Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Exploring the Political Ontology of European Integration

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Toward a Reflexive Political Sociology of the European Union

Part of the book series: Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology ((PSEPS))

  • 337 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the author politicizes the ontological dimension of EU studies. He discusses ontology’s power to determine the real by analyzing some of its unformulated presuppositions and the links with knowledge and action. He argues that key European institutions like the European Commission do not change only because of institutional dynamics but also in relation to transnational interplays of differentiated agents operating simultaneously in multiple social spheres. Institutions and particularly institutional change have to be explained in the light of both new policy challenges and the preferences and habits of the agents making up these institutions and their surroundings. Such an analysis challenges a number of firmly held ontological assumptions of research on the EU on issues such as agency-structure and material-ideational.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Adam, J.-M., Borel, J.-M., Calame, C., & Kilani, M. (Eds.). (1990). Le discours anthropologique. Description, narration, savoir. Paris: Méridiens Klincksieck.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M. (1981). The Dialogic Imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bakhtin, M. M., & Voloshinov, V. B. (1983). Freidizm: Kriticheski ocherk. New York: Chalidze Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beauvallet, W. (2007). L’institutionnalisation d’une nouvelle figure politique: La professionnalisation des eurodéputés français (1979–2004). Unpublished Ph.D Thesis, Institut d’études politiques, Strasbourg.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckfield, J. (2006). The Social Structure of the World Polity. Unpublished Manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P. L. (1963). An Invitation to Sociology: A Humanistic Perspective. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., & Luckmann, T. (1966). The Social Construction of Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bomberg, E., Peterson, J., & Stubb, A. (Eds.). (2008). The European Union: How Does it Work? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P., & Wacquant, L. (1992). An Invitation to Reflexive Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buchanan, J. (1991). The Economic and Ethics of Constitutional Order. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carnap, R. (1950). Empiricism, Semantics, and Ontology. Revue internationale de philosophie, 4, 20–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C. (2009). Debating Causality in the Government of the EU: “Territorial-institutionalism” and the Reform of the Common Fihseries Policy. Paper Delivered at the EUSA Conference, 27 April, Santa Monica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Castoriadis, C. (1975). L’institution imaginaire de la société. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkel, J. T. (2005). International Institutions and Socialization in Europe: Introduction and Framework. International Organisation, 59, 801–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christiansen, T., Jørgensen, K. E., & Wiener, A. (Eds.). (2001). The Social Construction of Europe. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen, A., & Vauchez, A. (2007). Introduction: Law, Lawyers, and Transnational Politics in the Production of Europe. Law & Social Inquiry, 32, 75–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collingwood, R. G. (1994). The Idea of History. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crum, B., & Fossum, J. E. (2009). The Multilevel Parliamentary Field: A Framework for Theorizing Representative Democracy in the EU. European Political Science Review, 1(29), 249–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Certeau, M. (1998). The Capture of Speech and Other Political Writings. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1982). Positions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, M. (1986). How Institutions Think. Syracuse: Syracuse University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duchêne, S., & Frognier, A.-P. (2002). Sur les dynamiques sociologiques et politiques de l’identification à l’Europe. Revue française de science politique, 52(4), 355–373.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1983). The Court Society. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fligstein, N. (2001). Social Skill and the Theory of Fields. www.irle.berkeley.edu/culture/papers/Fligstein01_01.pdf. Accessed 14 Apr 2009.

  • Flockhart, T. (2006). Complex Socialization: A Framework for the Study of State Socialization. European Journal of International Relations, 12(1), 89–118.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making Social Science Matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Georgakakis, D., & de Lassalle, M. (2007). Genèse et structure d’un capital institutionnel européen. Les très hauts fonctionnaires de la Commission européenne. Actes de la recherche en sciences sociales, 166–167, 39–53.

    Google Scholar 

  • Giddens, A. (1986). The Constitution of Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hay, C. (2006). Political Ontology. In R. E. Goodin & C. Tilly (Eds.), The Oxford Handbook of Contextual Political Analysis (pp. 78–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1996). Being and Time. Albany: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacquette, D. (2002). Ontology. Chesham: Acumen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauppi, N. (2005). Democracy, Social Resources and Political Power in the European Union. Manchester: Manchester University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauppi, N., & Madsen, M. R. (2008). Institutions et acteurs: rationalité, réflexivité et analyse de l’UE. Politique européenne, 25, 87–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keating, M. (2009). Putting European Political Science Back Together Again. European Review of Political Science, 1(2), 297–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kull, M. (2008). EU Multi-level Governance in the Making: The Community Initiative LEADER+ in Finland and Germany. Helsinki: Acta Politica.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landorff, L. (2016). Intergroups in the European Parliament: Social, Informational and Political Capital of MEPs. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, University of Bremen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Madsen, M. R. (2006). Transnational Fields: Elements of a Reflexive Sociology of the Internationalisation of Law. Retfærd, 114(3), 23–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mäki, U. (2001). The What, Why, and How of Economic Ontology. In U. Mäki (Ed.), The Economic Worldview: Studies in the Ontology of Economics (pp. 3–14). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Mayntz, R., & Scharpf, F. (2001). L’institutionnalisme centré sur les acteurs. Politix, 55(14), 95–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Medrano, J. D. (2003). Framing Europe: Attitudes to European Integration in Germany, Spain, and the United Kingdom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mérand, F. (2008). European Defence Policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, J., Boli, J., Thomas, G. M., & Ramirez, F. O. (1997). World Society and the Nation-State. American Journal of Sociology, 103(1), 144–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moravcsik, A. (1999). The Choice for Europe: Social Purpose and State Power from Messina to Maastricht. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moses, J. W., & Knutsen, T. (2007). Ways of Knowing: Competing Methodologies in Social and Political Research. London: Palgrave.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mouffe, C. (1994). On the Political. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulkay, M. (1981). Action and Belief or Scientific Discourse? A Possible Way of Ending Intellectual Vassalage in Social Studies of Science. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 11, 163–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odysseios, L. (2002). Radical Phenomenology, Ontology and International Political Theory. Alternatives: Global, Local, Political, 27(3), 373–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (2007). Exploring the Political Order of the EU. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P. (2009). Change and Continuity: An Institutional Approach to Institutions of Democratic Government. European Political Science Review, 1(1), 3–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, J. P., & March. J. G. (2004). The Logic of Appropriateness, ARENA Working Paper 09/2004. http://www.arena.uio.no/publications/working-papers2004/papers/04_09.xml. Accessed 9 Nov 2009.

  • Page, E. C. (1997). People Who Run Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palonen, K. (2006). Two Concepts of Politics. Conceptual History and Present Controversies. Distinktion, 12, 11–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, G. B. (1999). Institutional Theory in Political Science. The New Institutionalisms. London: Pinter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, J., Bomberg, E., & Stubb, A. (2008). Conclusion. In E. Bomberg, J. Peterson, & A. Stubb (Eds.), The European Union: How Does it Work? (pp. 222–234). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, G. (1995). Jacques Delors and European Integration. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saurugger, S. (2009). Sociological Approaches in EU Studies. Journal of European Public Policy, 16(6), 935–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scharpf, F. W. (1999). Governing in Europe: Effective and Democratic? Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2002). Goffman Meets IR: Dramaturgical Action in International Community. International Review of Sociology, 12(3), 417–438.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schimmelfennig, F. (2003). Strategic Action in a Community Environment. The Decision to Enlarge the European Union to the East. Comparative Political Studies, 36, 156–183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Searle, J. (1995). The Construction of Social Reality. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trondal, J. (2007). Is the European Commission a ‘Hothouse’ for Supranationalism? Exploring Actor-Level Supranationalism. Journal of Common Market Studies, 45(5), 1111–1133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsebelis, G. (1990). Nested Games: Rational Choice in Comparative Politics. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vanberg, V. J. (2005). Market and State: The Perspective of Constitutional Political Economy. Journal of Institutional Economics, 1, 23–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vauchez, A. (2008). Democratic Empowerment Through Euro-Law? European Political Science, 7(4), 444–452.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waltzer, M. (1983). Spheres of Justice. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (1968/1972). Economy and Society. Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Relations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wittgenstein, L. (1969). Tractatus Logicus Philosophicus. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zizek, S. (2000). The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Jyväskylä/Academy of Finland and French National Center for Scientific Research (CNRS), Helsinki, Finland

    Niilo Kauppi

Authors
  1. Niilo Kauppi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kauppi, N. (2018). Exploring the Political Ontology of European Integration. In: Toward a Reflexive Political Sociology of the European Union. Palgrave Studies in European Political Sociology. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71002-0_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-71002-0_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-71001-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-71002-0

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation