Advertisement

Hydrogeochemical Vulnerability Estimation

  • Constantin MoraruEmail author
  • Robyn Hannigan
Chapter
  • 347 Downloads
Part of the Springer Hydrogeology book series (SPRINGERHYDRO)

Abstract

Three representative test sites were used to determine the point of migration (PM) of pollutants in unsaturated zone. Test sites are located in different geographical, geological, and hydrogeological conditions. One common methodology was used for all study territories. In all cases, conclusions of the GAVEL methodology are confirmed with a preliminary study of groundwater quality. It is necessary to note that calculated PM is characteristic for a statistical period of time.

Keywords

Test sites Migration of pollutants GAVEL methodology 

References

  1. Boswell, E. H., Cushing, E. M., & Hosman, R. L. (1968). Quaternary aquifers in the Mississippi Embayment. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 448-E, p. 15.Google Scholar
  2. Brahana, J. V., & Broshears, R. E. (2001). Hydrogeology and ground-water flow in the Memphis and Fort Pillow aquifers in the Memphis area, Tennessee. US Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigation Report 89-4131, p. 56.Google Scholar
  3. Chang, K. W. Hg., & Hwang, H. H. M. (1989). Subsurface conditions of Memphis and Shelby County. Technical Report NCEER 89-0021 (July 26 1989), p. 30.Google Scholar
  4. Edmunts, W. M., & Tyler, S. W. (2002). Unsaturated zones as archive of past climates: Towards a new proxy for continental regions. Hydrogeology Journal, 10, 216–228.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Eiswirth, M., Held, I. I., Wolf, L., & Hotzl, H. (2003). AISUWRS work package 1. Background study. University of Karlsruhe, Department of Applied Geology, Commissioned report 30.08.2003, p. 78.Google Scholar
  6. Jousma, G., Kloosterman, F., Moraru, C., et al. (2000). Groundwater and land use. Report of the TACIS Prut water management project, p. 180.Google Scholar
  7. Moraru, C. E., & Anderson, J. A. (2005). Comparative assessment of the ground water quality of the Republic of Moldova and the Memphis, TN area of the United States of America. Ground Water Institute, Memphis, TN, p. 188.Google Scholar
  8. Tacis. (2000). Prut water management. Report, Chisinau, IGS ASM p. 1000.Google Scholar
  9. Wolf, L., Klinger, J., Hoetzl, H., & Mohrlok, U. (2007). Quantifying Mass Fluxes from urban drainage systems to the urban soil-aquifer system. Journal of Soils and Sediments, 7(2), 85–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Laboratory of HydrogeologyInstitute of Geology and SeismologyChisinauMoldova
  2. 2.School for the EnvironmentUniversity of Massachusetts BostonBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations