Analysis of Organisational Configuration of the Delivery System: Consistencies and Inconsistencies

Chapter
Part of the The Urban Book Series book series (UBS)

Abstract

Organisation design deals with the manipulation of a series of organisational attributes that determine the division of the workforce and achieving coordination. The organisational configuration is shaped by bringing those and situational factors towards creating a fit between them. A synthesis of theoretical discussions in Part I suggested an insight for understanding and examining the way reconstruction programmes are organised is the contingency, fit for organisational attributes and their consistency with each other, regardless of their form. This chapter analyses the initial organisational configuration, the actual implementation and evolution of the sociotechnical delivery system of the housing reconstruction programme in Bam. It identifies the most influential organisational attributes of the initial configuration and analyses their surrounding issues such as their interconnections and how they contributed to the way the programme worked in practice. Dynamics of those led to the need for further evolutions, which had domino effects. Unit grouping, control mechanisms, delegating accountability, (de)centralisation and the workflow process, were interlinked; and some of them had considerable influences on other parameters. The innovative approach to the formation of the system including the workflow was based on the modification of previous housing development. The fluency of the workflow was highly influenced by other attributes. Building on the contingency view, the Bam case presents a mixture of consistencies and inconsistencies in its organisational attributes that influenced the way the programme performed and its outcomes. Graphical presentations of those main influential organisational attributes and the final composition of the whole are explanatory, offering a visual analytical method of examination for reconstruction programme organisations.

References

  1. Alexander DE (2002) Principles of emergency planning and management, Illustrated, ed. Oxford University Press, EnglandGoogle Scholar
  2. Badir Y (2006) The role of network lead company in integrating new product development processes across strategic partners. PhD thesis, Ecole Polytechnique Federale De Lausanne, LausanneGoogle Scholar
  3. Benson C, Twigg J (2007) Tools for mainstreaming disaster risk reduction: guidance notes for development organisations. http://www.preventionweb.net/english/professional/publications/v.php?id=1066. Accessed 22 Nov 2010
  4. Christopolos I, ALNAP, Glemminge Development Research (2006) Provention consortium forum 2006. Strengthening global collaboration in disaster risk reduction. The elusive ‘window of opportunity’ for risk reduction in post-disaster recovery. ipcc-wg2.gov/njlite_download.php?id=5282. Accessed 20 Dec 2010
  5. Davidson C, Johnson C, Lizarralde G, Dikmen N, Sliwinski A (2007) Truths and myths about community participation in post-disaster housing projects. Habitat Int 31(1):100–115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Galbraith JR (1983) Strategy and organization planning. Hum Resour Manage 22(1–2):63–77.  https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm.3930220110 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Global Facility for Disaster Reduction and Facility, GFDRR (2014) Guide to developing disaster recovery framework (World Reconstruction Conference Version), GFDRR, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  8. Goold M (2002) Designing effective organizations: how to create structured networks. Jossey-Bass , Wiley (distributor), San Francisco Calif Google Scholar
  9. Herber J, Singh JV, Useem M (2000) The design of new organisational forms. In: Wharton and managing technologies, pp 376–392 (Reprinted in Mintzberg H, Ghoshal S, Lampel J, Quinn JB (2003) The strategy process: concepts, contexts, cases, 4th edn. Pearson Education, pp 234–240)Google Scholar
  10. HFIR (2012a) Documenting the reconstruction of Bam, role and function of governments, international agencies and NGOs in reconstruction, (focusing on Housing Reconstruction) (Unpublished report) (in Persian)Google Scholar
  11. HFIR (2012b) Documenting the reconstruction of Bam: design process in reconstruction, (unpublished report) (in Persian)Google Scholar
  12. Lyons M, Schilderman T, Boano C, D’Urzo S (2010) Conclusions. In: Lyons M, Schilderman T, Boano C (eds) Building back better: delivering people-centred housing reconstruction at scale. Pract Action Pub, Warwickshire, UK, pp 345–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Maskrey A (1994) Disaster mitigation as a crisis of paradigms: reconstructing after the Alto Mayo earthquake, Per. In: Varley A, Wiley J (eds) Disasters, development and environment. Chichester, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  14. Maskrey A (2011) Revisiting community-based disaster risk management. Environ Hazards 10(1):42–52.  https://doi.org/10.3763/ehaz.2011.0005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mintzberg H (1980) Structure in 5’s: a synthesis of the research on organization design. Manage Sci 26(3):322–341CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mintzberg H, Ghoshal S, Lampel J, Quinn JB (2003) The strategy process: concepts, contexts, cases, 4th edn. Pearson EducationGoogle Scholar
  17. Morgan G (2006) Images of organization, updated edition (first edition 1997). Sage, Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  18. Quzai U (2010) Pakistan: implementing people-centred reconstruction in urban and rural areas. In: Lyons M, Schilderman T, Boano C (eds) Building back better: delivering people-centred housing reconstruction at scale. Pract Action Pub, Warwickshire UK, pp 113–134Google Scholar
  19. Saemian S, Erfanian Daneshvar A (2011) The process of technical control and supervision in reconstruction of Bam (Unpublished report) (in Persian)Google Scholar
  20. Wisner B (2004) Chapter 9, Towards a safer environment. At risk: natural hazards, People’s Vulnerability and Disasters. Routledge, London, pp 321–376Google Scholar
  21. Zetter R, Boano C (2010) Space and place after natural disasters and forced displacement. In: Lizarralde G, Johnson C, Davidson C (eds) Rebuilding after disasters: from emergency to sustainability. Spon Press, London, New York, pp 206–230Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Silk Cities, The Bartlett Development Planning UnitUniversity College LondonLondonUK

Personalised recommendations