Skip to main content

Learning and Innovation in Health-Care-Based Teams: The Relationships Between Learning, Innovative Behavior at Work, and Implementation of Innovative Practices in Hospitals

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover The Organizational Context of Nursing Practice

Abstract

Non compliance with implementation of innovations is a major problem in health-care-based teams. In the literature, (team-) learning is proposed as a facilitator for the process of implementing innovations. Still, a comprehensive exploration of learning in health-care-based teams and the relation with innovation is scarce. This chapter explores (team-) learning activities in health-care-based teams and the relation between learning processes at individual, team, and organizational levels and implementation of innovations. A review of the literature was conducted. Theoretical aspects of learning on individual, team, and organizational levels are summarized, as well as the concepts of innovative work behavior and implementation of innovations. In addition, we used data and insights from the studies we performed on learning and innovation in health-care-based teams. Insights from separate empirical studies are synthesized to underbuild the relationships between (team) learning, innovative work behavior, and implementation of innovations in health-care-based teams. Learning in health-care-based teams exists on individual, team, and organizational levels. Especially for learning on team level, the relation with innovative behavior at work and implementation of innovations was demonstrated in different studies. Finally, we show how the theories can be used in practice, by showing how we used the theoretical assumptions on learning in building a master’s-level program in nursing science.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 69.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson FJ, Palmer J. The jigsaw approach: students motivating students. Education. 2001;109:59–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjørk IT, Tøien M, Sørensen AL. Exploring informal learning among hospital nurses. J Work Learn. 2013;25:426–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouwhuis L. Explanation of innovative behavior of teachers: a PhD study on individual variables, self-efficacy and learning-goal-orientation (in Dutch). Enschede: Universiteit Twente; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cheng CY, Liou SR, Hsu TS, Chang C. Preparing nursing students to be competent for future professional practice: applying the team-based learning–teaching strategy. J Prof Nurs. 2014;30(4):347–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crossan MM, Lane HW, White RE. An organizational learning framework: from intuition to institution. Acad Manag Rev. 1999;24:522–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong J, Den Hartog D. Measuring innovative work behavior. Creat Innovation Manage. 2010;19(1):23–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Klerk-Jolink N, van der Klink M, Timmermans O. Innovative behavior of university of applied sciences lecturers (in Dutch). Tijdschrift voor Hoger Onderwijs. 2016;34(1):37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Prins P, Segers J, De Vos A, Brouwers S. The influence of new and hard-working career practices on the sustainability of careers (in Dutch). Tijdschrift voor Arbeidsvraagstukken. 2012;28(4):413–33.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dixon NM, The organizational learning cycle: how we can learn collectively. New York: McGraw-Hill; 1994.

    Google Scholar 

  • Donderwinkel F. Implementation of “Skills online”: the relationship between individual factors of Nursing lecturers, team learning and the implementation effectiveness of the education innovation “Skills Online” (in Dutch). Utrecht: University Utrecht; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  • Edmondson AC, Bohmer RM, Pisano GP. Disrupted routines, team learning and new technology implementation in hospitals. Adm Sci Q. 2001;46(4):685–716.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eraut M. Informal learning in the workplace. Stud Contin Educ. 2004;26(2):247–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Felder RM, Brent R. Effective strategies for cooperative learning. J Coop Collab Coll Teach. 2001;10:69–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grol RPTM, Grimshaw J. From best evidence to best practice: effective implementation of change in patients’ care. Lancet. 2003;362:225–1230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holleman G, Poot E, Mintjes-de Groot J, Van Achterberg T. The relevance of team characteristics and team directed strategies in the implementation of nursing innovations. A literature review. Int J Nurs Stud. 2009;46:1256–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Homan T. Team learning: theory and facilitation (in Dutch). Schoonhoven: Academic Service; 2001.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoogveld A, Paas F, Jochems W. Application of an instructional systems design approach by teachers in higher education: individual versus team design. Teach Teach Educ. 2003;19:581–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Illeris K. Towards a contemporary and comprehensive theory of learning. Int J Lifelong Educ. 2003;22(4):396–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen O. How fairness perceptions make innovative. J Organ Behav. 2004;25:201–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knol J, Van Linge R. Innovative behavior: the effect of structural and psychological empowerment on nurses. J Adv Nurs. 2009;65(2):359–70.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mesdagh E, van Rompaey B, Beekman K, Boogaerts A, Timmermans O. A concept analysis of proactive behaviour in midwifery. J Adv Nurs. 2016;72(6):1236–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messmann MA. Innovative work behavior: investigating the nature and facilitation of vocational teachers contributions to innovation development. Regensburg: Universität Regensburg; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raisch S, Birkinshaw J. Organizational ambidexterity: antecedents, outcomes, and moderators. J Manag. 2008;34(3):375–409.

    Google Scholar 

  • Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario. Toolkit: implementation of best practice guidelines. 2nd ed. Toronto: Registered Nurses’ Association of Ontario; 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Senge PM. The fifth discipline – the art & practice of a learning organization. New York: Doubleday; 1990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simons PRJ, Van der Linden J, Duffy T. New learning: three ways to learn in a new balance. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers; 2000.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Stalmeijer R, Gijselaers W, Wolfhagen H, Harendza S, Scherpbier A. How interdisciplinary teams can create multi-disciplinary education: the interplay between team processes and educational quality. Med Educ. 2007;41:1059–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Thurlings M, Evers AT, Vermeulen M. Toward a model of explaining teachers innovative behavior: a literature review. Rev Educ Res. 2014;20(10):1–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans O, Van Linge R, Van Petegem P, Elseviers M, Denekens J. Team learning and team composition in nursing. J Work Learn. 2011;23:258–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans O, Van Linge R, Van Petegem P, Denekens J. Team learning and innovation in nursing; results of a comprehensive research project. J Nurs Educ Pract. 2012a;2(4):10–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans O, Van Linge R, Van Petegem P, Denekens J. Team learning and context; assessing the relationship between team-learning activities and contextual factors of team-learning environment and team-configurations. Nurs: Res Rev. 2012b;1:1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Timmermans O, Van Linge R, Van Petegem P, Van Rompaey B, Denekens J. Contingency perspective on team learning and innovation in nursing. J Adv Nurs. 2013;69(2):363–73.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Dam K, Schipper M, Runhaar P. Developing a competency-based framework for teachers’ entrepreneurial behavior. Teach Teach Educ. 2010;26(4):965–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Linge R. Innovation in health care: theory, practice and research (in Dutch). Maarssen: Elsevier Gezondheidszorg; 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  • West MA, Farr JL. Innovation at work: psychological perspectives. Soc Behav. 1989;4:15–30.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olaf Timmermans .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Timmermans, O., Van Rompaey, B., Franck, E. (2018). Learning and Innovation in Health-Care-Based Teams: The Relationships Between Learning, Innovative Behavior at Work, and Implementation of Innovative Practices in Hospitals. In: Van Bogaert, P., Clarke, S. (eds) The Organizational Context of Nursing Practice. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71042-6_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71042-6_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71041-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71042-6

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics