How Interactivity Is Changing in Immersive Performances

An Approach of Understanding the Use of Interactive Technologies in Performance Art
  • Ágnes Karolina BakkEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10690)


New, immersive or transmedia storytelling tools or game design elements can engage new audiences to watch performances. Companies which define themselves as performing art companies are creating immersive experiences that use various tactics in engaging their participants, including gamification mechanics and video game strategies, and also elements of interactive & transmedia storytelling, which increases the level of immersion as well. My research hypothesis is that new technology tools and immersive environments which incorporate video game mechanics used in performing arts context are changing the interactivity aspect of performances. To be able to scale or to define the level of interactivity in such productions it is necessary to perform an analysis using interactive storytelling, game studies and media archeology, but hermeneutical research and field studies (surveys and deep interviews) are also conducted. Phenomenological studies on the materiality of interaction design will also be used in defining the interactivity and the level of participation. In the current state of the work I’m focusing on “analogue” type of immersive performances (e.g. Danish company SIGNA) that can be analyzed with the help of a game studies approach, but I also focus on how these immersive performances create narrative environments. Parallel to this, I have conducted an audience survey which focused on whether the participants have the same interaction feeling as in video games or VR-environments.


Performing arts Immersive theatre Games studies Storytelling 


  1. 1.
    Jenkins, H.: Rethinking ‘Rethinking Convergence/Culture’. Cult. Stud. 28(2), 267–297 (2014). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Gonzalo, F.: Simulation versus narrative. Introduction to ludology. In: Wolf, M.J.P., Perron, B. (eds.) The Video Game Theory Reader, pp. 221–258. Routledge, New York and London (2003)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Rouse, R.: Media of attraction: a media archeology approach to panoramas, kinematography, mixed reality and beyond. In: Nack, F., Gordon, A.S. (eds.) ICIDS 2016. LNCS, vol. 10045, pp. 97–107. Springer, Cham (2016). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Böhme, G.: Atmosphere as the fundamental concept of a new aesthetics. Thesis Eleven 36, 113 (1993). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Juul, J.: Games telling stories? a brief note on games and narratives. GameStud. – Int. J. Comput. Game Res. Page. 1(1), 1–12 (2001). Accessed 31 Aug 2017
  6. 6.
    Ackermann, J.: Meaning creation in digital gaming performance. The intraludic communication of hybrid reality theatre. In: Dichtung Digital, Content No. 44 (2014). Accessed 30 Sep 2017
  7. 7.
    Kirkpatrick, G.: Computer Games and the Social Imaginary, p. 160. Polity Press, Cambridge (2013)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Baumgartner, E.: Transmedia Storytelling im zeitgenössischen Theater, MA Diplomarbeit, p. 91. Universitat Wien, Vienna (2012)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Moholy-Nagy University of Art and DesignBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations