Advertisement

CFD Investigation of the Hydrodynamic Structure Around a Modified Anchor System

  • Zied DrissEmail author
  • Abdelkader Salah
  • Dorra Driss
  • Brahim Necib
  • Hedi Kchaou
  • Mohamed Salah Abid
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter presents some CFD simulation results of the hydrodynamic structure around a modified anchor system. Using the CFD code ANSYS Fluent 17.0, the finite volume method was used to solve the Navier–Stokes equations. This study was carried out using the standard kε turbulence model. The comparison between our numerical results and the experimental results found in the literature shows a good agreement.

Keywords

CFD Hydrodynamic structure Modified anchor Stirred tank 

References

  1. Alcamo R, Micale G, Grisafi F, Brucato A, Ciofalo M (2005) Large-eddy simulation of turbulent flow in an unbaffled stirred tank driven by a Rushton turbine. Chem Eng Sci 60:2303–2316CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alvarez MM, Zalc JM, Shinbrot T, Arratia PE, Muzzio FJ (2002) Mechanisms of mixing and creation of structure in laminar stirred tanks. AIChE J 48:2135–2148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ammar M, Driss Z, Chtourou W, Abid MS (2011) Study of the baffles length effect on turbulent flow generated in stirred vessels equipped by a Rushton turbine. Cent Eur J Eng 1(4):401–412Google Scholar
  4. Brucato A, Ciofalo M, Grisafi F, Micale G (1998) Numerical prediction of flow fields in baffled stirred vessels: a comparison of alternative modelling approaches. Chem Eng Sci 53:3653–3684CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chtourou W, Ammar M, Driss Z, Abid MS (2011) Effect of the turbulent models on the flow generated with Rushton turbine in stirred tank. Cent Eur J Eng 1(4):380–389Google Scholar
  6. Deglon DA, Meyer CJ (2006) CFD modeling of stirred tanks: numerical considerations. Miner Eng 19:1059–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Driss Z, Bouzgarrou G, Chtourou W, Kchaou H, Abid MS (2010) Computational studies of the pitched blade turbines design effect on the stirred tank flow characteristics. Eur J Mech B Fluids 29:236–245CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. Guillard F, Trägardh C (2003) Mixing in industrial Rushton turbine agitated reactors under aerated conditions. Chem Eng Process 42:373–386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kchaou H, Driss Z, Bouzgarrou G, Chtourou W, Abid MS (2008) Numerical investigation of internal turbulent flow generated by a flat-blade turbine and a pitched-blade turbine in a vessel tank. Int Rev Mech Eng 2:427–434Google Scholar
  10. Montante G, Lee KC, Brucato A, Yianneskis M (2001) Experiments and predictions of the transition of the flow pattern with impeller clearance in stirred tanks. Comput Chem Eng 25:729–735CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Murthy NB, Joshi JB (2008) Assessment of standard k-ε RSM and LES turbulent models in a baffled stirred agitated by various impeller designs. Chem Eng Sci 63:5468–5495CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Stitt EH (2002) Alternative multiphase reactors for fine chemicals: a world beyond stirred tanks. Chem Eng J 90:47–60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Wu H, Patterson GK (1989) Laser doppler measurement of turbulent-flow parameters in a stirred mixer. Chem Eng Sci 44(10):2207–2221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Zalc JM, Szalai ES, Alvarez MM, Muzzio FJ (2002) Using CFD to understand chaotic mixing in laminar stirred tanks. AIChE J 48:2124–2134CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Zied Driss
    • 1
    Email author
  • Abdelkader Salah
    • 1
  • Dorra Driss
    • 1
  • Brahim Necib
    • 2
  • Hedi Kchaou
    • 1
  • Mohamed Salah Abid
    • 1
  1. 1.Laboratory of Electro-Mechanic Systems (LASEM), National School of Engineers of Sfax (ENIS)University of SfaxSfaxTunisia
  2. 2.Laboratory of MechanicsUniversity of Constantine 1ConstantineAlgeria

Personalised recommendations