Skip to main content

Value the Eigenvalue

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Introduction to Random Matrices

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics ((BRIEFSMAPHY,volume 26))

  • 3658 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, we start discussing the eigenvalues of random matrices.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Why is it defined a ‘surmise’? After all, it is the result of an exact calculation! The story goes as follows: at a conference on Neutron Physics by Time-of-Flight, held at the Oak Ridge National Laboratory in 1956, people asked a question about the possible shape of the distribution of the spacings of energy levels in a heavy nucleus. E. P. Wigner, who was in the audience, walked up to the blackboard and guessed (=surmised) the answer given above.

  2. 2.

    We will use the same symbol \(\rho \) for both the jpdf of the entries in the upper triangle and of the eigenvalues.

  3. 3.

    This jpdf goes back to the prehistory of RMT. It is an immediate consequence of Theorem 2 in [2], a 1939 statistics paper published in the journal Annals of Eugenics (a rather scary title, isn’t it?). In its full glory, it appeared explicitly for the first time in [3].

  4. 4.

    It can be computed via the so-called Mehta’s integral, a close relative of the celebrated Selberg’s integral [4].

  5. 5.

    The Dyson index is equal to the number of real variables needed to specify one entry of your matrix: 1 for real, 2 for complex and 4 for quaternions. This is usually referred to as Dyson’s threefold way. For the Gaussian ensemble, then, GOE corresponds to \(\beta =1\), GUE to \(\beta =2\) and GSE to \(\beta =4\).

  6. 6.

    For \(\beta =4\), each matrix has 2N eigenvalues that are two-fold degenerate.

  7. 7.

    Quite often, however, you find in the literature a Gaussian weight including extra factors, such as \(\exp (-(\beta /2)\sum _ix_i^2)\) or \(\exp (-(N/2)\sum _ix_i^2)\). One then needs to be very careful when comparing theoretical results (obtained with such conventions) to numerical simulations—in particular, a rescaling of the numerical eigenvalues by \(\sqrt{\beta }\) or \(\sqrt{N}\) before histogramming is essential in these two modified scenarios.

References

  1. P. Šeba, J. Stat. Mech. L10002 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  2. P.L. Hsu, Ann. Hum. Genet. 9, 250 (1939)

    Google Scholar 

  3. C.E. Porter, N. Rosenzweig, Ann. Acad. Sci. Fennicae, Serie A VI Physica 44 (1960), reprinted in C.E. Porter, Statistical Theories of Spectra: Fluctuations (Academic Press, New York, 1965)

    Google Scholar 

  4. P.J. Forrester, S.O. Warnaar, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc. (N.S) 45, 489 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pierpaolo Vivo .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Livan, G., Novaes, M., Vivo, P. (2018). Value the Eigenvalue. In: Introduction to Random Matrices. SpringerBriefs in Mathematical Physics, vol 26. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70885-0_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics