Skip to main content

Recession Coverage Using Soft Tissue Substitutes

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Gingival Recession Management

Abstract

Today, a variety of surgical procedures can be used to successfully treat gingival recession defects. Among them, the autogenous connective tissue graft in conjunction with a coronally advanced flap is commonly considered the gold standard procedure. However, the most significant disadvantages of this procedure are the potential morbidity associated with autogenous tissue harvesting and the limited availability of donor tissue. For these reasons, alternative surgical procedures using membranes, enamel matrix derivative, and soft tissue graft substitutes have been proposed and tested. The aim of the present chapter is to provide an overview on the use of soft tissue substitutes as a possible alternative to connective tissue grafts in the surgical management of gingival recession defects.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Richardson CR, Allen EP, Chambrone L, Langer B, McGuire MK, Zabalegui I, Zadeh HH, Tatakis DN. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: practical applications from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. Clin Adv Periodontics. 2015;5:2–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Tatakis DN, Chambrone L, Allen EP, Langer B, McGuire MK, Richardson CR, Zabalegui I, Zadeh HH. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a consensus report from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015;86:S52–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Langer B, Langer L. Subepithelial connective tissue graft technique for root coverage. J Periodontol. 1985;56:715–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Guiha R, el Khodeiry S, Mota L, Caffesse R. Histological evaluation of healing and revascularization of the subepithelial connective tissue graft. J Periodontol. 2001;72:470–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cairo F, Nieri M, Pagliaro U. Efficacy of periodontal plastic surgery procedures in the treatment of localized facial gingival recessions. A systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41:S44–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cortellini P, Tonetti M, Baldi C, Francetti L, Rasperini G, Rotundo R, Nieri M, Franceschi D, Labriola A, Prato GP. Does placement of a connective tissue graft improve the outcomes of coronally advanced flap for coverage of single gingival recessions in upper anterior teeth? A multi-centre, randomized, double-blind, clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:68–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Harris RJ. Human histologic evaluation of root coverage obtained with a connective tissue with partial thickness double pedicle graft. A case report. J Periodontol. 1999;70:813–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cummings LC, Kaldahl WB, Allen EP. Histologic evaluation of autogenous tissue and acellular dermal matrix grafts in humans. J Periodontol. 2005;76:178–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. McGuire MK, Scheyer ET, Schupbach P. A prospective, case-controlled study evaluating the use of enamel matrix derivative on human buccal recession defects: a human histologic examination. J Periodontol. 2016;87:645–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zucchelli G, Mounssif I, Mazzotti C, Stefanini M, Marzadori M, Petracci E, Montebugnoli L. Coronally advanced flap with and without connective tissue graft for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a comparative short- and long-term controlled randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41:396–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Pini-Prato GP, Cairo F, Nieri M, Franceschi D, Rotundo R, Cortellini P. Coronally advanced flap versus connective tissue graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions: a split-mouth study with a 5-year follow-up. J Clin Periodontol. 2010;37:644–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Cairo F, Pagliaro U, Nieri M. Treatment of gingival recession with coronally advanced flap procedures: a systematic review. J Clin Periodontol. 2008;35:136–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Al-Hamdan K, Eber R, Sarment D, Kowalski C, Wang HL. Guided tissue regeneration-based root coverage: meta-analysis. J Periodontol. 2003;74:1520–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Tinti C, Vincenzi G, Cortellini P, Pini Prato G, Clauser C. Guided tissue regeneration in the treatment of human facial recession. A 12-case report. J Periodontol. 1992;63:554–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Pini Prato G, Clauser C, Cortellini P, Tinti C, Vincenzi G, Pagliaro U. Guided tissue regeneration versus mucogingival surgery in the treatment of human buccal recessions. A 4-year follow-up study. J Periodontol. 1996;67:1216–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Paolantonio M. Treatment of gingival recessions by combined periodontal regenerative technique, guided tissue regeneration, and subpedicle connective tissue graft. A comparative clinical study. J Periodontol. 2002;73:53–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Cortellini P, Clauser C, Prato GP. Histologic assessment of new attachment following the treatment of a human buccal recession by means of a guided tissue regeneration procedure. J Periodontol. 1993;64:387–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Parma-Benfenati S, Tinti C. Histologic evaluation of new attachment utilizing a titanium-reinforced barrier membrane in a mucogingival recession defect. A case report. J Periodontol. 1998;69:834–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Borghetti A, Glise JM, Monnet-Corti V, Dejou J. Comparative clinical study of a bioabsorbable membrane and subepithelial connective tissue graft in the treatment of human gingival recession. J Periodontol. 1999;70:123–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Tatakis DN, Trombelli L. Gingival recession treatment: guided tissue regeneration with bioabsorbable membrane versus connective tissue graft. J Periodontol. 2000;71:299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Chambrone L, Tatakis DN. Periodontal soft tissue root coverage procedures: a systematic review from the AAP Regeneration Workshop. J Periodontol. 2015;86:S8–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Lins LH, de Lima AF, Sallum AW. Root coverage: comparison of coronally positioned flap with and without titanium-reinforced barrier membrane. J Periodontol. 2003;74:168–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wang HL, Modarressi M, Fu JH. Utilizing collagen membranes for guided tissue regeneration-based root coverage. Periodontol 2000. 2012;59:140–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. McGuire MK, Nunn M. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue. Part 1: comparison of clinical parameters. J Periodontol. 2003;74:1110–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McGuire MK, Scheyer ET, Nunn M. Evaluation of human recession defects treated with coronally advanced flaps and either enamel matrix derivative or connective tissue: comparison of clinical parameters at 10 years. J Periodontol. 2012;83:1353–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Koop R, Merheb J, Quirynen M. Periodontal regeneration with enamel matrix derivative in reconstructive periodontal therapy: a systematic review. J Periodontol. 2012;83:707–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Cheng GL, Fu E, Tu YK, Shen EC, Chiu HC, Huang RY, Yuh DY, Chiang CY. Root coverage by coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft and/or enamel matrix derivative: a meta-analysis. J Periodontal Res. 2015;50:220–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rebele SF, Zuhr O, Schneider D, Jung RE, Hürzeler MB. Tunnel technique with connective tissue graft versus coronally advanced flap with enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a RCT using 3D digital measuring methods. Part II. Volumetric studies on healing dynamics and gingival dimensions. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41:593–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Roman A, Soancă A, Kasaj A, Stratul SI. Subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for the treatment of Miller class I and II gingival recessions: a controlled randomized clinical trial. J Periodontal Res. 2013;48:563–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Henriques PS, Pelegrine AA, Nogueira AA, Borghi MM. Application of subepithelial connective tissue graft with or without enamel matrix derivative for root coverage: a split-mouth randomized study. J Oral Sci. 2010;52:463–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Allen EP. AlloDerm: an effective alternative to palatal donor tissue for treatment of gingival recession. Dent Today. 2006;25:48,50–2.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Richardson CR, Maynard JG. Acellular dermal graft: a human histologic case report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2002;22:21–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Woodyard JG, Greenwell H, Hill M, Drisko C, Iasella JM, Scheetz J. The clinical effect of acellular dermal matrix on gingival thickness and root coverage compared to coronally positioned flap alone. J Periodontol. 2004;75:44–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Mahajan A, Dixit J, Verma UP. A patient-centered clinical evaluation of acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of gingival recession defects. J Periodontol. 2007;78:2348–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. de Queiroz Cȏrtes A, Sallum AW, Casati MZ, Nociti FH Jr, Sallum EA. A two-year prospective study of coronally positioned flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft. J Clin Periodontol. 2006;33:683–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Ahmedbeyli C, Ipçi ŞD, Cakar G, Kuru BE, Yilmaz S. Clinical evaluation of coronally advanced flap with or without acellular dermal matrix graft on complete defect coverage for the treatment of multiple gingival recessions with thin tissue biotype. J Clin Periodontol. 2014;41:303–10.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Aichelmann-Reidy ME, Yukna RA, Evans GH, Nasr HF, Mayer ET. Clinical evaluation of acellular allograft dermis for the treatment of human gingival recession. J Periodontol. 2001;72:998–1005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Novaes AB Jr, Grisi DC, Molina GO, Souza SL, Taba M Jr, Grisi MF. Comparative 6-month clinical study of a subepithelial connective tissue graft and acellular dermal matrix graft for the treatment of gingival recession. J Periodontol. 2001;72:1477–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Paolantonio M, Dolci M, Esposito P, D’Archivio D, Lisanti L, Di Luccio A, Perinetti G. Subpedicle acellular dermal matrix graft and autogenous connective tissue graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: a comparative 1-year clinical study. J Periodontol. 2002;73:1299–307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Moslemi N, Mousavi Jazi M, Haghighati F, Morovati SP, Jamali R. Acellular dermal matrix allograft versus subepithelial connective tissue graft in treatment of gingival recessions: a 5-year randomized clinical study. J Clin Periodontol. 2011;38:1122–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Guan W, Liao H, Guo L, Wang C, Cao Z. Root coverage using a coronally advanced flap with or without acellular dermal matrix: a meta-analysis. J Periodontal Implant Sci. 2016;46:22–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Tal H, Moses O, Zohar R, Meir H, Nemcovsky C. Root coverage of advanced gingival recession: a comparative study between acellular dermal matrix allograft and subepithelial connective tissue grafts. J Periodontol. 2002;73:1405–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Felipe ME, Andrade PF, Grisi MF, Souza SL, Taba M, Palioto DB, Novaes AB. Comparison of two surgical procedures for use of the acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of gingival recessions: a randomized controlled clinical study. J Periodontol. 2007;78:1209–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Barros RR, Novaes AB, Grisi MF, Souza SL, Taba MJ, Palioto DB. A 6-month comparative clinical study of a conventional and a new surgical approach for root coverage with acellular dermal matrix. J Periodontol. 2004;75:1350–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Ozenci I, Ipci SD, Cakar G, Yilmaz S. Tunnel technique versus coronally advanced flap with acellular dermal matrix graft in the treatment of multiple gingival recessions. J Clin Periodontol. 2015;42:1135–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Ayub LG, Ramos UD, Reino DM, Grisi MF, Taba M Jr, Souza SL, Palioto DB, Novaes AB Jr. A randomized comparative clinical study of two surgical procedures to improve root coverage with the acellular dermal matrix graft. J Clin Periodontol. 2012;39:871–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Kasaj A. Gingival recession coverage: Do we still need autogenous grafts? Quintessence Int. 2016;47:775–83.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Harris RJ. A comparative study of root coverage obtained with an acellular dermal matrix versus a connective tissue graft: results of 107 recession defects in 50 consecutively treated patients. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2000;20:51–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Scarano A, Barros RR, Iezzi G, Piattelli A, Novaes AB Jr. Acellular dermal matrix graft for gingival augmentation: a preliminary clinical, histologic, and ultrastructural evaluation. J Periodontol. 2009;80:253–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Shin SH, Cueva MA, Kerns DG, Hallmon WW, Rivera-Hidalgo F, Nunn ME. A comparative study of root coverage using acellular dermal matrix with and without enamel matrix derivative. J Periodontol. 2007;78:411–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Harris RJ. A short-term and long-term comparison of root coverage with an acellular dermal matrix and a subepithelial graft. J Periodontol. 2004;75:734–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Lavker RM, Dong G, Zheng PS, Murphy GF. Hairless micropig skin. A novel model for studies of cutaneous biology. Am J Pathol. 1991;138:687–97.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Hoyama E, Schellini SA, Marques ME, Rossa R, Padovani CR. A comparison of human and porcine acellular dermal tissues in the subcutaneous space of a rat model. Orbit. 2005;24:249–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Sanz M, Lorenzo R, Aranda JJ, Martin C, Orsini M. Clinical evaluation of a new collagen matrix (Mucograft prototype) to enhance the width of keratinized tissue in patients with fixed prosthetic restorations: a randomized prospective clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:868–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Núñez J, Caffesse R, Vignoletti F, Guerra F, San Roman F, Sanz M. Clinical and histological evaluation of an acellular dermal matrix allograft in combination with the coronally advanced flap in the treatment of Miller class I recession defects: an experimental study in the mini-pig. J Clin Periodontol. 2009;36:523–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Rennert RC, Sorkin M, Garg RK, Januszyk M, Gurtner GC. Cellular response to a novel fetal acellular collagen matrix: implications for tissue regeneration. Int J Biomater. 2013;2013:527957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Camelo M, Nevins M, Nevins ML, Schupbach P, Kim DM. Treatment of gingival recession defects with xenogenic collagen matrix: a histologic report. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2012;32:167–73.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L. Coronally advanced flap with and without a xenogenic collagen matrix in the treatment of multiple recessions: a randomized controlled clinical study. Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2014;34:s97–102.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Jepsen K, Stefanini M, Sanz M, Zucchelli G, Jepsen S. Log-term stability of root coverage by coronally advanced flap procedures. J Periodontol. 2017;88:626–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Sangiorgio JPM, Neves FLDS, Rocha Dos Santos M, França-Grohmann IL, Casarin RCV, Casati MZ, Santamaria MP, Sallum EA. Xenogenous collagen matrix and/or enamel matrix derivative for treatment of localized gingival recessions—a randomized clinical trial. Part I: clinical outcomes. J Periodontol. 2017;88:1309–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Atieh MA, Alsabeeha N, Tawse-Smith A, Payne AG. Xenogeneic collagen matrix for periodontal plastic surgery procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Periodontal Res. 2016;51:438–52.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Moreira ARO, Santamaria MP, Silvério KG, Casati MZ, Nociti Junior FH, Sculean A, Sallum EA. Coronally advanced flap with or without porcine collagen matrix for root coverage: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Oral Investig. 2016;20:2539–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  63. Jepsen K, Jepsen S, Zucchelli G, Stefanini M, de Sanctis M, Baldini N, Greven B, Heinz B, Wennström J, Cassel B, Vignoletti F, Sanz M. Treatment of gingival recession defects with a coronally advanced flap and a xenogeneic collagen matrix: a multicenter randomized clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40:82–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Cardaropoli D, Tamagnone L, Roffredo A, Gaveglio L. Treatment of gingival recession defects using coronally advanced flap with a porcine collagen matrix compared to coronally advanced flap with connective tissue graft: a randomized controlled clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2012;83:321–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. McGuire MK, Scheyer ET. Xenogeneic collagen matrix with coronally advanced flap compared to connective tissue with coronally advanced flap for the treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects. J Periodontol. 2010;81:1108–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Aroca S, Molnár B, Windisch P, Gera I, Salvi GE, Nikolidakis D, Sculean A. Treatment of multiple adjacent Miller class I and II gingival recessions with a modified coronally advanced tunnel (MCAT) technique and a collagen matrix or palatal connective tissue graft: a randomized, controlled clinical trial. J Clin Periodontol. 2013;40:713–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Cieślik-Wegemund M, Wierucka-Mlynarczyk B, Tanasiewicz M, Gilowski L. Tunnel technique with collagen matrix compared with connective tissue graft for treatment of periodontal recession: a randomized clinical trial. J Periodontol. 2016;87:1436–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. McGuire MK, Scheyer ET. Long-term results comparing xenogeneic collagen matrix and autogenous connective tissue grafts with coronally advanced flaps for treatment of dehiscence-type recession defects. J Periodontol. 2016;87:221–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Adrian Kasaj D.D.S., M.Sc., Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature

About this chapter

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this chapter

Kasaj, A. (2018). Recession Coverage Using Soft Tissue Substitutes. In: Kasaj, A. (eds) Gingival Recession Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70719-8_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70719-8_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70717-4

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70719-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics