Abstract
In this paper, we ask how are climate hazards, local knowledge, affects and political arrangements assembled and generated by co-productive adaptation planning? Additionally, we ask how climate change preparedness comes to articulate and embody social imaginaries of the future and the governance arrangements these call forth. Using a paradigmatic case study from New Brunswick, Canada, we ask how the material dynamics of climate change impacts and local knowledge co-production in community-based adaptation planning are constitutive of the formation of “climate adaptation publics”? Our chapter argues that current governance arrangements are not adequate to the task of empowering and coordinating emerging climate adaptation publics, and keeping different levels of climate adaptation decision-making transparent, adaptive and accountable. We propose an institutional design based on an experimentalist form of regional adaptation governance to support climate adaptation publics and derive insights from this case study to inform regional adaptation governance more generally. This article also makes a theoretical contribution to non-extractive conceptions of local knowledge mobilization in climate change adaptation governance.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abbott, D., & Wilson, G. (2014). Climate change: Lived experience, policy and public action. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 6(1), 5–18.
Adger, W. N., Dessai, S., Goulden, M., et al. (2009). Are there social limits to adaptation to climate change? Climatic Change, 93, 335–354.
Agrawal, A. (1995). Dismantling the divide between indigenous and scientific knowledge. Development and change, 26, 413–439.
Amundsen, H., Berglund, F., & Westskog, H. (2010). Overcoming barriers to climate change adaptation: A question of multilevel governance? Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 28, 276–289.
Antonson, H., Isaksson, K., Storbjörk, S., & Hjerpe, M. (2016). Negotiating climate change responses: Regional and local perspectives on transport and coastal zone planning in South Sweden. Land Use Policy, 52, 297–305.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Toward a new modernity. London: SAGE Publications.
Bellamy, R., & Lezaun, J. (2015). Crafting a public for geoengineering. Public Understanding of Science, 19, 403–419.
Biesbroek, R., Klostermann, J., Termeer, C., & Kabat, P. (2011). Barriers to climate change adaptation in the Netherlands. Climate Law, 2, 181–199.
Braun, K., & Schultz, S. (2010). “…a certain amount of engineering involved:” Constructing the public in participatory governance arrangements. Public Understanding of Science, 14, 299–441.
Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., & Barthe, Y. (2011). Acting in an uncertain world: An essay on technical democracy. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Cloutier, G., Joerin, F., Bubois, C., Labarth, M., Legay, C., & Viens, D. (2015). Planning adaptation based on local actors’ knowledge and participation: A climate governance experiment. Climatic Policy, 15, 458–474.
Cruikshank, J. (2005). Do Glaciers Listen? Local Knowledge, Colonial Encounters & Social Imagination. Vancouver and Seattle: UBC Press and University of Washington Press.
Dannevig, H., & Aall, C. (2015). The regional level as boundary organization? An analysis of climate change adaptation governance in Norway. Environmental Science & Policy, 54, 168–175.
Dewey, J. (1927). The public and its problems. New York: Henry Holt.
Donaldson, A., Lane, S., Ward, N., & Whatmore, S. (2013). Overflowing with issues: Following the political trajectories of flooding. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 31, 603–618.
Ellen, R. F., Parkes, P., & Bicker, A. (2000). Indigenous environmental knowledge and its transformations: Critical anthropological perspectives. Amsterdam: Harwood Academic.
Emerson, K., & Gerlak, A. K. (2014). Adaptation in Collaborative Governance Regimes. Environmental Management, 54, 768–781.
Fidelman, P., Leitch, A. M., & Nelson, D. R. (2013). Unpacking multi-level adaptation to climate change in Great Barrier Reef Australia. Global Environmental Change, 23, 800–812.
Finn, J. G. (2008). Building Stronger Local Governments and Regions: An Action Plan for the Future of Local Governance in New Brunswick. Report of the Commissioner on the Future of Local Governance, Canada: Government of New Brunswick.
Flyvbjerg, B. (2006). Five misunderstandings about case-study research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2), 219–245.
Fossum, J. E. (2012). Reflections on experimentalist governance. Regulation & Governance, 6, 394–400.
Gomm, R., Hammersley, M., & Foster, P. (Eds.). (2000). Case Study Method. London, UK: Sage Publications.
Hanssen, G. S., Mydske, P. K., & Dahle, E. (2013). Multi-level coordination of climate change adaptation: By national hierarchical steering or by regional network governance? Local Environment, 18, 869–887.
IPCC. (2014). Summary for policymakers. In C. B. Field., V. R. Barros., D. J. Dokken., & et al. (Eds.) Climate Change 2014: Impacts, Adaptation, and Vulnerability. Part A: Global and Sectoral Aspects. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge, United Kingdom and New York, NY, USA: Cambridge University Press. pp. 1–32.
Jacobs, B., Lee, C., Watson, S., et al. (2016). Adaptation planning process and government adaptation architecture support regional action on climate change in New South Wales, Australia. In W. Leal Filho (Ed.), Innovation in Climate Change Adaptation. Berlin: Series in Climate Change Management, Springer.
Jasanoff, S. (2004). States of knowledge: The Co-production of science and social order. London: Routledge.
Klenk, N. L., Fiume, A., Meehan, K., & Gibbes, C. (2017). Local knowledge in climate adaptation research: Moving knowledge frameworks from extraction to co‐production. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change. (in press).
Lakoff, A., & Collier, S. J. (2010). Infrastructure and the event: The political technology of preparedness. In B. Braun & S. J. Whatmore (Eds.), Political Matter: Technoscience, Democracy, and Public Life (pp. 243–266). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Latour, B. (2004). The politics of nature: How to bring the sciences into democracy. Cambridge, USA: Harvard University Press.
Law, J. (2012). Collateral realities. In P. Baert & F. D. Rubio (Eds.), Politics of knowledge (pp. 156–178). Abingdon: Routledge.
Lezaun, J., & Soneryd, L. (2007). Consulting citizens: Technologies of elicitation and the mobility of publics. Public Understanding of Science, 16, 279–297.
Lieske, D. J., Roness, L. A., Phillips, E. A., & Fox, M. J. (2015). Climate change adaptation challenges facing New Brunswick coastal communities: A review of the problems and a synthesis of solutions suggested by regional adaptation research. Revue D’Études Sur Le Nouveau Brunswick, 6, 32–54.
MacLellan, J. I. (2008). Brokering the Local Global Dialectic. In A. Fenech & J. I. MacLellan (Eds.), Linking Climate and Impact Models to Decision and Policy Making Environment. Toronto: Canada.
MacLellan, J. I. (2013). Research Scoping Framework and Exercise: Potential 2014–2015 ETF Research Projects. In J. I. MacLellan & D. Floyd (Eds.), The New Brunswick Climate Change Research Collaborative ETF 130240 Final Report. Canada: New Brunswick Climate Change Research Collaborative, University of New Brunswick, New Brunswick.
Marres, N. (2012). Material Participation: Technology, The Environment and Everyday Publics. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
Measham, T. G., Preston, B. L., Smith, T. F., et al. (2011). Adapting to climate change through local municipal planning: Barriers and challenges. Mitigation and Adaptation Strategies for Global Change, 16, 889–909.
Mukheibir, P., Kuruppu, N., & Gero, A. (2013). Overcoming cross-scale challenges to climate change adaptation for local government: A focus on Australia. Climatic Change, 121, 271–283.
Naess, L., Bang, G., Eriksen, S., & Vevatne, J. (2005). Institutional adaptation to climate change: Flood response at the municipal level in Norway. Global Environmental Change, 15, 125–138.
Naess, L. O. (2013). The role of local knowledge in adaptation to climate change. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 4, 99–106.
Nagy, G., Seijo, L., Verocai, J., & Bidegain, M. (2009). Stakeholders’ climate perception and adaptation in coastal Uruguay. International Journal of Climate Change Strategies and Management, 6(1), 63–84.
Nilsson, A. E., Gerger Swartling, Å., & Eckerberg, K. (2012). Knowledge for local climate change adaptation in Sweden: Challenges of multilevel governance. Local Environment, 17(6–7), 751–767.
Overdevest, C., Bleicher, A., & Gross, M. (2010). The experimental turn in environmental sociology: Pragmatism and new forms of governance. In M. Gross & H. Heinrichs (Eds.), Environmental Sociology: European Perspectives and Interdisciplinary Challenges (pp. 279–322). Berlin: Springer.
Province of New Brunswick. (2014a). New Brunswick Climate Action Plan 2014–2020. Retrieved from the Department of Environment and Local Government http://www2.gnb.ca/content/dam/gnb/Departments/env/pdf/Climate-Climatiques/ClimateChangeActionPlan2014-2020.pdf.
Province of New Brunswick. (2014b). New Brunswick’s Flood Risk Reduction Strategy. Retrieved from the Department of Environment and Local Government http://www2.gnb.ca/content/dam/gnb/Departments/env/pdf/Publications/NBFloodRiskReductionStrategy.pdf.
Reyes-García, V., Fernández-Llamazares, A., Guèze, M., et al. (2016). Local indicators of climate change: The potential contribution of local knowledge to climate research. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 7, 109–124.
Rojas, D. (2015). Environmental management and open-air experiments in Brazilian Amazonia. Geoforum, 66, 136–145.
Sabel, C. (2012). Dewey, democracy, and democratic experimentalism. Contemporary Pragmatism, 9, 35–55.
Sabel, C., & Zeitlin, J. (2011). Experimentalist Governance. In D. Levi-Faur (Ed.), The Oxford Handbook of Governance. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
Signer, K., Reeder, K., & Killorn, D. (2014). Community vulnerability assessment of climate change and variability impacts in Charlotte County, New Brunswick; Eastern Charlotte Waterways Inc., Canada: New Brunswick.
Smith, H. M., Wall, G., & Blackstock, K. L. (2013). The role of map-based environmental information supporting integration between river basin planning and spatial planning. Environmental Science & Policy, 30, 81–89.
Storbjörk, S., & Hedrén, J. (2011). Institutional capacity-building for targeting sea-level rise in the climate adaptation of Swedish coastal zone management. Lessons from Coastby. Ocean & coastal management, 54(3), 265–273.
Termeer, C., Dewulf, A., van Rijswick, H., et al. (2011). The regional governance of climate adaptation: A framework for developing legitimate, effective, and resilient governance arrangements. Climatic Law, 2, 159–179.
Tironi, M. (2015). Disastrous publics: Counter-enactments in participatory experiments. Science, Technology, & Human Values, 40, 564–587.
Tironi, M., Rodríguez-Giralt, I., & Guggenheim, M. (2014). Disasters and Politics. Materials, Experiments, Preparedness. Chichester, UK: Wiley Blackwell.
Turnbull, D. (2003). Masons, Tricksters and Cartographers. London: Routledge.
Urwin, K., & Jordan, A. (2008). Does public policy support or undermine climate change adaptation? Exploring policy interplay across different scales of governance. Global Environmental Change, 18, 180–191.
Vink, M. J., Boezeman, D., Dewulf, A., & Termeer, C. J. A. M. (2013). Changing climate, changing frames. Dutch water policy frame developments in the context of a rise and fall of attention to climate change. Environmental Science & Policy, 30, 90–101.
Whatmore, S. J., & Landström, C. (2011). Flood apprentices: An exercise in making things public. Economy and Society, 40, 582–610.
Wyborn, C. (2015). Co-productive governance: A relational framework for adaptive governance. Global Environmental Change, 30, 56–67.
Zegwaard, A., Petersen, A. C., & Wester, P. (2015). Climate change and ontological politics in the Dutch Delta. Climatic Change, 132, 433–444.
Acknowledgements
This research was supported by a Canadian Social Science and Humanities Research Council Partnership Development Grant # 605512 (2013–2015): “Living with Climate Change: Mapping Experiences and Adaptation in the Global South and North to X and X. The authors are also thankful for the financial support of the New Brunswick Government Environmental Trust Fund granted to Kim Reeder for the CCCVA study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2018 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Klenk, N.L., MacLellan, J.I., Reeder, K., Flueraru, D. (2018). Local Knowledge Co-production, Emergent Climate Adaptation Publics and Regional Experimentalist Governance: An Institutional Design Case Study. In: Leal Filho, W. (eds) Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation Strategies for Coastal Communities. Climate Change Management. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70703-7_14
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70703-7_14
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70702-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70703-7
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)