Queering the Virgin/Whore Binary: The Virgin Mary, the Whore of Babylon, and Sexual Violence

  • Teguh Wijaya Mulya
Chapter
Part of the Religion and Radicalism book series (RERA)

Abstract

The binary of the virgin/whore—which categorizes women into either sexless virgins or hyper-sexualized whores—has been drawn upon to justify and normalize certain acts of sexual violence. In order to radically deconstruct this binary, Teguh Wijaya Mulya juxtaposes two biblical characters who typically represent the virgin and the whore categories: the Virgin Mary (Luke 1) and the Whore of Babylon (Revelation 17). Wijaya Mulya explores the possibility that both of these characters are not situated at opposite ends of any virgin/whore binary; rather, they share similar characteristics. He first considers how both characters’ relationships with the divine might be understood as sexually violent. He then addresses the potentially idolatrous nature of their relationship with their adherents. Queering the dichotomized roles of virgin and whore, he argues that these prove to be fluid and unstable within different historical and social contexts. Based on this queer theological reflection, Wijaya Mulya argues that the virgin/whore binary is oversimplified and inadequate, as well as being a source of violence against women, whose situatedness within this binary renders them vulnerable to sexualized aggression.

References

  1. Abbott-Smith, G. 2001. A Manual Greek Lexicon of the New Testament. Edinburgh: T&T Clark.Google Scholar
  2. Althaus-Reid, Marcella. 2000. Indecent Theology: Theological Perversions in Sex, Gender and Politics. London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Apostolos-Cappadona, Diane. 2005. On the Visual and the Vision: The Magdalene in Early Christian and Byzantine Art and Culture. In Mariam, the Magdalen, and the Mother, ed. Deirdre Joy Good, 123–152. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Asencio, Marysol W. 1999. Machos and Sluts: Gender, Sexuality, and Violence Among a Cohort of Puerto Rican Adolescents. Medical Anthropology Quarterly 13 (1): 107–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bennett, Linda Rae. 2005. Women, Islam and Modernity: Single Women, Sexuality and Reproductive Health in Contemporary Indonesia. New York: RoutledgeCurzon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bird, Phyllis. 1999. The Harlot as Heroine: Narrative Art and Social Presupposition in Three Old Testament Texts. In Women in the Hebrew Bible: A Reader, ed. Alice Bach, 99–118. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  7. Daly, Mary. 1978. Gyn/Ecology: The Metaethics of Radical Feminism. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  8. ———. 1984. Pure Lust: Elemental Feminist Philosophy. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  9. Emmerson, Grace I. 1989. Women in Ancient Israel. In The World of Ancient Israel: Sociological, Anthropological and Political Perspectives, ed. Ronald E. Clements, 371–396. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. García, Lorena. 2006. Beyond the Latina Virgin/Whore Dichotomy: Investigating the Sexual Subjectivity of Latina Youth. Santa Barbara: University of California.Google Scholar
  11. Goh, Joseph N. 2012. Mary and the Mak Nyahs: Queer Theological Imaginings of Malaysian Male-to-Female Transsexuals. Theology & Sexuality 18 (3): 215–233.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gottschall, Jonathan, Elizabeth Allison, Jay De Rosa, and Kaia Klockeman. 2006. Can Literary Study Be Scientific? Results of an Empirical Search for the Virgin/Whore Dichotomy. Interdisciplinary Literary Studies 7 (2): 1–17.Google Scholar
  13. Haupt, Paul. 1921. Abraham’s Bosom. American Journal of Philology 42 (2): 162–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Huber, Lynn R. 2011. Gazing at the Whore: Reading Revelation Queerly. In Bible Trouble: Queer Reading at the Boundaries of Biblical Scholarship, ed. Teresa J. Hornsby and Ken Stone, 301–320. Atlanta: Society of Biblical Literature.Google Scholar
  15. Ipsen, Avaren. 2009. Sex Working and the Bible. London: Equinox.Google Scholar
  16. Jackson, Stevi, and Sue Scott. 1997. Gut Reactions to Matters of the Heart: Reflections on Rationality, Irrationality and Sexuality. Sociological Review 45 (4): 551–575.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Johnson, Elizabeth A. 1992. She Who Is: The Mystery of God in Feminist Theological Discourse. New York: Crossroad.Google Scholar
  18. Kim, Jean K. 1999. ‘Uncovering Her Wickedness’: An Inter(Con)Textual Reading of Revelation 17 from a Postcolonial Feminist Perspective. Journal for the Study of the New Testament 21 (73): 61–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Moore, Stephen D. 2009. Metonymies of Empire: Sexual Humiliation and Gender Masquerade in the Book of Revelation. In Postcolonial Interventions: Essays in Honor of RS Sugirtharajah, ed. Tat Siong Benny Liew, 71–97. Sheffield: Sheffield Phoenix Press.Google Scholar
  20. Pineau, Lois. 1989. Date Rape: A Feminist Analysis. Law and Philosophy 8 (2): 217–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pippin, Tina, and J. Michael Clark. 2006. Revelation/Apocalypse. In The Queer Bible Commentary, ed. Deryn Guest, Robert Goss, Mona West, and Thomas Bohache, 753–768. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rey, Terry. 1999. Our Lady of Class Struggle: The Cult of the Virgin Mary in Haiti. Trenton, NJ: Africa World Press.Google Scholar
  23. Runions, Erin. 2014. The Babylon Complex: Theopolitical Fantasies of War, Sex, and Sovereignty. New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sawyer, Deborah F. 2008. Hidden Subjects: Rereading Eve and Mary. Theology and Sexuality 14 (3): 305–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Schipper, Jeremy. 2009. Deuteronomy 24:5 and King Asa’s Foot Disease in 1 Kings 15:23b. Journal of Biblical Literature 128 (4): 643–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sjöö, Monica, and Barbara Mor. 1987. The Great Cosmic Mother: Rediscovering the Religion of the Earth. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  27. Smith, S.H. 1990. ‘Heel’ and ‘Thigh’: The Concept of Sexuality in the Jacob-Esau Narratives. Vetus Testamentum 40 (4): 464–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Smith-Hefner, Nancy J. 2005. The New Muslim Romance: Changing Patterns of Courtship and Marriage Among Educated Javanese Youth. Journal of Southeast Asian Studies 36 (3): 441–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Spurr, Barry. 2007. See the Virgin Blest: The Virgin Mary in English Poetry. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. van der Stichele, Caroline. 2000. Just a Whore: The Annihilation of Babylon According to Revelation 17:16. Lectio Difficilior: European Electronic Journal for Feminist Exegesis 1: 1–11. http://www.lectio.unibe.ch/00_1/1-2000-j.pdf. Accessed 12 May 2017.Google Scholar
  31. Taylder, Sian. 2004. Our Lady of the Libido: Towards a Marian Theology of Sexual Liberation? Feminist Theology 12 (3): 343–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. The Thunder Perfect Mind. The Gnostic Society Library. http://gnosis.org/naghamm/thunder.html. Accessed on 17 May 2017.
  33. Truth, Sojourner. 1851. Ain’t I a Woman? Fordham University Modern History Sourcebook. http://legacy.fordham.edu/halsall/mod/sojtruth-woman.asp. Accessed 12 Apr 2017.
  34. Utomo, Iwu Dwisetyani, and Peter McDonald. 2009. Adolescent Reproductive Health in Indonesia: Contested Values and Policy Inaction. Studies in Family Planning 40 (2): 133–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Warren, Meredith. 2017. Sexual Violence and Rape Culture in the New Testament. The Shiloh Project: Rape Culture, Religion, and the Bible. http://shiloh-project.group.shef.ac.uk/index.php/2017/05/31/sexual-violence-and-rape-culture-in-the-new-testament/. Accessed 13 June 2017.
  36. Wijaya Mulya, Teguh. 2015. Queering the Virgin/Whore Binary: The Virgin Mary: The Whore of Babylon and Sexual Violence In God’s Image, Journal of Asian Women’s Resource Centre for Culture and Theology 34 (2): 45–55.Google Scholar
  37. ———. 2016. From Divine Designation to Discursive Contestation: The Constitution of Indonesian Christian Young People’s Sexual Subjectivities. PhD diss., University of Auckland.Google Scholar
  38. Yee, Gale A. 1993. By the Hand of a Woman: The Metaphor of the Woman Warrior in Judges 4. Semeia 61: 99–132.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Teguh Wijaya Mulya
    • 1
  1. 1.University of SurabayaSurabayaIndonesia

Personalised recommendations