Skip to main content

Theoretical Framework

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
U.S. Government Contractors and Human Trafficking

Part of the book series: SpringerBriefs in Criminology ((BRIEFSCRIMINOL))

  • 375 Accesses

Abstract

This research uses state-corporate crime theory to analyze the DynCorp-case, due to the inter-organizational relationship between DynCorp as a business corporation and the US government as a state agency and contractor of DynCorp in the Bosnia case. The research uses the integrated theoretical framework developed by Kramer and Michalowski (1990) to analyze the criminal activities. The framework explicates different factors that may contribute to the production of social harm on the intersections of three levels of analysis, the institutional, organizational, and individual level, and three catalysts for action, motivation, opportunity structure, and operationality of control.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Albanese, J. S. (1982b). What lockheed and la cosa nostra have in common: The effect of ideology on criminal justice policy. Crime and Delinquency, 28, 211–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, H. C. (1981). Corporate capitalism, corporate crime. Crime and Delinquency, 27(1), 4–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Box, S. (1983). Ideology, crime and mystification. London: Tavistock.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1985). White collar crime. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 1–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braithwaite, J. (1989). Criminological theory and organizational crime. Justice Quarterly, 6, 333–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, W. J. (1988). On the take: From petty crooks to presidents. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambliss, W. J. (1989). State-organized crime. Criminology, 27, 183–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinard, M. (1946). Criminological theories of violations of wartime regulations. American Sociological Review, 11, 258–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clinard, M., & Yeager, P. (1980). Corporate crime: The first comprehensive account of illegal practices among America’s top corporations. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cressey, D. R. (1950). The criminal violation of financial trust. American Sociological Review, 15, 738–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ermann, M. D., & Lundman, R. J. (1978). Corporate and governmental deviance: Problems of organizational behavior in contemporary society. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Finney, H. C., & Lesieur, H. R. (1982). A contingency theory of organizational crime. Research in the Sociology of Organizations, 1, 255–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gottfredson, M. R., & Hirschi, T. (1990). A general theory of crime. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, E. (1978). Organizational crime: A theoretical perspective. In N. K. Denzin (Ed.), Studies in symbolic interaction (Vol. 1, pp. 55–85). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1987). Causes of white-collar crime. Criminology, 25, 949–974.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschi, T., & Gottfredson, M. (1989). The significance of white-collar crime for a general theory of crime. Criminology, 27, 359–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauzlarich, D., & Kramer, R. C. (1998a). Crimes of the American nuclear state: At home and abroad. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauzlarich, D., & Kramer, R. C. (1998b). Explaining and controlling the crimes of the nuclear state. In D. Kauzlarich & R. C. Kramer (Eds.), Crimes of the American nuclear state: At home and abroad. Lebanon, NH: University Press of New England.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. C. (1990a). From white-collar crime to state-corporate crime. Paper presented at the North Central Sociological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. C., & Michalowski, R. J. (1990, November). Toward an integrated theory of state-corporate crime. Paper presented at a meeting of the American Society of Criminology, Baltimore, MD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. C., & Michalowski, R. J. (1993). State-corporate crime: Case studies in organizational deviance. Unpublished manuscript.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. C., Michalowski, R. J., & Kauzlarich, D. (2002). The origins and development of the concept and theory of state-corporate crime. Crime and Delinquency, 48(2), 263–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kramer, R. C., & Michalowski, R. J. (2006). The original formulation. In R. J. Michalowski & R. C. Kramer (Eds.), State-corporate crime: Wrongdoing at the intersection of business and government (pp. 18–26). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lane, R. E. (1953). Why businessmen violate the law. Criminal Law Journal, 44, 151–415.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messerschmidt, J. W. (1986). Capitalism, patriarchy, and crime: Toward a socialist feminist criminology. Totowa, NJ: Roman and Littlefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Michalowski, R. J. (1985). Order, law, and crime – An introduction to criminology. Westminister, MD: Random House Distribution Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Passas, N. (1990). Anomie and corporate deviance. Contemporary Crises, 14, 157–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rothe, D. L., & Mullins, C. W. (2011). State crime: Current perspectives. New York: Rutgers University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Schrager, L. S., & Short, J. F. (1978). Toward a sociology of organizational crime. Social Problems, 25, 407–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1949). White collar crime. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, E. H. (1956). Crime of corporations. In A. Cohen, A. Lindesmith, & K. Schuessler (Eds.), The Sutherland papers. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1982). Toward understanding unlawful organizational behavior. Michigan Law Review, 80, 1377–1402.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vaughan, D. (1983). Controlling unlawful organizational behavior: Social structure and corporate misconduct. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, T. R. (1981). Corporate crime: A critique of the Clinard report. Crime, Law and Social Change, 5(3), 323–336.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Cole, C., Vermeltfoort, R. (2018). Theoretical Framework. In: U.S. Government Contractors and Human Trafficking. SpringerBriefs in Criminology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70827-0_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70827-0_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70826-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70827-0

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics