The Drone Sector in Europe

Open Access
Chapter
Part of the SpringerBriefs in Law book series (BRIEFSLAW)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to review the industry sector in Europe, which involves big companies as well as SMEs. The leading European countries, the main competitors, and the main competitive advantages of the industry are analysed. We have identified five different segments in which companies compete based on distinctive features (toys, hobby/leisure, professional, commercial, and military). The homogenization of the industry, especially in the toy, hobby, and commercial subsectors, is mainly led by big companies, which at the same time also represent the largest market share. We have concluded that there are no entry barriers besides technology and commercial distribution, but the main difficulty that is hampering the industry’s expansion is regulation. This affects in particular the hobby/leisure and commercial drone segments, some areas more than others; while agricultural and military drones are expanding and evolving rapidly, professional filming and photography and toys are still too dependent on safety or legal issues, such as privacy concerns. It is also remarkable that companies from China and the USA are reaching the top positions. This should be taken into consideration by European policy makers, as the decisions made in the next years will be the key to the development of the sector in Europe.

1 Introduction

Why is it important to analyse the drone market first? There are two main reasons. Firstly, it illustrates the potential of this steadily growing market, which, due to the lack of unification of national laws in a common European regulation, is not fully exploited. Secondly, it shows why it is so difficult to reach a common agreement: tens of drone application and thus drone characteristics (e.g., size, weight, engine power, range of the aircraft, etc.) exist. Thus, before regulating markets (drones), first the market has to be described and analysed in detail to find a proper solution that pleases all: industry, governments, the military, researchers, and the general public.

How can we define the drone industry? This question needs to be answered to structure the information, since up to now information regarding drones has not been easy to find. This might be because the regulations do not fully support their use, because military uses are still the most common ones and the army industry treats everything as strictly secret, because technology is developing so fast that sharing information would help competitors, or because the rise of the industry is so fast that there is no time to analyse data and research the insights or to disseminate news.

Although difficulties exist, we will retrieve information regarding the drone industry and restructure it to try to provide readers with an engaging chapter that helps them to understand the main facts, characteristics, and strategic opportunities that the industry currently offers.

The Cambridge English Dictionary offers two definitions of a drone:
  • an aircraft that does not have a pilot but is controlled by someone on the ground and is used especially for dropping bombs or for surveillance (meaning careful watching of a place);

  • an aircraft without a pilot that is controlled by someone on the ground and is used especially as a hobby.

These definitions are very useful, as they clarify not only the meaning but also the main uses of drones. In the second definition, we could include different uses that have recently appeared, such as safety purposes, transport and delivery, and so on. As there is no unique word to name an aircraft without a pilot, it is also quite usual to find the following definitions:
  • UAV (Unmanned Aerial Vehicle)

  • UAS (Unmanned Aerial System)

  • UCAV (Unmanned Combat Aerial Vehicle)

  • RPA (Remotely Piloted Aircraft)

  • RPAS (Remotely Piloted Aircraft System).

Drone and UAV/UAS are commonly used to refer to military uses and RPA/RPAS to name drones with civilian purposes.

Although drones seem to be a very modern invention and there is no consensus regarding the first use of a drone, it seems that drones started to be used for military purposes. The first patent for a “Method of and apparatus for controlling mechanism of moving vessels or vehicles” was filed by Nikola Tesla in 1898 (Infographic 2016), although it was in 1951 that the first prototypes of Ryan’s Q-2C Firebee pilotless aircraft were tested. Designed by the company Ryan Aeronautical as a target contract from the North American Air Force, this drone was in production for over 40 years and is still being used by some military organizations (San Diego Air and Space Museum 2017).

Nowadays, different patents are being filed that are as specific as drones without propellers (application number KR20150177849 20151214) or drones capable of operating in an aqueous environment (application number US201614994662 20160113), showing how interesting the industry can be for new companies and new business ideas.

2 Overview of the Drone Sector

The use of drones has been growing during the last years, and the two main market segments (military and hobby/leisure) have turned into three, depending on their final uses: military, commercial, and hobby. Figure 1 presents the estimated evolution of the three segments. Although the military segment is the main market by value, the figure indicates that the other two segments will expand during the next years.
Fig. 1

Estimated value of drone market segments worldwide, 2016–2010 (mill. US$).

Source Own elaboration from data of Moe et al. (2016)

Although the use of drones has generated considerable controversy due to privacy and safety awareness, nowadays people’s perceptions about “good” uses of drones related to civil uses (commercial and hobby) have changed their image and acceptance (Table 1). Among the accepted uses of unmanned aerial vehicles, we may cite those related to health (transport of blood and defibrillators), humanitarian actions (drones for social goods and humanitarian purposes), shipping products to customers (Amazon’s fleet of drones), or ecological applications (surveying fauna and forest monitoring), among others.
Table 1

Acceptable drone applications

Accepted uses

Source

Use

Amukele et al. (2017)

Blood transportation

Hardy et al. (2017)

Mapping malaria vector habitats

Pulver et al. (2016)

Transporting automated external defibrillators

Chabot and Francis (2016)

Bird detection

Hodgson et al. (2017)

Surveying marine fauna

Sankey et al. (2017)

Forest monitoring

Casella et al. (2017)

Mapping coral reefs

Szantol et al. (2017)

Mapping orangutan habitat

Chowdhury et al. (2017)

Disaster response and relief

Restas (2015)

Supporting disaster management (earthquakes, floods, fires)

Source Own elaboration from different sources

However, not only are the applications of drones evolving; the expected revenue increase in the next 10 years is also impressive. According to Tractica (2017c), the greatest evolution will take place in North America, Asia, and Europe, which are also the areas of the market leaders nowadays.

The industry is growing fast, driven mainly by technology. The number of drone-specific exhibitions and conferences is rising (for instance UAV Expo in Brussels or AUVSI’s Xponential in the USA), and rapid industry developments are evident. Some examples are drones with robotic arms that can grab objects and magnetic pieces containing drone engines that can be adjusted to objects and turn them into drones (prototypes by Prodrone, a Japanese company). Additionally, though, safety and research are leading the change, and interesting conclusions are being drawn; indeed, the British company Consortiq’s CQNet, by collecting and analysing data, defines landing with minimal battery charge as the main reason for the lack of drone safety. The possibilities of the industry are immense, and currently the regulatory barrier (Pauner et al. 2015) seems to be the main impediment to the drone industry taking off definitively (Fig. 2).
Fig. 2

Projected commercial drone revenue from 2015 to 2025 (in million US dollars).

Source Own elaboration from data of Tractica (2017c)

Regarding manufacturers, China’s DJI followed by the French Parrot occupy the top positions, according to Droneii (2016a), followed by Chinese and North American companies, as reflected in Fig. 3.
Fig. 3

Drone company ranking, Q3 2016 (Droneii 2016a), with permission of the company (https://www.droneii.com/top20-drone-company-ranking-q3-2016)

3 Market Segments

Segmentation is a market strategy focused on the consumer side, which allows a better fit between products and users’ requirements (Smith 1956). A firm that follows a market segmentation strategy is expected to increase its profitability (Wind 1978), although an empirical study is needed. In this study the basic demographic data, such as customer characteristics, users’ needs, final use, and so on, are necessary to determine the different existing segments. This goal of this study is to identify and classify the market segments or “sets of buyers” that indeed will be the industry’s target groups and will define companies’ marketing strategies (Venter et al. 2015).

Markets for drones tend to be segmented in relation to their use, which also corresponds to price ranges. Generally, the sector is structured in three groups: military, commercial, and hobby. For our analysis, however, we have divided the market into five groups (Table 2), which we have defined after taking into consideration the theoretical market segmentation background.
Table 2

Market segments for drones

Use

Customer target

Price (€)

Example of drones

Group 1—Toys

Children

49.95

X_DRONE_ATOM_221

Group 2—Hobby

Young people and adults

179.99

Cheerson CX 20

Group 3—Professional

Professionals (for aerial filming and photography services)

4875

549

DJI Inspire 1 Pro

Parrot BEBOP 2 FPV

Group 4—Commercial

Companies in industries such as agriculture, media, mining, energy, construction, etc.

19,921.2

10,172.5

Altura Zenith (Aerialtronics)

Alta 6 (Freefly)

Group 5—Military

Governments

Not available

RQ-2A Pioneer

Sources Teal Group (2013), Tractica (2016, 2017a), and own elaboration through an analysis of the companies in the sector

Forecasting undertaken for the industry by the Teal Group (2013) and Tractica (2016, 2017a), among others, predicts future growth for all the market segments. For example, concerning the hobby segment, Tractica (2016) indicates that the revenue worldwide amounted to US$1865.65 million in the year 2015. Moreover, it estimates that the revenue for this segment will be US$3528.73 million in 2018 and US$5031.36 million in 2022. In relation to the military segment, the Teal Group (2013) estimates that the production value worldwide will be US$2629.1 million in 2015, while it will be US$4075.4 million in 2018 and US$8076.4 million in 2022.

The use of drones for commercial purposes in outdoor environments has increased in recent years, and this tendency will continue in the future. Their use for commercial purposes means their use in sectors such as infrastructure, transport, insurance, media and entertainment, telecommunications, agriculture, security, and mining (PwC 2016). Tractica (2017c) indicates that the worldwide revenue for commercial drones was US$452.43 million in the year 2015. It estimates that the revenue will be US$1110.59 million in 2018 and US$5334.68 million in 2022.

Figure 4 shows that the highest estimated growth in the next years will occur in the commercial segment; that is, companies in other industries will demand more drones for monitoring activities, mapping, and surveying (Narkus-Kramer 2017). In the future more industries will probably find new applications for drones that the current technology does not allow; then drone manufacturers will offer these features in their products (Ott 2012). Movement to the commercial segments can be detected nowadays in companies such as DJI, which has started to partner with other companies to offer drones with software specializing in agriculture, mining, and construction.
Fig. 4

Estimated growth for segments in the next years.

Source Own elaboration from data of the Teal Group (2013) and Tractica (2016, 2017c)

Focusing on the European market, Table 3 might explain why companies are interested in the drone industry and are developing specific software for drones. The turnover data show that the highest values are for energy, construction, agriculture, real estate, and transport. However, if we consider turnover by firm, interesting markets for drone manufacturers will be energy, water and waste, postal and courier activities, telecommunication, and mining. All these sectors are currently target markets for drone manufacturers.
Table 3

European data related to industries in which outdoor drones can be used (EU 20 countries 2014)

Sector

Number of firms

Turnovera

Largest number of firms

Largest turnover

Electricity, gas, steam, and air conditioning supply

87,465

1,478,875.8

France, Spain, Italy, Czech Republic

Germany, Italy, United Kingdom, France

Water supply; sewerage, waste management, and remediation activities

75,738

253,000.0

France, Italy, Poland

Germany, United Kingdom, France, Italy

Construction

3,441,304

1,577,430.1

France, Italy, Spain, Germany, United Kingdom

France, United Kingdom, Germany, Italy

Land transport and transport via pipelines

916,520

530,000.0

Spain, Poland, Italy, France

Germany, France, United Kingdom, Italy

Postal and courier activities

65,800

110,000.0

United Kingdom, Germany, Netherlands, Spain

Germany, United Kingdom, France

Insurance

n.a.

n.a.

Germany, France, Spain

Germany, France, Italy

Motion picture, video, and TV programme production; sound recording and music publishing activities

138,246

70,573.2

France, United Kingdom, Netherlands, Sweden, Germany

United Kingdom, France, Germany

Advertising and market research

300,440

160,000.0

Netherlands, Germany, France, Spain

United Kingdom, Germany, France

Telecommunication

45,377

378,000.0

United Kingdom, Poland, France, Spain, Italy

United Kingdom, France, Germany

Agriculture

178,126.54b

418,713.55c

France, Spain, United Kingdom, Germany

France, Germany, Italy, Spain, United Kingdom

Security and investigation activities

56,000

46,000.0

France, United Kingdom, Hungary, Germany

United Kingdom, France, Germany

Mining and quarrying

19,237

223,983.5

Italy, Germany, Spain, France, Poland, Romania, Portugal

Norway, Italy, United Kingdom, Netherlands

Architectural and engineering activities; technical testing and analysis

1,005,668

329,000.0

Italy, Germany, France, Spain, United Kingdom

United Kingdom, Germany, France

Real estate activities

1,369,456

484,231.4

Germany, Italy, France, Spain

Germany, France, United Kingdom

Source Eurostat

aMillions €

bUtilized agricultural area (thousands of hectares)

cOutput of the agricultural industry at basic prices (after taxes but including subsidies; million €)

4 Main Competitors in the Sector

Competitors in the drone sector operate globally, and this environment increases the rivalry in the market. To obtain a list of competitors in the industry, we used different lists obtained from sources specialized in the field (PwC 2016; Droneii 2016a) and a statistical database (Statista).

Through the analysis of the information on the web pages of the companies in these lists, including the products offered by the companies and their prices, we have organized the competitors using the same groups of markets as defined in Sect. 2. Therefore, we have established five groups of competitors depending on the market segment in which they sell their products (Tables 4, 5, 6, 7, 8):
Table 4

Manufacturers and their products in Group 1 (Toys)

Company

Country

Drone models

Prices (€)

Sells through own website

Sells through Amazon

Sells through others

(e.g.)

Support

Parrot

France

Minidrones (different names)

100–130

Yes

Yes

www.droneprix.es

Email, phone

AR Drone

180

Extreme Flyers

UK

Micro Drone 3.0

172

Yes

Not available

No

Community

Syma Toys

China

X8 (different models)

150

No

Yes

aliexpress.com

tomtop.com

Email, phone

Cheerson

China

Different models

42–110

Yes

Yes

aliexpress.com

tomtop.com

Email, website

UDI RC

China

Different models

50–160

No

Yes

tomtop.com

Email, phone

Drone WL Toys

Netherlands

Different models

50–280

Yes

Yes

aliexpress.com

tomtop.com

Email, website

Source Manufacturers’ web pages; Amazon, aliexpress.com, tomtop.com, etc.

Table 5

Manufacturers and their products in Group 2 (Hobby)

Company

Country

Drone models

Prices (€)

Sells through own website

Sells through Amazon

Sells through others (e.g.)

Support

3D Robotics

USA

Solo with camera GoPro

653

Yes

Yes

www.BestBuy.com

Email

AEE technology

China

Toruk AP 10 Pro

254

Yes

Yes

www.andorrafreemarket.com

Email

Toruk AP 11

593

 

www.andorrafreemarket.com

Condor Elite

1300

New

No

www.artencraft.be

Condor advanced

 

New

No

Displayed at www.aeeusa.com

Cheerson

China

CX

297–424

Yes

Yes

www.tomtop.es

Email, website

DJI

China

Spark

424–593

Yes

Yes

http://www.bestbuy.com

Email, online, phone, forum

Phantom 4

1272

www.tomtop.es

Mavic

848–1102

www.tomtop.es

Flame Wheel

203–254

www.HobbyReal.com

EHang

China

Ghostdrone 2.0

540–990

No

Yes

www.tomtop.com

Phone, email, community

Fleye

Belgium

Fleye Racer

590

Yes

No

No

Email

Fleye Helmet

290

Fleye Dudted

1180

GoPro

USA

Karma

1000–1400

Yes

Yes

www.todrone.com

Phone, chat

Helico aerospace/AirDog

Latvia

AirDog

1356

No

Yes

No

Email, community

Hover

China

Hover Camera

424

No

No

www.apple.com

Email

Hubsan

China

H109S X4 Pro

339–678

No

Yes

www.gearbest.com

Email, phone

Krossblade Aerosp.

USA

SkyProwler

2204

Yes

No

No

Website

Onago fly

USA

1 Plus

254

No

Yes

www.gearbest.com

Email, phone

Parrot

France

Bebop

500–700

Yes

Yes

www.bestbuy.com

Email, phone

 

Disco

900–1000

 

www.apple.com

Squadrone system

USA

Hexo+

1000

Yes

Yes

www.adorama.com

Email, website

SwellPro

Germany

Splash Drone Fisherman

1187

Yes

Yes

www.urbandrones.com

Email, phone

Walkera technology Co

China

AIBAO

398

Yes

Yes

www.tomtop.com

Email, phone

 

VITUS

678

 

www.HobbyReal.com

 

Scout X4

€1150

 

www.HobbyReal.com

 

Tali H500

€1400

 

http://www.dx.com

 

Different models for racing drones

136–381

 

www.rcmoment.com

Xiaomi

China

Mi Drone

487

No

Yes

www.tomtop.com

Email, phone

Yuneec

China

Breeze

339

No

Yes

www.fnac.es

Email, phone

 

Typhoon

678–1272

 

www.bestbuy.com

Zerotech

China

Dobby

339

No

Yes

www.tomtop.com

Email

Source manufacturers’ web pages; Amazon, aliexpress.com, Apple store, etc.

Table 6

Manufacturers and their products in Group 3 (Professional)

Company

Country

Drone models

Prices (€)

Sells through own website

Sells through Amazon

Sells through others (e.g.)

Support

3D Robotics

USA

Solo with camera Sony

4239

Yes

Yes

www.onedrone.com

Email

DJI

China

Inspire 2

2543–5256

Yes

Yes

www.onedrone.com

Email, online, phone, forum

Matrice

2797–4239

Spreading Wings

1017–1272

Aeronavics

New Zealand

SkyJib

1865–2119

No

No

www.aerogenix.com

Email, phone

Cyphy

USA

PARC

4239

No

No

No

Email

Ascending technologies

Germany

Astec Firefly

2543

No

No

No

Phone and email

Astec Hummingbird

3391

Astec Pelican

4239

Walkera technology

China

Voyager 4

3190

Yes

Yes

www.aliexpress.com

Email, phone

QR X900

3730

No

www.hobbyreal.com

Zerotech

China

Highone Pro

6104

No

No

http://www.rchobby-avenues.co.uk

Email

SwellPro

Germany

Splash Drone Auto

6104

Yes

No

www.urbandrones.com

Email, phone

Xaircraft

China

Xplanet

4239

No

No

www.aliexpress.com

Email

Xmission

4400

www.dronedron.com

Yuneec

China

Typhoon H520

2119–3815

No

New

www.futurdrone.com

Email, phone

Tornado H920 Plus

2713

Yes

www.futurdrone.com

Microdrones

Germany

MD4-200

1695

No

No

No

Customer portal, phone, email

Ascending technologies

Germany

Astec Firefly

2543

No

No

No

Phone, email

Astec Hummingbird

3391

Astec Pelican

4239

Source manufacturers’ web pages, Amazon, and searches through google.com

Table 7

Manufacturers and their products in Group 4 (Commercial)

Company

Country

Drone models

Prices (€)

Sells through own website

Sells through Amazon

Sells through others

Support

3D Robotics

USA

Site Scan (includes drone Solo)

10,173

Yes

Yes

No

Email

Aerialtronics

Netherlands

Altura Zenith (platform)

19,921

No

Yes

www.easyshopdrone.com

Email

Aeryon

Canada

SkyRanger

169,542

No

No

Worldwide distribution channel

Website, phone

DJI

China

Agras

13,563

No

No

Worldwide distribution channel

Email, online, phone, forum

Freefly

USA

Alta 6

10,173

Yes

Yes

http://www.quadrocopter.com

Forum, website

Alta 8

14,835

http://www.quadrocopter.com

INSITU

USA

Scan Eagle

84,771

No

No

No

Phone, email

Intuitive aerial

Sweden

Aerigon MKII

34,756

No

No

No

Phone, client portal

Kespry

USA

Kespry drone system

25,431 (yearly lease)

No

No

No

Email, web

Aeronavics

New Zealand

SkyJib (with RED camera)

12,716

No

No

www.1uas.com/

Email, phone

AeroVironments

USA

Quantix

12,716–25,431

No

No

No

Email, phone

Delair-Tech

France

UX5

43,233

No

No

Worldwide distribution channel

Email, phone

DT18

31,959

Worldwide distribution channel

DT26X

102,861

Worldwide distribution channel

Kespry

USA

Kespry drone system

25,431 (yearly lease)

No

No

No

Email, web

Parrot

France

Ebee SQ

11,400–12,600

Yes

No

www.tecnitop.com

Email, phone

Precision Hawk

USA

Lancaster 5

10,935

Yes

No

No

Phone, web

Sensefly (Parrot)

Switzerland

eBee

25,000

No

No

Worldwide distribution channel

Email, phone, customer portal

Albris

14,411

Worldwide distribution channel

Zerotech

China

E-Pic

12,521–15,259

No

No

www.skytechs.com

Email

Microdrones

Germany

MD4-1000

25,431

No

No

Worldwide distribution channel

Customer portal, phone, email

MD4-3000

44,081

Worldwide distribution channel

Ascending technologies

Germany

Astec Falcon 8

26,279

No

No

Worldwide distribution channel

Phone, email

Action Drones

USA

AD2

5680

No

No

www.spacecitydrones.com

Phone, email

Source manufacturers’ web pages and searches through google.com

Table 8

Manufacturers and their products in Group 5 (Military)

Company

Country

Drone models

Prices (€)

Sells through own website

Sells through Amazon

Sells through others

Support

AeroVironments

USA

Different models (RAVEN, PUMA, WASP)

n.a.

No

No

No

Email, phone

Aeryon

Canada

SkyRanger

169,542

No

No

No

Website, phone

Airbus D&S

France

Different models

n.a.

No

No

No

Phone

INSITU (Boeing)

USA

Scan Eagle

84,771

No

No

No

Phone, website

Integrator

n.a.

RQ-21A Blackjack

n.a.

General Atomics

USA

Predator

17 mill

No

No

No

Phone

Reaper

48 mill

FLIR

Norway

Black Hornet Nano

25,431–42,386

No

No

No

Phone, email

Thales

France

Different models and sizes

n.a.

No

No

No

Customer service platform

IAI

Israel

Different models

n.a.

No

No

No

Phone, email, cell

EMT

Germany

Luna and others

n.a.

No

No

No

Email, phone, website

Northrop Grumman

USA

Global Hawk

n.a.

No

No

No

Phone

UAV Solutions

USA

Phoenix models

n.a.

Yes

No

Yes

Website, phone, email

Source manufacturers’ web pages and searches through google.com

  • Group 1: manufacturers offering drones to consumer markets as toys,

  • Group 2: manufacturers offering drones to consumer markets as hobby products,

  • Group 3: manufacturers offering drones for professional purposes,

  • Group 4: manufacturers offering drones for specific industries,

  • Group 5: manufacturers offering military drones.

Group 1 (Toys) includes manufacturers of drones of which the customer target is children, who will have their first experience of flying drones. Table 4 presents some examples of the companies included in this group, indicating that the prices are around €100 and that some models carry a camera while others do not. Companies use external selling channels, such as Amazon, to reach their customers. European manufacturers in this group have to compete with Chinese firms.

Group 2 (Hobby) involves manufacturers of products that are focused on different customers from Group 1, who want to film themselves and their relatives and/or friends while participating in action sports or other activities. Taking into account the higher purchase capacity of customers in this group, drones will include more technical features than those in Group 1. These features might include a camera and storage function (e.g. Micro-SD card or similar). These recreational customers are also looking for customizable and programmable features, ease of use, durability, and flight time. They are willing to pay between €500 and €1500 for drones included in Group 2, and they buy them directly from the manufacturer’s website, through Amazon, and through other dealers, such as www.aliexpress.com or www.tomtop.com (Table 5). This group seems to be more profitable considering the number of companies involved in it. However, companies have to compete with an important rival, the Chinese firm DJI.

Group 3 (Professional) includes manufacturers of drones for professional filming and photography. Drone operators whose main activity is aerial filming services use these types of products, which are sometimes high models of those shown in Group 2. The prices are below €10,000, and DJI is an important rival. This company is very active in partnering with other firms for both hardware and software. Nowadays, DJI competes with firms that offer drones with cameras (Inspire 2, Phantom 4 Pro) and with those that offer drone platforms to carry different cameras (Matrice 600 Pro, Spreading Wings S1000 +). It is difficult for smaller companies to offer both products, so they need to choose between them. Offering a platform without a camera would allow customers to fit the drone with professional cameras, such as RED and Alexa, with a higher final cost for the user. These cameras are heavy and need bigger drones with the capacity to fly with a heavy camera.

Group 4 (Commercial) involves manufacturers that develop solutions for specific industries. The value of the offering is based more on the software and applications than on the drone itself. Companies partner (Droneii 2016b) with software firms (Airmap, Facebook), hardware firms (Intel, Leica Geosystems), and cameras makers (Sony) in an effort to increase the value associated with their products. As a result, the final price of the solution, which includes a drone, is higher. Moreover, some drone manufacturers offer the software with a yearly fee license (Kespry), following the rules from the software industry. Group 4 also includes companies that offer services through a drone instead of selling it. The company designs and assembles the drone, but its business model is built on offering services related to drones as its value proposition. Therefore, Group 4 includes companies offering only the product (drone and software), the product and services, and only services.

Few companies in Group 4 sell through their own online shop. Table 7 indicates that these companies are the ones with lower prices. The rest of the firms tend to sell directly to customers or use specialized dealers.

Group 5 (Military) includes manufacturers focused on defence and military purposes. They sell to armies, governments, and defence organizations like NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization). Companies need to fulfil the requirements specified by each government in security assurance relations. Some companies have started to offer products to customers in Group 4, as some of their products can be used for surveillance and monitoring. This might indicate their interest in the increase in the commercial market and the capacity of some of these industries to assume higher costs in buying drones and the services associated with them. Military companies have skilled resources and technologies that can be used for different purposes.

The software incorporated into drones has been demonstrated to be an importance source of value creation. This has produced parallel growth in companies focused on software development. Among these companies are Airware (USA), Dedrone (Germany), DroneDeploy (USA), MapBox (USA), PIX4D (Switzerland), RedBird (France), SkyWards (USA), and Skyworks Aerial System (USA). Most companies are from the United States and others are from European countries, outlining the drone industry. Some solutions allow the processing and analysis of data from images captured through drones, adapting their solutions to different industries (mining, agriculture, surveying, construction, etc.). Other companies work as developers of drone detection (Dedrone), flying simulators (Redbird), and platforms that publish data obtained through other drone software (MapBox).

The main conclusions that we could obtain from the analysis of the competitors are the following:
  1. (a)

    As shown by the number of companies that enter the drone market every year, there are no high barriers to entry.

     
  2. (b)

    Companies have started to extend their customer segments, especially the biggest companies in the sector. This can be observed in DJI, 3D Robotics, and Parrot, but also in some companies operating in both the commercial and the military segment.

     
  3. (c)

    Camera makers and software developers are strategic partners for drone companies. For example, big companies use cameras and software to offer products with a higher value and adapt them to each segment. The final cost of the solutions will increase with these additional features. Increasingly these customers pay for the software included as an annual fee.

     
  4. (d)

    New features spread rapidly through the industry (incremental innovations such as extended flight time, better cameras, less noise, auto charging batteries, etc.).

     
  5. (e)

    The high number of competitors in the market might explain why they offer more than one selling channel for their products, although this is less usual for higher-priced drones (the military segment and some commercial solutions).

     
  6. (f)

    While companies are selling lower-priced drones online, higher-priced drones are usually sold directly after contact by email or through a worldwide distribution channel.

     
  7. (g)

    The main support is obtained by users through channels including phone, email, and web pages.

     
  8. (h)

    The price of military drones is not readily available and might depend strongly on the amount ordered, extra features, and the strategic point of view.

     

5 Main European Figures

Tractica’s (2017b) data indicate that the revenue from commercial drones in Europe in 2015 was US$99.53 million. Moreover, they estimate important growth in revenue from 2016 to 2025. They forecast US$250.99 million in revenues for 2018, US$1248.32 million for 2022, and US$3035.33 million for 2025. Figure 5 presents these data in percentages, showing the highest growth period as 2018–2022. In terms of units, the current use of drones in Europe (SESAR 2016) is limited to around 1000 military drones, 1–1.5 million consumer drones, and 10,000 units of commercial drones. SESAR (2016) forecasts 200,000 units in 2025 and 395,000 in 2035 for the commercial domain, agriculture being the main domain with 150,000 units in 2035. Other important domains are energy (10,000 units), public safety and security (60,000), e-commerce and delivery (70,000), mobility and transport (1000), and others (media, mining and construction, insurance, real estate, telecommunication, and academic research) with 100,000 units in 2035. On the other hand, the main opportunities in the sector will be associated with service activities (related to software, data, and flying operations), which will absorb 80% of the total economic impact in 2035 (SESAR 2016).
Fig. 5

Estimated growth in revenues for commercial drones in Europe.

Source Own elaboration from data of Tractica (2017b)

Table 9 shows the location of drone companies in Europe and indicates that the main countries are the United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, and France. The importance of these countries is also clear when data about international trade and the number of operators registered are exposed. International trade data indicate that the country that imports the most drones is the United Kingdom, followed by India, Italy, Azerbaijan, Germany, Turkey, France, Singapore, and Brazil (The Guardian 2015a). On the other hand, the main exporting countries of drones are Israel, the United States, Canada, Russia, France, Austria, Italy, Germany, and China (The Guardian 2015b). Other sources include Spain and Switzerland among the important countries in the European drone market (Wichmann 2017). Tables 4, 5, 6, 7, 8 present the European manufacturers in each of the five segments analysed, and they included some of these countries. The leading European (Government Office for Science 2017) RPAS manufacturers are Parrot (France), AirRobot (Germany), Ascending Technologies (Germany), MicroDrones (Germany), UAV Factory (Latvia), and Aerialtronics (Netherlands).
Table 9

Drone manufacturers by European country in relation to important manufacturers’ countries

Country

Number of manufacturers

Country

Number of manufacturers

USA

229

Israel, Spain

16

China

38

Australia

15

UK

34

Austria, Netherlands, Sweden, Switzerland

8

Italy

31

Portugal, Romania, Slovenia, Ukraine

4

Germany

30

Belarus, Belgium, Bulgaria, Czech Republic, Finland, Serbia

3

France

28

Estonia, Hungary, Latvia

2

Canada, Russia

20

Denmark, Greece, Ireland, Luxembourg

1

Source AUVSI (2016)

Data about the number of drone operators certified are published by the aviation authorities of each country, although these data are not always available, because in some countries, such as Germany, there is no registration of drone operators. Table 10 presents the number of licensed operators for some countries. This number has increased in the last years and is continuing to grow, indicating the attraction to this market of new professionals and companies. The activities carried out by these professionals and companies differ by country. For example, in Spain (Todrone 2016) the main activities using drones undertaken by companies and RPAS operators are audiovisual/leisure (45.8%), infrastructure/mining (16.9%), and agriculture/environment (14.5%). In the United Kingdom (Government Office for Science 2017), however, the main activities are aerial photography/video, surveying/mapping, aerial cinematography, and industrial inspection.
Table 10

Certified drone operators by country

Country

Operators

Source

United Kingdom

3046

Civil Aviation Authority (2017)

Ireland

172

IAA (2017)

France

2250

Statista (2016)

Spain

2420

AESA (2017)

Italy

972

ENAC (2017)

Germany

n.a.

n.a.

Switzerland

n.a.

n.a.

Belgium

152

www.beuas.be/fr/membership/licentie

Source different sources (n.a.: not available)

6 Conclusions

In this chapter the available information regarding the drone industry has been compiled and analysed. Despite the sector having both technological and economic importance, there are important barriers preventing its expansion. The biggest barrier to the industry’s development is regulation, which limits the use of drones based mainly on two different reasons: safety and security/privacy. Europe has to resolve this issue as quickly as possible, before the other two big economic countries, the USA and China, achieve advances that are too great compared with those of European firms, leading to an increased gap in academic, technological, business, and social development areas.

Although the first drones were produced in 1951 and the first document regarding unpiloted aircraft was patented in 1898, the main evolution of the drone industry has occurred in recent years, led mainly by military needs. Nowadays the most innovative drone uses can be associated with collaboration (health and drugs delivery, emergency surveillance, security, etc.) and commercial efficiency (agriculture, topography, etc.).

It is important to distinguish among the different segments within the drone industry, since the needs and characteristics of different end users are distinct and therefore the strategic considerations should be addressed separately. In this chapter five different segments have been identified:
  • Toys, for which the final customers are children or young people and the use is educational.

  • Hobby/leisure, for which the final customers are young people and adults for recreational uses.

  • Professional, for which the final customers are drone pilots and the uses are aerial filming and photography services.

  • Commercial, for which the final customers are companies and the uses are agriculture, media, mining, energy, or construction activities.

  • Military purposes (vigilance, combat, etc.), for which governments are the end customers.

These segments differ significantly. The price ranges vary widely as well as the basic drone characteristics, like drones with/without a camera, camera quality, flight stability requirements, flight time, data transmission, and so on, so the competitive analysis of the segments must be conducted separately.

Regarding the toy drone subsector, the price is the decisive feature, while quality and technology are not so important. In this segment European companies (mainly from France, UK and the Netherlands) coexist with Chinese ones, whereas North American ones are not represented. Chinese companies offer the cheapest drones (although the French company Parrot offers a minidrone for 30 euros) and have the widest distribution network (not only Amazon but also Aliexpress, which is the most recognized Chinese online seller). To sum up, the companies in this segment follow a cost-based strategy, and Chinese companies seem to have more options. Only by offering distinctive features (for example educational) or additional services (such as competitions for children and young people) can European companies play a role.

The second segment, which we called “hobby”, seems to be more interesting for European companies, as quality, reliability, and technology play an important role in the final buying decision. The prices are higher (500–1000 euros); however, although they are important, the prices are not the primary aspect that final users consider when making their buying decision. Technology development (for example allowing the drone to follow you automatically when playing sport, associating with healthy applications, connecting to the usual devices, such as mobile phones or computers, to transfer data and images, and improving the safety measures) are the distinctive features that may define the best players in the near future. Chinese companies coexist with North American and European ones, with no clear leader. The distribution channels, technical support, and after-sales support are named as the key aspects, together with keeping in contact with the regulatory level to comply with safety regulations quickly and safely.

The “professional” segment is experiencing vibrant competition among the European, North American, and Chinese manufacturers. Although the market was led by European companies, the Chinese giant DJI is growing fast, along with other companies, such as Walkera, Zerotech, and Yuneec. The importance of pilot training courses, fair attendance, after-sales and technical support, and the software cost will define the subsector in the near future, together with filming/camera quality and ease of use. The regulations heavily constrain the final users, as they face the need for permits and licences and/or geographical restrictions in carrying out their work properly. The final price still differs by 30–40%, but, as the final characteristics are not especially different, this subsector will tend towards homogenization unless clear quality/technological/service characteristics appear.

The commercial segment has a bright future and is currently the most interesting segment in which to compete. The final prices of drones are high, and the regulations do not particularly affect the final uses, as the main activities are carried out in rural areas or in emergency situations. Most of these drones can be adapted to the final use and associated services, as software and support add value to the final product. European and North American companies are definitely the leaders in this group.

Information regarding the military segment, especially price and distinctive features, is not easy to find. No Chinese company is competing in this segment, and North American and European companies are mainly leading the segment development. The regulations do not affect the development of this segment as heavily, as the defence and civil fields differ in their limits and possibilities. These companies are often targeted directly by governments due to information restrictions, assuring, on one hand, the technological development and, on the other hand, strategic defence and information upgrades.

The easy of entry into the industry and the expansion of the biggest manufacturers, DJI especially, to other segments, is an important threat for companies operating in segments such as professional and commercial. Moreover, this big firm enters the segment with lower prices, forcing the existing companies to reduce their own prices. Companies are also responding to this threat with a value increase of their products, based on their associated software, which has been developed for specific industries (agriculture, mining, etc.). As a consequence, products have become solutions and cooperation between drone manufacturers and software firms has been the trend during the last years. Military companies have also been attracted to the commercial segment, taking advantage of its advanced technology, which can be used in industries other than defence. Despite positive forecasts for the commercial segment in the next two decades, an increase in rivalry might reduce the profitability in the medium term due to the life cycle of the technologies incorporated into the products. Companies will need to adapt their solutions constantly and take care of their customers by supporting them in purchasing, use, and maintenance.

The main difficulty that we faced during the elaboration of this chapter was the lack of statistics related to this sector. The registration of drone operators, including the drones to be operated, would increase the information available for companies, policy makers, and researchers.

References

  1. Agencia Estatal de Seguridad Aérea (AESA) (2017) Registro de declaración responsable de operador de aeronaves RPA’s. www.seguridadaerea.gob.es/lang_castellano/cias_empresas/trabajos/rpas/default.aspx. Accessed 22 July 2017
  2. Amukele T, Ness PM, Tobian AAR, Boyd J, Street J (2017) Drone transportation of blood products. Transfus Pract 57:582–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. AUVSI (2016) Maker melting point. Unmanned Syst 34(4):14–15Google Scholar
  4. Casella E, Collin A, Harris D, Ferse S, Bejarano S, Parravicini V, Hench JL, Rovere A (2017) Mapping coral reefs using consumer-grade drones and structure from motion photogrammetry techniques. Coral Reefs 36:269–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chabot D, Francis CM (2016) Computer automated bird detection and counts in high-resolution aerial images: a review. J Field Ornithol, 87(4):343–359Google Scholar
  6. Chowdhury S, Emelogu A, Marufuzzaman M, Nurre SG, Bian K (2017) Drones for disaster response and relief operations: a continuous approximation model. Int J Prod Econ 188:167–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Civil Aviation Authority (CAA) (2017) Small Unmanned Aircraft (SUA) operators holding a valid CAA permission. http://publicapps.caa.co.uk/docs/33/20170714RptUAVcurrent.pdf. Accessed 21 July 2017
  8. Droneii (2016a) Top 20 drone company ranking Q2 2016, activity and global reach of the Top20 leading hard- and software manufacturer in the drone industry. www.droneii.com. Accessed 19 July 2017
  9. Droneii (2016b) Drone company partnership. https://www.droneii.com/drone-company-partnerships. Accessed 19 July 2017
  10. Government Office for Science (2017) The UK value stream for remotely piloted civil aircraft systems (RPAS). www.gov.uk/government/publications/value-of-drones-to-the-uk-literature-review. Accessed 22 July 2017
  11. Hardy A, Makame M, Cross D, Majambere S, Msellem M (2017) Using low-cost drones to map malaria vector habitats. Parasites & Vectors 10:29CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hodgson A, Peel D, Kelly N (2017) Unmanned aerial vehicles for surveying marine fauna: assessing detection probability. Ecol Appl 27(4):1253–1267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. IAA (2017) Drone operators contact list. https://www.iaa.ie/general-aviation/drones/rpas-aerial-work-permission-holders. Accessed 21 July 2017
  14. Infographic (2016) How tesla developed the first drone ever. https://patentyogi.com/nikola-tesla/tesla-developed-first-drone/. Accessed 17 July 2017
  15. Moe M, Pampoulov L, Jiang L, Franco N, Han S (2016) Eye in the sky. Available via Statista, the statistics portal. www.a2apple.com/eye-in-the-sky/ and https://es.statista.com/estadisticas/660906/prevision-del-valor-mundial-de-los-segmentos-de-mercado-de-drones/. Accessed 17 July 2017
  16. Narkus-Kramer M (2017) Future demand and benefits for small unmanned aerial systems (UAS) package delivery. In: 17th AIAA aviation technology, integration, and operations conference, AIAA AVIATION Forum (AIAA 2017-4103)Google Scholar
  17. Ott I (2012) Service robotics: an emergent technology field at the interface between industry and services. Poiesis & Prax 9(3–4):219–229CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Pauner C, Kamara I, Viguri J (2015) Drones. Current challenges and standardisation solutions in the field of privacy and data protection. ITU Kaleidosc: Trust in the Inf Soc (K-2015):1–7Google Scholar
  19. Pulver A, Wei R, Mann C (2016) Locating AED enabled medical drones to enhance cardiac arrest response times. Prehospital Emerg Care 20(3):378–389CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. PwC (2016) Clarity from above. PwC global report on the commercial applications of drone technology. https://www.pwc.pl/pl/pdf/clarity-from-above-pwc.pdf. Accessed 29 June 2017
  21. Restas A (2015) Drone applications for supporting disaster management. World J Eng Technol 3(3):316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. San Diego Air and Space Museum (2017) http://sandiegoairandspace.org/hall-of-fame/honoree/t.-claude-ryan. Accessed 17 July 2017
  23. Sankey T, Donager J, McVay J, Sankey JB (2017) UAV lidar and hyperspectral fusion for forest monitoring in the southwestern USA. Remote Sens Environ 195:30–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. SESAR Joint Undertaking (2016) European drones outlook study. Unlocking the value for Europe. www.sesarju.eu/sites/default/files/documents/reports/European_Drones_Outlook_Study_2016.pdf. Accessed 19 July 2017
  25. Smith WR (1956) Product differentiation and market segmentation as alternative marketing strategies. J Mark 21(1):3–8CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Statista (2016) Nombre d’opérateurs commerciaux de drones déclarés en Australie, au Royaume-Uni, en France et aux États-Unis en février 2016. https://fr.statista.com/statistiques/638340/operateurs-commerciaux-enregistres-monde/. Accessed 5 July 2017
  27. Szantol Z, Smith SE, Strona G, Koh LP, Wich SA (2017) Mapping orang-utan habitat and agricultural areas using Landsat OLI imagery augmented with unmanned aircraft system aerial photography. Int J Remote Sens 30(8/10):2231–2245Google Scholar
  28. Teal Group (2013) Estimated worldwide production value for unmanned aerial vehicles (military drones) from 2013 to 2022 (in million U.S. dollars). Available via Statista, the statistics portal. www.statista.com/statistics/428935/global-production-value-forecast-for-unmanned-aerial-systems-or-drones/. Accessed 5 July 2017
  29. The Guardian (2015a) Major unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) importing countries between 2010 and 2014, by market share. Available via Statista, the statistics portal. www.statista.com/statistics/429100/major-importing-countries-of-drones/. Accessed 5 July 2017
  30. The Guardian (2015b) Major unmanned aerial vehicle (drone) exporting countries between 2010 and 2014, by market share. Available via Statista, the statistics portal. www.statista.com/statistics/429171/major-exporting-countries-of-drones/. Accessed 5 July 2017
  31. Todrone (2016) 1er barómetro del sector de los drones en España. www.todrone.com/wp-content/uploads/pdf/Informe-Barometro-todrone-baja.pdf. Accessed 22 July 201721
  32. Tractica (2016) Global consumer drones revenue from 2015 to 2021 (in million U.S. dollars). Available via Statista, the statistics portal. www.statista.com/statistics/608931/consumer-drone-revenue-worldwide/. Accessed 5 July 2017
  33. Tractica (2017a) Projected commercial drone revenue worldwide from 2015 to 2025 (in million U.S. dollars). Available via Statista, the statistics portal. www.statista.com/statistics/607922/commercial-drone-market-revenue-worldwide-projection/. Accessed 5 July 2017
  34. Tractica (2017b) Projected commercial drone revenue in Europe from 2015 to 2025 (in million U.S. dollars). Available via Statista, the statistics portal. www.statista.com/statistics/607794/commercial-drone-market-revenue-in-europe-projection/. Accessed 5 July 2017
  35. Venter P, Wright A, Dibb S (2015) Performing market segmentation: a performative perspective. J Mark Manag 31(1–2):62–83CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wichmann T (2017) Expanding drone operations into Europe. Available via Skyward. https://skyward.io/expanding-commercial-drone-operations-into-europe/. Accessed 21 July 2017
  37. Wind Y (1978) Issues and advances in segmentation research. J Mark Res 15(3):317–337CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Open Access   This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made.

The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

Authors and Affiliations

  • Blanca de Miguel Molina
    • 1
  • Marival Segarra Oña
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of ManagementUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaValenciaSpain

Personalised recommendations