Advertisement

The Contribution of Smart Cities to Quality of Life from the View of Citizens

  • José Luis Vázquez
  • Ana LaneroEmail author
  • Pablo Gutiérrez
  • César Sahelices
Chapter
Part of the Applying Quality of Life Research book series (BEPR)

Abstract

This study analyses the perceptions of a sample of 272 university students in Spain regarding current and ideal involvement of the municipality in six dimensions defining a smart city (smart economy, smart people, smart governance, smart mobility, smart environment and smart living). Data was collected through a questionnaire and analysed with descriptive statistical analysis and Student t-tests. Results point to an important gap between students’ real experience in the city and the perceived potential of the analysed dimensions to improve future quality of live. Main gaps were found in the dimensions of smart economy and smart governance.

Keywords

Smart cities Quality of life Sustainability Citizens University students Spain 

References

  1. AMETIC. (2012). Smart cities. Madrid: Foro TIC para la Sostenibilidad.Google Scholar
  2. ARUP. (2011). The smart solution for cities. ARUP.Google Scholar
  3. Caragliu, A., Del Bo, C., & Nijkamp, P. (2011). Smart cities in Europe. Journal of Urban Technology, 18, 65–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Centre of Innovation of the Public Service and IE Business School. (2015). Smart cities. La transformación de las ciudades. Madrid: Centre of Innovation of the Public Service and IE Business School.Google Scholar
  5. Cosgrave, E., Arbuthnot, K., & Tryfonas, T. (2013). Living labs, innovation districts and information marketplaces: A systems approach for smart cities. Procedia Computer Science, 16, 668–677.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Directorate-General for Internal Policies. (2014). Mapping smart cities in the EU. European Parliament.Google Scholar
  7. Dirks, S., Keeling, M., & Dencik, J. (2009). How smart is your city. IBM Institute for Business Value.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission. (2015). Digital agenda for Europe. A Europe 2020 initiative. Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  9. Giffinger, R., et al. (2007). Smart cities: Ranking of European medium-sized cities. Vienna: Centre of Regional Science (SRF), Vienna University of Technology.Google Scholar
  10. Hinkin, T. R. (1995). A review of scale development practices in the study of organizations. Journal of Management, 21, 967–988.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Kogan, N., & Lee, K. L. (2014). Exploratory research on the success and challenges of smart city projects. Asia Pacific Journal of Information Systems, 24, 141–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Komninos, N., Schaffers, H., & Pallot, M. (2011). Developing a policy road map for smart cities and the future Internet. In eChallenges e-2011 Conference Proceedings. P & M Cunningham.Google Scholar
  13. Leydesdorff, L., & Deakin, M. (2011). The triple-helix model of smart cities: A neo-evolutionary perspective. Journal of Urban Technology, 18, 53–63.Google Scholar
  14. Lombardi, P., Giordano, S., Farouh, H., & Yousef, W. (2012). Modelling the smart city performance. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 25(2), 137–149.Google Scholar
  15. Marsa-Maestre, I., López-Carmona, M. A., Velasco, J. R., & Navarro, A. (2008). Mobile agents for service personalization in smart environments. Journal of Networks, 3(5), 30–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mosannenzadeh, F., & Vettorato, D. (2014). Defining smart city. A conceptual framework based on keyword analysis. Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, (Special Issue):683–694.Google Scholar
  17. National Institute of Statistics. (2016). Cifras oficiales de población. http://www.ine.es
  18. Neirotti, P., De Marco, A., Cagliano, A. C., Mangano, G., & Scorrano, F. (2014). Current trends in smart city initiatives: Some stylised facts. Cities, 38, 25–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioural research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Shepard, M., & Simeti, A. (2013). What’s so smart about the smart citizen? In D. Hemment & A. Townsend (Eds.), Smart Citizens (Vol. 4). Manchester: Future Everything Publications.Google Scholar
  21. Toppeta, D. (2010). The smart city vision: How innovation and ICT can build smart, “livable”, sustainable cities. The Innovation Knowledge Foundation.Google Scholar
  22. Walravens, N. (2015). Mobile city applications for Brussels citizens: Smart city trends, challenges and a reality check. Telematics and Informatics, 32, 282–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Washburn, D., et al. (2010). Helping CIOs understand “smart city” initiatives: Defining the smart city, its drivers, and the role of the CIO. Cambridge, MA: Forrester Research.Google Scholar
  24. Yawson, R. M. (2009). The ecological system of innovation: A new architectural framework for a functional evidence-based platform for science and innovation policy. In The Future of Innovation Proceedings of the XXIV ISPIM 2009 Conference. Vienna.Google Scholar
  25. Yovanof, G. S., & Hazapis, G. N. (2009). An architectural framework and enabling wireless technologies for digital cities & intelligent urban environments. Wireless Personal Communications, 49, 445–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • José Luis Vázquez
    • 1
  • Ana Lanero
    • 1
    Email author
  • Pablo Gutiérrez
    • 1
  • César Sahelices
    • 1
  1. 1.Faculty of Economics and Business SciencesUniversity of LeónLeónSpain

Personalised recommendations