too a Philosophy of History for the Formation of Humankind (1774) in Herder 2002b.

  6. 6.

    See Stueber 2006: 1–28. For a critical discussion, see Zahavi 2014: 95–111.

  7. 7.

    See Titchener 1909 and, for the history of this translation, Debes 2015.

  8. 8.

    See Moran 2004, Zahavi 2014, and Debes 2015.

  9. 9.

    Regarding the contribution of imagination, see de Vignemont and Jacob (2012) and Stueber (2006). For a detailed overview of current debates on empathy in philosophy of mind, see Maibom’s Introduction in Maibom 2014.

  10. 10.

    Stein 1986: 172.

  11. 11.

    Wilhelm (he used ‘William’ in the USA) Stern (1871–1938) taught in Breslau from 1897 to 1916. In 1916, he was appointed Professor of Psychology at the University of Hamburg, but, as a person of Jewish descent, he had to emigrate to the Netherlands, and then to the USA, after the National Socialists took power in Germany in 1933. Stern subsequently taught at Duke University and died there in 1938. He was, with Clara Stern, the author of Psychologie der frühen Kindheit (Leipzig: Quelle & Meyer, 1914; reprinted and expanded in many editions). See J. T. Lamiell 2010.

  12. 12.

    Cfr. Stern 1906. See Stein 1986a.

  13. 13.

    Hönigswald was Jewish and was eventually dismissed from teaching by the Nazis in 1933. He was the teacher of Norbert Elias. He published primarily in the area of Neo-Kantian epistemology. Stein mentions his interest in the psychology of cognition, see his article, Hönigswald 1913.

  14. 14.

    See Stein 1986a. Stein wrote a great deal on feminism and especially advocated the participation of women in higher education. See Stein 1996; and Carey 1991.

  15. 15.

    Indeed, the eventual decree explicitly mentions Stein’s efforts. See ‘Erlaß des Preußischen Ministers für Wissenschaft, Kunst und Volksbildung vom 21. Februar 1920’, 50 Jahre Habilitation von Frauen in Deutschland. Eine Dokumentation über den Zeitraum von 1920–1970, ed. Elizabeth Boedeker (Göttingen: Schwartz 1974).

  16. 16.

    The Psychological Institute of the University of Würzburg had been founded in 1896 by Oswald Külpe and in 1903 began publication of its journal, Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie. The Würzburg school generally defended the cognitive nature of thinking and rejected its basis on sensation and association. Külpe was a student of Wilhelm Wundt and his students included Max Wertheimer, Kaspar Ach, and Henry Watt.

  17. 17.

    Stein 1986a: 217.

  18. 18.

    E. Husserl, Logische Untersuchungen, 2 Bande (Halle: Max Niemeyer, 1900–1901). A critical edition, which includes Husserl’s written emendations and additions to his own copies (Handexemplar), has appeared in the Husserliana series (Husserl 1975 and 1984). The only English translation is Husserl 2001.

  19. 19.

    See Stein 1986a: 218.

  20. 20.

    Reinach had completed his doctorate under Theodor Lipps at Munich before moving to Göttingen in 1909 to complete his Habilitation with Husserl. He was a brilliant exponent of phenomenology but sadly lost his life in Flanders in the Great War in 1917. His major work published in his lifetime was Die Apriorischen Grundlagen des Bürgerlichen Rechtes, published in Husserl’s Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung in 1913, now in Reinach 1983. In April 1914, he participated with Husserl in the 6th Congress of Experimental Psychology in Göttingen. He gave an important lecture on phenomenology in Marburg in 1914, later published as Über Phänomenologie, now in Reinach 1989. He is renowned for his work on states of affairs (Sachverhalte), social acts and speech acts, as well as his account of the a priori. According to Stein, he was a brilliant teacher. Originally Jewish, he converted to Christianity shortly before his death on 16th November 1917. Stein assisted in editing Reinach’s collected works.

  21. 21.

    See Husserl’s Foreword to the Second Edition of the Logical Investigations, in Husser 1975: Bxvii; Husserl 2001: 8.

  22. 22.

    Reinach 1989b. See Loidolt 2010.

  23. 23.

    See Bello 2008.

  24. 24.

    See Bell 2011.

  25. 25.

    Scheler, Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik. Neuer Versuch der Grundlegung eines ethischen Personalismus, Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung vol. 1 (1913); vol. 2 (1916), now in Scheler 1954.

  26. 26.

    See especially Stein 2010: 42ff. English trans: 27–34.

  27. 27.

    Georg Elias Müller (1850–1934) was born near Leipzig, where he studied from 1868–1869. He then moved to Berlin to continue his studies, but soon volunteered for the Prussian army. In 1871, he returned to his studies, moving in 1872 to work with Hermann Lotze (1817–1881) at Göttingen. He was appointed to a position in Göttingen in 1876, where he stayed, for the most part, for the next 40 years. Drawing on Hermann Ebbinghaus’ techniques with nonsense syllables, he developed a theory of memory, in which forgetting is caused by interference from later-learned material, rather than from the “fading away” of an original memory trace. He also espoused a version of Heinrich Ewald Hering’s (1866–1948) “opponent-process” theory of colour vision, the main rival to Hermann von Helmholtz’s (1821–1894) “trichromatic” theory. Müller appears to have been quite hostile to Husserl and never mentions him in his publications, see Spiegelberg 1972: 34–35.

  28. 28.

    Brentano and his students played an important role here. See Stumpf 1873.

  29. 29.

    See especially Mulligan 1995: 225 n. 3.

  30. 30.

    Erich R. Jaensch completed his doctorate with G. E. Müller (1850–1934) in 1908. He conducted research on visual acuity and eidetic imagery. He later became a defender of Nazi racial types in the study of personality and, on that basis, took over the editorship of the Zeitschrift für Psychologie. He died in 1940. He corresponded with Husserl and sent him his early studies on perception of faces.

  31. 31.

    Hofmann 1913. Hofmann wrote his doctoral dissertation with Husserl and is mentioned by Husserl, see Spiegelberg 1972: 56. We have not been able to determine when Hofmann died.

  32. 32.

    See Schapp 1976. Schapp studied with Rickert in Freiburg and Dilthey and Simmel in Berlin before going in 1905 to Husserl at Göttingen where he completed his doctorate in 1909. He subsequently had a career in law and published on legal philosophy and the philosophy of history. His book on perception is quoted approvingly by Merleau-Ponty 1962: 229–230; Fr. 265.

  33. 33.

    Jean Héring, born in Alsace, studied under Husserl at Göttingen, writing a dissertation on the a priori in Lotze, and later published an important essay on essence, Bemerkungen über das Wesen, die Wesenheit und die Idee, for the Jahrbuch in 1921. He later studied theology and Hering presented his pioneering thesis on phenomenology and religion, Phénoménologie et philosophie religieuse, for the licentiate degree at the Protestant Faculty of Theology in Strasbourg He wrote a number of texts on dreaming, see Héring 1946, 1947, and 1959. For a brief biography, see Ingarden 1967. See also Dupont 2015.

  34. 34.

    See Katz 1911. A revised and expanded edition was published in 1930 as Der Aufbau der Farbwelt (The Construction of the World of Colour, 1930). In the Introduction to the English translation, Katz records that his empirical methods have now found general acceptance in psychology. He opposed an atomistic approach which was welcomed by Gestalt psychologists.

  35. 35.

    See Salice 2015.

  36. 36.

    See Schuhmann 1991.

  37. 37.

    Husserl published an In Memoriam for Reinach in the Frankfurter Zeitung on 6th December 1917, and a second, “Adolf Reinach †,” in Kant-Studien vol. 23 (1919), pp. 147–149, reprinted in Husserliana XXV, ed. Hans R. Sepp and Thomas Nenon (The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1987), pp. 296–303; trans. Lucinda A. Vandervort Brettler, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, vol. 35 (1975), pp. 571–574.

  38. 38.

    Scheler had published the first edition in 1913 as Zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Sympathiegefühle und von Liebe und Hass. Mit einem Anhang über den Grund zur Annahme der Existenz des fremden Ich (Halle: Niemeyer, 1913). It was reprinted in an expanded edition in 1923. Stein had made use of the 1913 edition for her Empathy book.

  39. 39.

    See Stein 2000.

  40. 40.

    Cfr. Merleau-Ponty 1962: 31.

  41. 41.

    Cfr. Husserl 1989.

  42. 42.

    A new edition of the Ideas II and Ideas III manuscripts are in preparation by the Husserl Archives in Cologne, edited by Dirk Fonfara, as E. Husserl, Urfassung der Ideen II und Ideen III, Materialenband (Dordrecht: Springer, in press). See also Sawicki 1997.

  43. 43.

    See Husserl 1964: 16. See also Kortooms 2002: 19–21.

  44. 44.

    I am grateful to Peter Andras Varga for drawing this essay to my attention in his lecture, “Edith Stein als Assistentin von Edmund Husserl : Versuch einer Bilanz im Spiegel von Husserls Verhältnis zu seinen Assistenten. Im Anhang mit einem unveröffentlichten Brief Edmund Husserls über Edith Stein” [DM].

  45. 45.

    See Stein, 1986b: 226–248.

  46. 46.

    See Elsenhans 1915and 1917. Elsenhans is in a debate with Paul Ferdinand Linke who defended phenomenology in articles in Kant-Studien.

  47. 47.

    Husserl writes: “Sollte die akademische Laufbahn für Damen eröffnet werden, so konnte ich sie an allerester Stelle u. aufs Wärmste für die Zulassung zur Habilitation empfehlen”. Husserl 1994: 549.

  48. 48.

    The original document is archived in the Georg Misch Nachlass at the Niedersächsische Staats und Universitätsbibliothek Göttingen (shelf mark: Cod. Ms. G. Misch 74); a copy of the letter can be found in the Husserl Archive in Leuven. Husserl writes: “Sehr geehrter Herr Kollege! Fraülein Dr. Stein, welche nach ihrem Doktorat fast 2 Jahre lang als meine wissenschaftliche Assistentin tätig war, wünscht sich Ihnen vorzustellen und in Betreff der Möglichkeiten einer Habilitation in Göttingen Ihren Rat zu erbitten. Gestatten Sie mir nur soviel zu sagen, dass es sich dabei um eine wertvolle Persönlichkeit handelt, die ein gütiges Entgegenkommen verdient. Dass ich ihr nicht eine Meldung zur Habilitation in Freiburg anraten konnte hat, im Vertrauen gesagt, darin seinen Grund, dass in unserer philosophischen Fakultät (die der Göttinger philologisch-historischen Abtheilung entspricht) bereits 3 Dozenten jüdischer Abstammung sind, und ich nicht erwarten kann, dass die Fakultät die Habilitation eines 4ten genehmigen würde. An sich hätte ich mir zur Unterstützung meiner Lehrtätigkeit eine so wertvolle phänomenologische Hilfskraft sehr gewunscht. Frl Stein hat sich auch als Leiterin eigener philosophischer Übungen sehr bewährt. […]. Ihr sehr ergebener E. Husserl”.

  49. 49.

    Cfr. Stein 2006. In this work, Stein Adolf Reinach’s theory as found in his The Apriori Foundations of the Civil Law (Die apriorischen Grundlagen des burgerlichen Rechts, 1913), in order to account for the social ontology (soziale Ontologie) of the state, of law and of social acts (soziale Akte) generally. See De Vecchi 2015.

  50. 50.

    See Gaboriau 2002.

  51. 51.

    See Pryzwara 1923 and 1932. Pryzwara supported Scheler’s rejection of Kant and his realism which he thought could be compared with that of Thomas and Newman.

  52. 52.

    See Lebech 2015: 147–164.

  53. 53.

    Stein 2009.

  54. 54.

    Letter to Sr. Adelgundis Jaegerschmid 26th January 1931 in Stein 1993: 82.

  55. 55.

    See Ott 1993.

  56. 56.

    At an open-air ceremony in Cologne on 1stMay 1987, Pope John Paul II beatified Edith Stein, that is, he declared her worthy of public veneration as a genuinely holy, or blessed, person. In Rome on 11th October 1998 the Pope canonised her. In 1999, Stein was proclaimed one of the patron saints of Europe. The Pope wrote that the “proclamation of Edith Stein as a Co-Patroness of Europe is intended to raise on this Continent a banner of respect, tolerance and acceptance which invites all men and women to understand and appreciate each other, transcending their ethnic, cultural and religious differences in order to form a truly fraternal society”.

References

  • Agosta, Lou. 2014. A rumor of empathy. Rewriting empathy in the context of philosophy. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, J.M. 2011. Max Scheler’s secret Göttingen seminars. In 2011 annual conference on Christian philosophy in conjunction with the North American Society for Early Phenomenology and the Dietrich von Hildebrand legacy project. Steubenville: Franciscan University of Steubenville.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bello, A.A. 2008. Edmund Husserl and Edith Stein. American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly 82 (1): 143–159.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carey, M.A. 1991. A feminist anthropology. Women in the thought of Edith Stein. Washington, DC: S.T.L. Pontifical John Paul II Institute for Studies on Marriage and Family.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coplan, A., and P. Goldie, eds. 2011. Empathy. Philosophical and psychological perspectives. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuff, B.M.P., et al. 2016. Empathy. A review of the concept. Emotion Review 8 (2): 144–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwall, S. 1998. Empathy, sympathy, care. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition 89 (2/3): 261–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. 1981. The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. The expression of the emotions in man and animals. Cambridge: CUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • De Vecchi, F. 2015. Edith Stein’s social ontology of the state, the law and social acts. An Eidetic approach. Studia Phaenomenologica 15: 303–330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Vignemont, F., and P. Jacob. 2012. What is it like to feel another’s pain? Philosophy of Science 79 (2): 295–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Debes, R. 2007. Humanity, sympathy, and the puzzle of Hume’s second enquiry. British Journal for the History of Philosophy 15 (1): 27–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. From Einfühlung to empathy. Sympathy in early phenomenology and psychology. In Sympathy. A history, ed. E. Schliesser, 286–322. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Drummond, J. 2012. Imagination and Appresentation. Sympathy and empathy in Smith and Husserl. In Intersubjectivity and objectivity in Husserl and Adam Smith. A collection of essays, ed. C. Fricke and D. Føllesdal, 117–138. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dullstein, M. 2013. Direct perception and simulation. Stein’s account of empathy. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 4 (2013): 333–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dupont, C.Y. 2015. Jean Hering and the introduction of Husserl’s phenomenology to France. Studia Phaenomenologica 15: 129–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elsenhans, T. 1915. Phänomenologie, Psychologie, Erkenntnistheorie. Kant-Studien 20: 224–275.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1917. Phänomenologie und Empirie. Kant-Studien 21: 243–261.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleischaker, S. 2012. Sympathy in Hume and Smith: A contrast, critique, and reconstruction. In Intersubjectivity and objectivity in Husserl and Adam Smith. A collection of essays, ed. C. Fricke and D. Føllesdal, 273–311. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaboriau, F. 2002. The conversion of Edith Stein. South Bend: St. Augustine’s Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallagher, S. 2007. Logical and phenomenological arguments against simulation theory. In Folk psychology reassessed, ed. D.D. Hutto and M. Ratcliffe, 63–78. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Geiger, M. 1976. Zum Problem der Stimmungseinfühlung bei Landschaften. In Die Bedeutung der Kunst. Zugänge zu einer materialen Wertästhetik, ed. K. Berger and W. Henckmann. Munich: Fink.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A.I., and V. Gallese. 2013. Mirror neurons and the simulation theory of mindreading. In Joint ventures. Mindreading, mirroring, and embodied cognition, ed. A.I. Goldman. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Herder, J.G. 2002a. Sculpture. Some observations on shape and form from Pygmalion’s creative dream. Trans. J. Gaiger. Chicago/London: The University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002b. Philosophical writings, ed. M.N. Forster. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Héring, J. 1946. La répresentation et le rêve. Revue d’histoire et de philosophie religieuse 1946: 193–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1947. Concerning Image, Idea, and Dream. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 8 (2): 188–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1959. Quelques thémes d’une phénoménologie du rêve. In For Roman Ingarden. Nine Essays in Phenomenology, ed. A.-T. Tymieniecka, 75–89. Nijhoff: The Hague.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hofmann, H. 1913. Untersuchungen über den Empfindungsbegriff. Archiv für die gesamte Psychologie XXVI: 1–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hönigswald, R. 1913. Prinzipienfragen der Denkpsychologie. Kant-Studien 18: 205–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hume, D. 1978. A Treatise of Human Nature. Second edition, with text revised and notes by P. H. Nidditch. Oxford: OUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Husserl, E. 1964. Vorlesungen zur Phänomenologie des inneren Zeitbewußtseins, ed. M. Heidegger (Tübingen: Max Nieymeyer, 1928). Trans. James Churchill as The Phenomenology of Internal Time-Consciousness, ed. Martin Heidegger. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1975. Logische Untersuchungen. Erster Band: Prolegomena zur reinen Logik. Text der 1. und der 2. Auflage. Husserliana, Volume XVIII, ed. Elmar Holenstein. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1977. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Erstes Buch: Allgemeine Einführung in die reine Phänomenologie. 2. Halbband: Ergänzende Texte (1912–1929). Husserliana Volume III/1-2, ed. K. Schuhmann. The Hague: Nijhoff.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1984. Logische Untersuchungen. Zweiter Band: Untersuchungen zur Phänomenologie und Theorie der Erkenntnis, in zwei Bänden. Volume XIX, ed. Ursula Panzer. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Ideen zu einer reinen Phänomenologie und phänomenologischen Philosophie. Zweites Buch: Phänomenologische Untersuchungen zur Konstitution. Husserliana IV, ed. Marly Biemel (The Hague: Nijhoff, 1952). Trans. R. Rojcewicz and A. Schuwer as Ideas pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and to a Phenomenological Philosophy, Second Book. Husserl Collected Works III. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1994. Briefwechsel, ed. Karl Schuhmann in collaboration with Elizabeth Schuhmann. Husserliana Dokumente. Vol. III. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2001. Logical Investigations, 2 Volumes. Trans. J.N. Findlay, with a new Introduction by Dermot Moran. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Natur und Geist. Vorlesungen Sommersemester 1919. Materialenbände Vol. 4, ed. M. Weiler. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ingarden, R. 1962. Edith Stein on her activity as an assistant of Edmund Husserl. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research XXIII (2): 155–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1967. Jean Hering 1890–1966. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 27 (1967): 308–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1999. Über die philosophischen Forschungen Edith Steins. In Schriften zur frühen Phänomenologie. Gesammelte Werke 3, ed. R. Ingarden. Berlin: De Gruyter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, P. 2011. The direct-perception model of empathy: A critique. Review of Philosophy and Psychology 2: 519–540.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Katz, D. 1911. Die Erscheinungsweisen der Farben und ihre Beeinflussung durch die individuelle Erfahrung. In Zeitschrift für Psychologie Ergängzungsband 7. Leipzig: Johann Ambrosius Barth. Trans. R. B. MacLeod, The World of Colour (London: Routledge, Trench, Trubner, 1935; reprinted Routledge, 1999).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kortooms, T. 2002. Phenomenology of Time. Edmund Husserl’s Analysis of Time-Consciousness, Phaenomenologica 16. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamiell, J.T. 2010. William Stern (1871–1938): A brief introduction to his life and works. Lengerich/Berlin: Pabst Science Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lebech, M. 2015. The philosophy of Edith Stein. From phenomenology to metaphysics. Frankfurt: Peter Lang.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lipps, T. 1909. Leitfaden der Psychologie. Leipzig: Verlag von Wilhelm Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loidolt, S. 2010. Einführung in die Rechtsphänomenologie. Eine historisch-systematische Darstellung. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Magrì, E. 2015. Subjectivity and Empathy. A Steinian Approach. Discipline Filosofiche 2: 129–148.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maibom, H.L., ed. 2014. Empathy and morality. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———., ed. 2017. The Routledge handbook of philosophy of empathy. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. 1962. Phénoménologie de la perception (Paris: Gallimard, 1945); Trans. C. Smith as Phenomenology of Perception. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moran, D. 2004. The problem of empathy: Lipps, Scheler, Husserl and Stein. In Amor Amicitiae: On the love that is friendship. Essays in Medieval Thought and Beyond in Honor of the Rev. Professor James McEvoy, ed. T.A.F. Kelly and P.W. Roseman. Leuven-Paris-Dudley, Peeters.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moskiewicz, G. 1910. Psychologie des Denkens. Leipzig: Engelmann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan, K. 1995. Perception. In The Cambridge Companion to Husserl, ed. B. Smith and D.W. Smith. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ott, H. 1993. Die Randnotizen Martin Honeckers zur Habilitationsschrift Potenz und Akt. Studien zur Philosophie von Edith Stein. International Edith Stein Symposium Eichstätt, 1991. Phänomenologische Forschungen 26/27: 140–145.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinotti, A. 2009. Empathy. In Handbook of phenomenological aesthetics, ed. H.R. Sepp, 92–98. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryzwara, E. 1923. Religionsbegründung. Max Scheler-J.H. Newman. Freiburg: Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pryzwara, E. 1932. Analogia entis: Metaphysik. München: Kösel und Pustet. Trans. John R. Betz. Analogia Entis: Metaphysics: Original structure and universal rhythm (Grand Rapids, Michigan: Eerdmans 2014).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ratcliffe, M. 2007. Rethinking commonsense psychology. A critique of folk psychology, theory of mind and simulation. London: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2012. Phenomenology as a form of empathy. Inquiry 55 (5): 473–495.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reinach, A. 1983. The a priori foundations of civil law (Trans. John Crosby). Aletheia 3 1–142.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1989. Über Phänomenologie. In Reinach, Sämtliche Werke. Textkritische Ausgabe in 2 Bänden, 531–550. München: Philosophia Verlag. (Trans. D. Willard, Concerning Phenomenology, in The phenomenology reader, ed. D. Moran and T. Mooney. London/New York: Routledge 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  • Salice, A. 2015. The phenomenology of the Munich and Göttingen Circles. Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (online resource).

    Google Scholar 

  • Sawicki, M. 1997. Body, text, and science. The literacy of investigative practices and the phenomenology of Edith Stein. Dordrecht: Kluwer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schapp, W. 1976. Beiträge zur Phänomenologie der Wahrnehmung. Halle, 1910; reprinted with a new Foreword by Carl Friedrich Graumann, Wiesbaden: B. Heymann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheler, M. 1954. Der Formalismus in der Ethik und die materiale Wertethik. Neuer Versuch der Grundlegung eines ethischen Personalismus. In Gesammelte Werke, ed. Maria Scheler, Band 2. Bern/München: Francke Verlag. Trans. Manfred S. Frings and Roger L. Funk, Formalism in Ethics and Non-Formal Ethics of Values. A New Attempt Toward a Foundation of An Ethical Personalism. Evanston: Northwestern University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Schuhmann, K. 1991. Husserls Exzerpt aus der Staatsexamensarbeit von Edith Stein. Tijdschrift voor Filosofie 4 (53): 686–699.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 2004. In A theory of moral sentiments, ed. K. Haakonssen. Cambridge: CUP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Spiegelberg, H. 1972. Phenomenology in psychology and psychiatry: A historical introduction. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein, E. 1986a. Aus dem Leben einer Jüdischen Familie. Das Leben Edith Steins: Kindheit und Jugend (Edith Stein Gesamtausgabe, Vol 1. Freiburg: Herder 2015). Trans. Josephine Koeppel, Life in a Jewish Family 1891–1916. An Autobiography. The Collected Works of Edith Stein Vol. 1. Washington, DC: ICS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1986b. Zur Kritik an Theodor Elsenhans und August Messer. In Aufsätze und Vorträge (1911–1921), 226–248. Husserliana XXV, ed. Tom Nenon and Hans Rainer Sepp. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1993. Selbstbildnis in Briefen. Erster Teil 1916–1933 (Edith Stein Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 2. Freiburg: Herder, 2010). Trans. Josephine Koeppel, Self-Portrait in Letters, 1916–1942. The Collected Works of Edith Stein, Volume Five. Washington, DC: ICS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 1996. Essays on Woman. Washington, DC: ICS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2000. Beiträge zur philosophischen Begründung der Psychologie und der Geisteswissenschaften. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung. Vol. 5 (Edith Stein Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 6. Freiburg: Herder). Trans. Philosophy of Psychology and the Humanities. Washington, DC: ICS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2002. Endliches und Ewiges Sein. Versuch eines Aufstiegs zum Sinn des Seins (Edith Stein Gesamtausgabe, Voll. 11–12. Herder, Freiburg, 1986). Trans. Kurt F. Reinhardt, Finite and Eternal Being. An Attempt at an Ascent to the Meaning of Being. The Collected Works of Edith Stein. Washington, DC: ICS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2006. Eine Untersuchung über den Staat. Jahrbuch für Philosophie und phänomenologische Forschung 7 (Edith Stein Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 7. Freiburg: Herder, 2006). Trans. Marianne Sawicki, An Investigation Concerning the State. Washington, DC: ICS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2009. Potenz und Akt. Studien zu einer Philosophie des Seins (Edith Stein Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 10. Freiburg: Herder, 2010). Trans. L. Gelber and R. Leuven, Potency and Act: Studies Towards a Philosophy of Being. The Collected Works of Edith Stein. Washington, DC.: ICS Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2010. Zum Problem der Einfühlung. Edith Stein Gesamtausgabe, Vol. 5. Freiburg: Herder. Trans. W. Stein, On the Problem of Empathy. 3rd rev. ed. Dordrecht: Springer 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2015. Der Aufbau der menschlichen Person. Vorlesungen zur philosophische Anthropologie. Münster 1932/1933. Edith Stein Gesamtausgabe, vol. 14. Freiburg: Herder.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stern, W. 1906. Person und Sache: System der Philosophischen Weltanschauung. Leipzig: Ambrosius Barth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stueber, K.R. 2006. Rediscovering empathy. Agency, folk-psychology, and the human sciences. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stumpf, C. 1873. Über den psychologischen Ursprung der Raumvorstellung. Leipzig.

    Google Scholar 

  • Szanto, T., and D. Moran. 2015. Special issue on Empathy and collective intentionality. The Social Philosophy of Edith Stein. Human Studies. 38 (4).

    Google Scholar 

  • Titchener, E. 1909. Lectures on the experimental psychology of thought-process. New York: MacMillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Vischer, R. 1994. On the optical sense of form: A contribution to aesthetics. In Empathy, form, and space. Problems in German aesthetics, 1873–1893. Trans. H. F. Mallgrave and E. Ikonomou. Santa Monica CA: The Getty Center for the History of Art and the Humanities.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walther, G. 1960. Zum Anderen Ufer. Vom Marxismus und Atheismus zum Christentum. Remagen: Otto Reichl Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wispé, L. 1991. The psychology of sympathy. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zahavi, D. 2005. Subjectivity and selfhood. Investigating the first-person perspective. Cambridge MA: MIT.

    Google Scholar 

  • ———. 2014. Self and other. Exploring subjectivity, empathy, and shame. Oxford: OUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elisa Magrì .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Magrì, E., Moran, D. (2017). Editors’ Introduction. In: Magrì, E., Moran, D. (eds) Empathy, Sociality, and Personhood. Contributions To Phenomenology, vol 94. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71096-9_1

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics