Abstract
A comparison of the rules of voting in the last two main Polish classical music competitions: the XVIIth Chopin Piano Competition and the XVth Wieniawski Violin Competition. Weak and strong points of rules are analyzed. The rules are also compared to rules used in the previous editions of the competitions. We conclude that the changes resulted in the simplification of rules.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Nurmi, H.: Comparing Voting Systems. D. Reidel Publishing Company, Dordrecht (1987)
Rzazewski, K., Slomczynski, W., Zyczkowski, K.: Kazdy glos się liczy (Each vote is counted, in Polish). Wydawnictwo Sejmowe, Warsaw (2014)
Arrow, K.J.: Social Choice and Individual Values, 2nd edn. Wiley, New York (1963)
Arrow, K.J., Sen, A.K., Suzumura, K.: Handbook of Social Choice and Welfare, vol. 1. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2002)
Gibbard, A.: Manipulation of voting schemes. Econometrica 41, 587–601 (1973)
Sosnowska, H.: The rules for the Jury of the Fryderyk Chopin Piano Competition as a non standard voting rule. Roczniki Kolegium Analiz Ekonomicznych 32, 23–31 (2013)
Gambarelli, G.: The “coherent majority average” for juries’ evaluation processes. J. Sport Sci. 26, 1091–1095 (2008)
Gambarelli, G., Iaquinta, G., Piazza, M.: Anti-collusion indices and averages for evaluation of performances and judges. J. Sports Sci. 30, 411–417 (2012)
Tyszka, T., Wielochowski, M.: Must boxing verdicts be biased. J. Behav. Decis. Making 4, 283–295 (1991)
Przybysz, D.: Agregowanie ocen sedziow sportowych jako przyklad zbiorowego podejmowania decyzji (Aggregation of the (sport) judges marks as a form of collective decision making, in Polish). Studia Socjologiczne 1–2, 105–136 (2000)
Web 1. http://static.eu.chopincompetition2015.com/download/regulamin_jury_konkursu.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2017
Brams, S., Fisburn, P.C.: Approval Voting. Birkhaser, Boston (1983)
Laslier, J.F., Sanver, M.R. (eds.): Handbook on Approval Voting. Springer, Heilderberg (2010)
Web 2. http://static.eu.chopincompetition2015.com/u299/i_etap_oceny.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2017
Web 3. http://static.eu.chopincompetition2015.com/u299/ii_etap_oceny.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2017
Web 4. http://static.eu.chopincompetition2015.com/u299/iii_etap_oceny.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2017
Web 5. http://static.eu.chopincompetition2015.com/u299/final_oceny.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2017
Oral communicate by the Chopin Competition organizers
Igersheim, H., Baujard, A., Gavrel, F., Lebon, L.I.: Individual behavior under evaluative voting: a comparison between laboratory and in situ experiments. In: Blais, A., Laslier, J.F., Van der Straeten, K. (eds.) Voting Experiments, pp. 257–269. Springer, Heildelberg (2016)
Oral communicate by the Wieniawski Competition organizers
http://www.wieniawski-competition.com/konkurs-skrzypcowy/wp-content/uploads/sites/3/2016/11/WYNIKI-I-ETAP-RESULTS-STAGE-1.pdf. Accessed 21 Mar 2017
http://wyborcza.pl/7,113768,20925157,konkurs-wieniawskiego-2016-wewnetrzna wo
Oral communicate by K. Kontek
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Sosnowska, H. (2017). Comparison of Voting Methods Used in Some Classical Music Competitions. In: Mercik, J. (eds) Transactions on Computational Collective Intelligence XXVII. Lecture Notes in Computer Science(), vol 10480. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70647-4_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-70647-4_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-70646-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-70647-4
eBook Packages: Computer ScienceComputer Science (R0)