Advertisement

Sustainable Ecosystems Through Indigenous Social Enterprises

  • Mario Vázquez-MaguirreEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Applying Quality of Life Research book series (BEPR)

Abstract

The aim of this chapter is to explore the mechanisms by which an indigenous social enterprise in southern Mexico is building a sustainable ecosystem that improves the quality of life of the community. The research suggests that indigenous social enterprises have developed novel mechanisms based on its culture and cosmovision, which ultimately generate an ecosystem that promotes community welfare. These mechanisms are accountability and transparency, legitimacy, equality policies, a participatory organizational structure, social innovation, and entrepreneurial orientation. This case shows how the communitarian perspective of the entity increases the quality of life of employees and their households, fosters the local economy, and consolidates an ecosystem that promotes development in the community. From a public policy perspective, the case also suggests actions that might promote the generation of business models that integrate vulnerable communities to the global economy from a sustainable, collaborative perspective.

Keywords

Social enterprises Sustainable development Indigenous communities Sustainable ecosystem Quality of life Social innovation 

References

  1. Alfaro, O. (2014). Microcréditos mexicanos, los más caros de Latam. El Financiero. http://www.elfinanciero.com.mx/economia/mexico-con-los-microcreditos-mas-caros-de-america-latina.html. Accessed 20 Jan 2017.
  2. Ashoka. (2015). Emprendimiento social en México y Centro América. Ashoka.Google Scholar
  3. Bornstein, D., & Davis, S. (2010). Social entrepreneurship: What everyone needs to know. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bray, D. B. (1991). The struggle for the forest: Conservation and development in the Sierra Juarez. Grassroots Development, 15(3), 14–25.Google Scholar
  5. Bray, D., Antinori, C., & Torres-Rojo, J. M. (2006). The Mexican model of community forest management. Forest Policy and Economics, 8, 470–484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dinero en imagen. (2016). ¿Cómo se define a los informales y cuántos hay en México? http://www.dineroenimagen.com/2016-02-17/68875. Accessed 10 Jan 2017.
  7. Gu, H., & Subramanian, S.M. (2012). Socio-ecological production landscapes: Relevance to the green economy agenda. United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies. http://collections.unu.edu/eserv/UNU:5509/Socioecological_production_landscapes.pdf
  8. INEGI. (2010). Compendio de información estadística y geográfica municipal. México: INEGI.Google Scholar
  9. Mair, J., & Martí, I. (2006). Social entrepreneurship research: A source of explanation, prediction, and delight. Journal of World Business, 41, 37–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Martin. L. & Osberg, S. (2007). Social entrepreneurship: The case for definition. Stanford Social Innovation Review 30–39.Google Scholar
  11. Peredo, A. M., & Chrisman, J. J. (2006). Toward a theory of community-based enterprise. Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Peredo, A. M., & McLean, M. (2006). Social entrepreneurship: A critical review of the concept. Journal of World Business, 41, 56–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Rainforest Alliance. (2001). Resumen público de certificación de comunidad Ixtlán de Juárez. SmartWood Program. http://www.rainforest-alliance.org/business/forestry/documents/comunidad-ixtlan.pdf. Accessed 10 Jan 2017.
  14. Santos, F. M. (2012). A positive theory of social entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Ethics, 111(3), 335–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Santos, F. M., & Eisenhardt K. M. (2006). Constructing markets and organizing boundaries: Entrepreneurial action in nascent fields. INSEAD. http://www.insead.edu/facultyresearch/research/doc.cfm?did=1837. Accessed 10 Jan 2017.
  16. Spiggle, S. (1994). Analysis and interpretation of qualitative data in consumer research. Journal of Consumer Research, 21(3), 491–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. The World Bank. (2011). Empowerment. The World Bank. http://siteresources.worldbank.org/INTEMPOWERMENT/Resources/486312-1095094954594/draft2.pdf. Accessed 14 Sept 2016.
  18. Vázquez-Maguirre, M., & Portales, L. (2014). La empresa social como generadora de calidad de vida y desarrollo sustentable en comunidades rurales. Pensamiento y Gestión, 37, 255–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Yunus, M. (2010). Building social business: The new kind of capitalism that serves humanity’s most pressing needs. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad de Monterrey, Avenida Ignacio Morones Prieto 4500 Pte., 66238San Pedro Garza GarcíaMexico

Personalised recommendations