Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Imaging of the Acute Abdomen in the Pediatric Patients

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover MDCT and MR Imaging of Acute Abdomen

  • 716 Accesses

Abstract

The acute abdomen and pelvis is a serious clinical condition which may require urgent surgery. The potential causes of the acute abdomen and pelvis in pediatric patients are numerous, as in adults, and diagnosis is often delayed due to misleading signs and symptoms. Clinical signs and symptoms are often nonspecific; abdominal and pelvic pain and abdominal distention are common in a wide variety of disorders. Other signs and symptoms can include bilious vomiting, other signs of intestinal obstruction, urinary tract signs, fever, and weakness. Although in adult patients with an acute abdomen/pelvis, computed tomography (CT) is the mainstay of diagnosis and for discriminating conditions requiring surgery from those which can be treated conservatively, the use of CT in pediatric patients in recent years has decreased due to the potential risks of radiation exposure. The role of ultrasound (US) has become increasingly important. US does not use ionizing radiation, is usually readily available in emergency departments, is inexpensive, is portable, and does not require patient sedation. Furthermore, US allows assessment of intestinal peristalsis, and allows compression of the bowel. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) also does not use ionizing radiation, and can be used to diagnose a wide variety of pediatric acute abdominal and pelvic conditions, but MRI is more expansive, is not always available in emergency departments, and often requires sedation of pediatric patients to obtain good-quality images. Despite this, in line with radioprotection criteria, MRI should be considered as an alternative to CT, for its excellent ability to depict the causes of acute abdominal and pelvic disease, to provide valuable assistance in differential diagnosis, and for evaluation of any complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Cardoni G, Fabiani E, Vignini M. Il dolore addominale acuto. Rivista di emergenza ed urgenza pediatrica. 2009;3(1):5–17.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hernanz-Schulman M. CT and US in the diagnosis of appendicitis: an argument for CT. Radiology. 2010;255:3–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brenner DJ, Hall EJ. Computed tomography: an increasing source of radiation exposure. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:2277–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Cogley JR, O’Connor SC, Houshyar R, et al. Emergent pediatric US: what every radiologist should know. Radiographics. 2012;32:651–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Hryhorczuk AL, Mannix RC, Taylor GA. Pediatric abdominal pain: use of imaging in the emergency department in the United States from 1999 to 2007. Radiology. 2012;263:778–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lochead A, Jamjoom R, Ratnapalan S. Intussusception in children presenting to the emergency department. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2013;52:1029–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Galluzzo M, Gaudino F, Palliola R, et al. Intestinal intussusception. In: Miele V, Trinci M, editors. Imaging non-traumatic abdominal emergencies in pediatric patients. Switzerland: Springer International Publisher; 2016. p. 133–47.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Strouse PJ. Sonographic evaluation of the child with lower abdominal or pelvic pain. Radiol Clin North Am. 2006;44(6):911–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Di Giacomo V, Trinci M, Van der Byl G, et al. Ultrasound in newborns and children suffering from non-traumatic acute abdominal pain: imaging with clinical and surgical correlation. J Ultrasound. 2014;18:385–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. del-Pozo G, Albillos JC, Tejedor D, et al. Intussusception in children: current concepts in diagnosis and enema reduction. Radiographics. 1999;19:299–319.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. John SD. The value of ultrasound in children with suspected intussusception. Emerg Radiol. 1998;5:297–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hryhorczuk AL, Strouse PJ. Validation of US as a first-line diagnostic test for assessment of pediatric ileocolic intussusception. Pediatr Radiol. 2009;39:1075–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ko HS, Schenk JP, Tröger J, et al. Current radiological management of intussusception in children. Eur Radiol. 2007;17:2411–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Lim HK, Bae SH, Lee KH, et al. Assessment of reducibility of ileocolic intussusception in children: usefulness of color Doppler sonography. Radiology. 1994;191:781–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sargent MA, Babyn P, Alton DJ. Plain abdominal radiography in suspected intussusception: a reassessment. Pediatr Radiol. 1994;24:17–20.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Niramis R, Watanatittan S, Kruatrachue A, et al. Management of recurrent intussusception: nonoperative or operative reduction? J Pediatr Surg. 2010;45:2175–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Flaum V, Schneider A, Ferreira CG, et al. Twenty years’ experience for reduction of ileocolic intussusception by saline enema under sonography control. J Pediatr Surg. 2015;51:179–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Stein M, Alton DJ, Daneman A. Pneumatic reduction of intussusception: 5-years experience. Radiology. 1992;183:681–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grosfeld JL. Intussusception then and now: a historical vignette. J Am Coll Surg. 2005;201:830–3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaiser S, Frenckner B, Jorulf HK. Suspected appendicitis in children: US and CT—a prospective randomized study. Radiology. 2002;223:633–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Kosloske AM, Love CL, Rohrer JE, et al. The diagnosis of appendicitis in children: outcomes of a strategy based on pediatric surgical evaluation. Pediatrics. 2004;113:29–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rabah R. Pathology of the appendix in children: an institutional experience and review of the literature. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:15–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Sivit CJ, Siegel MJ, Applegate KE, et al. When appendicitis is suspected in children. Radiographics. 2001;21:247–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wiersma F, Toorenvliet BR, Bloem JL, et al. US examination of the appendix in children with suspected appendicitis: the additional value of secondary signs. Eur Radiol. 2009;19:455–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Klein MD. Clinical approach to a child with abdominal pain who might have appendicitis. Pediatr Radiol. 2007;37:11–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. van Breda Vriesman AC, Puylaert JB. Mimics of appendicitis: alternative nonsurgical diagnoses with sonography and CT. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186(4):1103–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Doria AS, Moineddin R, Kellenberger CJ, et al. US or CT for diagnosis of appendicitis in children and adults? A meta-analysis. Radiology. 2006;241:83–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Puylaert JB. Acute appendicitis: US evaluation using graded compression. Radiology. 1986;158:355–60.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Birnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology. 2000;215:337–48.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Buquicchio GL, Cuneo G, Giannecchini S, et al. Acute appendicitis. In: Miele V, Trinci M, editors. Imaging non-traumatic abdominal emergencies in pediatric patients. Switzerland: Springer International Publisher; 2016. p. 149–70.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  31. Kessler N, Cyteval C, Gallix B, et al. Appendicitis: evaluation of sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of US, Doppler US, and laboratory findings. Radiology. 2004;230:472–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Papes D, Medancic SS, Antabak A, et al. What is the acceptable rate of negative appendicectomy? Comment of the prospective evaluation of the added value of imaging within the Dutch National diagnostic appendicitis guideline—do we forget our clinical eye? Dig Surg. 2015;32:181–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Singh S, Kaira MK, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, et al. Radiation dose reduction with hybrid iterative reconstruction for pediatric CT. Radiology. 2012;263:537–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Imler D, Keller C, Sivasankar S, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging versus ultrasound as the initial imaging modality for pediatric and young adult patients with suspected appendicitis. Acad Emerg Med. 2017;24:569–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Moore MM, Kulaylat AN, Hollenbeak CS, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging in pediatric appendicitis: a systematic review. Pediatr Radiol. 2016;46:928–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Cullen JJ, Kelly KA, Moir CR, et al. Surgical management of Meckel’s diverticulum: an epidemiologic, population-based study. Ann Surg. 1994;220:564–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Pantongrag-Brown L, Levine MS, Buetow PC, et al. Meckel’s enteroliths: clinical, radiologic, and pathologic findings. Am J Roentgenol. 1996;167:1447–50.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Maglinte DD, Elmore MF, Isenberg M, et al. Meckel diverticulum: radiologic demonstration by enteroclysis. Am J Roentgenol. 1980;134:925–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  39. Daneman A, Lobo E, Alton DJ, et al. The value of sonography, CT and air enema for detection of complicated Meckel diverticulum in children with nonspecific clinical presentation. Pediatr Radiol. 1998;28:928–32.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Levy AD, Hobbs CM. From the archives of the AFIP. Meckel diverticulum: radiologic features with pathologic correlation. Radiographics. 2004;24:565–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Blumhardt R, Growcock GW, Hartshorne MF, et al. Patterns of intestinal activity with Meckel’s scintigraphy. Gastrointest Radiol. 1984;9:353–6.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Miele V, De Cicco ML, Andreoli C, Buffa V, Adami L, David V. US and CT findings in complicated Meckel diverticulum. Radiol Med. 2001;101:230–4.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Esposito JJ. Small intestinal abnormalities in anaphylactoid purpura: report of two cases. Radiology. 1950;55:548–52.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Miller JH, Kemberling CR. Ultrasound scanning of the gastrointestinal tract in children: subject review. Radiology. 1984;152:671–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Quillin SP, Siegel MJ. Color Doppler US of children with acute lower abdominal pain. Radiographics. 1993;13:1281–93.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Emergency Radiology, S. Camillo Hospital, Rome, Italy

    Grazia Loretta Buquicchio M.D., Margherita Trinci M.D., Riccardo Ferrari M.D., Stefania Ianniello M.D. & Michele Galluzzo M.D.

  2. Department of Radiology, Careggi University Hospital, Florence, Italy

    Vittorio Miele M.D.

Authors
  1. Grazia Loretta Buquicchio M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Margherita Trinci M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Riccardo Ferrari M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Stefania Ianniello M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Michele Galluzzo M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Vittorio Miele M.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vittorio Miele M.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Hamilton General Hospital, Department of Radiology, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

    Michael Patlas

  2. Department of Radiology, Winthrop-University Hospital, Mineola, New York, USA

    Douglas S. Katz

  3. Department of Imaging, Pineta Grande Medical Center, Castel Volturno, Caserta, Italy

    Mariano Scaglione

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Buquicchio, G.L., Trinci, M., Ferrari, R., Ianniello, S., Galluzzo, M., Miele, V. (2018). Imaging of the Acute Abdomen in the Pediatric Patients. In: Patlas, M., Katz, D., Scaglione, M. (eds) MDCT and MR Imaging of Acute Abdomen. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70778-5_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70778-5_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70777-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70778-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation