Skip to main content

Fission Nuclear Power Plants for Renewable Energy Source

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 1273 Accesses

Abstract

In this chapter, the history of nuclear power plant is presented, and need for nuclear power plant for production of electricity is argued. The foundation has been structured and consequently some technology of ongoing research that makes production of electricity from the nuclear power plant more cost-effective. For the nuclear reactors to be more comparative with fossil and gas fuel power plants, they need to be as efficient as the traditional power plants are, when it comes to output thermal efficiency. As this chapter suggests, utilizing the combined cycles to drive and produce electricity via nuclear fuel makes more sense to own them from return on investment, total cost of ownership, and efficient for their owners, namely, electricity companies. Results of modeling a combined cycle Brayton-Rankine power conversion system are presented in this chapter and based model reactor for this purpose was chosen to be the molten salt reactor type. The Rankine bottoming cycle appears to offer significant advantages over the recuperated Brayton cycle. The overall cycle in the modeling for purpose of writing this chapter was optimized as a unit, and lower pressure Rankine systems did seem to be more efficient. The combined cycle requires a lot less circulating water for a heat dump than current power plants. The Rankine bottoming cycle appears to offer significant advantages over the recuperated Brayton cycle as part of computer simulation written by this author. The overall cycle was optimized as a unit, and lower pressure Rankine systems seem to be more efficient. The combined cycle requires a lot less circulating water for a heat dump than current power plants. Molten salt reactors and lead-cooled reactors have been extended to temperatures typical of liquid metal-cooled fast reactors. A split compressor with intercooler has been added to the Brayton cycle that serves as a “feed water heater” for the steam bottoming cycle as part of computer simulation. Adding this component to the system provides about a 3% increase in efficiency. For the purpose of simplicity, an in-house computer code was developed, where the consideration was on the steady-state situation; however a more sophisticated computer code is needed, which will take the transient approach under consideration for better accuracy and optimization of these analysis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems, MIT-ANP-TR-170, July 2017, Massachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  2. Electric Power Monthly with Data for June 2017, U.S. Energy Information Administration, August 2017

    Google Scholar 

  3. https://www.siemens.com/global/en/home/company/topic-areas/sustainable-energy.html#Power-generations

  4. http://www.iowapolicyproject.org/

  5. http://www.engineeringnews.co.za/article/electricity-consumption-to-increase-to-over-30-116-b-kwh-globally-in-2030-2009-04-17

  6. B. Zohuri, Plasma Physics and Controlled Thermonuclear Reactions Driven Fusion Energy, 1st edn. (Springer, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  7. B. Zohuri, Inertial Confinement Fusion Driven Thermonuclear Energy, 1st edn. (Springer, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  8. B. Zohuri, Magnetic Confinement Fusion Drive Thermonuclear Energy, 1st edn. (Springer, 2017)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Center for Advanced Nuclear Energy Systems, MIT-ANP-TR-170, July 2017, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  10. B. Zohuri, Combined Cycle Driven Efficiency for Next Generation Nuclear Power Plants: An Innovative Design Approach, 1st edn. (Springer, 2015)

    Google Scholar 

  11. K. Johnson, Is nuclear power renewable energy. Wall Str. J. 21 May 2009

    Google Scholar 

  12. B.L. Cohen, Breeder reactors: A renewable energy source. Am. J. Phys. 51, 75 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. J. Kanter, Is nuclear power renewable. New York Times, 3 Aug 2009

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. Chowdhury, Is nuclear energy renewable energy. Stanford Physics Department, 22 Mar 2012

    Google Scholar 

  15. http://www.wisconsinpublicservice.com/environment/crane_creek.aspx

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Zohuri, B. (2018). Fission Nuclear Power Plants for Renewable Energy Source. In: Hybrid Energy Systems. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70721-1_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70721-1_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70720-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70721-1

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics