Skip to main content

Product Innovation as Territory Sustainability Added Value: The Case Study of Douro Skincare

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Entrepreneurial, Innovative and Sustainable Ecosystems

Part of the book series: Applying Quality of Life Research ((BEPR))

Abstract

Within a smart specialization context, regions and businesses have to develop their innovation and product delivery with added value to supply market needs in a different perspective. As the territory sustainability within the Portuguese smart specialization strategy (RIS3) is defined, we propose to exemplify through a case study a good practice in answering these new challenges. The case study explores the growth and regional involvement of Douro Skincare, a company created by women that operates in the field of selective biological cosmetics through the creation, development, and production of cosmetic lines that are based on emblematic raw materials of the Douro region, one of the oldest wine-growing areas, located in the north of our country, Portugal. It uses Douro grapes and PORT WINE DNA ™ (Douro Nuclear Aroma), created from the first Port wine from entirely organic production, to develop cosmetic lines produced with endogenous products. These types of territorial intensive products (TIPs) are associated directly with the region and are intensively endogenous, an answer to the challenges created within RIS3.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Interview_(research), retrieved on July 29, 2016

    • Informal, conversational interview – no predetermined questions are asked, in order to remain as open and adaptable as possible to the interviewee’s nature and priorities; during the interview the interviewer “goes with the flow.”

    • General interview guide approach – the guide approach is intended to ensure that the same general areas of information are collected from each interviewee; this provides more focus than the conversational approach but still allows a degree of freedom and adaptability in getting the information from the interviewee.

    • Standardized, open-ended interview – the same open-ended questions are asked to all interviewees; this approach facilitates faster interviews that can be more easily analyzed and compared.

    • Closed, fixed-response interview – where all interviewees are asked the same questions and asked to choose answers from among the same set of alternatives. This format is useful for those not practiced in interviewing.

References

  • Ambler, T. (1997). How much of brand equity is explained by trust? Management Decision, 35(4), 283–292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asero, V., & Patti, S. (2009). Developing the tourist market through the exploitation of the typical products. The Annals of Dunarea de Jos, University of Galati, Fascicle I/2009, Year XV, 5–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhat, S., & Reddy, S. K. (1998). Symbolic and functional positioning of brands. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 15(1), 32–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Camagni, R., & Capello, R. (2012). Regional innovation patterns and the EU regional policy reform: Towards smart innovation policies. Proceedings of the 52nd ERSA Conference in Bratislava.

    Google Scholar 

  • Capello, R. (2013). Knowledge, innovation, and regional performance: Toward smart innovation policies. Introductory Remarks to the Special Issue, Growth, and Change, 44(2), 185–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carvalho, L. (2014). From winery to rural tourism experience: A perfect married couple. IX Congresso Internacional Sobre Turismo Rural e Desenvolvimento Sustentável (CITURDES), 9–10 setembro, São Paulo, Brasil.

    Google Scholar 

  • CCDRN. (2014). Estratégia Regional de Especialização Inteligente – Norte2020. Comissão de Coordenação da Região Norte.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEC – Commission of the European Communities. (2010). Europe 2020. A strategy for smart, suitable and inclusive growth. Communication from the Commission, COM (2010) 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charters, S., & Spielmann, N. (2014). Characteristics of strong territorial brands: The case of champagne. Journal of Business Research, 67(2014), 1461–1467.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charters, S., Mitchell, R., Menival, D. (2011). The territorial brand in wine. 6th AWBR International Conference, 9–10 June, Bordeaux Management School, France.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Chernatony, L. (1993). Categorizing brands: Evolutionary processes underpinned by two key dimensions. Journal of Marketing Management, 9(2), 173–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Chernatony, L., & Macdonald, M. (2003). Creating powerful brands. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., & Grewal, D. (1991). Effects of price, brand, and store information on buyers’ product evaluations. Journal of Marketing Research, 28(August), 307–319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt, K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. The Academy of Management Review, 14(4), 532–550.

    Google Scholar 

  • ESPON. (2012). Knowledge, innovation, territory (KIT). Final Report available online http://www.espon.eu/main/Menu_Projects/Menu_AppliedResearch/kit.html. Accessed 26 Dec 2016.

  • Foray, D. (2012). Economic fundamentals of smart specialisation. Ekonomiaz, special issue.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D., David, P.A., Hall, B. (2009). Smart specialisation – The concept. http://ec.europa.eu/invest-inresearch/pdf/download_en/kfg_policy_brief_no9.pdf?11111. Accessed 26 Dec 2016.

  • Hausmann, R., & Rodrik, D. (2003). Economic development as a self-discovery. Journal of Development Economics, 72, 2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kotler, P., Chandler, P. C., et al. (1994). Marketing. Sydney: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Long, M. M., & Schiffman, L. G. (2000). Consumption values and relationships: Segmenting the market for frequency programs. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 17(3), 214–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, P., & Ortega-Argilés, R. (2011). Smart specialisation, regional growth and applications to EU cohesion policy (Work document of IEB 2011/14). Institut d’Economia de Barcelona, Barcelona.

    Google Scholar 

  • McNamara, C. (1999). General guidelines for conducting interviews. Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (1997). OECD proposed guidelines for collecting and interpreting technological innovation data – Oslo-manual. Eurostat: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Innovation-driven growth in regions: The role of smart specialisation. Paris: OECD Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ohe, Y., & Kurihara, S. (2013). Evaluating the complementary relationship between local brand farm products and rural tourism: Evidence from Japan. Tourism Management, 35, 278–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paiva, T., & Proença, R. (2011). Marketing Verde. Edited by Atual, Portugal.

    Google Scholar 

  • Papadopoulos, N., & Heslop, L. (2002). Country equity and country branding: Problems and prospects. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 9(4–5), 294–314.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perrouty, J. P., d’Hauteville, F., et al. (2006). The influence of wine attributes on the region of origin equity: An analysis of the moderating effect of consumer’s perceived expertise. Agribusiness, 22(3), 323–341.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rennings, K. (2000). Redefining innovation – eco-innovation research and the contribution from ecological economics. Ecological Economics, 32(2000), 319–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheth, J. N., Newman, B. I., & Gross, B. L. (1991). Why we buy what we buy: A theory of consumption values. Journal of Business Research, 22, 159–175.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Ittersum, K., Candel, M. J., et al. (2003). The influence of the image of a product’s region of origin on product evaluation. Journal of Business Research, 56, 215–226.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin, R. (2004). Case study methods. COSMOS Corporation. Revised draft, January 20, 2004. http://www.cosmoscorp.com/docs/aeradraft.pdf. Accessed 26 Dec 2016.

  • Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). Consumer perceptions of price, quality and value: Means-end model and synthesis of evidence. Journal of Marketing, 52(July), 2–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Teresa Paiva .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Paiva, T., Carvalho, L.C., Soutinho, C., Leal, S. (2018). Product Innovation as Territory Sustainability Added Value: The Case Study of Douro Skincare. In: Leitão, J., Alves, H., Krueger, N., Park, J. (eds) Entrepreneurial, Innovative and Sustainable Ecosystems. Applying Quality of Life Research. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71014-3_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71014-3_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71013-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71014-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics