Abstract
Models that simulate environmental processes by quantifying fluxes and states vary largely in their complexity and number of parameters. Most models suffer from over-parameterization, meaning that the available information does not allow identification of all model parameters. Over-parameterization is a serious problem in environmental modeling, as it might imply that a model works well, but could do so for the wrong reasons. This can lead to unreliable results when the model is used to make predictions. Model testing, or model validation, is therefore crucial. Usually, in more complex models more, internal variables are explicitly simulated, and, thus, there are more opportunities for model testing against observations than is the case for simple models. Increasing model complexity, however, comes at the cost of more parameters, and therefore the risk for over-parameterization increases as well. In this chapter, we discuss different ways to validate models, which simulate hydrological processes at the catchment scale, and the balance between model testability and over-parameterization.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Ambroise, B., Perrin, J. L., & Reutenauer, D. (1995). Multicriterion validation of a semidistributed conceptual model of the water cycle in the Fecht Catchment (Vosges Massif, France). Water Resources Research, 31(6), 1467–1481. https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR03293.
Andreadis, K. M., & Lettenmaier, D. P. (2006). Assimilating remotely sensed snow observations into a macroscale hydrology model. Advances in Water Resources, 29(6), 872–886. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2005.08.004.
Barnes, C. J., & Bonell, M. (1996). Application of the Unit hydrograph techniques to solute transport in catchments. Hydrological Processes, 10(6), 793–802. https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(199606)10:6%3c793:AID-HYP372%3e3.0.CO;2-K.
Bathurst, J., Ewen, J, Parkin, G, O’Connell, P., & Cooper, J. (2004). Validation of catchment models for predicting land-use and climate change impacts. 3. Blind validation for internal and outlet responses. Journal of Hydrology, 287(1–4), 74–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2003.09.021.
Beven, K. (1983). Surface water hydrology—runoff generation and basin structure. Reviews of Geophysics and Space Physics, 21(3), 721–730. https://doi.org/10.1029/RG021i003p00721.
Beven, K. (1989). Changing ideas in hydrology—the case of physically-based models. Journal of Hydrology, 105(1–2), 157–172. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(89)90101-7.
Beven, K. (1993). Prophecy, reality and uncertainty in distributed hydrological modelling. Advances in Water Resources, 16, 41–51.
Beven, K. (2006). A manifesto for the equifinality thesis. Journal of Hydrology, 320, 18–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2005.07.007.
Beven, K. (2012). Rainfall-runoff modelling: The primer (2nd Ed.).
Beven, K., & Germann, P. (1982). Macropores and water flow in soils. Water Resources Research, 18(5), 1311–1325. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR018i005p01311.
Beven, K. J. (2000). Uniqueness of place and process representations in hydrological modelling. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 4(2), 203–213. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-203-2000.
Birkel, C., & Soulsby, C. (2015). Advancing tracer-aided rainfall-runoff modelling: A review of progress, problems and unrealised potential. Hydrological Processes, 29(25), 5227–5240. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10594.
Birkel, C., Soulsby, C., & Tetzlaff, D. (2011). Modelling catchment-scale water storage dynamics: Reconciling dynamic storage with tracer-inferred passive storage. Hydrological Processes, 25(25), 3924–3936. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8201.
Bixio, A., et al. (2002). Modeling groundwater-surface water interactions including effects of morphogenetic depressions in the Chernobyl exclusion zone. Environmental Geology, 42(2–3), 162–177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00254-001-0486-7.
Blazkova, S., Beven, K., Tacheci, P., & Kulasova, A. (2002). Testing the distributed water table predictions of TOPMODEL (allowing for uncertainty in model calibration): The death of TOPMODEL? Water Resources Research, 38(11), 39-1–39–11. https://doi.org/10.1029/2001wr000912.
Brooks, E. S., Boll, J., & McDaniel, P. A. (2004). A hillslope-scale experiment to measure lateral saturated hydraulic conductivity. Water Resources Research, 40(W04208), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1029/2003WR002858.
Brunner, P., & Simmons, C. T. (2012). Hydrogeosphere: A fully integrated, physically based hydrological model. Ground Water, 50(2), 170–176. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.2011.00882.x.
Bühler, Y., et al. (2015). Snow depth mapping in high-alpine catchments using digital photogrammetry. Cryosphere, 9(1), 229–243. https://doi.org/10.5194/tc-9-229-2015.
Camporese, M., Paniconi, C., Putti, M., & Orlandini, S. (2010). Surface-subsurface flow modeling with path-based runoff routing, boundary condition-based coupling, and assimilation of multisource observation data. Water Resources Research, 46(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2008wr007536.
Clark, M. P., et al. (2017). The evolution of process-based hydrologic models: Historical challenges and the collective quest for physical realism. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(7), 3427–3440. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-21-3427-2017.
Clark, M. P., Schaefli, B., Schymanski, S. J., Samaniego, L., Luce, C. H., Jackson, B. M., et al. (2016). Improving the theoretical underpinnings of process-based hydrologic models. Water Resources Research, 52(3), 2350–2365. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR017910.
Coron, L., Andréassian, V., Perrin, C., Lerat, J., Vaze, J., Bourqui, M., et al. (2012). Crash testing hydrological models in contrasted climate conditions: An experiment on 216 Australian catchments. Water Resources Research, 48(5), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011721.
Dakhlaoui, H., Ruelland, D., Tramblay, Y., & Bargaoui, Z. (2017). Evaluating the robustness of conceptual rainfall-runoff models under climate variability in Northern Tunisia. Journal of Hydrology, 550, 201–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.04.032.
Davies, J., Beven, K., Nyberg, L., & Rodhe, A. (2011). A discrete particle representation of hillslope hydrology: Hypothesis testing in reproducing a tracer experiment at Gårdsjön, Sweden. Hydrological Processes, 25(23), 3602–3612. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8085.
Detty, J. M., & McGuire, K. J. (2010). Topographic controls on shallow groundwater dynamics: Implications of hydrologic connectivity between hillslopes and riparian zones in a till mantled catchment. Hydrological Processes, 24(16), 2222–2236. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7656.
Dong, J., Walker, J. P., Houser, P. R., & Sun, C. (2007). Scanning multichannel microwave radiometer snow water equivalent assimilation. Journal of Geophysical Research, 112(D7), D07108. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006JD007209.
Dunn, S. M., Bacon, J. R., Soulsby, C., Tetzlaff, D., Stutter, M. I., Waldron, S., et al. (2008a). Interpretation of homogeneity in d18O signatures of stream water in a nested sub-catchment system in North-East Scotland. Hydrological Processes, 22, 4767–4782.
Dunn, S. M., Freer, J., Weiler, M., Kirkby, M. J., Seibert, J., Quinn, P. F., et al. (2008b). Conceptualization in catchment modelling: Simply learning? Hydrological Processes, 22(13), 2389–2393. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7070.
Dunne, T. (1983). Relation of field studies and modeling in the prediction of storm runoff. Journal of Hydrology, 65(1–3), 25–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(83)90209-3.
Durand, M., & Margulis, S. A. (2006). Feasibility test of multifrequency radiometric data assimilation to estimate snow water equivalent. Journal of Hydrometeorology, 7(3), 443–457. https://doi.org/10.1175/JHM502.1.
Ebel, B. A., & Loague, K. (2006). Physics-based hydrologic-response simulation: Seeing through the fog of equifinality. Hydrological Processes, 20(13), 2887–2900. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6388.
Ebel, B. A., Loague, K., Vanderkwaak, J. E., Dietrich, W. E., Montgomery, D. R., Torres, R., et al. (2007). Near-surface hydrologic response for a steep, unchanneled catchment near Coos Bay, Oregon: 2. Physics-based simulations. American Journal of Science, 307(4), 709–748. https://doi.org/10.2475/04.2007.03.
Euser, T., Winsemius, H. C., Hrachowitz, M., Fenicia, F., Uhlenbrook, S., & Savenije, H. H. G. (2013). A framework to assess the realism of model structures using hydrological signatures. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(5), 1893–1912. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-1893-2013.
Fenicia, F., McDonnell, J. J., & Savenije, H. H. G. (2008). Learning from model improvement: On the contribution of complementary data to process understanding. Water Resources Research, 44 (December 2007), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007wr006386.
Finger, D., Vis, M. J. P., Huss, M., & Seibert, J. (2015). The value of multiple data set calibration versus model complexity for improving the performance of hydrological models in mountain catchments. Water Resources Research, 51(1), 1939–1958. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016259.
Glaser, B., Klaus, J., Frei, S., Frentress, J., Pfister, L., & Hopp, L. (2016). On the value of surface saturated area dynamics mapped with thermal infrared imagery for modeling the hillslope-riparian-stream continuum. Water Resources Research, 52(10), 8317–8342. https://doi.org/10.1002/2015WR018414.
Grabs, T., Seibert, J., Bishop, K., & Laudon, H. (2009). Modeling spatial patterns of saturated areas: A comparison of the topographic wetness index and a dynamic distributed model. Journal of Hydrology, 373(1–2), 15–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.03.031.
Grayson, R. B., & Blöschl, G. (eds.) (2001). Spatial patterns in catchment hydrology: Observations and modelling. CUP Archive.
Grayson, R. B., Moore, I. D., & McMahon, T. A. (1992). Physically based hydrologic modeling 2. Is the concept realistic. Water Resources Research, 26(10), 2659–2666.
Griessinger, N., Seibert, J., Magnusson, J., & Jonas, T. (2016). Assessing the benefit of snow data assimilation for runoff modeling in Alpine catchments. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 20(9), 3895–3905. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-20-3895-2016.
de Grosbois, E., Hooper, R. P., & Christophersen, N. (1988). A multisignal automatic calibration methodology for hydrochemical models: A case study of the Birkenes Model. Water Resources Research, 24(8), 1299–1307. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR024i008p01299.
Gupta, H. V., Kling, H., Yilmaz, K. K., & Martinez, G. F. (2009). Decomposition of the mean squared error and NSE performance criteria: Implications for improving hydrological modelling. Journal of Hydrology, 377(1–2), 80–91. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.003.
Gupta, H. V., Wagener, T., & Liu, Y. (2008). Reconciling theory with observations: Elements of a diagnostic approach to model evaluation. Hydrological Processes, 22, 3802–3813. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6989.
Hansen, A. L., Refsgaard, J. C., Christensen, B. S. B., & Jensen, K. H. (2013). Importance of including small-scale tile drain discharge in the calibration of a coupled groundwater-surface water catchment model. Water Resources Research, 49(1), 585–603. https://doi.org/10.1029/2011WR011783.
Hartmann, A., Goldscheider, N., Wagener, T., Lange, J., & Weiler, M. (2014). Karst water resources in a changing world: Review of hydrological modeling approaches. Reviews of Geophysics, 52(3), 218–242. https://doi.org/10.1002/2013RG000443.
Hartmann, A., et al. (2013). Process-based karst modelling to relate hydrodynamic and hydrochemical characteristics to system properties. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(8), 3305–3321. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-3305-2013.
Haught, D. R. W., & van Meerveld, H. J. (2011). Spatial variation in transient water table responses: Differences between an upper and lower hillslope zone. Hydrological Processes, 25(25), 3866–3877. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8354.
Hourdin, F, et al. (2016). The art and science of climate model tuning. Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society (MARCH): BAMS-D-15-00135.1. https://doi.org/10.1175/bams-d-15-00135.1.
Hrachowitz, M., Savenije, H., Bogaard, T. A., Tetzlaff, D., & Soulsby, C. (2013). What can flux tracking teach us about water age distribution patterns and their temporal dynamics? Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 17(2), 533–564. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-17-533-2013.
Iorgulescu, I., Beven, K. J., & Musy, A. (2005). Data-based modelling of runoff and chemical tracer concentrations in the Haute-Mentue research catchment (Switzerland). Hydrological Processes, 19(13), 2557–2573. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5731.
Ivanov, V. Y., Vivoni, E. R., Bras, R. L., & Entekhabi, D. (2004). Catchment hydrologic response with a fully distributed triangulated irregular network model. Water Resources Research, 40(11). https://doi.org/10.1029/2004wr003218.
James, L. D., & Burges, S. J. (1982). Selection, calibration, and testing of hydrologic models, Hydrologic Modeling of Small Watersheds (C Haan, H Johnson, and D Brakensiek, eds). American Society of Agricultural Engineers: St. Joseph, Mich.
Jones, J. P., Sudicky, E. A., Brookfield, A. E., & Park, Y. -J. (2006). An assessment of the tracer-based approach to quantifying groundwater contributions to streamflow. Water Resources Research, 42(2). https://doi.org/10.1029/2005wr004130.
Jones, J. P., Sudicky, E. A., & McLaren, R. G. (2008). Application of a fully-integrated surface-subsurface flow model at the watershed-scale: A case study. Water Resources Research, 44(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006wr005603.
Kachanoski, R. G., De Jong, E., & Van, Wesenbeeck I. J. (1990). Field scale patterns of soil water storage from non-contacting measurements of bulk electrical conductivity. Canadian Journal of Soil Science, 70(3), 537–542. https://doi.org/10.4141/cjss90-056.
Karlsen, R. H., Seibert, J., Grabs, T., Laudon, H., Blomkvist, P., & Bishop, K. (2016). The assumption of uniform specific discharge: Unsafe at any time? Hydrological Processes, 30(21), 3978–3988. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10877.
Kikuchi, C. (2017). Toward increased use of data worth analyses in groundwater studies. Groundwater, 55(5), 670–673. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12562.
Kirchner, J. W. (2006a). Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology. Water Resources Research, 42(3), 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004362.
Kirchner, J. W. (2006b). Getting the right answers for the right reasons: Linking measurements, analyses, and models to advance the science of hydrology. Water Resources Research, 42(3), W03S04 https://doi.org/10.1029/2005wr004362.
Kirchner, J. W., & Neal, C. (2013). Universal fractal scaling in stream chemistry and its implications for solute transport and water quality trend detection. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 110(30), 12213–12218. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1304328110.
Klemeš, V. (1983). Conceptualization and scale in hydology. Journal of Hydrology, 65, 1–23.
Klemeš, V. (1986a). Operational testing of hydrological simulation models. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 31(1), 13–24. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626668609491024.
Klemeš, V. (1986b). Dilettantism in hydrology: Transition or destiny? Water Resources Research, 22(9 S), 177S–188S. https://doi.org/10.1029/wr022i09sp0177s.
Klemeš, V. (1997). Guest editorial: Of carts and horses in hydrologic modeling. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering, 2(2), 43–49. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(1997)2:2(43).
Koboltschnig, G. R., Schöner, W., Zappa, M., Kroisleitner, C., & Holzmann, H. (2008). Runoff modelling of the glacierized Alpine Upper Salzach Basin (Austria): Multi-criteria result validation. Hydrological Processes, 22(19), 3950–3964. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7112.
Krause, P., & Boyle, D. P. (2005). Advances in geosciences comparison of different efficiency criteria for hydrological model assessment. Advances In Geosciences, 5(89), 89–97. https://doi.org/10.5194/adgeo-5-89-2005.
Kuczera, G., & Mroczkowski, M. (1998). Assessment of hydrologic parameter uncertainty and the worth of multiresponse data. Water Resources Research, 34(6), 1481–1489. https://doi.org/10.1029/98WR00496.
Laudan, L. (1990). Demystifying underdetermination. In C. W. Savage (Ed.), Scientific theories. Minnesota studies in the philosophy of science (pp. 267–297). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press. https://doi.org/10.1080/03634528709378635.
Leaf, A. T. (2017). Using models to identify the best data: An example from Northern Wisconsin. Groundwater, 55(5), 641–645. https://doi.org/10.1111/gwat.12561.
Liang, X., Lettenmaier, D. P., Wood, E. F., & Burges, S. J. (1994). A simple hydrologically based model of land surface water and energy fluxes for general circulation models. Journal of Geophysical Research, 99(D7), 14415. https://doi.org/10.1029/94JD00483.
Lindström, G. (1997). A simple automatic calibration routine for the HBV model. Nordic Hydrology, 28(3), 153–168.
Loague, K., & Ebel, B. A. (2016). Finite-element modelling of physics-based hillslope hydrology, Keith Beven, and beyond. Hydrological Processes, 30(14), 2432–2437. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10762.
Loague, K., & VanderKwaak, J. E. (2002). Simulating hydrological response for the R-5 catchment: Comparison of two models and the impact of the roads. Hydrological Processes, 16(5), 1015–1032. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.316.
Loague, K., & VanderKwaak, J. E. (2004a). Physics-based hydrologic response simulation: Platinum bridge, 1958 Edsel, or useful tool. Hydrological Processes, 18(15), 2949–2956. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5737.
Loague, K., & VanderKwaak, J. E. (2004b). Physics-based hydrologic response simulation: Platinum bridge, 1958 Edsel, or useful tool. Hydrological Processes, 18(15), 2949–2956. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5737.
Magnusson, J., Gustafsson, D., Hüsler, F., & Jonas, T. (2014). Assimilation of point SWE data into a distributed snow cover model comparing two contrasting methods. Water Resources Research, 50(10), 7816–7835. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR015302.
Magnusson, J., Wever, N., Essery, R., Helbig, N., Winstral, A., & Jonas, T. (2015). Evaluating snow models with varying process representations for hydrological applications. Water Resources Research, 51(4), 2707–2723. https://doi.org/10.1002/2014WR016498.
Martinez-Landa, L., & Carrera, J. (2005). An analysis of hydraulic conductivity scale effects in granite (Full-scale Engineered Barrier Experiment (FEBEX), Grimsel, Switzerland). Water Resources Research, 41(3), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004WR003458.
McGuire, K. J., Weiler, M., & McDonnell, J. J. (2007). Integrating tracer experiments with modeling to assess runoff processes and water transit times. Advances in Water Resources, 30(4), 824–837. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.advwatres.2006.07.004.
McMillan, H., Krueger, T., & Freer, J. (2012). Benchmarking observational uncertainties for hydrology: Rainfall, river discharge and water quality. Hydrological Processes, 26(26), 4078–4111. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9384.
Milzow, C., Krogh, P. E., & Bauer-Gottwein, P. (2011). Combining satellite radar altimetry, SAR surface soil moisture and GRACE total storage changes for hydrological model calibration in a large poorly gauged catchment. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(6), 1729–1743. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-1729-2011.
Mirus, B. B., Ebel, B. A., Heppner, C. S., Loague, K. (2011). Assessing the detail needed to capture rainfall-runoff dynamics with physics-based hydrologic response simulation. Water Resources Research 47(3). https://doi.org/10.1029/2010wr009906.
Mirus, B. B., Loague, K., VanderKwaak, J. E., Kampf, S. K., & Burges, S. J. (2009). A hypothetical reality of Tarrawarra-like hydrologic response. Hydrological Processes, 23(7), 1093–1103. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.7241.
Motovilov, Y. G., Gottschalk, L., Engeland, K., & Rodhe, A. (1999). Validation of a distributed hydrological model against spatial observations. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 99, 257–277.
Mroczkowski, M., Raper, P. G., & Kuczera, G. (1997). The quest for more powerful validation of conceptual catchment models. Water Resources Research, 33(10), 2325–2335. https://doi.org/10.1029/97WR01922.
Nash, J. E., & Sutcliffe, J. V. (1970). River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I-a discussion of principles. Journal of Hydrology, 10, 282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6.
Parajka, J., & Blöschl, G. (2008). The value of MODIS snow cover data in validating and calibrating conceptual hydrologic models. Journal of Hydrology, 358(3–4), 240–258. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.06.006.
Parkin, G., O’Donnell, G., Ewen, J., Bathurst, J. C., O’Connell, P. E., & Lavabre, J. (1996). Validation of catchment models for predicting land-use and climate change impacts. 2. Case study for a Mediterranean catchment. Journal of Hydrology, 175(1–4), 595–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0022-1694(96)80027-8.
Perrin, C., Michel, C., & Andréassian, V. (2003). Improvement of a parsimonious model for streamflow simulation. Journal of Hydrology, 279(1–4), 275–289. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1694(03)00225-7.
Pool, S., Vis, M. J. P., Knight, R. R., & Seibert, J. (2017). Streamflow characteristics from modeled runoff time series – importance of calibration criteria selection. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 21(11), 5443–5457.
Pool, S., Vis, M., & Seibert, J. (2018). Evaluating model performance: Towards a non-parametric variant of the Kling-Gupta efficiency. Hydrological Sciences Journal, 63, 13–14, 1941–1953. https://doi.org/10.1080/02626667.2018.1552002.
Refsgaard, J. C. (1997). Parameterisation, calibration and validation of distributed hydrological models. Journal of Hydrology, 198, 69–97.
Refsgaard, J. C., & Knudsen, J. (1996). Operational validation and intercomparison of different types of hydrological models. Water Resources Research, 32(7), 2189–2202. https://doi.org/10.1029/96WR00896.
Remondi, F., Kirchner, J. W., Burlando, P., & Fatichi, S. (2018). Water flux tracking with a distributed hydrological model to quantify controls on the spatiotemporal variability of transit time distributions. Water Resources Research, 3081–3099. https://doi.org/10.1002/2017wr021689.
Rivera Villarreyes, C. A., Baroni, G., & Oswald, S. E. (2011). Integral quantification of seasonal soil moisture changes in farmland by cosmic-ray neutrons. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 15(12), 3843–3859. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-15-3843-2011.
Robinson, D. A., Campbell, C. S., Hopmans, J. W., Hornbuckle, B. K., Jones, S. B., Knight, R., et al. (2008). Soil moisture measurement for ecological and hydrological watershed-scale observatories: A review. Vadose Zone Journal, 7(1), 358. https://doi.org/10.2136/vzj2007.0143.
Schaefli, B., & Gupta, H. V. (2007). Do nash values have value? Hydrological Processes, 21, 2075–2080. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.
Schulze-Makuch, D., Carlson, D. A., Cherkauer, D. S., & Malik, P. (1999). Scale dependency of hydraulic conductivity in heterogeneous media. Groundwater, 37(6), 904–919. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6584.1999.tb01190.x.
Seibert, J. (2000). Multi-criteria calibration of a conceptual runoff model using a genetic algorithm. Hydrology and Earth System Science, 4(2), 215–224. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-4-215-2000.
Seibert, J. (2001a). Comment on “On the calibration and verification of two-dimensional, distributed, Hortonian, continuous watershed models“ by Sharika U. S. Senarath et al. Water Resources Research 37(12), 3393–3395. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000wr000017.
Seibert, J. (2001b). On the need for benchmarks in hydrological modelling. Hydrological Processes, 15(6), 1063–1064. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.446.
Seibert, J. (2003). Reliability of model predictions outside calibration conditions. Hydrology Research, 34(5), 477–492.
Seibert, J., & McDonnell, J. J. (2002). On the dialog between experimentalist and modeler in catchment hydrology: Use of soft data for multicriteria model calibration. Water Resources Research, 38(11), 23-1–23–14 https://doi.org/10.1029/2001wr000978.
Seibert, J., Rodhe, A., & Bishop, K. (2003). Simulating interactions between saturated and unsaturated storage in a conceptual runoff model. Hydrological Processes, 17(2), 379–390. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.1130.
Seyfried, M. S., & Wilcox, B. P. (1995). Scale and the nature of spatial variability: Field examples having implications for hydrologic modeling. Water Resources Research, 31(1), 173–184. https://doi.org/10.1029/94WR02025.
Sheets, R., & Hendrickx, J. M. H. (1995). Noninvasive soil water content measurement using electromagnetic induction. Water Resources Research, 31(10), 2401–2409.
Smerdon, B. D., Mendoza, C. A., & Devito, K. J. (2007). Simulations of fully coupled lake-groundwater exchange in a subhumid climate with an integrated hydrologic model. Water Resources Research, 43(1). https://doi.org/10.1029/2006wr005137.
Stadnyk, T. A., Delavau, C., Kouwen, N., & Edwards, T. W. D. (2013). Towards hydrological model calibration and validation: Simulation of stable water isotopes using the isoWATFLOOD model. Hydrological Processes, 27(25), 3791–3810. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9695.
Staudinger, M., Stoelzle, M., Cochand, F., Seibert, J., Weiler, M., & Hunkeler, D. (in review). Your work is my boundary condition! Challenges and approaches for a closer collaboration between hydrologists and hydrogeologists. Revised version resubmitted to Journal of Hydrology.
Stephenson, G. R., & Freeze, R. A. (1974). Mathematical simulation of subsurface flow contributions to snowmelt runoff, Reynolds Creek Watershed Idaho. Water Resources Research, 10(2), 284–294. https://doi.org/10.1029/WR010i002p00284.
Tromp-van Meerveld, I., & Weiler, M. (2008). Hillslope dynamics modeled with increasing complexity. Journal of Hydrology, 361(1–2), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2008.07.019.
Turner, J. V., & Barnes, C. J. (1998). Modeling of isotope and hydrogeochemical responses in catchment hydrology. In C. Kendall & J. Mcdonnell (Eds.), Isotope Tracers in Catchment Hydrology (723–760). Elsevier.
Uhlenbrook, S., & Leibundgut, C. (2002). Process-oriented catchment modelling and multiple-response validation. Hydrological Processes, 16(2), 423–440. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.330.
Vaché, K. B., & McDonnell, J. J. (2006). A process-based rejectionist framework for evaluating catchment runoff model structure. Water Resources Research, 42(2), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1029/2005WR004247.
Vaché, K. B., McDonnell, J. J., & Bolte, J. (2004). On the use of multiple criteria for a posteriori model rejection: Soft data to characterize model performance. Geophysical Research Letters, 31(21), 1–4. https://doi.org/10.1029/2004GL021577.
van Huijgevoort, M. H. J., Tetzlaff, D., Sutanudjaja, E. H., & Soulsby, C. (2016). Using high resolution tracer data to constrain water storage, flux and age estimates in a spatially distributed rainfall-runoff model. Hydrological Processes, 30(25), 4761–4778. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10902.
Van Meerveld, H. J., Seibert, J., & Peters, N. E. (2015). Hhillslope–riparian‐stream connectivity and flow directions at the panola mountain research watershed. Hydrological Processes, 29, 3556–3574. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.10508.
VanderKwaak, J. E., & Loague, K. (2001). Hydrologic-response simulations for the R-5 catchment with a comprehensive physics-based model. Water Resources Research, 37(4), 999–1013. https://doi.org/10.1029/2000WR900272.
Vis, M., Knight, R., Pool, S., Wolfe, W., & Seibert, J. (2015). Model calibration criteria for estimating ecological flow characteristics. Water (Switzerland), 7(5), 2358–2381. https://doi.org/10.3390/w7052358.
Viviroli, D., Mittelbach, H., Gurtz, J., & Weingartner, R. (2009). Continuous simulation for flood estimation in ungauged mesoscale catchments of Switzerland—Part II: Parameter regionalisation and flood estimation results. Journal of Hydrology, 377(1–2), 208–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2009.08.022.
von Freyberg, J., Studer, B., Rinderer, M., Kirchner, J. W. (2018). Studying catchment storm response using event- and pre-event-water volumes as fractions of precipitation rather than discharge. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 22, 5847–5865. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-22-5847-2018.
Weiler, M. (2017). Macropores and preferential flow—a love-hate relationship. Hydrological Processes, 31(1), 15–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11074.
Werth, S., Güntner, A., Petrovic, S., & Schmidt, R. (2009). Integration of GRACE mass variations into a global hydrological model. Earth and Planetary Science Letters, 277(1–2), 166–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.epsl.2008.10.021.
Western, A. W., Grayson, R. B., & Green, T. R. (1999a). The tarrawarra project: High resolution spatial measurement, modelling and analysis of soil moisture and hydrological response. Hydrological Processes, 13(5), 633–652. isi:000079622700002.
Western, A. W., Grayson, R. B., & Green, T. R. (1999b). The Tarrawarra project: High resolution spatial measurement, modelling and analysis of soil moisture and hydrological response. Hydrological Processes, 13(5), 633–652.
Yilmaz, K. K., Gupta, H. V., & Wagener, T. (2008). A process-based diagnostic approach to model evaluation: Application to the NWS distributed hydrologic model. Water Resources Research, 44(9), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1029/2007WR006716.
Zehe, E., et al. (2014). HESS Opinions: From response units to functional units: A thermodynamic reinterpretation of the HRU concept to link spatial organization and functioning of intermediate scale catchments. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences, 18(11), 4635–4655. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4635-2014.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Textbox: Short Description of Catchment Hydrology
Textbox: Short Description of Catchment Hydrology
A catchment is the area that contributes to streamflow at a certain point and is usually determined based on the surface topography (Fig. 33.4). Precipitation can fall as snow or rainfall. A fraction of the precipitation is intercepted by the vegetation and evaporates from the leaves or needles without ever reaching the soil surface. While rainwater that is not intercepted by the vegetation infiltrates directly into the soil, snow can accumulate on the surface until it melts, resulting in a significant time lag between snowfall and infiltration. If the soils are saturated, i.e., the pores between the soil particles are completely filled with water, or if the precipitation intensity is higher than the infiltration capacity, part of the rain or meltwater does not infiltrate but flows over the soil surface to the stream as surface runoff. The infiltrated water is stored in the soil as soil moisture storage or percolates through the soil to the groundwater. Groundwater eventually flows to the stream and becomes streamflow, but flow times for groundwater can vary largely. Some of the water stored in the soil (and groundwater) is taken up by plants and transpired. To describe the sum of all forms of evaporation (from the canopy and soil surface) and transpiration, the term evapotranspiration is used. In the unsaturated zone, the soil pores are not completely filled with water but partly filled with air; water is held in the pores by capillary and adhesive forces. The amount of water that a soil can hold against gravity, also called the field capacity, depends largely on the size distribution of the pores. In a sand soil with large pores, only little water can be held against gravity, whereas field capacity is much higher in loamy or silty soils with smaller pores. However, plants can only extract water that is held not too tightly in the soil. The so-called wilting point describes the amount of water in the soil that cannot be extracted by the plants. The soil moisture retention (pF) curve describes the amount of water in the soil and how strongly it is held back (matric potential). Flow velocities and water fluxes in the subsurface can be computed based on the hydraulic conductivity and pressure gradients (Darcy and Darcy-Richardson equation). The hydraulic conductivity describes how quickly water can flow through the soil and is highly dependent on the moisture content of the soil. Water flows faster through large pores than small pores. Therefore, a large portion of the water may flow through macropores (i.e., large pores or macropores such as cracks, old roots, or animal burrows), particularly when the soil is wet and these macro pores are filled with water.
Over longer time periods (i.e., at least one year), the inputs and outputs are balanced so that the sum of streamflow and evapotranspiration are equal to the precipitation. If shorter periods are considered, storage changes must be considered in the water balance. The storage term includes all water that is stored in snow and ice, soil- or groundwater and lakes. The changes in storage are important as streamflow responses to rainfall and snowmelt are largely dependent on the storage conditions. Hydrological models simulate how precipitation eventually leaves the catchment as streamflow, including the above-described processes in more or less detail. While there are different types of hydrological models as discussed in Sect. 33.2.2, all catchment-scale hydrological models include one or several differential equations to describe the relation between storage and streamflow.
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2019 Springer Nature Switzerland AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Seibert, J., Staudinger, M., van Meerveld, H.J.(. (2019). Validation and Over-Parameterization—Experiences from Hydrological Modeling. In: Beisbart, C., Saam, N. (eds) Computer Simulation Validation. Simulation Foundations, Methods and Applications. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70766-2_33
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70766-2_33
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70765-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70766-2
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)