Skip to main content

An Experimental Investigation on Porosity in Gravel Beds

  • Conference paper
  • First Online:
Free Surface Flows and Transport Processes

Abstract

This paper presents results from a set of laboratory measurements of the roughness geometry function and subsurface porosity at different spatial scales and with different beds using the water displacement method. For water worked gravel beds, the roughness geometry function was determined in both the interfacial sublayer and subsurface layer while for non-water worked bed configurations the vertical variation of porosity was evaluated from the manually created bed surface to the bottom, i.e. solely within the subsurface layer. The results show that the capillary action in sediment beds can have a significant influence on the porosity-values at the bed surface and the transition to a flat subsurface bottom as it was found that the capillary action over-/underestimates the porosity close to the gravel bed bottom and surface, respectively. The results are subsequently used to discuss recent findings reported in the hydraulic engineering literature in regard to the vertical variation of porosity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 169.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 219.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aberle J (2006) Spatially averaged near-bed flow field over rough armor layers. River Flow 2006, Two Volume Set. Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Aberle J (2007) Measurements of armour layer roughness geometry function and porosity. Acta Geophys 55:23–32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aberle J, Koll K, Dittrich A (2008) Form induced stresses over rough gravel-beds. Acta Geophys 56:584–600

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anovitz LM, Cole DR (2015) Characterization and analysis of porosity and pore structures. Rev Miner Geochem 80:61–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boano F, Harvey JW, Marion A, Packman AI, Revelli R, Ridolfi L, Wörman A (2014) Hyporheic flow and transport processes: mechanisms, models, and biogeochemical implications. Rev Geophys 52:603–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brunke M (1999) Colmation and depth filtration within streambeds: retention of particles in hyporheic interstices. Int Rev Hydrobiol 84:99–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Carling PA, Reader NA (1982) Structure, composition and bulk properties of upland stream gravels. Earth Surf Proc Land 7:349–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dey S, Das R (2012) Gravel-Bed Hydrodynamics: double-averaging approach. J Hydraul Eng 138:707–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frings RM, Schüttrumpf H, Vollmer S (2011) Verification of porosity predictors for fluvial sand-gravel deposits. Water Resour Res 47, n/a-n/a

    Google Scholar 

  • Liang R, Schruff T, Jia X, Schüttrumpf H, Frings RM (2015) Validation of a stochastic digital packing algorithm for porosity prediction in fluvial gravel deposits. Sed Geol 329:18–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lohman SW (1972) Ground-Water Hydraulics. Unites States Department of the Interior, Wasgington

    Google Scholar 

  • Marion A, Fraccarollo L (1997) New conversion model for areal sampling of fluvial sediments. J Hydraul Eng 123:1148–1151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikora V, Goring D, McEwan I, Griffiths G (2001) Spatially averaged open-channel flow over rough bed. J Hydraul Eng 127:123–133

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikora V, Koll K, McEwan I, McLean S, Dittrich A (2004) Velocity distribution in the roughness layer of rough-bed flows. J Hydraul Eng 130:1036–1042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikora V, McEwan I, McLean S, Coleman S, Pokrajac D, Walters R (2007a) Double-averaging concept for rough-bed open-channel and overland flows: theoretical background. J Hydraul Eng 133:873–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nikora V, McLean S, Coleman S, Pokrajac D, McEwan I, Campbell L, Aberle J, Clunie D, Koll K (2007b) Double-averaging concept for rough-bed open-channel and overland flows: applications. J Hydraul Eng 133:884–895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slotwinski JA, Garboczi EJ, Hebenstreit KM (2014) Porosity measurements and analysis for metal additive manufacturing process control. J Res Nat Inst Stand Technol 119:494–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooster JK, Dusterhoff SR, Cui Y, Sklar LS, Dietrich WE, Malko M (2008) Sediment supply and relative size distribution effects on fine sediment infiltration into immobile gravels. Water Resour Res 44, n/a-n/a

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu W, Wang SSY (2006) Formulas for sediment porosity and settling velocity. J Hydraul Eng 132:858–862

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christy Ushanth Navaratnam .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this paper

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this paper

Navaratnam, C.U., Aberle, J., Daxnerová, J. (2018). An Experimental Investigation on Porosity in Gravel Beds. In: Kalinowska, M., Mrokowska, M., Rowiński, P. (eds) Free Surface Flows and Transport Processes. GeoPlanet: Earth and Planetary Sciences. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70914-7_21

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics