Skip to main content

Designing and Prototyping Adaptive Structures—An Energy-Based Approach Beyond Lightweight Design

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Robotic Building

Abstract

This chapter presents an overview of an original methodology to design optimum adaptive structures with minimum whole-life energy. Structural adaptation is here understood as a simultaneous change of the shape and internal load-path (i.e. internal forces). The whole-life energy of the structure comprises an embodied part in the material and an operational part for structural adaptation. Instead of using more material to cope with the effect of rare but strong loading events, a strategically integrated actuation system redirects the internal load path to homogenise the stresses and to keep deflections within limits by changing the shape of the structure. This method has been used to design planar and spatial reticular structures of complex layout. Simulations show that the adaptive solution can save significant amount of the whole-life energy compared to weight-optimised passive structures. A tower supported by an exo-skeleton structural system is taken as a case study showing the potential for application of this design method to architectural buildings featuring high slenderness (e.g. long span and high-rise structures). The methodology has been successfully tested on a prototype adaptive structure whose main features are described in this chapter. Experimental tests confirmed the feasibility of the design process when applied to a real structure and that up to 70% of the whole-life energy can be saved compared to equivalent passive structures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abdel-Rohman M, Leipholz H (1983) Active control of tall buildings. J Struct Eng 109(3):628–645

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adam B, Smith IF (2008) Active tensegrity: a control framework for an adaptive civil-engineering structure. Comput Struct 86(23–24):2215–2223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bani-Hani K, Ghaboussi J (1998) Nonlinear structural control using neural networks. J Eng Mech 124(3):319–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker GM, Staebler J, Barth K (2011) Serviceability limits and economical steel bridge design (report no. FHWA-HIF-11-044). U.S. Department of Transportation, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnes MR (1977) Form finding and analysis of tension space structures by dynamic relaxation. Doctoral dissertation, City University, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Campanile LF (2005) Initial thoughts on weight penalty effects in shape-adaptable systems. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 16:47–56

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor JJ (2002) Introduction to structural motion control. Pearson Education, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Crisfield M (1990) A consistent co-rotational formulation for non-linear, three-dimensional, beam-elements. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 81(2):131–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Day A (1965) An introduction to dynamic relaxation. Engineer 220–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Domer B, Smith I (2005) An active structure that learns. J Comput. Civ. Eng 19(1):16–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dorf RC, Bishop RH (2011) Modern control systems, 12th ed., Pearson

    Google Scholar 

  • ENERPAC (2016) E328e industrial tools—Europe. http://www.enerpac.com/en-us/downloads. Accessed 12 July 2017

  • Felippa C, Haugen B (2005) A unified formulation of small-strain corotational finite elements: I. Theory. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 194(21–24):2285–2336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fest E, Shea K, Domer B, Smith F (2003) Adjustable tensegrity structures. J Struct Eng 129:515–526

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Flori JP, Delpech GG (2010) Stavros Niarchos foundation cultural center in Athens Part I: climatic analysis. Technical report, Centre Scientifique et Tecnique du Batiment, Nantes

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammond G, Jones C (2008) Embodied energy and carbon in construction materials. In: Proceedings of the institution of civil engineers—energy, vol 161, no 2, pp 87–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasse A, Campanile F (2009) Design of compliant mechanisms with selective compliance. Smart Mater Struct 18(11)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry A, Kam C, Smith M, Lewis C, King M, Boulter N, Hoad P, Wong R, Munro S and Ming S (2016) Singapore sports hub: engineering the national stadium. Struct Eng 94(9)

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber JE, Fleck NA, Ashby MF (1997) The selection of mechanical actuators based on performance indices. In: Proceedings: mathematical physical and engineering sciences, vol 453, pp 2185–2205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jenkins C (2005) Compliant structures in nature and engineering, 1st edn. WIT Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Korkmaz S (2011) A review of active structural control: challenges for engineering informatics. Comput Struct 89:2113–2132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lienhard J, Schleicher S, Poppinga S, Masselter T, Milwich M, Speck T, Knippers J (2011) Flectofin: a hingeless flapping mechanism inspired by nature. Bioinspir Biomimet 6:1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Neuhäuser S (2014) Untersuchungen zur Homogenisierung von Spannungsfeldern bei adaptiven Schalentragwerken mittels Auflagerverschiebung. University of Stuttgart (ILEK), Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Nowak AS, Collins KR (2012) Reliability of structures, 2nd edn. Taylor & Francis

    Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik S (1973) An integrated force method for discrete analysis. Int J Numer Meth Eng 6:237–251

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Patnaik S, Gendy A, Berke S, Hopkins D (1998) Modified fully utilized design (MFUD) method for stress and displacement constraints. Int J Numer Meth Eng 41:1171–1194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preumont A, de Marneffe B, Deraemaeker A, Bossensb F (2008) The damping of a truss structure with a piezoelectric transducer. Comput Struct 86(3–5):227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Previtali F, Ermanni P (2012) Performance of a non-tapered 3D morphing wing with integrated compliant ribs. J Smart Mater Struct 21:1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reksowardojo AP, Senatore G, Smith IF (2017) Large and reversible shape changes as a strategy for structural adaptation. In: International associtaion for shell and spatial structures, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Reinhorn AST, Lin R, Riley M (1992) Active bracing sytem: a full scale implementation of active control. National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, Buffalo

    Google Scholar 

  • Rodellar J, Mañosa V, Monroy C (2002) An active tendon control scheme for cable-stayed bridges with model uncertainties and seismic excitation. Struct Control Health Monit 9(1):75–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos FA, Rodrigues A, Micheletti A (2015) Design and experimental testing of an adaptive shape-morphing tensegrity structure, with frequency self-tuning capabilities, using shape-memory alloys. Smart Mater Struct 24:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schnellenbach MH, Steiner D (2013) Self-tuning closed-loop fuzzy logic control algorithm for adaptive prestressed structures. Struct Eng Int 163–172

    Google Scholar 

  • SCX (2010) Wimbledon centre court retractable roof. http://www.scxspecialprojects.co.uk/cache/filelibrary/73/library/fileLibrary/2011/6/Wimbledon.pdf. Accessed 15 Sept 2016

  • Senatore G, Duffour P, Hanna S, Labbe F, Winslow P (2011) Adaptive structures for whole life energy savings. Int Assoc Shell Spat Struct (IASS) 52(4):233–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Senatore G, Duffour P, Winslow P, Hanna S, Wise C (2013) Designing adaptive structures for whole life energy savings. In: Proceedings of the fifth international conference on structural engineering, mechanics & computation, Cape Town. Taylor & Francis Group, London, pp 2105–2110

    Google Scholar 

  • Senatore G, Piker D (2015) Interactive real-time physics: an intuitive approach to form-finding and structural analysis for design and education. Comput Aided Des 61:32–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senatore G, Duffour P, Winslow P (2018a) Energy and cost assessment of adaptive structures: Case studies. J Struct Eng (ASCE) 144(8):04018107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senatore G, Duffour P, Winslow P (2018b) Exploring the domain of application of adaptive structures. Eng Struct 167:608–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Senatore G, Duffour P, Winslow P, Wise C (2018c) Shape control and whole-life energy assessment of an “infinitely stiff” prototype adaptive structure. Smart Mater Struct 27(1):015022

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senatore G (2016) Adaptive building structures. Doctoral dissertation, University College London, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Senatore G (2017a), PushMePullMe 3D. http://www.gennarosenatore.com/research/real-time_physics/push_me_pull_me_3d.html. Accessed 09 Nov 2017

  • Senatore G (2017b) Make a scape. http://www.gennarosenatore.com/projects/make_a_scape.html. Accessed 09 Nov 2017

  • Senatore G (2017c) Adaptive structures demonstration movies. https://vimeo.com/groups/adaptivestructures. Accessed 03 2017

  • Senatore G (2017d) Adaptive structures—building centre exhibition. http://www.gennarosenatore.com/research/adaptive_structures/the_building_centre_exhibition.html. Accessed 19 Sept 2017

  • Senatore G, Wang Q, Bier H, Teuffel P (2017) The use of variable stiffness joints in adaptive structures. In: International association for shells and spatial structures, Hamburg

    Google Scholar 

  • Shea K, Smith I (1998) Intelligent structures: a new direction in structural control, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobek W (1987) Auf pneumatisch gestützten Schalungen hergestellte Betonschalen. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Sobek W, Teuffel P (2001) Adaptive systems in architecture and structural engineering. In: Liu SC (ed) Smart structures and materials 2001: smart systems for bridges, structures, and highways, Proceedings of SPIE

    Google Scholar 

  • Soong TT (1988) State of the art review: active structural control in civil engineering. Eng Struct 10(2):74–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Soong TT, Pitarresi JM (1987) Optimal design of active structures. Comput Appl Struct Eng 579–591

    Google Scholar 

  • Teuffel P (2004) Entwerfen adaptiver strukturen. Doctoral dissertation, University of Stuttgart, ILEK, Struttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Tibert G (2002) Deployable tensegrity structures for space applications. Doctoral dissertation, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Utku S (1998) Theory of adaptive structures: incorporating intelligence into engineered products. CRC Press LLC, Boca Raban

    Google Scholar 

  • Veuve NW, Safei SD, Smith IFC (2015) Deployment of a tensegrity footbridge. J Struct Eng 141(11):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent JFV (1990) Structural biomaterials. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Wada B, Fanson J, Crawley E (1990) Adaptive structures. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 1:157–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weilandt A (2007) Adaptivität bei Flächentragwerken. ILEK, University of Stuttgart, Stuttgart

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams C (2000) British museum great court roof. http://people.bath.ac.uk/abscjkw/BritishMuseum/. Accessed 14 Apr 2013

  • Xu B, Wu S, Yokoyama K (2003) Neural networks for decentralized control of cable-stayed bridge. J Bridge Eng (ASCE) 8:229–236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yao J (1972) Concept of structural control. ASCE J Struct Control 98:1567–1574

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziegler F (2005) Computational aspects of structural shape control. Comput Struct 83:1191–1204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuk W, Clark RH (1970) Kinetic architecture. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author gratefully acknowledges the Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council (EPSRC) who provided core funding through UCL Doctoral Training Centre in Urban Sustainability and Resilience, Expedition Engineering who provided significant additional resources. EPFL Applied Computing and Mechanics Laboratory (IMAC) is thankfully acknowledged for their support during the review process of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gennaro Senatore .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Senatore, G. (2018). Designing and Prototyping Adaptive Structures—An Energy-Based Approach Beyond Lightweight Design. In: Bier, H. (eds) Robotic Building. Springer Series in Adaptive Environments. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70866-9_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70866-9_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70865-2

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70866-9

  • eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics