Skip to main content

MR Imaging of Acute Appendicitis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
MDCT and MR Imaging of Acute Abdomen

Abstract

Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is highly accurate for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Lack of ionizing radiation and high contrast resolution makes MRI an attractive alternative to ultrasound and CT in pediatric and pregnant patients. This chapter discusses the literature supporting use of MRI in diagnosis of acute appendicitis, proper MRI technique essential for maximizing diagnostic accuracy, the MRI findings of acute appendicitis, and potential cases of false-positive and false-negative results.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Anderson JE, Bickler SW, Chang DC, Talamini MA. Examining a common disease with unknown etiology: trends in epidemiology and surgical management of appendicitis in California, 1995-2009. World J Surg. 2012;36(12):2787–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith MP, Katz DS, Lalani T, Carucci LR, Cash BD, Kim DH, et al. ACR appropriateness criteria(R) right lower quadrant pain--suspected appendicitis. Ultrasound Q. 2015;31(2):85–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Repplinger MD, Levy JF, Peethumnongsin E, Gussick ME, Svenson JE, Golden SK, et al. Systematic review and meta-analysis of the accuracy of MRI to diagnose appendicitis in the general population. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016;43(6):1346–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Duke E, Kalb B, Arif-Tiwari H, Daye ZJ, Gilbertson-Dahdal D, Keim SM, et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic performance of MRI for evaluation of acute appendicitis. AJR. 2016;206(3):508–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Petkovska I, Martin DR, Covington MF, Urbina S, Duke E, Daye ZJ, et al. Accuracy of unenhanced MR imaging in the detection of acute appendicitis: single-institution clinical performance review. Radiology. 2016;279(2):451–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Moore MM, Kulaylat AN, Hollenbeak CS, Engbrecht BW, Dillman JR, Methratta ST. Magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric appendicitis: a systematic review. Pediatr Radiol. 2016;46(6):928–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kulaylat AN, Moore MM, Engbrecht BW, Brian JM, Khaku A, Hollenbeak CS, et al. An implemented MRI program to eliminate radiation from the evaluation of pediatric appendicitis. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;50(8):1359–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Koning JL, Naheedy JH, Kruk PG. Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MR for acute appendicitis and alternative causes of abdominal pain in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2014;44(8):948–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Burke LM, Bashir MR, Miller FH, Siegelman ES, Brown M, Alobaidy M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging of acute appendicitis in pregnancy: a 5-year multiinstitutional study. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;213(5):693 e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Konrad J, Grand D, Lourenco A. MRI: first-line imaging modality for pregnant patients with suspected appendicitis. Abdom Imaging. 2015;40(8):3359–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Patel D, Fingard J, Winters S, Low G. Clinical use of MRI for the evaluation of acute appendicitis during pregnancy. Abdom Radiol. 2017;42(7):1857–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Amitai MM, Katorza E, Guranda L, Apter S, Portnoy O, Inbar Y, et al. Role of emergency magnetic resonance imaging for the workup of suspected appendicitis in pregnant women. Isr Med Assoc J. 2016;18(10):600–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Theilen LH, Mellnick VM, Longman RE, Tuuli MG, Odibo AO, Macones GA, et al. Utility of magnetic resonance imaging for suspected appendicitis in pregnant women. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2015;212(3):345 e1–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Moore MM, Kulaylat AN, Brian JM, Khaku A, Hulse MA, Engbrecht BW, et al. Alternative diagnoses at paediatric appendicitis MRI. Clin Radiol. 2015;70(8):881–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Dillman JR, Gadepalli S, Sroufe NS, Davenport MS, Smith EA, Chong ST, et al. Equivocal pediatric appendicitis: unenhanced MR imaging protocol for nonsedated children-A clinical effectiveness study. Radiology. 2016;279(1):216–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leeuwenburgh MM, Wiarda BM, Wiezer MJ, Vrouenraets BC, Gratama JW, Spilt A, et al. Comparison of imaging strategies with conditional contrast-enhanced CT and unenhanced MR imaging in patients suspected of having appendicitis: a multicenter diagnostic performance study. Radiology. 2013;268(1):135–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Leeuwenburgh MM, Wiezer MJ, Wiarda BM, Bouma WH, Phoa SS, Stockmann HB, et al. Accuracy of MRI compared with ultrasound imaging and selective use of CT to discriminate simple from perforated appendicitis. Br J Surg. 2014;101(1):e147–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rosenkrantz AB, Ginocchio LA, Cornfeld D, Froemming AT, Gupta RT, Turkbey B, et al. Interobserver reproducibility of the PI-RADS version 2 lexicon: a multicenter study of six experienced prostate radiologists. Radiology. 2016;280(3):793–804.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Davenport MS, Khalatbari S, Liu PS, Maturen KE, Kaza RK, Wasnik AP, et al. Repeatability of diagnostic features and scoring systems for hepatocellular carcinoma by using MR imaging. Radiology. 2014;272(1):132–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Puylaert CA, Tielbeek JA, Bipat S, Boellaard TN, Nio CY, Stoker J. Long-term performance of readers trained in grading Crohn disease activity using MRI. Acad Radiol. 2016;23(12):1539–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Purysko AS, Bittencourt LK, Bullen JA, Mostardeiro TR, Herts BR, Klein EA. Accuracy and interobserver agreement for prostate imaging reporting and data system, version 2, for the characterization of lesions identified on multiparametric MRI of the prostate. AJR. 2017;209(2):339–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Leeuwenburgh MM, Wiarda BM, Jensch S, van Es HW, Stockmann HB, Gratama JW, et al. Accuracy and interobserver agreement between MR-non-expert radiologists and MR-experts in reading MRI for suspected appendicitis. Eur J Radiol. 2014;83(1):103–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. des Ziedses Plantes CM, van Veen MJ, van der Palen J, Klaase JM, Gielkens HA, Geelkerken RH. The effect of unenhanced MRI on the surgeons' decision-making process in females with suspected appendicitis. World J Surg. 2016;40(12):2881–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rapp EJ, Naim F, Kadivar K, Davarpanah A, Cornfeld D. Integrating MR imaging into the clinical workup of pregnant patients suspected of having appendicitis is associated with a lower negative laparotomy rate: single-institution study. Radiology. 2013;267(1):137–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Fonseca AL, Schuster KM, Kaplan LJ, Maung AA, Lui FY, Davis KA. The use of magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of suspected appendicitis in pregnancy: shortened length of stay without increase in hospital charges. JAMA Surg. 2014;149(7):687–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee SM, Ku YM, Choi BG, Byun JY. In vivo location of the vermiform appendix in multidetector CT. J Korean Soc Radiol. 2014;70(4):283–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosines LA, Chow DS, Lampl BS, Chen S, Gordon S, Mui LW, et al. Value of gadolinium-enhanced MRI in detection of acute appendicitis in children and adolescents. AJR. 2014;203(5):W543–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Singh A, Danrad R, Hahn PF, Blake MA, Mueller PR, Novelline RA. MR imaging of the acute abdomen and pelvis: acute appendicitis and beyond. Radiographics. 2007;27(5):1419–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Tkacz JN, Anderson SA, Soto J. MR imaging in gastrointestinal emergencies. Radiographics. 2009;29(6):1767–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Martin DR, Danrad R, Herrmann K, Semelka RC, Hussain SM. Magnetic resonance imaging of the gastrointestinal tract. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2005;16(1):77–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Kinner S, Repplinger MD, Pickhardt PJ, Reeder SB. Contrast-enhanced abdominal MRI for suspected appendicitis: how we do it. AJR. 2016;207(1):49–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Heverhagen JT, Klose KJ. MR imaging for acute lower abdominal and pelvic pain. Radiographics. 2009;29(6):1781–96.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lyons GR, Renjen P, Askin G, Giambrone AE, Beneck D, Kovanlikaya A. Diagnostic utility of intravenous contrast for MR imaging in pediatric appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(4):398–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bayraktutan U, Oral A, Kantarci M, Demir M, Ogul H, Yalcin A, et al. Diagnostic performance of diffusion-weighted MR imaging in detecting acute appendicitis in children: comparison with conventional MRI and surgical findings. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014;39(6):1518–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Inci E, Kilickesmez O, Hocaoglu E, Aydin S, Bayramoglu S, Cimilli T. Utility of diffusion-weighted imaging in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Eur Radiol. 2011;21(4):768–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Lee MH, Eutsler EP, Sheybani EF, Khanna G. Rapid non-contrast magnetic resonance imaging for post appendectomy intra-abdominal abscess in children. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(8):935–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Swenson DW, Schooler GR, Stamoulis C, Lee EY. MRI of the normal appendix in children: data toward a new reference standard. Pediatr Radiol. 2016;46(7):1003–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Kearl YL, Claudius I, Behar S, Cooper J, Dollbaum R, Hardasmalani M, et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound for appendicitis in diagnostic and nondiagnostic studies. Acad Emerg Med. 2016;23(2):179–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Lam M, Singh A, Kaewlai R, Novelline RA. Magnetic resonance of acute appendicitis: pearls and pitfalls. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol. 2008;37(2):57–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Shin I, An C, Lim JS, Kim MJ, Chung YE. T1 bright appendix sign to exclude acute appendicitis in pregnant women. Eur Radiol. 2017;27(8):3310–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Rosenbaum DG, Askin G, Beneck DM, Kovanlikaya A. Differentiating perforated from non-perforated appendicitis on contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. Pediatr Radiol. 2017;47(11):1483–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Leeuwenburgh MM, Jensch S, Gratama JW, Spilt A, Wiarda BM, Van Es HW, et al. MRI features associated with acute appendicitis. Eur Radiol. 2014;24(1):214–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Avcu S, Cetin FA, Arslan H, Kemik O, Dulger AC. The value of diffusion-weighted imaging and apparent diffusion coefficient quantification in the diagnosis of perforated and nonperforated appendicitis. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2013;19(2):106–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Imler D, Keller C, Sivasankar S, Wang NE, Vasanawala S, Bruzoni M, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound as the initial imaging modality for pediatric and young adult patients with suspected appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24(5):569–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Chernyak, V. (2018). MR Imaging of Acute Appendicitis. In: Patlas, M., Katz, D., Scaglione, M. (eds) MDCT and MR Imaging of Acute Abdomen. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70778-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70778-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70777-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70778-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics