Skip to main content

Multiple Testing of One-Sided Hypotheses: Combining Bonferroni and the Bootstrap

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Predictive Econometrics and Big Data (TES 2018)

Part of the book series: Studies in Computational Intelligence ((SCI,volume 753))

Included in the following conference series:

Abstract

In many multiple testing problems, the individual null hypotheses (i) concern univariate parameters and (ii) are one-sided. In such problems, power gains can be obtained for bootstrap multiple testing procedures in scenarios where some of the parameters are ‘deep in the null’ by making certain adjustments to the null distribution under which to resample. In this paper, we compare a Bonferroni adjustment that is based on finite-sample considerations with certain ‘asymptotic’ adjustments previously suggested in the literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    This means that \(\hat{\sigma }_{n,s}\) is an estimator of the standard deviation of \(\hat{\theta }_{n,s}\).

  2. 2.

    More precisely, the improvement is a stepdown method.

  3. 3.

    Such a program is carried out in the moment inequality problem by [RSW14].

  4. 4.

    More precisely, the improvement is a stepdown method.

References

  1. Andrews, D.W.K., Barwick, P.J.: Inference for parameters defined by moment inequalities: a recommended moment selection procedure. Econometrica 80(6), 2805–2826 (2012)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Andrews, D.W.K., Soares, G.: Inference for parameters defined by moment inequalities using generalized moment selection. Econometrica 78(1), 119–157 (2010)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Davison, A.C., Hinkley, D.V.: Bootstrap Methods and their Application. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1997)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Efron, B.: Bootstrap methods: another look at the jackknife. Ann. Stat. 7, 1–26 (1979)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  5. Hansen, P.R.: A test for superior predictive ability. J. Bus. Econ. Stat. 23, 365–380 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Hsu, P.-H., Hsu, Y.-C., Kuan, C.-M.: Testing the predictive ability of technical analysis using a new stepwise test with data snooping bias. J. Empir. Finance 17, 471–484 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Holm, S.: A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scand. J. Stat. 6, 65–70 (1979)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  8. Lahiri, S.N.: Resampling Methods for Dependent Data. Springer, New York (2003)

    Book  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Romano, J.P., Shaikh, A.M., Wolf, M.: A practical two-step method for testing moment inequalities. Econometrica 82(5), 1979–2002 (2014)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  10. Romano, J.P., Wolf, M.: Exact and approximate stepdown methods for multiple hypothesis testing. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 100(469), 94–108 (2005)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. White, H.L.: A reality check for data snooping. Econometrica 68(5), 1097–1126 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Wolf .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

A Detailed Monte Carlo Results

A Detailed Monte Carlo Results

1.1 A.1 Results for \(n = 50\)

See Tables 1, 2, 3 and 4.

Table 1. All \(\theta _s = 0\): FWE.
Table 2. Five of the \(\theta _s = 0.4\): FWE | Power.
Table 3. Five of the \(\theta _s = 0.4\) and S/2 of the \(\theta _s = -0.4\): FWE | Power.
Table 4. Five of the \(\theta _s = 0.4\) and S/2 of the \(\theta _s = -0.8\): FWE | Power.

1.2 A.2 Results for \(n=100\)

See Tables 5, 6, 7 and 8.

Table 5. All \(\theta _s = 0\): FWE.
Table 6. Ten of the \(\theta _s = 0.3\): FWE | Power.
Table 7. Ten of the \(\theta _s = 0.3\) and S/2 of the \(\theta _s = -0.3\): FWE | Power.
Table 8. Ten of the \(\theta _s = 0.3\) and S/2 of the \(\theta _s = -0.6\): FWE | Power.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Romano, J.P., Wolf, M. (2018). Multiple Testing of One-Sided Hypotheses: Combining Bonferroni and the Bootstrap. In: Kreinovich, V., Sriboonchitta, S., Chakpitak, N. (eds) Predictive Econometrics and Big Data. TES 2018. Studies in Computational Intelligence, vol 753. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70942-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70942-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70941-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70942-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics